Guest guest Posted April 26, 2003 Report Share Posted April 26, 2003 Dear Misty and list members, I am going to respond to the points in your previous letter. I hope that this is clear. << But I do understand ALL information is susceptible to manipulation. >> Yes, I agree, including and especially information from the pharmaceutical industry. They notorious for manipulating data, omitting and not publishing unfavorable data, eliminating patients from studies in order to get favorable results, etc. etc., therefore biasing perceptions. " Perhaps you will take a look and tell me what you think? " Re citations in your second post, again there is no hard evidence in any of these articles or any link between antidepressant medication and cancer. " But whether we can find out if there is a link or not, I would personally want to exhaust all natural & holistic solutions before taking a prescription such as a SSRI. " I absolutely agree if depression were mild to moderate and clearly related to stress and there were no medical reasons for depression (e.g. treatable medical condition such as thyroid disorder, anemia, etc.). For example, energy psychology, homeopathy, talk therapy, and St. John's Wort, phototherapy are good examples of interventions with little or no complications or side effects. However, bipolar disorder often presents as depression and is often misdiagnosed as a unipolar depression. The average time of diagnosis from onset of symptoms (usually depression) to diagnosis of bipolar disorder is eight years. Evidence indicates that the longer bipolar disorder is not treated with medication, the more difficult and resistant it becomes to subsequent treatment of any kind as the neurophysiological dysfunction becomes more " set " in the central nervous system. Therefore in this case if more time were lost because of ineffective non pharmaceutical treatment, the prognosis becomes potentially worse. Lost time with ineffective approaches has the consequence of increase morbidity and mortality - with increased risks of suicide, loss of job, loss of marriage, comorbid drug/alcohol dependence and abuse which are all clearly associated with bipolar disorder. This not only has a devastating impact on the individuals and their family, but also on society with loss of work productivity, costs of hospitalization and further medical treatment, etc. An individual with mood disorder that is obviously a reaction to an acute stress and in which there is no family history of mood disorder or alcohol/drug dependence, with no significant prior history of depression and no current medical disorder which may contribute to depression has time to try a non pharmaceutical approach. In this case I agree that non pharmaceutical approaches might well be exhausted before trying psychotropic medications. Each individual's personal preferences for Rx should be respected. Health care providers should educate clients/patients as to the risks and/or benefits of intervening or not treating (pharmaceutical or non pharmaceutical.) Then it is up to the individual to decide what make sense to them in view of the information presented. Pharmaceutical Rx (not only SSRIs) is not to be taken lightly. Cancer is usually our last concern (if considered at all) regarding adverse medication reactions. The plethora of potential side effects from GI distress, sexual dysfunction, weight gain/loss, potentially serious allergic reactions, changes in blood electrolytes, and blood pressure, sedation, insomnia, etc. (the list is almost endless) are more common and troublesome. Last, but not least, non pharmaceutical preparations in the processed forms are not always benign. Some examples - ginko biloba causes impaired clotting and should be discontinued before surgery, Kava Kava has been withdrawn in Europe because of liver toxicity, ephedra may cause serious cardiovascular reactions. Best regards, Phil Milstein, MD Adult Psychiatry/Psychopharmacology Santa Fe, NM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2003 Report Share Posted April 27, 2003 Hi Dr. Milstein, Yes, the herbs you have mentioned have caused problems, but in most cases after the person taking them had abused them in a really bad, bad way... You might be interested in checking out homeopathy in relationship to psychology and psychiatry. There are wonderful remedies for all sorts of different mood disorders- what ever the label might be. For example, Aurum Metallicum is ideal for those suffering from deep, deep depression- even suicidal depression. I have seen homeopathic remedies work in situations that were conventionally thought of as untreatable/incurable- including the disorders you mentioned. I feel these are valid avenues of exploration, which deserve a chance before trying more drastic (and dangerous) protocols such as SSRI's. This is a site for just such an exploration and for the people who wish to participate in such an exploration. If you have suggestions on how to explore these alternative options more fully/effectively, please feel free to share your wisdom with us. I trust that you are a very knowledgeable and open-minded MD. If however your perception is deeply rooted in allopathic medicine, I respect and honor that, and suggest perhaps a different, more allopathic site as being appropriate. Be Well,Mistyhttp://www..com MidbarNM wrote:Dear Misty and list members, I am going to respond to the points in your previous letter. I hope that this is clear. << But I do understand ALL information is susceptible to manipulation. >> Yes, I agree, including and especially information from the pharmaceutical industry. They notorious for manipulating data, omitting and not publishing unfavorable data, eliminating patients from studies in order to get favorable results, etc. etc., therefore biasing perceptions. " Perhaps you will take a look and tell me what you think? " Re citations in your second post, again there is no hard evidence in any of these articles or any link between antidepressant medication and cancer. " But whether we can find out if there is a link or not, I would personally want to exhaust all natural & holistic solutions before taking a prescription such as a SSRI. " I absolutely agree if depression were mild to moderate and clearly related to stress and there were no medical reasons for depression (e.g. treatable medical condition such as thyroid disorder, anemia, etc.). For example, energy psychology, homeopathy, talk therapy, and St. John's Wort, phototherapy are good examples of interventions with little or no complications or side effects. However, bipolar disorder often presents as depression and is often misdiagnosed as a unipolar depression. The average time of diagnosis from onset of symptoms (usually depression) to diagnosis of bipolar disorder is eight years. Evidence indicates that the longer bipolar disorder is not treated with medication, the more difficult and resistant it becomes to subsequent treatment of any kind as the neurophysiological dysfunction becomes more " set " in the central nervous system. Therefore in this case if more time were lost because of ineffective non pharmaceutical treatment, the prognosis becomes potentially worse. Lost time with ineffective approaches has the consequence of increase morbidity and mortality - with increased risks of suicide, loss of job, loss of marriage, comorbid drug/alcohol dependence and abuse which are all clearly associated with bipolar disorder. This not only has a devastating impact on the individuals and their family, but also on society with loss of work productivity, costs of hospitalization and further medical treatment, etc. An individual with mood disorder that is obviously a reaction to an acute stress and in which there is no family history of mood disorder or alcohol/drug dependence, with no significant prior history of depression and no current medical disorder which may contribute to depression has time to try a non pharmaceutical approach. In this case I agree that non pharmaceutical approaches might well be exhausted before trying psychotropic medications. Each individual's personal preferences for Rx should be respected. Health care providers should educate clients/patients as to the risks and/or benefits of intervening or not treating (pharmaceutical or non pharmaceutical.) Then it is up to the individual to decide what make sense to them in view of the information presented. Pharmaceutical Rx (not only SSRIs) is not to be taken lightly. Cancer is usually our last concern (if considered at all) regarding adverse medication reactions. The plethora of potential side effects from GI distress, sexual dysfunction, weight gain/loss, potentially serious allergic reactions, changes in blood electrolytes, and blood pressure, sedation, insomnia, etc. (the list is almost endless) are more common and troublesome. Last, but not least, non pharmaceutical preparations in the processed forms are not always benign. Some examples - ginko biloba causes impaired clotting and should be discontinued before surgery, Kava Kava has been withdrawn in Europe because of liver toxicity, ephedra may cause serious cardiovascular reactions. Best regards, Phil Milstein, MD Adult Psychiatry/Psychopharmacology Santa Fe, NM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.