Guest guest Posted June 7, 2008 Report Share Posted June 7, 2008 The various sources in history present a fascinating story of Asoka, the Mauryan king. Asoka was called by many names such as Devanam priya and priyadarsi. There are obviously many Asokas etc in history /message/64 In fact, Priyadarsi as a title to Asoka is a misnomer, as Asoka was known to be ugly and hence, disliked by his father. Quote " The Sanskrit Divy & #257;vad & #257;na elaborates the ugly appearance and fierce nature of A & #347;oka and presents a grotesque and gruesome episode of how he converted his royal pleasance into a place of terror, horror, oppression and tragic deaths of the unwary visitors and passers-by through his agent Candagirika. 17 It also attributes to A & #347;oka the beheading of 500 ministers with his own sword and the burning to death of 500 court ladies. The Chinese A & #347;ok & #257;vad & #257;na resorts to higher levels of poetical imagination in representing A & #347;oka as a most wicked character. " Unquote The name of his mother is mentioned as Janapada Kalyani, which was also the name of an unfortunate bride married to Nanda, the Sankya prince who Buddha has converted to a monk on the night of his marriage. In any case, it is apparent that Asoka's mother is a Brahmin, coming from the banks of River Champa, perhaps married to Bindusara on his campaigns to Anga, the country of Bihar lying on the other side of the river. Some sources mention her name as Dharma, a disciple of Ajivaka preceptor Jan & #257;sana (Jar & #257;sana, Jarasona, skt : :Pingalavatsa) Some people cling to his obviously false connection to a Greek mother, perhaps because of the romanticism that is offered by such a connection. His mother, fallen out of grace with the king due to palace intrigues , had named Asoka since the birth of the child has made her " sorrow less " His brother was named Vitasoka since the queen felt that the birth of the second male child has ultimately put an end to her sorrows. Asoka was a man of great tact. There was a great revolt against the oppression by the officers in the province of Taxila, who were a republic before being brought under the rule of the empire of Bimbisara. Asoka was sent there as Viceroy to quell the same, which he did to a great aplomb, without using much force or inviting resentment from the people of Taxila. In fact, he might have been fondly remembered into the later days as priyadarsi(?) by these people, connected to Iranians, as evinced by an Aramaic edict found in Taxila. He was later sent to Ujjain as the regent there by his father. The ceylone sources mention a 4 year interregnum between the demise of his father and his ascension to the throne. This must be true since Asoka had no less than 7 brothers contending for the throne, each one of them being strong in his own right. The same tact which was exhibited at Taxila was displayed by him in his later years of rule, though not so openly . Romila Thapar once said he is a ruler of great ambition. I feel he used the concept of dharma, not for religious reasons but to discipline people into his fold – In other words, he has used religion as a political tool. This is apparent since most of his edicts are found in gold bearing areas This has influenced the common man so much that the guilds of artisans, mostly consisting of common people, have heavily donated to Sangha (Amaravati and Ajanta epigraphy) For example, how he uses carrot and stick method can be seen in one of the famous edicts: " Now the Beloved of the Gods thinks that, even if a person should wrong him, the offense would be forgiven if it was possible to forgive it. And the forest-folk who live in the dominions of the Beloved of the Gods, even them he entreats and exhorts in regard to their duty. It is hereby explained to them that, in spite of his repentance, the Beloved of the Gods possesses power enough 39 to punish them for their crimes, so that they should turn away from evil ways and would not be killed for their crimes. " That he did not place the edict of his repentance due to the kalinga war, which has been placed in many places anywhere in or around Kalinga country raises many doubts about the sincerity of his repentance. Why did he not want the people of Kalinga know about his repentance? He prohibited animal sacrifices and eating of meat even at his palace. But by his own admission, the cooking of meat has continued daily at a low level, obviously for the consumption of the king, whereas he prevented most of the palace dwellers from partaking meat. Also, he talked of respecting Brahmins and Sramanakas (monks, not necessarily Buddhist) and he dedicated two caves to Ajivakas, perhaps in the tradition of his mother., in the 12th year of his coronation, much later to Kalinga war. In view of this, it is often doubted the stories of his conversion are ever true. /message/117 He does not mention the names of Nyagrodha and Mogaliputta Tissa in his edicts, who the Buddhist sources have eulogized as the main preceptors for Asoka. On the other hand, these sources do not discuss Kalinga war at all. The Buddhist sources say that Asoka got converted to Buddhism in 4th year of his coronation, whereas as per his own confession, Asoka started following as a lay upasaka (which does not mean conversion) only after Kalinga war. Further, his edicts also do not speak of his foreign missions, for which Tissa was more responsible. Perhaps, What is spoken by Buddhist sources may not be about Mauryan Asoka but about somebody else, one immediate name that comes to my mind is Asoka of Kashmir, who was mentioned in Raja Tarangini. I invite comments from the group, Kishore patnaik Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.