Science Condemning Chemo/Prescription Drugs

[Guest guest]

According to my understanding, one cannot be counted

as " cured " of an illness until and unless it has been

in remission for at least five years - so those who

have another cancer in another year or two or still

have cancer but continue to live more than five years

are not counted in the statistics.

 

Kat

 

--- annie summers <lammasmoon wrote:

> If you survive for five years from the time of

> diagnosis - I believe that is counted in the

> statistics as a 'cure'. If you go on to develop

> another cancer a year or two later, which is a

> metastasis of the original cancer, I would assume

> that you are not removed from the 'cured'

> statistics.

>

> This then means that the statistics are seriously

> flawed as it means that the 'cures' are a lot less

> than they claim.

>

> Basically, they are no further forward - and with

> all of the research and all of the money poured into

> the cancer charities I believe the scientists who

> work in that field should seriously question their

> methods. Or is it that they have a vested interest

> in not finding a cure - then they'll be out of a

> job? 'Fraud' is a word that springs to mind! Or

> am I just a cynic?

>

> Annie

>

> " Misty L. Trepke " <mistytrepke wrote:

> Comments?

> Misty L. Trepke

> http://www..com

>

> The Science Condemning Chemotherapy & Prescription

> Drugs

>

>

---

> -----------

>

> Arnoldgore

> " Plodzien, Leonard " wrote:

>

> Over $1 TRILLION a year is spent on medical

> treatment in America.

>

> Over $100 BILLION of this was spent on cancer

> treatment.

>

> The average cost of cancer treatment is well over

> $100,000 per

> person.

>

> This year well over 1.5 million Americans will

> develop cancer, and

> over 600, 000 of them will die from it, which means

> that in the last

> 5 years.

>

> Medical treatment is America's biggest business,

> representing over

> 15% of the entire nation's Gross National Product.

>

>

>

>