Are 3 beads enough ?

[Guest guest]

Namaste Chandan,

 

The wearing of 3 beads rudraksha is mentioned in holy texts, hence

its advisable to wear a minimum of 3 beads of a specific mukhi for

good effects. Yes, 3 is the minimum and extra beads can be added if

you wish.

 

Rudraksha from 3 beads upwards are as good as gemstones as rudraksha

do not have side effects and also last for 100's of years if

maintained properly. It is well-known that gems have side effects.

 

Regarding a benefic planet, if it is weak, then a gem for that planet

can be worn to strengthen it. Again preferably, rudraksha will prove

more useful because of the lack of side effects.

 

The number of beads, whether its 3 or many more, is a matter of

personal choice and it also depends on personal budget. There is no

right or wrong choice when it comes to selecting rudraksha. They are

Tears of Shiva and for saving mankind.

 

In most cases, we recommend a Personal Mala for the person instead of

beads of a specific mukhi. For a free recommendation, please visit:

 

/signup.php

 

Om Namah Shivaya

 

 

 

, " Chandan

Ssabarwal " <wavelogix wrote:

>

> Hello ,

>

> I was visiting the rudkraksha ratna website and in the description

of most

> of the rudraksha , it is advised to wear 3 beads of the specific

> mukhi.justwanted to know are 3 beads enough to see major efffects?

or

> one need to wear

> more beads of the same mukhi and 3 are just on the minimum

side .. ? also ,

> are 3 beads as effective as a high quality gemstone ? considering

gemstone

> is more dense than rudraksha ... !

>

> please help me clear these thoughts . what would be advisable for a

benefic

> planet ? to wear a high quality gemstone .? or rudraksha beads of

the

> specific planet . ? and if beads , then how many ? providied they

gave same

> power as the gemstone would ..!

>

> i wld opt for the rudraksha , as they would be definately cheaper

than the

> gemstones ..

>

>

> thanks and regards,

> Chandan.

>