Guest guest Posted June 9, 2004 Report Share Posted June 9, 2004 I've got an idea, why don't we store it directly under their living and working space? Think that might bring about some changes, eh? Other comments? Misty L. Trepke http://www..com Senate Helps DOE Abandon High-level Nuclear Waste: Don't want to clean it up? Just reclassify it! It isn't easy being simply green. When the government and industry doesn't want to clean up toxic chemicals, it just reclassifies them. This isn't new. It's been happening for many decades, possibly for centuries. What begins as toxic waste or some chemical waste by- product is often reclassified as a food, food additives or something else to be more easily disposed. The real boon to industry however has been to sell waste to people as an addictive food or additive. ~ek Senate Helps DOE Abandon High-level Nuclear Waste <http://usgovinfo.about.com/mbiopage.htm> Your Guide, Robert Longley From Robert Longley <http://usgovinfo.about.com/mbiopage.htm> , Your Guide to U.S. Gov Info / Resources <http://usgovinfo.about.com/> . Sign up for my Newsletter <http://usgovinfo.about.com/gi/pages/mmail.htm> Dateline: June 5, 2004 The U.S. Senate may have cleared the way for the Department of Energy (DOE) to virtually abandon, rather than clean up, millions of gallons of highly radioactive waste in leaking storage tanks by simply " reclassifying " it. By a vote of 48-48, the Senate last week rejected an amendment to remove language from the Defense Authorization funding bill that changes the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA), allowing DOE to reclassify high-level radioactive waste as " Waste Incidental to Reprocessing " in South Carolina. The language in the bill, which was written by DOE and added in committee by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), will allow DOE to abandon potentially millions of gallons of highly radioactive waste in leaking tanks in South Carolina, and, according to environmentalists, set an alarming precedent for similar nuclear waste cleanup sites in Idaho and Washington. Background: DOE is responsible for cleaning up 253 underground tanks containing approximately 100 million gallons of high-level nuclear waste in Washington, Idaho, South Carolina and New York. In July 2003, a federal district court ordered DOE to remove the highly toxic radioactive waste from the storage tanks, many of which have already begun leaking, to protect human health. The ruling prohibited DOE from arbitrarily " reclassifying " the waste as " Waste Incidental to Reprocessing " and abandoning the waste in tanks beneath a layer of grout as the agency had planned. DOE has appealed the district court decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco. Six states (South Carolina, Washington, Idaho, New York, Oregon and New Mexico) have written in support of upholding the district court's ruling. In its earlier deliberations on the Defense Authorization funding bill, the House of Representatives voted to remove the language allowing DOE to take the " reclassification " tact. Reaction: The following is a statement from a press release by Karen Wayland, legislative director of the Natural Resources Defense Council in reaction to the Senate's action: " Despite strong bi-partisan support for Senator Cantwell's amendment to strike a dangerous provision from the defense authorization bill, the effort to prevent the Bush administration from weakening nuclear waste protections fell in a tie vote. " Senator Graham has done the dirty work for the Department of Energy, rewriting nuclear cleanup laws behind closed doors despite the risks to South Carolina and other states. " Thanks to Senator Graham, the Savannah River (South Carolina) Site could become the most radioactive place on the planet. " We're shocked that Senator Graham and some of his colleagues would sell their states down the river so the Department of Energy can avoid cleaning up millions of gallons of highly radioactive waste in corroding tanks next to drinking water supplies. " This legislative fix is a cruel trick that allows the Bush administration to leave a legacy of radioactive pollution that could endanger drinking water for millions of Americans. " Unlike the Senate, members of the House prevented the Department of Energy's dirty and dangerous deal from polluting the defense bill. The fight to protect the public from radioactive waste now moves to conference committee. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.