Fwd: The Other Side of SARS

[Guest guest]

Hi everyone...

 

I have intentionally not posted any information surrounding SARS because of the

hype surrounding it. My basic thought is to focus on keeping the immune system

strong so it can throw off illness quickly, rather than feeding into the fear

and hype that can lower the immune system!

 

One of my homeopathic instructors left for vacation and came back to town to

find one of her patients very ill, so being a homeopath, she treated her. My

instructor later learned of a Hanta Virus breakout that had occured in her

absence and in retrospect realized her patient was most likely suffering from

Hanta. But by the time of this revealation, the patient was back to health. So

if the right remedy can address a case of Hanta, then why not SARS, is my

thinking....

 

In fact, in homeopathy we don't even really look at the label, the diagnosis of

" SARS " or " flu " or " asthma " etc...- we are more interested in how the unique

vital force of a person is expressing through their own unique symptom picture.

Because not every case of SARS or flu or asthma is alike... normally these

labels are a box that we throw a multitude of dissimilar symptoms into and claim

they fit.

 

For example, when some get the flu- I am picking this one for the ease of

referring to a condition most everyone has had- some of us get feverish and hot,

others get chills. Some will have accompaning respiratory symptoms, others

might have digestive complaints. Some of us might get cranky, others of us may

crave company. These are very different experiences indeed! And because I no

longer believe in " boxed " diseases, all that is left is to build, strengthen and

maintain the vital force as it is expressed through the immune system.

 

But I also realize the media has inundated us with the scare of SARS. So here

is some information regarding the other side of SARS, I thought I would add it

to the mix and everyone can come to their own conclusion...

 

Comments either way?

 

Be Well, Misty

 

http://www..com

 

 

Chris, I attended Toronto's Consumer Health Organization Total Health show

over the weekend. Len Horowitz aptly named SARS as " Sickening and Repulsive

SCAM " . Please read and share the following as far and widely as possible.

Warm regards,

Pritam Singh © " Peter "

 

THE FAKE SARS TEST AND THE FAKE SCIENCE

March 24. The hysteria that has been created by reports of the mysterious

global pneumonia (SARS) now claims new victims: media and scientists.

 

See, the media are reporting that a test has been found to detect the virus

that is causing SARS. Of course, if you read far enough into these stories

(MSNBC today, for example), you find out that the new test is dubious, at best.

 

First of all, here is the way the test is done. A person suspected of

having SARS gives a little bit of blood to a doctor. The doc sends this to

a lab, where they also have blood from SARS people who have recovered. To

that " victorious blood " they add the virus just found in the patient in

question. If the victorious blood kills the virus, then the patient in

question does have SARS.

 

This is science like Dan Rather is an astronaut.

 

Because they haven't found a virus that causes SARS. They may hope they

have, but they haven't. So how can they add this virus to the victorious

blood, if they don't have it, if they haven't isolated it? Oh, they may

have isolated SOME virus or another, but they don't know that it is causing

SARS.

 

Get it?

 

Who knows how many irrelevant viruses are floating around in the human body

all the time?

 

And if they haven't found the true causative virus, they absolutely can't

say all these so-called cases of SARS are actually connected in any way.

They could very well be various kinds of flu and pneumonia and infections

that are unrelated.

 

Diseases have been invented on the basis of taking unrelated illness and

tying it together under one name. AIDS is one example.

 

Travelers around the world get sick and die all the time. Most recover. But

all of a sudden we have SARS, and medical teams are claiming that cases in

China are related to cases in Nome.

 

To have any hope of finding a germ that actually causes an illness, you

have to establish a few things. The germ is present in all cases. It is the

same germ. It is present in large numbers at locatable sites in the body.

The germ is actually doing something. It is attacking cells, it is

registering some kind of destructive biological activity.

 

In the case of so-called SARS, they have NONE of that.

 

And even when the germ in question passes all the above tests, you still

have the overriding factor: how healthy is the PERSON? Is the person able

to throw off the germ easily? Are most people with good immune systems able

to throw off the germ?

 

You see, when you get down in the dirt and really look, you don't get

hysteria, you get information or lack of same, and you can move on with

confidence, not fear.

 

But fear is what drives the medical cartel.

 

JON RAPPOPORT www.nomorefakenews.com

 

CANADA GOES CRAZY OVER SARS DISEASE---MEDICAL EMERGENCY DECLARED IN ONTARIO

 

March 27. And other parts of the world are following suit. Hong Kong has

ordered 1000 people quarantined.

 

Singapore, after two deaths, has closed all schools until April 6.

 

Who knows what measures are being taken in China, said to be the source of

the mystery pneumonia.

 

Health Canada has " urged " citizens to put off travel to Vietnam, Hong Kong,

Singapore, and the Guangdong Province of China.

 

Thousands of Canadians have been asked to quarantine themselves.

 

The Toronto Scarborough Hospital may close. Meanwhile, some health workers

there are already quarantined.

 

SARS is the biggest story in Canada. It's knocked the war off the front page.

 

The Ontario government has declared a medical emergency, which basically

gives authorities the power to take any action to block the spread of the

disease.

 

Okay. So now what is really happening?

 

Scientists in Hong Kong have scuttled the virus they said was causing SARS.

Forget it. They are now falling in line with the US CDC, which says the

probable cause is a strain of the coronavirus, that family of germs which

numbers among its greatest achievements the common cold.

 

Except, this is probably a new strain, possibly coming from animals in

South China. Ah yes. Remember the green-monkey theory of AIDS? The theory

quietly dropped after it became apparent that no one could prove any

connection?

 

Here is what health authorities DON'T know about SARS:

 

They don't know what's causing it.

 

They don't know that SARS is an IT at all. In other words, there is a good

chance that these patients getting sick and dying are getting sick for

VARIOUS unrelated reasons.

 

And as the hysteria grows, people will be labeled SARS who actually are,

oh, poisoned by pesticides, suffering from reactions to smallpox shots,

dying of starvation, dying of infections that move in when immune systems

are weak...

 

Fever, cough, weakness, respiratory problems---a few of the SARS

symptoms---a person can pick those up almost anywhere for almost any

reason. Heck, even CHEMTRAILS can cause these things in some people.

 

And then we get the good old back-up position: " We think this virus is the

cause, but other viruses may be combining with it to create the real

danger. " Sure, and there may be 1 asteroid or 4 or 16 or 4587 within a

light year of Earth.

 

Buried in a CTV story about SARS were two interesting facts. Most people

who get sick are recovering without treatment, and the recovery rate seems

to be increasing. (By the way, there is no treatment for " SARS. " )

 

The second interesting fact was revealed by a Doctor Rau (Canadian): " For

those who recover, it's their immune system taking care of it. "

 

This is called a CLUE. Hmm.

 

Perhaps it would make sense to build up your immune system. Wow.

 

Except conventional medicine does not know how to do this. There is no

medical treatment called; IMMUNE BUILD-UP.

 

And yet...this is obviously the thing to do. Nutrients, better food, less

sugar, less coffee, and so on. The simple things. The things mainstream

doctors don't write scripts for.

 

Now, if you visit various alternative news sites, you'll see all sorts of

material about killer germs that may be on the loose. And yes, if

scientists screw around in labs long enough, they may come up with some

designer germs that cause health problems. But on the other hand, all these

sites automatically assume that SARS is one disease entity. It's an IT.

It's one thing. When, in fact, that's a dangerous presumption to make,

because when you do, you're going right into the medical paradigm full

tilt. You're looking over the shoulders of researchers as they try to

isolate the one germ that is causing the one disease and soon you will see

them pull out one drug, most likely a toxic drug, and you will forget all

about this primary idea of strengthening your immune system. You'll leave

that by the side of the road, as you sink into a trance.

 

Canada is rapidly moving into that trance.

 

People are wearing masks even at home.

 

" Let's have a kiss, hon. "

 

" Hell no. I'm not taking off my mask. "

 

The fear op is working. Most official fear ops do work.

 

Check out mainstream reports on SARS. Who are the reporters talking to?

Where are they getting their information? Who is calling the shots? How

often do those sources change their story?

 

If this thing goes much further, you're going to see that the medical

honchos have developed an approved test for SARS. It'll be a test that

registers the presence of antibodies. They'll say those antibodies are a

specific indicator that the SARS germ is present in the body, because the

antibodies were sent out by the body to combat the SARS germ. And then

those people who test positive can be quarantined.

 

Here is what they won't say. Antibodies, traditionally, are a clear sign

that the body is mounting a SUCCESSFUL defense against a germ. And very

often, antibodies are present because they are working against SOME GERM

OTHER THAN THE ONE BEING TESTED FOR. It's called cross reaction, and it

renders the test useless.

 

You won't hear these things.

 

You also won't hear that fear can cause a lowering of immune function in

the body.

 

JON RAPPOPORT www.nomorefakenews.com

 

 

SARS CHIEFS TAKE NEW STEPS

 

March 28. An MSNBC/Reuters/AP piece spells it out.

 

WHO has ordered any airline with international flights out of Toronto, Hong

Kong, Singapore, Hanoi, Taiwan, and Guangdong Province in China to screen

boarding passengers for SARS.

 

Since no one knows the cause of the disease or if SARS is one disease, and

since there are no blood tests done at airports, how is the screening to be

accomplished?

 

Airport employees will ask passengers if they have flu-like symptoms, or if

they've been in contact with someone who has SARS.

 

If the answer is yes to either question, the passenger is not allowed to

board a plane.

 

To say this is a cosmetic procedure is an understatement.

 

Governments have the option of following the new WHO guidelines or not.

 

The other development: Dr. Jim Hughes, head of the CDC infectious disease

unit, states that, even though SARS has been described as a pneumonia, many

US cases do not have pneumonia.

 

Here we go.

 

This is the disease-definition expanding phase, in which more and more

people are taken into the net.

 

The same thing happened with AIDS. New symptoms added.

 

This is SOP. First it's only pneumonia, then it's any lung problem, then

it's high fever plus a cough, then it's fatigue, then it's headache plus

fever, then it's a splinter in the foot, then it's anyone with a cup of

coffee in his hand.

 

The definition-expansion is justified on the grounds that health

authorities are really constructing a surveillance definition. They're

trying to scoop up everybody who MIGHT have SARS, to prevent the spread of

the whatever-it-is.

 

But, as the days and weeks and months go by, somehow these add-on symptoms

are never really expelled from the new definitions. They stay on board.

 

We'll see how far SARS goes. Remember, they have found no root cause. They

have no test. They have no assurance that SARS was one thing to begin with,

as opposed to a grab-bag of unrelated cases..

 

The group at the US CDC which always appoints itself in charge of these

" emerging diseases " is EIS. Epidemic Intelligence Service. The doctors who

are drafted for projects at EIS are all trained to go out into the field

and FIND THE ONE CAUSE OF THE ONE DISEASE.

 

That's their orientation and their predisposition. They never take the

attitude that the " outbreak " may well involve a mistake from the beginning.

They never start with the idea that all the reports of cases from various

far-flung areas may well be WELDING TOGETHER instances which are really not

connected.

 

In the early 1980s at UCLA, researchers investigated many possible causes

for AIDS: overuse of antibiotics, recreational drugs, contaminated drugs,

cytomegalovirus, intestinal parasites, and so on.

 

Each potential root cause was eliminated because NOT ALL CASES OF SO-CALLED

AIDS SHARED ANY ONE CAUSE.

 

Why was this a completely wrong way to proceed?

 

Because it was based on the unproven idea that AIDS was one disease condition.

 

Whereas, since immune-system suppression was the common denominator in all

cases, any sane person would realize that hundreds of different causes in

various cases could bring about immune suppression.

 

This obvious idea was ignored. The researchers were trained to assume, from

the get-go, that every case was an example of the same disease condition.

 

The basic flaw.

 

One disease, one germ, one basic drug to kill the one germ.

 

Researchers will tell you that epidemiology is their ace in the hole. They

mean: " We have tracked SARS from person to person so we know it's one

disease caused by one germ. "

 

Joe got on a plane in Singapore. He was already suffering from flu-like

symptoms. Sid, a guy sitting three rows away from Joe, later developed the

same symptoms. That kind of thing.

 

This sounds very convincing, but it really isn't, for various reasons. For

example, there are a number of solid studies which show that people with

HIV do not pass it on to those they live with. And of course, Joe and Sid

may be flu-like for different reasons. Joe ate fish that was a little bit

tainted, and Sid was recently walking through a pesticide-laden field of rice.

 

But no one asks Sid and Joe the right questions, because the hunt is for a

germ.

 

JON RAPPOPORT www.nomorefakenews.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more