Guest guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Hi Gine, There is no Shiva without Shakti. Rudraksha beads honor both the male and female Divinities although its seldom mentioned. Rudrakshas are called the Tears of Lord Shiva for another reason, one being that Shiva is male and Tears are very much an emotional, feminine trait which also indicates Shiva's feminine aspect. Its not the intention of this Group not to honor women, don't get it wrong. Whether you like it for not, there are always ladies (Hindu or not Hindu) who would wear rudrakshas during menses and those who would not wear. You are right that it all depends on their personal comfort levels and choice. Its been mentioned in an earlier message that there is no mention in ANY holy texts (Shastras) that rudrakshas cannot be worn during menses. People can belief and stick to what they wish to believe and practice. There is no strict rule governing the use of rudrakshas at any given time. None of the Scrpitures say so. But the Scriptures mentioned that its necessary to take baths before wearing rudraksha and tha the chanting of mantra is essential for the wearer to gain benefits. In Tantra as you've been quoting, to wear or not to wear are both sides of the same coin and since you mentioned Goddess several times, guess you might be Shakta? No? Anyway, being the sides of the same coin means wearing or not wearing rudraksha during menses (both are actions); whichever one chooses to do, is still honoring and respecting Goddess. Indeed its wise to heed the Upaguru when making a choice. Om Namah Shivaya , " paxetamo " <mirmade wrote: > > Namaste Joan Radha, > > You are more correct in your estimations that most realize. > > The Native American Indian tribes indigenous to the North American > continent knew and honored a woman's deep connection the spiritual, > which is especially heightened during her cycle while of a > child-bearing age. > > They created 'moon lodges' for the women to take rest, contemplation > and be in the company of other women at this time. This was not a > banishment, nor posited on the premise that a woman is tainted or able > to defile male objects. In fact, they were ideally honored and > revered, albeit some superstitious men worried that if women touched > their weapons during this time, it would affect the items; the truth > of this is that secondary to the increased amplification of the power > coursing thru them, it was not wise for them to be concerned about the > activities of daily living or tending to others -this restive time in > the moon lodge was a time to seek repose and minimize the intense > energies that often feel overwhelming. They were thus nurtured by > other women and spent the time in a quiet and supportive environment. > It IS a pity that other cultures (even today) have misunderstood women > and their deep and abiding connecting to the Moon. > > The Lunar radiations and vibrations profoundly effect every sentient > being; it even controls the tides, and 75% of the planet is covered > with oceanic seas! > > For deep meditation and access to pure spirit, being near any water > during a full moon is especially beneficial for both genders. > As the moon reflects the light of the sun, so woman is a direct > reflection of spirit, and thus more deeply connected to the Earth and > spiritual realms/power. > > The Abrahamic faiths are based on fear; they recognize this innate > difference between men and women, yet instead of honoring the sacred > divine in feminine form, they try to suppress the natural order of > things and keep women in an 'inferior' position. > Now, Kabbalah and some other mystic sects still honor women. > This is not to suggest women are superior in any regard; but we were > created different, and those differences ought to be honored and > exploited for their inherent potential. > > > On the other hand, the 'form' of gender is also illusory - only God is > the true male. But until each of us achieve consciousness and awaken > to the fact that we are merely pure spirit covered with a thin veil of > Maya which creates the illusion of 'different' or 'separate'.....the > best we can do is operate within our respective roles and positions. > > Forgive my diatribe, but it really amuses me to see so many people ask > this question about rudraksha and menses. I, for one, would not think > of wearing ANY sacred item during sexual relations (except for certain > tantric methods in which the union is more a joining of spirit than > temporal), or the functions of urination and excreting --but this is > wholly referential to ones energy flowing downward, which opposes the > whole purpose of rudraksha, et al. > > I expect it's a matter of personal comfort and choice -if a woman > truly believes that wearing rudraksha during menses is forbidden or > dishonoring the sacred, then she ought to govern herself accordingly. > > Is it not, after all, the intent which is honored by God/dess? If one > honors by wearing, the item and God/dess is thus honored. And if a > woman removes rudraksha as a gesture of honor & respect, does this not > suggest the same level of honor and respect? > Each must listen to and heed their Upaguru in such matters, I think. > And if one does not know what the Holy Scriptures state or recommend, > then ask for guidance from someone who is well-versed and informed. > > Hope this does not offend anyone, just interjecting my opinion here. > > Bom Bom! OM Shanti Shanti Shanti..... > Gina > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.