Fwd: [SoFlaVegans] Dr. Kill More People than...

[Guest guest]

I thought this was very interesting...

 

Comments?

 

Misty

 

http://www..com

 

 

 

 

Doctors Kill More People Than Guns and Traffic Accidents Combined

By Don Harkins

The Idaho Observer - April, 1999

 

http://www.relfe.com/doctors_kill.html

 

SANDPOINT -- Last St. Patrick's Day, Sandpoint Chiropractor Blaze

Welch gave a lecture on how to get off of the disease scary-go-round

at the Gardenia Center here. The purpose of the talk, which was

sponsored by the North Idaho chapter of Vaccination Liberation, was

to teach people that they are responsible for their own health. Dr.

Welch also discussed figures from right out of the Journal of the

American Medical Association (JAMA) which prove, through accurate

interpretations of their own words, that in the last century we chose

the wrong fork in the road with regard to our health care paradigm.

 

 

 

Most people have been conditioned to believe in what is called the

germ theory of disease -- that germs cause disease. The truth is

that germs (bacteria) are everywhere and they are attracted to and

proliferate in dis-eased tissues. Bacteria decompose dead matter.

That is their job.

 

 

 

For instance, when a tree dies, bacteria come in and eat the tree and

it eventually becomes soil. Bacteria do not eat a live, healthy tree.

The same thing is true in people -- bacteria are attracted to dead

matter.

 

 

 

Therefore, if you have dead matter in your body, bacteria will come

in and get to work decomposing the dead fidyl tissue so that it may

eventually become soil. In the mid 1800s, western medical science

had the choice of going one of two ways. Bechamp's theory of disease

maintained that every living thing has arisen from the microzyma (the

fundamental unit of the corporate organism) and every living thing is

reducible to the microzyma. Bechamp believed that microzymas secrete

fermentative substances that aid in digestion in a healthy body and evolve into

bacteria when they encounter dead or damaged cells.

 

 

 

Pasteur's germ theory of disease maintained that diseases come into

our bodies and make germs that we must fight so that we may be rid of

them. J.I. Rodale explained Pasteur's germ theory of disease by stating

that germs live in the air, and every once in awhile get into a human

body, multiply and cause illness. Nothing to it at all. All you have to

do is kill germs and disease is licked.

 

 

 

Bechamp's theory placed all of the responsibility of disease

prevention on the individual and his lifestyle. In a practical sense,

there was no money in that and people would be empowered with the

ability to resist dis-ease by taking care of themselves. Western

medical science went with Pasteur's theory because it opened the door

which created the world's medical and pharmaceutical industries.

Since the 1850s, we have been developing new drugs to attack and kill

the disease invaders and the result has been epidemics of cancers and

sicknesses and diseases -- and a very rich and powerful

pharmaceutical industry.

 

 

 

Last year, commented Dr. Welch, the pharmaceutical industry did $182

billion in drug sales world wide. . . . Dr. Welch read off some

statistics which should cause concern to anybody who sees an

allopathic doctor, has medical insurance or may end up in the

hospital someday.

 

 

Again, the following admissions were taken from JAMA:

 

 

 

The top five causes of death in the United States, in order, are

tobacco, alcohol, medical malpractice, traffic and firearms.

According to JAMA, doctors kill more people than auto accidents and

guns. With that in mind, one has to wonder why gun control is such a

hot legislative issue when, perhaps, we should be more concerned

about doctor control.

 

 

 

The number of people that doctors kill per day from medical

malpractice is roughly equal to the amount of people that would die

if every day, three jumbo jets crashed and killed everybody on board,

commented Dr. Welch who added, in defense of his own profession, just

imagine what headlines would result if a chiropractor or a naturopath

accidentally killed just one patient?

 

 

 

Another JAMA statistic stated that 1/5 (20 percent) of all people who

 

see an allopath will suffer a doctor-induced injury.

 

 

 

Again, according to JAMA, 16 percent of all people who die in the

hospital are determined by autopsy to have died of something other

than their admission diagnosis. In other words, the doctor had no

idea what was really wrong with the patient and, therefore, the

patient may have died for want of appropriate care that would have

been subsequent to an accurate diagnosis.

 

 

 

Another trade publication, American Medical News, stated that 28

percent of people admitted to hospitals are there because they have

suffered an adverse reaction to prescribed drugs.

 

 

 

We are miserably losing the battle against viruses and bacteria.

Antibiotics do not work. We need to take a different tack because

this is obviously not working, said Dr. Welch. Dr. Welch made

numerous practical and logical observations throughout his lecture.

One of them is so obvious that it deserves mention here. When there

is an epidemic of, say, pertussis in a school and 14 of 200 kids get

sick, who gets studied? he asked. The answer, of course, is that the

sick kids get studied. They get studied by the county health district

and the health district accumulates its data and then tells the

newspapers about the epidemic of sickness and everybody then flocks

down to the health district or goes to see their doctor to get

vaccinated.

 

 

 

Would it not be more appropriate to study the 186 kids that did not

get sick? I asked Dr. Welch. Dr. Welch also read a quote from the

British Medical Journal which states that only one percent of all

scientific research papers which explore medicine are scientifically

sound.

 

 

 

So, if that is true, then not only are allopathic doctors incorrect

in their understanding of the basic nature of disease, they are basing

99 percent of their conclusions, and therefore their diagnosis and

treatment of people, on flawed science.

 

 

 

The Idaho Observer P.O. Box 1353 Rathdrum, Idaho 83858-1353

Phone: 208-687-9441 Email: observer Web:

http://proliberty.com/observer/

 

http://www.sightings.com

 

=====

Fidyl

Live Simply So That

Others May Simply Live

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more

 

 

[Guest guest]

What about the increase in our lifespan? Is it in spite of them? Deana

 

 

 

 

 

 

>mistylyn trepke <mistytrepke

>

>

> Fwd: [soFlaVegans] Dr. Kill More People

>than...

>Fri, 7 Mar 2003 05:12:35 -0800 (PST)

>

>

>I thought this was very interesting...

>

>Comments?

>

>Misty

>

>http://www..com

>

>

>

>

>Doctors Kill More People Than Guns and Traffic Accidents Combined

>By Don Harkins

>The Idaho Observer - April, 1999

>

>http://www.relfe.com/doctors_kill.html

>

>SANDPOINT -- Last St. Patrick's Day, Sandpoint Chiropractor Blaze

>Welch gave a lecture on how to get off of the disease scary-go-round

>at the Gardenia Center here. The purpose of the talk, which was

>sponsored by the North Idaho chapter of Vaccination Liberation, was

>to teach people that they are responsible for their own health. Dr.

>Welch also discussed figures from right out of the Journal of the

>American Medical Association (JAMA) which prove, through accurate

>interpretations of their own words, that in the last century we chose

>the wrong fork in the road with regard to our health care paradigm.

>

>

>

>Most people have been conditioned to believe in what is called the

>germ theory of disease -- that germs cause disease. The truth is

>that germs (bacteria) are everywhere and they are attracted to and

>proliferate in dis-eased tissues. Bacteria decompose dead matter.

>That is their job.

>

>

>

>For instance, when a tree dies, bacteria come in and eat the tree and

>it eventually becomes soil. Bacteria do not eat a live, healthy tree.

>The same thing is true in people -- bacteria are attracted to dead

>matter.

>

>

>

>Therefore, if you have dead matter in your body, bacteria will come

>in and get to work decomposing the dead fidyl tissue so that it may

>eventually become soil. In the mid 1800s, western medical science

>had the choice of going one of two ways. Bechamp's theory of disease

>maintained that every living thing has arisen from the microzyma (the

>fundamental unit of the corporate organism) and every living thing is

>reducible to the microzyma. Bechamp believed that microzymas secrete

>fermentative substances that aid in digestion in a healthy body and evolve

>into bacteria when they encounter dead or damaged cells.

>

>

>

>Pasteur's germ theory of disease maintained that diseases come into

>our bodies and make germs that we must fight so that we may be rid of

>them. J.I. Rodale explained Pasteur's germ theory of disease by stating

>that germs live in the air, and every once in awhile get into a human

>body, multiply and cause illness. Nothing to it at all. All you have to

>do is kill germs and disease is licked.

>

>

>

>Bechamp's theory placed all of the responsibility of disease

>prevention on the individual and his lifestyle. In a practical sense,

>there was no money in that and people would be empowered with the

>ability to resist dis-ease by taking care of themselves. Western

>medical science went with Pasteur's theory because it opened the door

>which created the world's medical and pharmaceutical industries.

>Since the 1850s, we have been developing new drugs to attack and kill

>the disease invaders and the result has been epidemics of cancers and

>sicknesses and diseases -- and a very rich and powerful

>pharmaceutical industry.

>

>

>

>Last year, commented Dr. Welch, the pharmaceutical industry did $182

>billion in drug sales world wide. . . . Dr. Welch read off some

>statistics which should cause concern to anybody who sees an

>allopathic doctor, has medical insurance or may end up in the

>hospital someday.

>

>

>Again, the following admissions were taken from JAMA:

>

>

>

>The top five causes of death in the United States, in order, are

>tobacco, alcohol, medical malpractice, traffic and firearms.

>According to JAMA, doctors kill more people than auto accidents and

>guns. With that in mind, one has to wonder why gun control is such a

>hot legislative issue when, perhaps, we should be more concerned

>about doctor control.

>

>

>

>The number of people that doctors kill per day from medical

>malpractice is roughly equal to the amount of people that would die

>if every day, three jumbo jets crashed and killed everybody on board,

>commented Dr. Welch who added, in defense of his own profession, just

>imagine what headlines would result if a chiropractor or a naturopath

>accidentally killed just one patient?

>

>

>

>Another JAMA statistic stated that 1/5 (20 percent) of all people who

>

>see an allopath will suffer a doctor-induced injury.

>

>

>

>Again, according to JAMA, 16 percent of all people who die in the

>hospital are determined by autopsy to have died of something other

>than their admission diagnosis. In other words, the doctor had no

>idea what was really wrong with the patient and, therefore, the

>patient may have died for want of appropriate care that would have

>been subsequent to an accurate diagnosis.

>

>

>

>Another trade publication, American Medical News, stated that 28

>percent of people admitted to hospitals are there because they have

>suffered an adverse reaction to prescribed drugs.

>

>

>

>We are miserably losing the battle against viruses and bacteria.

>Antibiotics do not work. We need to take a different tack because

>this is obviously not working, said Dr. Welch. Dr. Welch made

>numerous practical and logical observations throughout his lecture.

>One of them is so obvious that it deserves mention here. When there

>is an epidemic of, say, pertussis in a school and 14 of 200 kids get

>sick, who gets studied? he asked. The answer, of course, is that the

>sick kids get studied. They get studied by the county health district

>and the health district accumulates its data and then tells the

>newspapers about the epidemic of sickness and everybody then flocks

>down to the health district or goes to see their doctor to get

>vaccinated.

>

>

>

>Would it not be more appropriate to study the 186 kids that did not

>get sick? I asked Dr. Welch. Dr. Welch also read a quote from the

>British Medical Journal which states that only one percent of all

>scientific research papers which explore medicine are scientifically

>sound.

>

>

>

>So, if that is true, then not only are allopathic doctors incorrect

>in their understanding of the basic nature of disease, they are basing

>99 percent of their conclusions, and therefore their diagnosis and

>treatment of people, on flawed science.

>

>

>

>The Idaho Observer P.O. Box 1353 Rathdrum, Idaho 83858-1353

>Phone: 208-687-9441 Email: observer Web:

>http://proliberty.com/observer/

>

>http://www.sightings.com

>

>=====

>Fidyl

>Live Simply So That

>Others May Simply Live

>

Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Deana,

 

My thought is improved sanitation, hygiene, nutrition, and living

conditions such as better heating, better insulation are largely

responsible for our increased lifespans.

 

Did you know the longest running treatment of Western medicine is

leaching? Leaching was practiced for over 2,500 years! How much do

we observe and how well do we use that information if it takes 2,500

years to realize leaching is not a good thing?

 

Likewise I think one day we will look back and consider many of the

suppressive treatments used today as barbaric. Imagine exposing our

most sick and ill people to one of the most feared and deadly forces

known today- radiation.

 

One day I think many more people will also realize the link between

suppressed acute illness and resulting chronic disease. By using

alternative medicine for acute illness the constitution is

strengthened through the exercise rather than being hampered and

weakened by suppressive medical treatments which may never fully

resolve the original disease but leave the person in a vulnerable

state for further complications.

 

Homeopathy has an absolutely glorious track record with acute

illness- in the Cholera epidemic if you saw a medical doctor your

chances were 1 out of 10 to live, whereas the homeopaths were saving

roughly 90% of the people they saw.

 

So my personal feeling is by using alternative medicine, especially

homeopathy, the life span will not only be longer but more enjoyable.

 

I hope that helps,

Misty

http://www..com

 

, " Deana Smiel "

<rsmiel@h...> wrote:

> What about the increase in our lifespan? Is it in spite of them?

Deana

>

>

>