Guest guest Posted January 27, 2009 Report Share Posted January 27, 2009 " Whether or not one wishes to agree with Robert Drews about the coming of the Greeks (Drews 1988), he nonetheless points to a series of interrelated historical changes in the Near East during the eighteenth to sixteenth centuries BC. They were linked among other things to the spread and adoption of the `chariot package, " which demanded both skilled specialist and the importation and training of horses from the steppe. This coincided with disruptions and social changes including conquest migrations over large areas: The Kassites in Mesopotamia, the Aryans in India, the Hyskos ion Egypt and new chiefly dynasty in Mycenae (the B-circle), just as Indo-European speaking people were emerging in Mittani texts and other sources from the Levant and Palestine. In all cases we are dealing with rather small groups lined to the ruling elite, being warriors and specialists, sometimes rulers. The new rulers are in most cases a dominant minority constituting only a tiny fragment of the population. This was especially true of the Aryan rulers in Mittani and the Aryan and Hurrian princes in the Levant; it seems also true of the Kassites in Babylon and the Hyskos in Egypt. The Aryan speakers who took over Northwest India may have gone there enmasse but were nonetheless a minority in their newly acquired domain (Drews 1988:63), (Kristiansen and Larsson 2005, pp. 180-181). " " As the textual evidence of the Near East and Egypt describes conquest migrations and the influx of specialist, warriors and rulers of Aryan origin, it may seem justified to reassess some earlier interpretations of the shaft grave kings (Kristiansen and Larsson 2005, p. 185). " Kristiansen, K. and Larsson, T. (2005). The rise of bronze age society: travels transmissions and transformations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. ISBN-13: 978 0 521 60466 6 (pbk) One wonders what is meant by " conquest migrations?! " The Mittani " Indo-Aryan " chariotering aristocracy does not exist (Dassow 2008). The three wheeled carts of Sintashta/Arkiam do not qualify as " chariots " (Kohl 2007). " Indo-European " speakers cannot be linked to the domestication of the horse (Levine 1999, 2003; Shislina 2003). A proto word for wheel cannot be constructed in all " Indo European " languages (Bellwood 2005). M. Kelkar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Here is the complete quote from Bellwood (2005) in case one wonders how an archaeologist could comment on linguistic issues. " " For instance, Jim Mallory (1997), one of the staunchest supporters of a Pontic Homeland, is clearly no longer convinced that domesticated horses and wheeled vehicles MUST be reconstructed to PIE (although wild horses could be another matter). Neither are linguists James Clarkson (2000), Robert Coleman (1988: 450), Calvert Watkins (1985), and historian Igor Diakonov (1985). The reconstructed PIE vocabulary was not exclusively pastoralist, and neither is the archaeological record entirely pastoralist from the relevant period on the steppes (Mallory 1997; Anthony and Brown 2000). Recent research on horse domestication archaeologist Marsha Levine (et. al 1999) suggests much later dates for horse riding, only late second millennium BC and thus irrelevant for PIE dispersal. Many linguists are now willing to entertain suggestions that PIE could be older than 5000 years (see below), and the idea that the Anatolian languages were not native to Anatolia (and thus not relevant for IE homeland questions) has no strong factual basis. But the fundamental nail in the coffin of the Pontic steppes hypothesis was hammered by Colin Renfrew (1987), when he asked how a KURGAN- based expansion of late Neolithic and Bronze Age conquering pastoralists across most of Europe could have left absolutely no corresponding continent-wide horizon in the archaeological record (Bellwood 2005, p. 204, emphasis in the original). " Bellwood, Peter (2005), " First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies, " Malden, MA, Oxford England: Blackwell Publishing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.