Guest guest Posted February 28, 2003 Report Share Posted February 28, 2003 More GM food for thought... Funny how supplements need regulating by the FDA, but the FDA takes no action against a university that puts genetically altered pigs into the public food supply. Anyone else, comments? Misty http://www..com Food Supply May Contain Genetically Altered Pigs Between April 2001 and January of this year, 386 pigs, the offspring of genetically altered mothers, were released to a " livestock dealer " by the University of Illinois (UI). According to the FDA, this was against regulations. Whether the pigs were slaughtered for food is unknown. A UI spokesperson said the university had a different interpretation of the regulations. He said the university had been doing the same since 1999, and expressed surprised that the FDA said it was unaware of it. The pigs were from an experiment which sought to make pigs grow faster. Some were given a cow lactation gene, others a synthesized gene for insulin-like growth factor 1 hormone. Some were given both. UI insists the offspring were repeatedly tested and that none who inherited the introduced material were released. The FDA says insufficient records were kept to be able to verify that but, due to the nature of the genetic material, doubts the incident represents a public health fidyl risk. UI has agreed to stop releasing such animals, and the FDA is planning no immediate action against the university. The FDA became aware of the incident when UI alerted it to a transgenic pig who had mistakenly been rendered instead of incinerated. Joe Cummins, Professor Emeritus of Genetics of the University of Western Ontario, criticizes the FDA for acting like UI's public relation firm. Citing an article in the British Medical Journal, he contends the added hormone is associated with cancer, and that the pigs pose a " real and present danger. " See the February 10th AnimalNet: http://131.104.232.9/animalnet-archives.htm " > " FDA Says Food Supply May Contain Altered Pigs, " AnimalNet (NYT/AP articles), 2/6/03. http://131.104.232.9/animalnetarchives.htm http://131.104.232.9/animalnet-archives.htm " FDA: Genetically Altered Pigs Might Have Gone to Market, " Meating Place, Daniel Yovich. http://www.meatingplace.com/meatingplace/DailyNews/oop/qnohit_g.asp? ID=10412 Farmed Animal Watch V.6, N.2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 28, 2003 Report Share Posted February 28, 2003 Thanks, Misty. FOLLOW THE MONEY! Namaste` Walt - <mistytrepke Friday, February 28, 2003 9:27 AM Food Supply May Contain Genetically Altered Pigs > More GM food for thought... > > Funny how supplements need regulating by the FDA, > but the FDA takes no action against a university that puts > genetically altered pigs into the public food supply. > > Anyone else, comments? > > Misty > http://www..com > > Food Supply May Contain Genetically Altered Pigs > > Between April 2001 and January of this year, 386 pigs, the offspring > of genetically altered mothers, were released to a " livestock dealer " > by the University of Illinois (UI). According to the FDA, this was > against regulations. Whether the pigs were slaughtered for food is > unknown. > > A UI spokesperson said the university had a different > interpretation of the regulations. He said the university had been > doing the same since 1999, and expressed surprised that the FDA said > it was unaware of it. The pigs were from an experiment which sought > to make pigs grow faster. Some were given a cow lactation gene, > others a synthesized gene for insulin-like growth factor 1 hormone. > Some were given both. > > UI insists the offspring were repeatedly tested and that none who > inherited the introduced material were released. The FDA says > insufficient records were kept to be able to verify that but, due to > the nature of the genetic material, doubts the incident represents a > public health fidyl risk. > > UI has agreed to stop releasing such animals, and the FDA is > planning no immediate action against the university. > > The FDA became aware of the incident when UI alerted it to a > transgenic pig who had mistakenly been rendered instead of > incinerated. Joe Cummins, Professor Emeritus of Genetics of the > University of Western Ontario, criticizes the FDA for acting > like UI's public relation firm. > > Citing an article in the British Medical Journal, he contends the > added hormone is associated with cancer, and that the pigs pose > a " real and present danger. " > > See the February 10th AnimalNet: > http://131.104.232.9/animalnet-archives.htm " > > > > " FDA Says Food Supply May Contain Altered Pigs, " AnimalNet (NYT/AP > articles), 2/6/03. > http://131.104.232.9/animalnetarchives.htm > http://131.104.232.9/animalnet-archives.htm > " FDA: Genetically Altered Pigs Might Have Gone to Market, " Meating > Place, Daniel Yovich. > http://www.meatingplace.com/meatingplace/DailyNews/oop/qnohit_g.asp? > ID=10412 > > Farmed Animal Watch V.6, N.2 > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.