Guest guest Posted February 29, 2004 Report Share Posted February 29, 2004 Comments? Misty L. Trepke http://www..com Countries strike deal on stricter GM rules February 27 2004 at 11:45AM http://www.itechnology.co.za/index.phpclick_id=143 & art_id=qw107787510 2550B236 & set_id=1 Kuala Lumpur - Countries across Asia, Africa, Europe and most of Latin America agreed to tighter rules governing trade in genetically modified seeds on Friday, prompting dismay among major producers such as the United States. Negotiators from nearly 90 countries struck a deal requiring detailed information on shipments of GM crops such as maize, fidyl, cotton and soy, to help importers decide whether to accept them, going way beyond what exporters wanted. They also set terms for talks to thrash out a framework to fix blame for problems due to the controversial technology, along with systems of redress and enforcement. Ethiopian negotiator Tewolde Egziabher, who led in talks for many developing nations represented at the week-long Malaysian meeting, highlighted the liability deal as key. 'They also set terms for talks to thrash out a framework' " It's badly needed. Not as much for the redress side of it but for the caution that we will force on those who export, " he said as formal talks drew to a close. He said genetic engineering was a technology developed by the private rather than the public sector, meaning that risk assessment and research by the authorities were all the more important. " The temptation is to say: We have sunk so much money into it, even if it's not entirely safe, we will commercialise. " Australia and the United States were among major farm nations regretting what was agreed under the United Nations Cartagena Biosafety Protocol, saying it would be hard to put into practice. Talks under the protocol are intended to curb potential risks arising from the cross-border trade in GM species. But neither Australia nor the United States is a party to the law, having chosen not to sign. " We wish to record our disappointment that the views of non-parties were not taken into account as effectively as they could have been, " Australian negotiator Peter Heyward said in official remarks to the meeting. Opponents of genetic modification say its effects on the environment and the safety of foods remain unproven, while supporters say the technology has been adequately tested. ===== Fidyl Live Simply So That Others May Simply Live Yoga-With-Nancy-SoFla/ SignSoFla/ SoFlaVegans/ SoFlaSchools/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.