Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

vested interest awareness

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

The sin bin -Vested interest Apathy and other unworthy systems

Dear reader this section is not pleasant reading so please be warned

if you are happy in your way and comfortable be warned this

information certainly has the capacity to unnerve you. However if you

do like to know what is going on and are not afraid of the truth read

on, it is very enlightening.

Drugs and other treatments

 

 

There are a few very important points that I would like to cover on

the subject of drugs and research and treatment At present the system

in England is this, all treatment recommended by the NHS should be

tested and approved and quite rightly so. Obviously it costs vast

sums of money to test and approve treatments because of the possible

damage to people and the subsequent litigation costing millions of

pounds. Where does this money come from to test and approve

treatments?

 

By far the biggest source is the drug companies. So take for example

a researcher might go along to his local drug company and tell them

his findings about this treatment he has been working on which is of

outstanding value but needs testing further or approving, you might

think they would be falling over themselves to know more –right, you

could not be more wrong. By and large only treatments which show a

profit will even get examined. Because they are in business to make a

profit, not for serving the people. So many of the thousands of

therapies which they see as having no profit potential do not get

approved and thus by and large do not get recommended by your local

doctor or hospital despite the fact that some of them do have

overwhelming benefits some which have saved needless operations,

needless amputations, needless pain and trauma, needless kidney

failures and much loss of life.

 

So Mrs Jones by and large you will probably only get recommended

treatments where there is profit in them for someone.

Have you heard your local doctor recommend, Massage, Spiritual

healing, Knieisiology Herbs, Light therapy, Colour therapy,

Regression therapy, Osteopathy, Zappers, Magnetic devices, Electrical

Frequency devices. All of these have shown their inherent worth with

thousands if not millions of testimonials.

 

 

As you can see this system in its present state is inherently flawed

that is until the day comes when most of the research and testing is

done by an agency with no vested interests attached and a clear

agenda of being objective. There is clear evidence that some of these

drug companies will even go much further than just dismiss this

proposed treatment especially if it is going to affect their profits.

 

Ever heard of a brilliant doctor with the name of Raymond rife the

gifted scientist and winner of 14 government awards including

scientist of the year award twice.

Rife discovered that some major diseases could be eliminated with

frequencies based on that diseases individual electromagnetic

signature. He uses the same effect, which causes a glass to shatter

by the use of some peoples voices. These distinguished medical

doctors who originally confirmed part or this entire discovery

included:

E.C. Rosenow, Sr. (Chief of Bacteriology, 32 yrs., at Mayo Clinic),

Fredrich Koch (Detroit, Brazil), Gaston Naessens (Quebec), Sakae

Inoue (Japan), Georges Mazet (France,), Franz Gerlach (Germany),

Niello Mori and Clara Fonti (Italy), Cameron Gruner (McGill Univ.),

T.J. Glover (Canada), Florence Seibert (V.A. Research Lab,Bay Pines,

Fla.), Irene Diller (Inst. of Cancer Research, Phila, Penn), Eleanor

Alex. Jackson and Virginia Livingston (NJ & San Diego clinics).

But events started to happen; firstly, arsonists burned the Burnett

Lab in New Jersey, which was validating Rife's work.

 

 

Then, someone fatally poisoned Dr. Milbank Johnson, president of the

Southern California American Medical Association. He died just hours

before a scheduled press conference in which he was to announce that

Rife's electronic therapy cured every terminal patient in a study

supervised by the University of Southern California.

Dr. Nemes, who duplicated some of Rife's work just 40 miles from

Rife's lab, was killed in a mysterious fire, which destroyed his lab.

Rife stopped work, but died at Grossmont Hospital from a lethal dose

of Valium. Following Dr. Milbank Johnson's murder, threats, other

incidents followed; 30 doctors once photographed honoring Rife at a

banquet now denied they ever knew him! Dr. Isaac Kendall, Rife's

chief research associate and Dean of Northwestern Medical School,

received $200,000 in " grants " & disappeared. Was this a bribe?

Dr. Virginia Livingston-Wheeler in 1947 while studying tumors found

the same organism in all of them.

 

Her findings were published in August 1948 by the New York

Microscopical Society Bullitin. Later in Dec. 1950 Wheeler had an

article published in the American Journal of Medical Sciences on

microbes cultures taken from both human and animal tumors. On Sept.

10, 1953 The Washington Post reported the discoveries of Dr. Wheeler

and her team from Rutgers-Presbyterian Hospital Laboratory which were

disclosed at the 6 th International Congress of Microbiology in Rome.

They had found conclusive proof of a microbial cause for cancer. When

Dr. Wheeler and her group returned from Rome to Rutgers-Presbyterian

Hospital they found that the funds for their laboratory were being

cutt off. The laboratory was closed. This was the behind- the-scenes

work and doings of Dr. Corneluis P. Rhoads, the head of Memorial

Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

 

The fear of the cancer industry elite is and was immense. If the

truth about the true cause of cancer becomes known a cheap cure will

be found shortly thereafter. This will kill the cancer goose which

lays tens of billions of dollars worth of eggs a year. Is there

nothing these scum will not do for their god money? No

 

And it does not stop there John Walsh head of the cayce center in

Durham England had a stuttering problem which he cured using the

recommendations of Edgar cayce , naturally he wanted to share this

with the stuttering society so that others may alleviate their

suffering, at a meeting he was going to deliver a talk telling

people of how he did it but just as he was about to speak , he was

stopped and the only reason John says is that the organizers realized

that if this information got out it could mean the end of their

society.

 

Doctors Hertal and Blanc undertook research on the effects of

microwave ovens and declared that foods cooked in this way posed a

greater risk to health than cooking by conventional means, food

cooked in this way seemed to have a cancerous effect on the blood. A

gag order was issued on both of these doctors .DR Hertal stood his

ground and fought the decision and the European court of Human rights

issued an order saying the gag order was contrary to the right of

Human expression and Switzerland was ordered to pay compensation.

 

Personally I have been extensively involved in sharing the Edgar

Cayce information, Spiritual healing and some information on the rife

machine over the Internet on problems like MS Parkinsons, Galucoma,

Myasthenia gravis etc. On the issue of M.S.thousands of groups who

had a site on the Internet were contacted including support groups,

hospitals etc. Major foundations and national societies were

contacted as well.

 

These people have clear mission statements saying for example, for

the treatment, support and research on M.S.The response -only a few

even replied with some interest despite numerous approaches and

despite mentioning the clear evidence which the meridian research

institute was getting using the cayce therapies.

 

 

The next to try was the Myasthenia gravis association which is

located in Derby England, Cayce gave a couple of readings on this

problem, despite phone calls and letters and e mails including

letters to the chairman not one person came back to me .I tried a few

hundred other M.G. Associations throughout the Internet and only a

very few were interested. The others did not even reply.

 

 

Cayce on Glaucoma was also tried, again writing, and e mailing to

many National associations and support groups again with very little

interest. Also tried was posting information on the discussion forums

on the Internet, Many were removed, the " Wills eye hospital in the

USA were highly guilty of this. After this I tried Cayce on

Parkinson's again the same procedure was followed I even tried

writing and e mailing to Mary Baker chairman of the Parkinson's

society in England, she did not even reply. National organizations

were contacted and support groups, the results only about 5% showed

any interest at all.

 

The conclusion: Clearly there are forces out there that would do

anything to protect their interests, your unnecessary suffering is of

no consequence to them at all. There are lots of Charities,

organizations, associations, support groups who are proclaiming all

sorts of things, which have a sacred duty, to give you information,

to conduct and fund research, to push forward their cause, which are

failing miserably you the patient. They are seemingly more interested

in maintaining the status quo, keeping their jobs or are just

apathetic.

 

As you can see they are not to be relied upon if you value your

health.

One must take responsibility for their own wellness, not hand the

problem over to others.

I advocate that most research should be done by government

organizations with the only vested interest in mind of that of the

patient, but that is a long way off.

As many NEXUS readers will know, Dr Hulda Clark has helped thousands

of people around the world cure themselves of many ailments and

diseases. Her approach is to remove exposure to solvents and to

remove parasites from the body.

 

On 20 September, Dr Hulda Clark was arrested in San Diego. She was

subsequently held in a prison in Santee, waiting extradition to

Indiana where she is charged with practising medicine without a

licence, a class C felony with a penalty of two to eight years in

prison.

The patients in her clinic in Mexico most of them terminally ill, but

getting better under Dr Clark's supervision had to be sent home to

try to do the protocols on their own.

 

Dr Clark was escorted from prison on 4 October and arrived in Indiana

on 6 October at 2.30 am. A hearing was held at 9.00 am and bail was

set at US$10,000. Dr Clark was offered a plea bargain with a fine if

she pleaded guilty, but she pleaded not guilty. The trial will be

held on 2 February 2000.

 

 

Other pioneers some of which we are in great debt too

J.C. Burnett: His " electronic medicine research lab " was burnt to the

ground while he was visiting Rife in 1939, just before the Rife

technology itself was attacked

Harry Oldfield: dismissed when he wanted to publish his research

demonstrating the damage done to the human energy field by

chemotherapy treatment

Upton, Knuth and Armstrong: inventors of the " homeotron " -forced into

bankruptcy

DR Albert Abrams: inventor of the " Oscilloclast " , a forerunner of the

Rife generator. Slated by the establishment. Denounced as a quack and

a charlatan in 18 consecutive issues of " The Scientific American " .

Died in shame and ignominy

George Lahovsky: Inventor of the " multi-wave oscillator " . Run over by

a car and died 1943.

Bill Morre (researcher and author): fled into retreat

George De La Warre: Nearly bankrupted by legal proceedings

DR Franz Anton Mesmer: used magnets for healing - struck off

Ruth Drown: inventor of the " Radio Vision Instrument " and " Homo-vibra

ray instrument " - committed suicide

Wilhelm Reich: inventor of " Orgone Energy Accumulator " - died in

prison

 

C.M. Allen: driven insane

DR M.K. Jessup: reporter of the infamous " Philadelphia Experiment " -

suicide/murdered

DR Max Gerson: Used natural treatment regime to cure cancer, Multiple

Sclerosis and other disease. AMA harassment forced him to close

clinic and re-open in Mexico

 

 

Harry Hoxsey: (cured cancer using herbs). Mentally and financially

ruined by legal proceedings and AMA harassment. Arrested 157 times in

16 months. Died in suspicious circumstances, possibly murdered

Rene Caisse: (also cured cancer-using herbs). The 'Canadian Ministry

of Health and Welfare' had the whole of the records destroyed

immediately after her death in 1978. These records detailed thousands

of cured patients.

DR Lawrence Burton: Fraudulently accused of spreading AIDS

contaminated serum forcing the Bahamian government to close it down

under American pressure

 

DR Stanislaw Burzynski: Ordered by FDA to stop development of his

highly effective 'anti-neoplaston' treatment program. Raided and had

all his scientific, medical and personal records seized which were

never returned

Gaston Naessens: microbiologist - still alive and working with Rife

type microscope today. Developer of 714X cancer treatment -

Prosecuted for fraud and driven out of France. Prosecuted and

threatened again with life imprisonment in Canada but was acquitted

Dr. Andrew C. Ivy: world-renowned medical researcher. Researcher

of " Krebiozen " (harmless chemical compound which was claimed to have

observable, often curative benefits in 70% of cancer cases) suspended

from membership of the Chicago Medical Society, removed from the vice

presidency of the University of Illinois, and had his " resignation "

accepted by both national cancer societies.

 

AMA declared Krebiozen " worthless " six weeks after he published his

research (1951) even though a properly conducted trial would take 3-5

years, dismissed all of his conclusions, discredited his research

methods and suggested that his belief in the compound was due to

senility.

 

Edward J. McCabe: Health journalist who reported success of oxygen

therapy. Sentenced to 3 years in prison on the pre-text of tax

evasion 1999 (and served 2 years).

 

DR William F. Koch: Medical doctor, Professor of chemistry, histology

and physiology. Inventor of " Glyoxylide catalyst " cure for cancer.

Sued by FDA but was acquitted after 600 doctors testified in his

favor. Died of poisoning, 1967.

 

Dr. F.M. Eugene Blass: Developer of " Homozon™ " (the original oxygen

therapy product) - murdered outside his house, same year and month as

DR Koch.

 

DR Basil Earle Wainright: Physicist - inventor of polyatomic

apheuresis oxygen therapy. Imprisoned for 4 years. Claims he survived

six assassination attempts whilst in prison.

 

DR George A. Freibott, IV. President of the American Naturopathic

Association, consultant for International Association for Oxygen

Therapy, US Government approved and internationally accepted expert

witness on oxygen/oxidation therapies. Survived numerous

assassination attempts and several anonymous phone calls threatening

him with his life.

 

DR James Boyce: Turned 254 people HIV+ to HIV- using ozone therapy:

Charged with using unproven methods and sentenced to 5 years in

prison. Had his medical license revoked.

 

Ken Thiefault sold ozone generators: Sentenced to 7 years in prison

for making medical claims for ozone generators. His wife was

sentenced to three years.

 

 

In Paul millers book on harry edwards and spiritual healing there are

a number of issues which are mentioned.

1.Harry it seems had enormous resistance to his work from certain

quarters people who claimed to be doctors but had it seems there own

hidden agendas. Harry presented a whole host of cases, which were

restored to good health from being so called incurable. Some doctors

were called to account for this. They would evade the issue and give

a variety of reasons for example the patient despite being born with

terrible deformations had a temporary remission which the healer was

not slow to point out seemed to occur just after healing had taken

place.

 

The general medical view was that they would see the patient in a few

more years to check his progress .At the right time harry then raised

the issue again only to be told that too much time had elapsed.

2.Another famous expletive was wrongly labelled x-rays and

spontaneous healing. Many times doctors opened up a patient to find a

growth only to find that it was gone. Mistaken diagnosis was another

favourite.

So you see that there are certain elements within the medical

profession who would gladly not see this work at all to the cost of

millions of peoples suffering. Their motives can only be guessed at.

On the other hand there are many brilliant doctors out there some of

which attended the sanctuary witnessing many healings and many

presented their own problems to harry for healing.

 

Oh yes the church, Harry it seems had many dealings with the church

and it seems was very disappointed to see that the church had failed

miserably its duty to go forth and heal the sick as was the master

Jesus commanded. Harry had invited numerous priests and bishops to

his healing demonstrations where they could witness right in front of

their very eyes some of the fantastic things which were going on .He

was disappointed that the archbishop of Canterbury had declined the

invitation to attend one of his healing demonstrations right under

the cathedral. But it started the seemingly very little known

commission to investigate divine healing.

 

This commission had the archbishop of Canterbury and York seeking

the co-operation of the British medical association who appointed a

number of physicians to examine the evidence put before them by the

man they had jointly denigrated. It was over two years before the

Anglican Church got their act together. They actually asked Harry to

submit just six cases for investigation –six can you imagine that

number for a proper investigation. Harry thought the same and

submitted seventy many of which were considered incurable by their

very own doctors.

 

After submitting these and giving a lengthy address the response was

astonishing One of these so called doctors stood up and claimed they

could have been spontaneous healing, but Harry had pointed out it was

the doctors themselves who proclaimed these people were incurable.Un

believably no proper scientific examination of the seventy cases was

carried out. Harry was offered a position in the Church with

conditions which of course he could not accept to those who think

that the Church would not sink to these sort of tactics Harry

referred to the Archbishops commission on survival which was

suppressed and never officially published because the majority report

found that the case for survival was proven

 

Medical Mistakes in the USA

This article in the Journal of the American Medical Association

(JAMA) is the best article I have ever seen written in the published

literature documenting the tragedy of the traditional medical

paradigm.If you want to keep updated on issues like this to sign up

for my free

newsletter at mercola.comThis information is a follow up of the

Institute of Medicine report which hit the papers in December of 1999,

http://www.mercola.com/1999/dec/5/medical_mistakes.html

but the data was hard to reference as it was not in peer-reviewed

journal.

Now it is published in JAMA which is the most widely circulated

medical periodical in the world.The author is Dr. Barbara Starfield

of the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health and she

desribes how the US health care system may contribute to poor health.

 

ALL THESE ARE DEATHS PER YEAR:

 

12,000 -----unnecessary surgery 8

7,000 -----medication errors in hospitals 9

20,000 ----other errors in hospitals 10

80,000 ----infections in hospitals 10

106,000 ---non-error, negative effects of drugs 2

 

These total to 250,000 deaths per year from iatrogenic causes!!What

does the word iatrogenic mean? This term is defined as induced in a

patient by a physician's activity, manner, or therapy. Used

especially of a complication of treatment.

 

Dr. Starfield offers several warnings in interpreting these

numbers:First, most of the data are derived from studies in

hospitalized patients.Second, these estimates are for deaths only and

do not include negative effects that are associated with disability

or discomfort.Third, the estimates of death due to error are lower

than those in the IOM

>report.1 If the higher estimates are used, the deaths due to

iatrogenic causes would

 

 

>range from 230,000 to 284,000. In any case, 225,000 deaths per year

constitutes the third leading cause of death in the United States,

after deaths from heart disease and cancer. Even if these figures are

overestimated, there is a wide margin between these numbers of deaths

and the next leading cause of death (cerebrovascular disease).

Another analysis 11 concluded that between 4% and 18% of consecutive

patients experience negative effects in outpatient settings,with:

116 million extra physician visits

77 million extra prescriptions

17 million emergency department visits

8 million hospitalizations

3 million long-term admissions

199,000 additional deaths

$77 billion in extra costs

 

The high cost of the health care system is considered to be a

deficit, but seems to be tolerated under the assumption that better

health results from more expensive care.

However, evidence from a few studies indicates that as many as 20% to

30% of patients receive inappropriate care.An estimated 44,000 to

98,000 among them die each year as a result of medical errors.2 This

might be tolerated if it resulted in better health, but does it? Of

13 countries in a recent comparison,3,4 the United States ranks an

average of 12th (second from the bottom) for 16 available health

indicators. More

>specifically, the ranking of the US on several indicators was: 13th

(last) for low-birth-weight percentages13th for neonatal mortality

and infant mortality overall 14

11th for postneonatal mortality

13th for years of potential life lost (excluding external causes)

11th for life expectancy at 1 year for females, 12th for males

10th for life expectancy at 15 years for females, 12th for males10th

for life expectancy at 40 years for females, 9th for males

7th for life expectancy at 65 years for females, 7th for males

3rd for life expectancy at 80 years for females, 3rd for males

10th for age-adjusted mortality

 

The poor performance of the US was recently confirmed by a World

Health

Organization study, which used different data and ranked the United

States

as 15th among 25 industrialized countries.

There is a perception that the American public " behaves badly " by

smoking,

>drinking, and perpetrating violence. " However the data does not

support this

>assertion.

>The proportion of females who smoke ranges from 14% in Japan to 41%

in

>Denmark; in the United States, it is 24% (fifth best). For males,

the range

>is from 26% in Sweden to 61% in Japan; it is 28% in the United

States (third

>best).

>The US ranks fifth best for alcoholic beverage consumption.

The US has relatively low consumption of animal fats (fifth lowest in

men

>aged 55-64 years in 20 industrialized countries) and the third

lowest mean

>cholesterol concentrations among men aged 50 to 70 years among 13

>industrialized countries.

>

>These estimates of death due to error are lower than those in a

recent

>Institutes of Medicine report, and if the higher estimates are used,

the

>deaths due to iatrogenic causes would range from 230,000 to 284,000.

>

>Even at the lower estimate of 225,000 deaths per year, this

constitutes the

>third leading cause of death in the US, following heart disease and

cancer.

>

>Lack of technology is certainly not a contributing factor to the

US's low

>ranking.

>

>Among 29 countries, the United States is second only to Japan in the

>availability of magnetic resonance imaging units and computed

tomography

>scanners per million population. 17 Japan, however, ranks highest on

health,

>whereas the US ranks among the lowest. It is possible that the high

use of

>technology in Japan is limited to diagnostic technology not matched

by high

>rates of treatment, whereas in the US, high use of diagnostic

technology may

>be linked to more treatment. Supporting this possibility are data

showing

>that the number of employees per bed (full-time equivalents) in the

United

>States is highest among the countries ranked, whereas they are very

low in

>Japan, far lower than can be accounted for by the common practice of

having

>family members rather than hospital staff provide the amenities of

hospital

>care.

>

>Journal American Medical Association Vol 284 July 26, 2000

>

>COMMENT: Folks, this is what they call a " Landmark Article " . Only

several

>ones like this are published every year. One of the major reasons it

is so

>huge as that it is published in JAMA which is the largest and one of

the

>most respected medical journals in the entire world. I did find it

most

>curious that the best wire service in the world, Reuter's, did not

pick up

>this article. I have no idea why they let it slip by.

>

>I would encourage you to bookmark this article and review it several

times

>so you can use the statistics to counter the arguments of your

friends and

>relatives who are so enthralled with the traditional medical

paradigm. These

>statistics prove very clearly that the system is just not working.

It is

>broken and is in desperate need of repair.

>

>I was previously fond of saying that drugs are the fourth leading

cause of

>death in this country. However, this article makes it quite clear

that the

>more powerful number is that doctors are the third leading cause of

death in

>this country killing nearly a quarter million people a year. The

only more

>common causes are cancer and heart disease. This statistic is likely

to be

>seriously underestimated as much of the coding only describes the

cause of

>organ failure and does not address iatrogenic causes at all.

>

>Japan seems to have benefited from recognizing that technology is

wonderful,

>but just because you diagnose something with it, one should not be

committed

>to undergoing treatment in the traditional paradigm. Their health

statistics

>reflect this aspect of their philosophy as much of their treatment

is not

>treatment at all, but loving care rendered in the home.

>

>Care, not treatment, is the answer. Drugs, surgery and hospitals are

rarely

>the answer to chronic health problems. Facilitating the God-given

healing

>capacity that all of us have is the key. Improving the diet,

exercise, and

>lifestyle are basic. Effective interventions for the underlying

emotional

>and spiritual wounding behind most chronic illness are also

important clues

>to maximizing health and reducing disease.

>

>Related Articles:

>

>Medical Mistakes Kill 100,000 per year

>

>US Health Care System Most Expensive in the World

>

>Drug Induced Disorders

>

>Author/Article Information

>

>Author Affiliation: Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns

>Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Md.

Corresponding

>Author and Reprints: Barbara Starfield, MD, MPH, Department of

Health Policy

>and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health,

624 N

>Broadway, Room 452, Baltimore, MD 21205-1996 (e-mail:

bstarfie).

>

>REFERENCES

>

>1. Schuster M, McGlynn E, Brook R. How good is the quality of health

care in

>the United States? Milbank Q. 1998;76:517-563.

>

>2. Kohn L, ed, Corrigan J, ed, Donaldson M, ed. To Err Is Human:

Building a

>Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.

>

>3. Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and

>Technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.

>

>4. World Health Report 2000. Available at:

>http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/report.htm. Accessed June 28, 2000.

>

>5. Kunst A. Cross-national Comparisons of Socioeconomic Differences

in

>Mortality. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus University; 1997.

>

>6. Law M, Wald N. Why heart disease mortality is low in France: the

time lag

>explanation. BMJ. 1999;313:1471-1480.

>

>7. Starfield B. Evaluating the State Children's Health Insurance

Program:

>critical considerations.

>Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:569-585.

>

>8. Leape L.Unecessarsary surgery. Annu Rev Public Health.

1992;13:363-383.

>

>9. Phillips D, Christenfeld N, Glynn L. Increase in US medication-

error

>deaths between 1983 and 1993. Lancet. 1998;351:643-644.

>

>10. Lazarou J, Pomeranz B, Corey P. Incidence of adverse drug

reactions in

>hospitalized patients. JAMA. 1998;279:1200-1205.

>

>11. Weingart SN, Wilson RM, Gibberd RW, Harrison B. Epidemiology and

medical

>error. BMJ. 2000;320:774-777.

>

>12. Wilkinson R. Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality.

London,

>England: Routledge; 1996.

>

>13. Evans R, Roos N. What is right about the Canadian health system?

Milbank

>Q. 1999;77:393-399.

>

>14. Guyer B, Hoyert D, Martin J, Ventura S, MacDorman M, Strobino D.

Annual

>summary of vital statistics1998. Pediatrics. 1999;104:1229- 1246.

>

>15. Harrold LR, Field TS, Gurwitz JH. Knowledge, patterns of care,

and

>outcomes of care for generalists and specialists. J Gen Intern Med.

>1999;14:499-511.

>

>16. Donahoe MT. Comparing generalist and specialty care:

discrepancies,

>deficiencies, and excesses. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1596- 1607.

>

>17. Anderson G, Poullier J-P. Health Spending, Access, and Outcomes:

Trends

>in Industrialized Countries. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund;

1999.

>

>18. Mold J, Stein H. The cascade effect in the clinical care of

patients. N

>Engl J Med. 1986;314:512-514.

>

>19. Shi L, Starfield B. Income inequality, primary care, and health

>indicators. J Fam Pract.

>1999;48:275-284.

>

>Other Newsletters

>http://www.mercola.com/2002/index.htm

>

>©Copyright 1997-2002 Dr. Joseph Mercola. . This

content

>may be copied in full, with copyright; contact; creation; and

information

>intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-

profit

>format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr.

Mercola

>is required.

>Disclaimer - Newsletters are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola.

They

>are not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a

qualified

>health care professional and they are not intended as medical

advice. They

>are intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the

research

>experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages

you to

>make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in

>partnership with a qualified health care professional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...