Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Calls for Labeling Grow After Meats are Found in Veggie Foods

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Comments?

Misty L. Trepke

http://www..com

 

Calls for Labeling Grow After Meats Are Found in 'Veggie' Foods

 

http://news.ncmonline.com/news/view_article.html?

article_id=f9ac0bdba978a3c9ec591eba49a294ad

 

Calls for Labeling Grow After Meats Are Found in 'Veggie' Foods

India-West, News Report,

Lisa Tsering, Jan 05, 2004

While preparing dinner one night last February, Supriya Kelkar

didn't think twice before tearing open a package of Lipton SideKicks

Broccoli and White Cheddar Pasta mix.

 

Kelkar, a vegetarian, had read the package's label in the

supermarket earlier. Among the ingredients listed on the package

were pasta, salt, cornstarch, cheddar and blue cheese, whey,

broccoli, MSG, spices, autolyzed yeast extract, maltodextrin, and

natural flavors.

 

What came next shocked Kelkar.

 

" I had a taste of the pasta, and I immediately sensed

something `meaty,' " she told India-West.

 

So she called the 800 number of Lipton's customer service to ask if

the product contained meat as one of its " natural flavors. " She was

told by a representative that it was safe to assume that it did.

Kelkar, 23, a vegetarian since her teens, decided to write a letter

to complain.

 

" [The customer service rep] explained that Lipton does not need to

disclose that information to the public because meat is not a common

allergen, " Kelkar wrote in her letter. " I find this completely and

utterly offensive. "

 

Two months later, she received a reply from Warren Blume, a

spokesperson for Lipton's parent company, Unilever Bestfoods: " We

cannot always guarantee that the ingredients are dairy, meat and egg

free, " he wrote. " In speaking to our consumers, a majority of people

found this to be an acceptable solution. "

 

" His email was infuriating, " Kelkar told India-West by phone last

week from her home in Detroit. " To say, `We tested it, and most

consumers thought it was okay,' was very patronizing. "

 

Kelkar began to suspect that meat was hiding in many packaged foods

on her shelf, such as Knorr soup and sauce mixes, Prego spaghetti

sauces and Campbell soups, so she started writing letters to food

companies, and even to the Food and Drug Administration, expressing

her concern. She learned that not only was there no law requiring

the disclosure of meat as an ingredient on food labels, but that few

companies seemed to care. " With a lot of companies, such as Kraft,

their indifference was almost insulting, " she said. Many companies

cite " proprietary reasons " for their refusal to disclose whether

their natural flavors contain meat.

 

On the surface, the solution to her problem would seem quite simple —

stop buying MSG-laden processed foods and cook everything from

scratch; seek out frozen or packaged foods from natural foods

companies such as Amy's Kitchen or Cascadian Farm, which offer a

wide range of vegetarian entrees; or shop only in Indian grocery

stores, where vegetarian foods are more likely to be clearly labeled

and easy to find.

 

But that's not always convenient or practical. Kelkar, a member of

the screenwriting team on Vidhu Vinod Chopra's Move 5 film project,

often finds herself too busy to drive across town to search out a

health food store. Busy working parents have even less time. And for

vegetarians who live outside a major American city, their choices

are fewer still.

 

" In this country, it seems like that sort of information should be

disclosed, " Kelkar said. " It seems like it should be a natural

consideration. "

 

HIDDEN MEAT IN RESTAURANTS

 

Tejas Mehta, a CPA living in Anaheim, Calif., was a regular customer

at a Marie Callender's restaurant there. " I used to go there

regularly for Lions Club meetings, " he recalled, " and I used to eat

the same Fettucini Alfredo due to the lack of vegetarian choices. "

 

He asked a waitress to check that the dish was vegetarian, and

she " specifically confirmed " that it was, he said. Mehta, an

adherent to the strictly vegetarian Jain religion, had heard from an

acquaintance that some restaurants added chicken stock to their

Alfredo sauce to keep it moist, so he asked the waitress to

doublecheck. His fears were confirmed when she returned from the

kitchen. " It had been non-vegetarian all along, " he told India-West.

 

Mehta shared his concerns with others in the Jain community, and

found that the practice was widespread. In an article he wrote and

circulated on the Internet, he quoted other Jains with similar

experiences: " We were shocked to find out that the beans and rice at

El Torito Grill in Irvine, Calif., are made with chicken and/or beef

stock, " said Hansni Kamdar. " I have found out that soups, mashed

potatoes, hash browns and rice are mostly made with beef/chicken

broth, " said Aarti Mehta. " I tell every Jain not to eat in any

Mexican restaurant, " said Geeta Khona.

 

" Some popular items that look vegetarian are really not what they

appear to be, " said Mehta. " Tortilla chips, rice and beans generally

appear vegetarian on the face of it, but many restaurants use lard,

chicken or beef stocks to make these items. I used to eat Caesar

salad for a long time before I realized it is not vegetarian. " (Many

Caesar dressings contain anchovy and raw egg.)

 

" Isn't this an eye opener? It's about time issues like this are

taken up with government agencies and consumer interest groups, "

said Mehta.

 

DO THE NUMBERS

 

A 2003 national Harris Interactive survey question sponsored by the

Vegetarian Resource Group concluded that about six percent of the

United States population never eats meat (which translates to about

5.7 million people), while a Time magazine poll last year set the

number at closer to 10 million. " A look at the increased number of

vegetarian products now available is evidence that the interest in

vegetarian foods has exploded in the last few years, " states the

VRG's report, which is posted on their Web site, www.vrg.org.

 

The worries felt by Hindu and Jain vegetarians over food labeling

are " not unfounded, " VRG consumer research manager John Cunningham

told India-West. " There is a good reason to worry ... the

term `natural flavors' can mean almost anything. "

 

Despite Kelkar's experiences, many food manufacturers have started

to notice that the number of vegetarians in the U.S., compounded

with the number of individuals who have chosen to cut back their

consumption of meat for ethical or health reasons, adds up to a big

chunk of the $13.4 billion natural foods market.

 

According to a survey by Mintel Consumer Intelligence, sales of

vegetarian foods reached $1.25 billion in 2001, up from $893 million

the year before, and Mintel analysts estimate the market could

balloon to $2.8 billion by 2006.

 

Over the past few years, the country's biggest food conglomerates

have slowly been taking over some of the best-known natural and

vegetarian brands.

 

In 1999, the Kellogg Company purchased Worthington Foods, which

makes an all-soy line of meat alternatives under the Morningside

Farms label. The same year, General Mills purchased Cascadian Farm,

a natural foods manufacturer with a wide selection of vegetarian

entrees.

 

In 2000, Kraft Foods, the nation's largest packaged foods company,

took over the all-vegetarian Boca Burger line. By the way, Kraft,

which is owned by tobacco giant Philip Morris, also sells Oscar

Meyer hotdogs.

 

The same year, ConAgra Inc., a $25-billion-plus food company whose

brands include Chef Boyardee, Chun King and Marie Callender's frozen

entrees, purchased Lightlife, the makers of all-tofu Smart Dogs.

 

Also in 2000, Heinz announced that it had spent $80 million to

purchase 19.5 percent of the stock of the Hain Celestial Group

(whose brands include Westbrae and Health Valley).

 

On the fast food front, Burger King has had success with its BK

Veggie sandwich, and in early 2003, McDonald's started test-

marketing a McVeggie sandwich on a whole wheat bun in 600 of its

stores in Southern California.

 

CRAFTING LAWS

 

Food producers marketing their products as vegetarian, or meat-free,

now do so on a voluntary basis. Although meat must be mentioned on a

food label if it appears as a stand-alone ingredient (such as in

chicken or beef stock), meat may appear under a vague listing

of " natural flavors " without the need to be identified.

 

Title 21, Chapter I, Part 101, Section 101.22 of the Code of Federal

Regulations' FDA requirements on food labeling states: " The term

natural flavor or natural flavoring means the essential oil,

oleoresin, essence or extractive, protein hydrolysate, distillate,

or any product of roasting, heating or enzymolysis, which contains

the flavoring constituents derived from a spice, fruit or fruit

juice, vegetable or vegetable juice, edible yeast, herb, bark, bud,

root, leaf or similar plant material, meat, seafood, poultry, eggs,

dairy products, or fermentation products thereof, whose significant

function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional " (emphasis

added).

 

The laws governing the labeling of food are complex to the point of

absurdity, points out Marion Nestle, professor and chair of the

Department of Nutrition and Food Studies at New York University, in

her book " Safe Food: Bacteria, Biotechnology and Terrorism "

(University of California Press).

 

For example, the U.S. Department of Agriculture regulates beef broth

and dehydrated chicken soup, but the Food and Drug Administration

regulates dehydrated beef soup and chicken broth; and the USDA

regulates open-face meat and poultry sandwiches, while the FDA

regulates closed-face meat and poultry sandwiches.

 

Adding to the confusion, lobbyists from the meat and other

industries have spent hundreds of millions of dollars in an attempt

to sway legislation.

 

As Nestle explains in her latest book, " Food Politics: How the Food

Industry Influences Nutrition and Health, " food companies have been

able to " exert disproportionate influence on government nutrition

policy " through monetary contributions and by hiring well-connected

former lawmakers in a " revolving door " system which invites

conflicts of interest. Nestle cites an analysis of the travel

practices of members of the House of Representatives for 1989-1990,

for example, which showed that House members had collectively taken

nearly 4,000 sponsored trips (two-thirds of them courtesy of

corporations or trade associations), and had accepted more than

$500,000 in honoraria. In 1996-97, she writes, one Congressional

lawmaker had gone on no fewer than 26 trips paid for by the meat

industry, valued at $18,550.

 

Till now, much of the debate over food labeling has arisen over

issues such as genetically modified ingredients or the disclosure of

country of origin.

 

Efforts to legislate the identification of meat in products have not

made much progress; in 1999 Veggie Lawyers, a group of law students

at George Washington University, petitioned the FDA to change their

regulations and persuaded hundreds of citizens to write to the FDA

in support; their campaign fizzled out in mid-2001.

 

But one lawmaker has renewed efforts to identify meat on product

labels in an attempt to help not just vegetarians, but also

consumers with allergies.

 

Nita M. Lowey, a Democratic Congresswoman from New York's 18th

district, introduced H.R. 467, also known as the " Food Ingredient

Right to Know Act, " in the House of Representatives Jan. 29, 2003.

 

In a statement issued to India-West, Lowey — who coincidentally, is

a member of the India Caucus — writes, " Every day, millions of

Americans look to food ingredient statements to make critical health

and dietary decisions. Unfortunately, getting accurate, reliable,

and thorough information is a tedious, often impossible task. We

must change the current regulations that do not require food

manufacturers to identify the products used in certain flavorings

and additives. That's why I introduced the Food Ingredient Right to

Know Act in January 2003.

 

" This legislation would give vegetarians, food allergic consumers,

and those who maintain special diets for health or religious reasons

the information they need to ensure that the foods they eat are safe

and in line with their diets ... Grassroots efforts will certainly

help the fight to pass this bill for better food labels. "

 

The bill states that H.R. 467 would " amend the Federal Food, Drug

and Cosmetic Act to require that foods containing spices, flavoring,

or coloring derived from meat, poultry or other animal products

(including insects), or known allergens bear labeling stating that

fact and their names. "

 

H.R. 467, which is currently in referral in the House Subcommittee

on Health, is cosponsored by Barbara Lee, (Calif.-9th district);

Pete Stark (Calif.-13th district); George Miller (Calif.-7th

district); Lynn Woolsey (Calif.-6th district); and eight other

representatives including Ohio Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich.

Kucinich, who is also a Democratic candidate for president, is a

vegan who eschews all animal products, including dairy.

 

As encouraging as Lowey's bill seems, however, its passage is far

from guaranteed.

 

Geeta Sikand, a registered dietician in Mission Viejo, Calif., and a

fellow of the American Dietetic Association, says that the bill will

have to be reintroduced in the 2004 session of Congress since no

progress was made in 2003. " Legislation for labeling is introduced

all the time, but that doesn't mean that it ever makes it through

the House and/or Senate, " she noted in an email.

 

Marion Nestle believes that H.R. 467 is not clear enough. " I can't

say what Congress will do but my guess is that it will get bogged

down in committee for lack of clarity, " Nestle told India-West in an

email.

 

" [H.R. 467] seems to be about two things — protecting vegetarians

from ingredients derived from animal foods, and protecting people

with food allergies from ingredients that might cause reactions. The

first is an issue of ethics rather than safety. The second is a

safety issue, but a complicated one. Allergens are proteins. Most

people with allergies are allergic to one or more of about 10 foods.

A few people are allergic to other foods. I'm not clear about what's

intended [by the bill]. "

 

Creating an FDA-approved label with enough information to satisfy

everybody is a major challenge, observes nutritionist Christina

Stark of Cornell University. " It's a real balancing act to provide

enough information to be helpful but not so much that it becomes

useless, because no one wants to read it all, " Stark told India-

West.

 

A VOLUNTARY SOLUTION?

 

Vegetarians in the U.K. may have another solution that American food

producers might want to adopt: a voluntary " vegetarian-friendly "

labeling program which involves the food industry instead of the

government.

 

Since 1969, the Vegetarian Society of the United Kingdom has issued

its " seedling " logo, a blue and yellow label which

states " Vegetarian Society Approved, " on more than 2,000 English

products including retail food and drinks, household goods,

cosmetics and toiletries. The group claims that the seedling logo is

the most widely recognized and trusted stamp of vegetarian approval

anywhere in the world.

 

In order to display the logo, manufacturers must agree to the

following guidelines:

 

* Products must be free from all meat, poultry, fish, shellfish and

crustacea.

 

* Products must not contain slaughter by-products such as gelatin or

animal fat.

 

* Any eggs used in the product must be free-range.

 

* Approval will only be granted to products or ingredients not

tested on animals.

 

* Approval will not be given to genetically modified ingredients " as

these are likely to have been tested on animals. "

 

" The Society also requires that cross contamination does not occur

between vegetarian and non-vegetarian products during food

production, " reads the Web site (www.vegsoc.org).

 

The seedling symbol is widely accepted and well-recognized by

consumers: 96 percent of survey respondents said they believed that

the Vegetarian Society's trademark on a product was the must

trustworthy guarantee of vegetarian suitability. In addition, the

group constantly updates its Web site with announcements of new

products, as well as restaurants, hotels, health food stores and

cafes, which earn the trademark.

 

" I support the adoption of a vegetarian-friendly label here in the

United States, " registered dietician Geeta Sikand told India-

West. " I believe it would be good PR and corporate responsibility

for any company that chooses to do so. "

 

" Possibly a label could help — it couldn't hurt, " notes Terry Mayo,

vice president of sales and marketing for Cedarlane, a line of

vegetarian entrees whose offerings include " Veggie " Pepperoni

Stuffed Focaccia, Grande Burrito with Chile Verde Sauce, and various

wraps, enchiladas, burritos and pizzas.

 

The nation's leading producer of vegetarian organic frozen prepared

meals, Amy's Kitchen, would also support a voluntary label. Speaking

to India-West from the company's 100,000-square-foot facility in

Santa Rosa, Calif., Amy's cofounder Andy Berliner said that he

would " definitely support " a voluntary label. " It would make life

easier " for vegetarian consumers like himself, he said. " I'm excited

about this idea. "

 

Andy and his wife, Rachel, founded the pioneering company in 1988

and named it after their daughter. Their first product was a

vegetable pot pie designed as an alternative to Swanson's chicken

pot pies. Since then, Amy's has enjoyed phenomenal growth — sales

now top $100 million per year — and their products are consistently

the top-selling vegetarian and organic entrees in the natural market

space.

 

Interestingly, although both Amy's and Cedarlane's entire product

lines are vegetarian, neither company aggressively markets its

products as such. First of all, here in the United States, more

consumers are looking for the word " organic " than " vegetarian, "

explained Mayo. Secondly, " There are all kinds of different

interpretations of what `vegetarian' is, " Mayo said. " If you

push `vegetarian,' the vegans will start an uproar. "

 

Although he supports the idea of a voluntary " veg-friendly " label,

Andy Berliner believes its design and placement would demand careful

consideration.

 

" More than 50 percent of [Amy's] customers are non-vegetarian, " and

are looking for organic products, said Berliner. " We don't emphasize

that our products are vegetarian because some consumers assume that

if it's vegetarian, it's not for them. "

 

And even if industry leaders agreed to adopt a

voluntary " vegetarian " label, who would issue it? The Vegetarian

Society of the U.K. does not have an American chapter, but spokesman

Chris Olivant told India-West in an email that the group has

licensed the seedling symbol for use in Austria and other countries

in Europe through local groups there. " There is no reason why it

couldn't be so in America, " he said.

 

The International Vegetarian Union issues what it calls a " V-label "

in Europe but not in the United States.

 

The American Vegetarian Association claims to have had some success

with its triangular logos for vegan and vegetarian products, but it

charges producers and health professionals a fee to join and

manufacturers $250 for the right to display their logo.

 

A spokesman for the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the

most visible vegetarian advocacy group in the United States, said

the group deliberately does not issue a vegetarian label for

foods. " For PETA, it's not about dogma, " Bruce Friedrich, director

of vegan outreach, told India-West. " We consider it of utmost

importance to save the animals. To focus on infinitesimal

ingredients misses a few key points. We have enormous respect for

religious and dietary restrictions, but they tend to place personal

purity ahead of saving animals. That hurts animals. "

 

EarthSave, an organization founded in 1988 by one of America's most

famous and influential vegetarians, bestselling author John Robbins

( " Diet for a New America, " " Food Revolution " ), is enthusiastic about

a labeling program. " We'd absolutely encourage a label, " said

EarthSave executive director Caryn Hartglass. " People have been

talking about a label for a long time. We certainly need one. But it

needs significant interest from the public. " She invites India-West

readers to contact the organization to show support for a labeling

campaign (see sidebar).

 

Some grocery companies, such as Whole Foods Market and Wild Oats,

the nation's number one and two natural foods supermarket chains,

already label vegetarian and vegan items in their deli cases and in-

store cafes but not on supermarket shelves. Both grocery chains

offer a much wider selection of vegetarian fare than do their

mainstream counterparts.

 

A few restaurant chains, such as the Fresh Choice and Sweet

Tomatoes/Soup Plantation salad buffet restaurants, clearly mark

vegetarian items in-house and on menus posted on their Web sites

(both restaurant chains are popular with Indian American diners,

too).

 

The Cheesecake Factory, ranked by the National Restaurant

Association as America's number one restaurant chain in terms of

sales per unit, offers no fewer than 16 vegetarian entrees on its

menu, according to its Web site.

 

P.F. Chang's China Bistro, ranked at number two on the NRA's list,

also offers a complete line of vegetarian entrees and appetizers,

clearly marked on its Web site and menus. The Web site for Olive

Garden, at number seven on the NRA's list, mentions several items as

suitable for vegetarians, with a caveat (see separate list).

 

Until the FDA mandates a change in food labeling laws or

manufacturers adopt a voluntary standardized vegetarian label, it's

up to consumers to search out more information by themselves.

 

Supriya Kelkar, who says she has " severely reduced " her food choices

since her experience earlier this year, has taken her concerns about

hidden meat and meat flavorings to religious organizations such as

the International Society for Krishna Consciousness, The Federation

of Jain Organizations in North America (JAINA), and the Seventh Day

Adventists.

 

According to dietician Geeta Sikand, " The industry is consumer

driven and in my opinion will respond to the consumers' needs. If

consumers demand for a label that states, `contains no meat

products' or `contains no animal products,' I believe the industry

will respond. Vegetarians have a right to know what is in the food

they eat. "

 

She added: " Food companies typically label for the majority, not a

small minority, but respond to minority concerns by having

information available upon request, so strict vegetarians and vegans

currently need to do some more due diligence on their part. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...