Rudraksha

[Guest guest]

Namaste, 5 seeds cannot become one. It doesn't happen botanically

after the bead been plucked from tree. Understand your beads are in

good shape but that does not make them One Mukh automatically. Yes

you can break one bead and see if you wish. Reference in ancient

books are in twilight language. Some mention " number of mouths, faces

or seeds " . All these means the same thing: mukhi is equal to mumber

of seeds inside a bead.

 

If you know about any special or miraculous japa that can be done to

turn other mukhis into One Mukhi, we all here would like to know

about it, thanks. As far as we know, there in none.

 

Aum Namah Shivaya

 

 

, awakening

<hiddenmaster7 wrote:

>

> oh.but wouldn't it be interesting to find out wether this is a

possibility.do you think the 5 seeds have become one.? i don't want

to break one bead because of that.but i can surely tell you that the

beads are not in a bad shape.there is no wear and tear. they have

been maintained beautifully.only the mukhs are disappearing.do you

think i can break one bead and see?would there be any reference of

this in any ancient books?i really think there is something to this

one.how can we all go into depth of wether a 5 mukhi or any other

mukhi rudraksha can/cannot turn into 1 mukhi if certain japa done.?

>

>

> narasimhaye <no_reply > wrote: Namaste

Dhharram, during 12 years of wearing a 5 mukhi mala of japa

> mala sized beads, there may be wear and tear. Disintegration of

> grooves and mukhis also depends on the person's body chemistry.

> However, a mukhi is determined by the number of seeds it contains

> within the bead. Thus a 5 mukhi bead would have 5 seeds within the

> outer facade. The fact that it contains 5 seeds still makes the

beads

> of your description 5 mukhis.

>

> Aum Namah Shivaya

>

> , awakening

> <hiddenmaster7@> wrote:

> >

> > would anyone believe that after wearing a rudraksha beads mala

> of 5 mukhis for 12 years,it has turned into 1 mukhi.most of the

beads

> have no mukhs and they are in perfect shape.what does this mean?is

> there any one who can explain this.

> >

> > dhharram pratap

>