Science Condemning Chemo/Prescription Drugs

May 27, 2004

If you survive for five years from the time of diagnosis - I believe that is

counted in the statistics as a 'cure'. If you go on to develop another cancer a

year or two later, which is a metastasis of the original cancer, I would assume

that you are not removed from the 'cured' statistics.

This then means that the statistics are seriously flawed as it means that the

'cures' are a lot less than they claim.

Basically, they are no further forward - and with all of the research and all of

the money poured into the cancer charities I believe the scientists who work in

that field should seriously question their methods. Or is it that they have a

vested interest in not finding a cure - then they'll be out of a job? 'Fraud'

is a word that springs to mind! Or am I just a cynic?

Annie

" Misty L. Trepke " <mistytrepke wrote:

Comments?

Misty L. Trepke

The Science Condemning Chemotherapy & Prescription Drugs

---

-----------

Arnoldgore

" Plodzien, Leonard " wrote:

Over $1 TRILLION a year is spent on medical treatment in America.

Over $100 BILLION of this was spent on cancer treatment.

The average cost of cancer treatment is well over $100,000 per

person.

This year well over 1.5 million Americans will develop cancer, and

over 600, 000 of them will die from it, which means that in the last

5 years.

Medical treatment is America's biggest business, representing over

15% of the entire nation's Gross National Product.

Recommended Posts