Guest guest Posted August 11, 2008 Report Share Posted August 11, 2008 Oh how wonderful innuendo is... Things on the net can live forever. Wouldn't it have been easier and wiser to just bow down and err on the side of Dharma, instead of defending oneself at the risk of harm to another? When you take things too seriously that you shouldn't (no open flames) and don't take things seriously that you should (hmmm), that's being *backwards*. Blame it on Mars' transiting. War is everywhere. Ammachi , " visvanathan " <kasi_visvanath wrote: > > > OM Amrtesvaryai Namah!! > > Namaskarams!! > > go ahead and remove it if you want...but i don't believe any real > damage was done except to " A's " ego....in my mind she appears to be > behaving (and has as VD also earlier (i know: same person, different > name) at least as contentious, fanatical and retaliatory as she has > been accusing the " ammabots " of being, if not > worse...not only that, but WHILE being an EX Amma devotee, she has > CONTINUED using her Amma given " spiritual " name in her work...if she > hates Amma so much why would she do this? if i were to leave, i would > abandon the name along with the rest of the baggage...so one wonders > what she is really up to....is she afraid to use her real name in her > work? (snipped) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.