Guest guest Posted November 15, 2008 Report Share Posted November 15, 2008 Namaste if i could ask Amma a question it would be. . . " Amma how do i and your children not turn You and your message into another Fundamentalism?. . . last week i read an interesting entry in Dr. Clarissa Pinkola Estes blog that supplied me with information to ponder deeply and perhaps it dances on the edges of what i am trying to unpeel because of the discussions. . ..Please know it is not about sides. . .but rather more about my own questions and the tendency of the egoic to set legalistic standards for other people based on beliefs rather than right relationship. . ..Please hear i am not saying that anyone else is attempting to do this. .. .but when i hear the suggestion to censor these are the questions that come forth. . .i am attempting an ongoing unpeel so i will not become engaged in creating the soil that fundamentalism can spring up from. . . that is one of my biggest fears to turn Amma into belief that tries to regulate other people and how they express their Beingness as they journey on towards Amma. . .rather than Beingness of the true Self that we are attempting to realize. . .i still cry over an incident that happened in India a few years ago when the love and fervor for Amma perhaps turned briefly into an idolatry that lead to violence. . . maybe i am wrong but have wondered if anytime mean spiritedness and violence appears in religions is it not an indication of idolatry rather than breath from the living God/dess?. . . . I think Amma would say. . . love and serve. . . .love and serve. . . ..and love and serve. . . but for me there are often processes of peeling in order to reside within the message of Her life. . . . This is the entry and comment i shared with Dr. E. . . .not so much the issue of Prop 8 but the ongoing dueling of the opposites. . . Poli-Sci (Fi) Girl: On Gays and Marriage by Dr. Clarissa Pinkola Estes blog on a Catholic site. . .( She is using an Sci Fi story in order to make a comment about legalism. . .) " In our galaxy, there is a place known as Brool-Yi, sometimes spelled Broolyi, also called The Isle of Peace. There, they have automated priests and ministers made of wax, ala Madame Tussaud, who whir out of church portals built somewhat like cuckoo clocks. These reverend-puppets perform all sanctioned services for the masses, including sanctioned marriage. This came about in Broolyi, in part, because multiple interpretations and exegeses of church law and writings by various priests and ministers caused disagreement amongst the ranks of clergy and church hierarchies….so the Broolyians decided to do away with heroic human thought and feeling, and automate religion instead. Thus, in Broolyi, Isle of Peace, all the churches, temples and other places of Godness, are run by humanoid machines dressed in vestments… all manufactured at an authorized ‘automated religion factory.’ Meanwhile, on planet Earth, one wonders, are some who are concerned with these matters of clerical uniformity of thought, considering the same?… importing from the ‘automated religion factory,’ standardized wax clerics who will only follow the diagrams soldered into their copper and wire innards…. PoliSci(Fi) Girl cannot claim to understand all these matters, perhaps because she’s just passed the van Allen Belt, but perhaps more so, from lack of large enough mind to comprehend all the complex customs of earth beings… yet, just as one small mind whirling through the galaxy, I wonder as I wander… Wouldn’t such services, such as marriages by rote, not dehumanize all and any who marry under such automated rather than living, ever expanding philosophy? Wouldn’t it be more Imitatio Cristi, for instance, to base the blessing of marriage on the inclusions of the earthlings’ God of Love, rather than on the minds of mere men? Or lack of minds in automatons? Just asking. ___________ CODA 1. The Broolyians are written about by Sweven Godfrey in 1901 after one of the obviously clearest circumnavigations of odd outposts in our galaxy. His story was entitled Riallaro, The Archipelago of Exiles. 2. See too, this article today at TMV by Joe Windish: Urgent Call: Prop 8 in CA; Marriage Myths and Historical Facts <http://themoderatevoice.com/politics/california/23970/urgent-call-prop-\ 8-in-ca-marriage-myths-and-historical-facts/> 3. My views on Prop 8 in Calif, were shaped by being an activist on resisting Amendment 2 here in the Rockies, which passed and was declared finally, unconstitutional. Amendment 2 was also sponsored by a religious group. It attempted to exclude GLBT people from equal rights under the law. If you’d like to know more about how I was involved with helping to fight Amendment 2 in the 1990s, (along with thousands of other good souls) you can go here and read the story… “Not a witch hunt †" a treasure hunt: GLTB persons†<http://ncrcafe.org/node/1864> below is my comment to Dr. E. so agree with you on the prop 8. . .for me it is an attempt for a constitutional amendment that would protect the right to discriminate by fundamental christianity. . .with issues of separation of church and state and equal protection for the GLTB persons. . . But once again when i read your article. . . am left with a question that this psyche has attempted to peel for years. . . It seems for the GLTB person this issue has to do with tolerance, love, equality and equanimity. . . whereas when i listen to the Religious Right stance on this and many social isses. . . am taken back by the " WAR " language as to how they confront the many social issues. . . it is like for the Religious Right prop 8 and part of the War of Armageddon war with the attempt to censor and renouce that which they oppose. . . So many times i struggle to hear the issues because of the language that is used. . . Here is an example: Charles Colson from Charisma magazine. . . " ALL is at stake here. . . This is where if we LOSE, it would be VERY HARD to TURN THE SHIP right again. . . if we WIN, we might start rolling back the OTHER side. . . This is a MAJOR, MAJOR STRUGGLE, and we should SPARE NOTHING in DEFENDING marriage the way every civilization has, as the union of one man and one woman joined together in one flesh, as we believe in the SCRIPTURE in order to PROCREATE. . . " Why the War language DR. E.?. . . . I am once again left with the question. . . What is going on in the psyche of the Religious R ight that the language of war is utilized in the opposition of others that do not follow the dictates of their perceived interpretation of religious belief? These are two pieces my mind often brings up when this question is pondered ?. . . . The first comes from a mentor from Denver. . . .a Dr. C Kenner. . . near twenty years ago, heard him say, " The inability to withstand ambiguity leads to splitting. " . . . i have found that sentence to contain powerful healing in the deepest of places. . . .. . . .Dr. E. i can understand the need for SCI-FI in the attempt to supply frame . . . I have a base belief that if i can understand a person or situation then there is an opening for compassion. . . have wanted to honor, understand and feel compassion for the Religious Right .. . . The following story is where i find a soft spot where understanding can open to compassion. . . " Jackie was the youngest son of four boys. He was a raised on a Texas ranch and the only life he knew was Cowboy. . . .When Jackie was five years old his Mom decided it was time for Jackie to go to Sunday School for the first time. . . it was Easter Sunday. . . .Jackie was a big little kid. . .and he loved everything Hoss Cartwright. . . he dressed like Hoss with the big ten gallon hat, scarf, and cowboy boots. . . The only way little Jackie would go to Sunday School was if he got to wear his boots and hat. . . This is the account of the event as told by his Sunday School teacher, Melba. . . .little Jackie came in and she asked him if he wanted to take his hat off. . . Jackie decline and said, " No, i have to wear my hat. " . .. . .He sat down in the little pre-school chair and was really quite. . .. Melba began the lesson. . .She told the story of the crucifixion. . . ..how Jesus was beaten. . . how he had to carry the cross and people made fun of him. . .how his hands where nailed to the cross. . . then his feet. . .how a crown of thorns was placed on Jesus head. . . and how Jesus was given vinegar when he wanted a drink of water. . . at this place Melba looks at Jackie and notices the huge tears that are running down his cheeks. . . .Melba asked, " Jackie what is the matter with you? " . . . .Jackie then took off his hat and held it over his heart. . ..(the way Cowboys do at funerals to show respect and sorrow ) . . . then he wiped the tears from his face. . .then said, " Those God Damn Son of Bitches would not of done that if Roy Rogers would of been there. " Cousin Jackie grew up to be a big Texas lawman that continues to notch his gun handle each time he draws fire. . . .Little Jackie at five only knew there where " good guys " and " bad guys " and i have wondered if the Crucifixion narrative is too much for little psyches?. . . .Is the protection and defense of Religious Right, that cast good guys and bad guys a split from the inability to withstand the ambiguity of the message of the Cross?. . . What is it that causes so many to feel and then act in violence in order to " Protect " their God. . . When i heard the War language of the Religious Right i see little Jackie and then feel compassion. . . and then can listen from a different place. . ..Does any of this make sense Dr. E?. . . comment from Dr.E. . . . To my mind, you're making sense dear river, and I think your question is a worthy one. Re chronic war metaphors used by some Christians: I would suggest looking a bit more into some of the less savory history of Christianity, the Crusades in particular where a height of 'religious war' language was elevated as though it was given by Creator. I don't believe it was. And, I dont believe it is now. I'd look too at, say, Bernal Diaz' diary... a conquistador who wrote about the Conquest of Mexico in terms of glory of God, when in fact it was greed for land, slaves, money, fame, women, and fabulous riches to plunder and steal. In other words their God had an L in it: GOLD I think the language legacy handed down by those very long campaigns, and others, has barely been examined in our times... in part because there would be a ton of apologizing to do and shameful confessions over matters that were anything but Xrist-like... and 'the hand me down' language from those long ago times continues. Some of the early church 'fathers' also wrote of Satan as the Chieftain of the armies of demons and etc. I am not sure that given the state of constant incursions and conquests and slaughters between tribes of long ago, that people who wrote the histories /inspired words then had much other language, besides that of murder and mayhem, to express themselves. Perhaps paucity of language and a paucity of experience of meeting/ seeing G!d --which changes a person and leaves them for a time not knowing Anything, but to wander around half out of one's mind-- is why the language of war in our times sometimes continues to be tired and dull. lol. Viz: For instance, stories of Moses and his contacts with Yahweh gives us some idea of the disorganization of the ego and the re-seating of the soul after meeting the Ineffable. I liked the story you put here. The profound mystery of the passion and resurrection is perhaps, for many, only understood at whatever depth one usually thinks about life in general. Some seem to have understandings beyond not only the literal and rote, but in a range of visceral contact with the Divine...cheek to cheek experiences, such as Franscis of Assisi wrote about... ones that cannot report in common language; such a person has often to move to poetry or music because the experienced phenomena is representable in ego's language. Also, the archetype of destruction, being saved by magical means, facing the demon, the imperfection of the hero/ heroine, the helping creatures and communities that the protagonist meets along the way; the protagonist's own demons etc., the great and ever more inclusive heart of the hero/ heroine, the sorrow of the hero/ heroine about their own failings, being loved by a force greater despite all foibles... all these are probably the far richer leitmotifs that underlie the language of 'war only,' ...as though some have broken the archetype and only fondled and characterized 'war' as some small part of a far greater idea. There is a reason why many persons understand Lord of the Rings innately. It is not only a 'war' story. Not only about demons. But quest for consciousness, to know oneself and one's place in the mundane and divine worlds; a meeting of the mundane world in finding nourishment and shelter and like companions, but also seeking to master some of the mysteries. this is just my two cents worth. And I am glad you can see the parallels between how I am writing about politics and culture--- and science fiction and fantasy stories. I am ever wowed by human imagination; so so rich in ways that can bring so much good... " have wanted to honor, understand and feel compassion for the Religious Right " ... Good, and agreed. I join you in this river. I row toward this with 'all sides' as much as i can, for there are many sides, not just two. Many. I'd also add to your good intent, 'speak to, talk to with respect, learn about, bless what can be blessed, even if all cannot agree...' dr.e, who cannot spell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.