Guest guest Posted January 25, 2009 Report Share Posted January 25, 2009 Site older than Mohenjodaro found in Pak 1/23/2009 1:25:20 PM (Times Now) An archaeological site dating back about 5,500 years and believed to be older than Mohenjodaro has been found in Pakistan's southern Sindh province. A team of 22 archaeologists found some semi-precious and precious stones and utensils made of clay, copper and other metals during an excavation at the site in Lakhian Jo Daro in Sukkur district yesterday. " At present, we can say that it (the site) is older than Mohenjodaro, " Ghulam Mustafa Shar, the director of the Lakhian Jo Daro project, told Dawn newspaper. The find is said to be of the Kot Diji era, experts said. Shar said the remains of a " faience " or tin-glazed pottery factory had been found at the site. It is believed to be of the era of mirror factories in Italy that date back to some 9,000 years. A painting has also been found at the site and the discovery of more such items could establish the site as 9,000 years old, like the remains found at Mehargarh in Balochistan and Jericho in Palestine, Shar said. Archaeology professors and students from Punjab University, Peshawar University and Islamabad will soon join the team from Shah Abdul Latif University that is currently excavating the site in Lakhian Jo Daro. Work on the second block of the site will continue for a month and more items could be found, Shar said. Local officials have asked Shar to prepare proposals for setting up a museum at the site. (Agencies) http://www.timesnow.tv/Newsdtls.aspx?NewsID=27411 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 15, 2009 Report Share Posted February 15, 2009 IndiaArchaeology , " S. Kalyanaraman " <kalyan97 wrote: Lakhian jo daro and Bhirrana Here is a report on a new site: Lakhian Jo Daro. An older site is Bhirrana on Sarasvati River basin. The late Dr. LS Rao's contribution on Bhirrana made at the Sarasvati Conference (Oct. 2008 at the India Intl. Centre, New Delhi) can be seen at http://www.scribd.com/doc/7577484/lsraobhirrana (ppt slides) http://www.scribd.com/doc/7544034/Bhirrana-Excavation (paper) The excavation of the site at Bhirrana is a landmark in archaeological history of India. For the first time, the possibility of identifying Vedic people of circa 7thmillennium is close at hand, thanks to the splendid work done by the late Dr. LS Rao and his associates of ASI. kalyanaraman January 23 Ancient Lakhian Jo Daro city discovered in Sukkur----The 7000 year old Pakistani Civilization The Pakistani civilization is as old as time itself. 150,000 years ago Pakistanis roamed the Soan river around the Potohar region. 7000 years ago the Mehargarh Pakistanis worked on the first agricultural site in South Asia (religious dogma notwithstanding). 5000 years ago Pakistanis of the Sukkur ditrict were building brick cities unequaled in the world. 3500 years ago the Moenjodaro and Harrapa Pakistanis were trading with Sumer, and Ur with the Mesopotamians, and with the Egyptian pharos. The Indus Valley and its precedents of course existed only on along the banks of the Indus. The Pakistanis of that time were not vegetarian, buried their dead, ate beef, lived in unstratified housing (no caste system), used a pictographic language in vogue during that era in Phoenicia etc., ate beef, wrote right to left, and did not worship the current Bharati pantheon of Gods. *SUKKUR, Jan 22: An archaeological site, about 5,500 years old, has been found in Lakhian Jo Daro near Goth Nihal Khoso in the district of Sukkur.** The find is said to be of the era of Kot Diji.* *A team of 22 archaeologists headed by the chairman of Shah Abdul Latif University's archaeology department and Lakhian Jo Daro project director Ghulam Mustafa Shar found some semi-precious and precious stones and utensils made of clay, copper and other metals during excavation on Thursday. The remains are said to be older than those of Moenjodaro.* *Mr Shar told Dawn that remains of a 'faience' mirror factory had been found at the project's second block. It was believed to be of the era of mirror factories of Italy which dates back to some 9,000 years.* *He said a painting had also been found and discovery of more such items could establish the site as 9,000 years old, like the remains found at Mehar Garh in Balochistan and Jericho in Palestine.* * " At present, we can say that it is older than Moenjodaro, " he said. Mr Shar said that archaeology professors and students from Punjab University, Peshawar University and Islamabad would join the team in a couple of days.* *He said the work on the second block would continue for a month and more items could be found. Sukkur District Nazim Syed Nasir Hussain visited the site on Thursday and asked the project director to prepare proposals for a museum. Dawn. Site older than Moenjodaro found in Sukkur By Waseem Shamsi* *The land East of the Indus was jungle roamed by lions and tigers and monkeys*. Around 1500 BC part of the Pakistani civilization's Indus Valley sections moved Eastwards to conquest territory in Western Gujarat. They built some minor settlements but abandoned it soon after. The Ganges Plains were inhabited later, centuries later when the incoming Aryan hordes destroyed the IVC and moved Eastward. The news about new cities being discovered in the Punjab will help us further define the breadth and depth of the Pakistani civilization http://moinansari.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!13E83389ABB46AB9!1904.entry?wa=wsigni\ n1.0 & sa=663647294<http://moinansari.spaces.live.com/blog/cns%2113E83389ABB46AB9%\ 211904.entry?wa=wsignin1.0 & sa=663647294> Site older than Moenjodaro found in Pakistan Islamabad | January 23, 2009 12:09:27 PM IST An archaeological site, about 5500 years old,, has been found in a district in Pakistan, which has been claimed by experts as being older than the ruins of Moenjodaro. According to a report in Dawn, the site was found in Lakhian Jo Daro near Goth Nihal Khoso in the district of Sukkur. The find is said to be of the era of Kot Diji. A team of 22 archaeologists, headed by the chairman of Shah Abdul Latif University's archaeology department and Lakhian Jo Daro project director Ghulam Mustafa Shar, found some semi-precious and precious stones and utensils made of clay, copper and other metals<http://news.webindia123.com/news/Articles/Asia/20090123/1159409.html>duri\ ng the excavation. The remains are said to be older than those of Moenjodaro. The remains of a 'faience' mirror factory had been found at the project's second block. It was believed to be of the era of mirror factories of Italy which dates back to some 9,000 years, according to Shar.He said that a painting had also been found and discovery of more such items could establish the site as 9,000 years old, like the remains found at Mehar Garh in Balochistan and Jericho in Palestine. " At present, we can say that it is older than Moenjodaro, " he said. Shar said that archaeology professors and students from Punjab University, Peshawar University and Islamabad would join the team in a couple of days. He said the work on the second block would continue for a month and more items could be found. (ANI) http://news.webindia123.com/news/Articles/Asia/20090123/1159409.html The Excavation Branch-I, Nagpur of the Archaeological Survey of India<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeological_Survey_of_India>excavated this site for three field seasons during 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06. The excavation has revealed the remains of the Harappan culture right from its nascent stage, i.e. Hakra Wares Culture (antedating the Known Early Harappan Culture in the subcontinent, also known as Kalibangan<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalibangan>-I.) to a full-fledged Mature Harappan city. *Puratattva*, the Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of India No. 34, 35 and 36; Man and Environment http://asi.nic.in/asi_exca_2007_bhirrana_images.asp *The ageless tale a potsherd from Bhirrana tells * T.S. Subramanian †" Photo: ASI http://www.thehindu.com/2007/09/12/images/2007091255372201.jpg*sequence:**The " Dancing Girl " * CHENNAI: In a rare discovery, the Archaeological Survey of India has found at Bhirrana, a Harappan site in Fatehabad district in Haryana, a red potsherd with an engraving that resembles the 'Dancing Girl,' the iconic bronze figurine of Mohenjodaro. While the bronze was discovered in the early 1920s, the potsherd with the engraving was discovered during excavations by the ASI in 2004-05. A few hundred kilometres separate Mohenjodaro, now in Pakistan, and Bhirrana. The potsherd, discovered by a team led by L.S. Rao, Superintending Archaeologist, Excavation Branch, ASI, Nagpur, belonged to the Mature Harappan period. Mr. Rao called it the " only one of its kind " because " no parallel to the Dancing Girl, in bronze or any other medium, was known " until the latest find. In an article in the latest issue of *Man and Environment *(Volume XXXII, No.1, 2007), published by the Indian Society for Prehistoric and Quaternary Studies, Pune, Mr. Rao says, " ... the delineation [of the lines in the potsher d] is so true to the stance, including the disposition of the hands, of the bronze that it appears that the craftsman of Bhirrana had first-hand knowledge of the former. " In his article, Mr. Rao has said the bronze was justly known for its stance and workmanship. " With its tilted head, flexed legs, right hand resting on the hip and the left suspended by its side, the bronze sculpture, although nude, enjoys a modest ornamentation with a necklace, wristlets and armlets. A statuette of 11 cm in height, it occupies a unique position in the sculptural art of the Mature Harappan period. " http://www.thehindu.com/2007/09/12/images/2007091255372202.jpg *The potsherd with the engraving. * Mr. Rao called the engraving on the potsherd " a highly stylised figure whose torso resembles that of an hour-glass or two triangles meeting at their apex. " Upon the horizontal shoulder line, a partly damaged round head was visible. In consonance with the bronze, " here too, the right hand is akimbo, and the left is suspended by its side. Slight oblique strokes on the right upper arm are suggestive of the presence of armlets. The lower portion of the body is missing owing to damage on the sherd. The clothing is indicated by horizontal hatchings on the chest and abdomen, and vertical hatchings on the thighs. " Mr. Rao called Bhirrana an " exemplary " and " paradigmatic " site that stood out on two more grounds. For the first time in the post-Independence period, artefacts called Hakra ware, belonging to the pre-early Harappan period, were found as independent, stratified deposits at Bhirrana. This and other discoveries established the presence of an unbroken cultural sequence at Bhirrana: from the Hakra ware culture and its evolution into early Harappan, early Mature Harappan and Mature Harappan until the site was abandoned. The discoveries of these periods include underground dwelling pits; house-complexes on streets; a fortification wall; bichrome pottery; terracotta cups; arrowheads, fish-hooks and bangles, all in copper; incised copper celts; terracotta toy-carts and animal figurines; and beads of semi-precious stones. Seals made of steatite of the Mature Harappan period were found. They have animal figures such as a unicorn, a deer with wavy antlers, a bull with outsized horns, and an animal with three heads †" of a deer, a unicorn and a bull. The seals also have typical Harappan legends on them. All these were found during excavations in 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06. Mr. Rao and colleagues have written on their work in *Puratattva *(Nos. 34, 35 and 36), a bulletin of the Indian Archaeological Society. http://www.hindu.com/2007/09/12/stories/2007091255372200.htm *ARCHAEOLOGY* *Harappan link * T.S. SUBRAMANIAN *Discoveries made at Bhirrana in Haryana provide the missing link in the evolution of Harappan civilisation archaeology. * ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA http://www.flonnet.com/fl2502/images/20080201504012901.jpg *The red potsherd with the engraving resembling the Dancing Girl bronze figurine of Mohenjodaro, found at Bhirrana. * THE Archaeological Survey of India's discoveries at the Harappan sites of Bhirrana and Rakhigarhi, both in Haryana, in the past one decade testify to the importance of these sites in the evolution of the Harappan civilisation. While excavations were carried out in three consecutive seasons †" 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06 †" at Bhirrana in Fatehabad district, excavations at Rakhigarhi in Hissar district lasted from 1997 to 2000. Both sites are on the banks of the Saraswati river, now dried up. In a rare discovery during the excavations of 2004-05 at Bhirrana, the ASI found a thick red potsherd with an engraving that resembles the Dancing Girl, the famous bronze figurine found at Mohenjodaro in the early 1920s. Bhirrana is a few hundred kilometres from Mohenjodaro, which is now in Pakistan. The potsherd with the engraving was discovered by a team led by L.S. Rao, Superintending Archaeologist, Excavation Branch, ASI, Nagpur. It belongs to the mature Harappan period. L.S. Rao called the discovery " the only one of its kind " because " no parallel to the Dancing Girl, either in bronze or in any other medium, was known " until the potsherd was found. Bhirrana is an " exemplary site " because, for the first time in post-Independence India, Hakra ware belonging to the pre-early Harappan period were found as independent, stratified deposits. L.S. Rao also called it a " paradigmatic site " because " to put it in a nutshell, the importance of the excavation at Bhirrana lies in the fact that we have strong evidence for the first time of an unbroken cultural sequence, starting from the village culture represented by Hakra ware and its evolution gradually into semi-urban and urban cultures till the site was finally abandoned. " Excavations at Bhirrana conclusively show that during the period of Hakra ware culture, people lived in circular pits cut into the soil. There were auxiliary pits for cooking and for industrial activities (such as melting copper) and for religious purposes, including animal sacrifices. " In the present state of knowledge, " L.S. Rao said, " the Hakra ware culture belongs to the fourth millennium B.C., or 6,000 years before the present. " In the early Harappan period, people came out of the pits and built houses made of sun-baked bricks. The whole settlement was within a fortification wall. In the mature Harappan period, the entire settlement was once again reorganised and the city layout reoriented with major and minor lanes, by-lanes and streets, which had house complexes. The streets always cut one another at right angles. The discoveries at Bhirrana include underground dwelling pits; house complexes on streets and lanes; a fortification wall; bichrome pottery; terracotta vases, bowls and cups; arrowheads, fish-hooks and bangles, all made of copper; terracotta toy-carts and animal figurines; and beads made of semi-precious stones such as faience, lapis lazuli, agate and carnelian. One of the arrowheads, of the mature Harappan period, still retains a fibre impression of the wooden haft. Several mature Harappan period seals made of steatite were also found in Bhirrana. The animals represented on the obverse of these seals include unicorns, deer with wavy antlers and a bull with outsized horns. The seals have typical Harappan legends. The reverse side of the seals has a knob with perforations. D.R. Sahni discovered Harappa (which is also in Pakistan now) in Punjab in 1921 and R.D. Banerji discovered Mohenjodaro in Sind a few months later in the same year. Both were archaeologists of the ASI. The existence of these sites was known to scholars for about 85 years before their actual discovery. What came to light after the discoveries was that a highly developed civilisation (the Harappan civilisation, or the Indus civilisation) had flourished on the banks of the rivers Indus and Saraswati, around 3000 B.C. It was Banerji who discovered the " Dancing Girl " . The Harappan culture was a highly developed, urbanised culture. People lived in houses that had several rooms, bathrooms and underground drainage. The discovery of Harappa and Mohenjodaro, and the many other sites that were excavated later, revealed the grandeur of this civilisation, and scholars made consistent attempts to find out what had preceded it. This curiosity drove archaeologists to locate more and more Harappan sites. BENOY K. BEHL/COLLECTION: NATIONAL MUSEUM, NEW DELHI http://www.flonnet.com/fl2502/images/20080201504012902.jpg *The Dancing Girl, the iconic bronze figurine of Mohenjodaro. * Since the 1920s, about 300 Harappan sites have been excavated in Pakistan and India. The sites excavated in India include Bhirrana, Kunal, Rakhigarhi, Banawali, Bedhawa and Farmana in Haryana, Sanauli in Uttar Pradesh, Dholavira and Lothal in Gujarat, Kalibangan and Baror in Rajasthan, and Daimabad in Maharashtra. At its height, the Harappan civilisation flourished over an area of 2.5 million sq km, from Sutkagendor in the Makran coast of Balochistan to Alamgirhpur in the east in Uttar Pradesh and from Manda in Jammu to Daimabad in Ahmednagar district in Maharashtra. Between 1972 and 1974, M.R. Mughal, former Director-General of Archaeology and Museums, Pakistan, explored Bahawalpur in the Cholistan region of Punjab, situated just across the international border from adjoining Rajasthan. Mughal found a lot of pottery on the surface there. The ware was named after the Hakra river, which flows there. Ultimately, Hakra ware was found stratigraphically during the excavations at Jalilpur, on the banks of the Ravi river near Harappa. It was found lying beneath early Harappan deposits. This was the story on the Pakistani side. On the Indian side, although many excavations were carried out at Kalibangan, Banawali, Rakhigarhi and Kunal, they did not yield any independent horizon of Hakra ware culture in their earliest levels. So there was a missing link in the Harappan civilisation archaeology between Pakistan and India. " For the first time now, " L.S. Rao said, " in post-Independence India, stratigraphically positioned Hakra ware culture deposits have been exposed at Bhirrana. They show a typical early village settlement, wherein dwelling pits were cut into the natural soil. " These pits had a superstructure. Interestingly, no post-holes were found on the floor of the pits. (Posts would have supported the roof of these dwelling pits). ASI http://www.flonnet.com/fl2502/images/20080201504012903.jpg *The site of the Harappan excavation at Bhirrana. * In their article entitled, " Unearthing Harappan Settlement at Bhirrana (2003-04) " , published in *Puratattva* (number 34, 2003-2004), L.S. Rao and his colleagues, Nandini B. Sahu, Prabash Sahu, U.A. Shastry and Samir Diwan, say the pits are mostly circular in shape with occasional brick lining. " The bricks used are of irregular shape and as such do not conform to the known ratio of early Harappan brick sizes. The inside walls of the pits were mud-plastered. The average diameter of the pit was 2.30 metres…. This unique tradition of pit dwelling, especially in the early Harappan context of Haryana region, was in practice " at Mitathal, Hissar district, and Kunal, Fatehabad. " The distinguishing ceramic of the period is the bichrome ware where the outlines of the motifs are painted in black and the space within is painted in evanescent white, " the authors say. In the transitional period, there was a phenomenal change in the settlement pattern. " The entire site was occupied and the town appears to have been fortified. People started living over ground in houses, built of mud bricks of pink and buff colour, of size 30 × 20 × 10 cm, 33 × 22 × 11 cm or 36 × 24 × 12 cm, conforming to the ratio of 3:2:1…. Besides, a few rectangular mud brick platforms with circular fire pits and hearths were exposed, " the writers say. The Bhirrana excavation in 2003-04 also yielded two inscribed copper celts, each bearing typical Harappan alphabets of the mature Harappan period. ASI http://www.flonnet.com/fl2502/images/20080201504012904.jpg *TERRACOTTA HORNS among the exciting finds. * Copper smithy, which began with the Hakra ware culture, advanced in technology over a period of time, and bigger objects such as shells, bangles, fish-hooks and arrowheads made of copper were found. There was a flourishing bead industry, and beads were manufactured out of semi-precious stones such as lapis lazuli, carnelian, agate, faience and steatite. It was during the second season of excavation, in 2004-05, that the sturdy red ware with the incised figure of the Dancing Girl was found. In an article in *Man and Environment* (Volume XXXII, No.1, 2007), the journal of the Indian Society for Prehistoric and Quaternary Studies, Pune, L.S. Rao says, " …the delineation of the lines in the potsherd is so true to stance, including the disposition of the hands, of the bronze that it appears that the craftsman of Bhirrana had first-hand knowledge of the former. " The bronze, 11 centimetres in height, occupied a unique position in the sculptural art of the mature Harappan period. " With its tilted head, flexed legs, right hand resting on the hip, and the left [hand] suspended by its side, the bronze sculpture, although nude, enjoys a modest ornamentation with a necklace, wristlets and armlets. " The engraving on the potsherd was a highly stylised figure whose torso resembled that of an hourglass, or two triangles meeting at their apex. In consonance with the bronze, on the potsherd, " the right hand is akimbo, and the left is suspended by its side. Slight oblique strokes on the right upper arm are suggestive of the presence of armlets…. " During the Harappan civilisation, seals were made as a mark of trade and commerce. Those made during the early Harappan period were button seals, but later, they were made out of steatite. An important seal, made out of black steatite, has an engraving of an animal with three heads †" those of a bull, a unicorn and a deer. A horned deity standing nearby holds the deer's neck with his right hand, and his left hand is raised. There is a manger in front of the animal. Interestingly, this seal does not have any Harappan legend. ASI http://www.flonnet.com/fl2502/images/20080201504012905.jpg *SEALS, FOUND AT Bhirrana, with animals such as a deer, a three-headed animal, a unicorn, and a bull. These seals have typical Harappan legends. * Other exciting finds at Bhirrana include terracotta horns and terracotta wheels with painted spokes. Largest site The Rakhigarhi site, discovered in 1963, is the largest Harappan site found in India. For three seasons, from 1997 to 2000, Amarendra Nath, who recently retired as Director of the ASI, headed the excavations there, with important contributions coming from Alok Tripathy and Arun Malik. Since 1963, several archaeologists have visited the site and carried out exploratory work. " The site has acquired importance, " said Amarendra Nath, " because we have been able to extensively identify the purpose behind early Harappan structures and trace the beginning of the emergence of town planning in early Harappan levels, wherein the structures were well laid-out with evidence of a public drainage system. " The use of burnt bricks could also be traced to the early Harappan level at this site. ASI http://www.flonnet.com/fl2502/images/20080201504012906.jpg *PAINTED TERRACOTTA TOY wheels were also discovered at the site. * Other sites have yielded potsherds with graffiti marks. But Rakhigarhi is important because " here we have graffiti arranged in a sequence, which suggests the beginning of writing in the early Harappan level " , Amarendra Nath said. ASI http://www.flonnet.com/fl2502/images/20080201504012907.jpg *THE EXCAVATION OF 2003-04 yielded inscribed copper celts. * The finding of a needle suggested that some kind of a stitched clothing was used. As if to confirm this, a potsherd with a painting was found: Amarendra Nath said, " This is a rare painting in the Harappan context, wherein you get evidence of a person wearing a dhoti and a stitched upper garment. " ASI http://www.flonnet.com/fl2502/images/20080201504012908.jpg *THE ARTEFACTS UNEARTHED include pottery and potsherds, an ivory comb, bone points and chert blades. * A number of sealings and seals were found. (A seal is an original stone object, which is carved in depth. A sealing is an impression of a seal.) One of them is a cylindrical seal, which indicates contact with contemporary urban centres in Iraq. This seal has an engraving of a crocodile on the one side and Harappan characters on the other. Such types of seals have been found in Iraq. The significance of the Rakhigarhi site also lies in its having 11 burials, with the skeletons aligned north to south. The skeletons were laid in pits with grave goods, copper bangles and shell bangles. Arun Malik found an intact skeleton in a pit. The burial site is located north of the habitational site. http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2502/stories/20080201504012900.htm http://www.scribd.com/doc/6973419/*Bhirrana*-Excavation<http://www.scribd.com/do\ c/6973419/Bhirrana-Excavation> *The ageless tale of a Bhirrana potsherd; dance as a hieroglyph * http://asi.nic.in/asi_exca_2007_bhirrana.asp Excavation site: Bhirrana http://asi.nic.in/asi_exca_2007_bhirrana_images.asp Images of site and artefacts discovered Why is a 'dancing girl' glyph shown on a potsherd discovered at Bhirrana? Dancers are depicted as hieroglyphs on a tablet m0493 as shown below. m0493Bt Pict-93: Three dancing figures in a row. Text 2843 Glyph: Three dancers. Kolmo 'three'; meD 'to dance' Rebus: kolami 'furnace, smithy'; meD 'iron' http://www.orientalthane.com/archaeology/s1.jpg Sign 44 (this glyph could be compared with the orthography of three dancers in a row; the glyph is a ligature showing a 'dance step' and a rimless pot). Glyphs: meD 'dance' (Remo); rebus: meD 'iron'; bat.a 'pot'; bat.hi 'furnace'. So, why a dancing girl? Because, depiction of a dance pose is a hieroglyph to represent what was contained in the pot. The glyph encodes the mleccha word for 'iron': med. Glyph: meD 'to dance' (F.)[reduplicated from me-]; me id. (M.) in Remo (Munda)(Source: D. Stampe's Munda etyma)me??u to tread, trample, crush under foot, tread or place the foot upon (Te.); me??u step (Ga.); mettunga steps (Ga.). ma?ye to trample, tread (Malt.)(DEDR 5057) Rebus: meD 'iron' (Mundari. Remo.) Bhirrana find; the potsherd with the engraving. †" Photo: ASI sequence: The " Dancing Girl " statuette made of bronze. The ageless tale a potsherd from Bhirrana tells T.S. Subramanian (The Hindu, 12 Sept. 2007) CHENNAI: In a rare discovery, the Archaeological Survey of India has found at Bhirrana, a Harappan site in Fatehabad district in Haryana, a red potsherd with an engraving that resembles the 'Dancing Girl,' the iconic bronze figurine of Mohenjodaro. While the bronze was discovered in the early 1920s, the potsherd with the engraving was discovered during excavations by the ASI in 2004-05. A few hundred kilometres separate Mohenjodaro, now in Pakistan, and Bhirrana. The potsherd, discovered by a team led by L.S. Rao, Superintending Archaeologist, Excavation Branch, ASI, Nagpur, belonged to the Mature Harappan period. Mr. Rao called it the " only one of its kind " because " no parallel to the Dancing Girl, in bronze or any other medium, was known " until the latest find. In an article in the latest issue of Man and Environment (Volume XXXII, No.1, 2007), published by the Indian Society for Prehistoric and Quaternary Studies, Pune, Mr. Rao says, " ... the delineation [of the lines in the potsher d] is so true to the stance, including the disposition of the hands, of the bronze that it appears that the craftsman of Bhirrana had first-hand knowledge of the former. " In his article, Mr. Rao has said the bronze was justly known for its stance and workmanship. " With its tilted head, flexed legs, right hand resting on the hip and the left suspended by its side, the bronze sculpture, although nude, enjoys a modest ornamentation with a necklace, wristlets and armlets. A statuette of 11 cm in height, it occupies a unique position in the sculptural art of the Mature Harappan period. " Mr. Rao called the engraving on the potsherd " a highly stylised figure whose torso resembles that of an hour-glass or two triangles meeting at their apex. " Upon the horizontal shoulder line, a partly damaged round head was visible. In consonance with the bronze, " here too, the right hand is akimbo, and the left is suspended by its side. Slight oblique strokes on the right upper arm are suggestive of the presence of armlets. The lower portion of the body is missing owing to damage on the sherd. The clothing is indicated by horizontal hatchings on the chest and abdomen, and vertical hatchings on the thighs. " Mr. Rao called Bhirrana an " exemplary " and " paradigmatic " site that stood out on two more grounds. For the first time in the post-Independence period, artefacts called Hakra ware, belonging to the pre-early Harappan period, were found as independent, stratified deposits at Bhirrana. This and other discoveries established the presence of an unbroken cultural sequence at Bhirrana: from the Hakra ware culture and its evolution into early Harappan, early Mature Harappan and Mature Harappan until the site was abandoned. The discoveries of these periods include underground dwelling pits; house-complexes on streets; a fortification wall; bichrome pottery; terracotta cups; arrowheads, fish-hooks and bangles, all in copper; incised copper celts; terracotta toy-carts and animal figurines; and beads of semi-precious stones. Seals made of steatite of the Mature Harappan period were found. They have animal figures such as a unicorn, a deer with wavy antlers, a bull with outsized horns, and an animal with three heads †" of a deer, a unicorn and a bull. The seals also have typical Harappan legends on them. All these were found during excavations in 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06. Mr. Rao and colleagues have written on their work in Puratattva (Nos. 34, 35 and 36), a bulletin of the Indian Archaeological Society. http://www.orientalthane.com/archaeology/news_2008_03_11_1.htm --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 15, 2009 Report Share Posted February 15, 2009 IndiaArchaeology , " Carlos Aramayo " <cararam50 wrote: IndiaArchaeology , " Francesco Brighenti " <frabrig@> wrote: > > > Nowhere in Dr. Rao's paper are archaeological remains at Bhirrana > dating from the seventh millennium BCE mentioned (and there is, of > course, no mention at all of " Vedic people " in the paper -- that's > entirely a fantasy of your own!). > > Rao reports that the earliest archaeological layers he found at > Bhirrana should be identified with the pre-Early Harappan Hakra Ware > Cultures, whose beginnings are dated to the first half of the fourth > millennium BCE by archaeologist Rafique Mughal. > As ever, Francesco obviously did not read L S Rao 2005 paper or B B Lal's article from the same year and subsequent papers. Of course, it is not JUST a fantasy of Dr K. B B Lal commented on possible Vedic people also. Bhirrana's early datings were also mentioned in Sarasvati Conference, Delhi, October 2008, and are shown in a table in a ppt in an article related to this meeting. On the other hand, Francesco still uses his offensive words against ANOTHER member of the present group without academic support. Hey! Moderator! Are you there??? Best regards, Carlos --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 15, 2009 Report Share Posted February 15, 2009 How can you call them Pakistanis when Pakistan itself was not there during those times of civilization. On 2/15/09, Kishore patnaik <kishorepatnaik09 wrote: IndiaArchaeology , " Carlos Aramayo " <cararam50 wrote: IndiaArchaeology , " Francesco Brighenti " <frabrig@> wrote: >> > Nowhere in Dr. Rao's paper are archaeological remains at Bhirrana > dating from the seventh millennium BCE mentioned (and there is, of > course, no mention at all of " Vedic people " in the paper -- that's > entirely a fantasy of your own!).> > Rao reports that the earliest archaeological layers he found at > Bhirrana should be identified with the pre-Early Harappan Hakra Ware > Cultures, whose beginnings are dated to the first half of the fourth > millennium BCE by archaeologist Rafique Mughal.> As ever, Francesco obviously did not read L S Rao 2005 paper or B B Lal's article from the same year and subsequent papers.Of course, it is not JUST a fantasy of Dr K. B B Lal commented on possible Vedic people also.Bhirrana's early datings were also mentioned in Sarasvati Conference, Delhi, October 2008, and are shown in a table in a ppt in an article related to this meeting. On the other hand, Francesco still uses his offensive words against ANOTHER member of the present group without academic support. Hey! Moderator! Are you there???Best regards,Carlos--- End forwarded message --- -- Bhalchandra G. ThatteyShubham BhavatuSvalpasya Yogasya Trayate Mahato Bhayat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 , " Kishore patnaik " <kishorepatnaik09 wrote: > > IndiaArchaeology , " Carlos Aramayo " > <cararam50@> wrote: > > IndiaArchaeology , " Francesco Brighenti " > <frabrig@> wrote: > > > > > > Nowhere in Dr. Rao's paper are archaeological remains at Bhirrana > > dating from the seventh millennium BCE mentioned (and there is, of > > course, no mention at all of " Vedic people " in the paper -- that's > > entirely a fantasy of your own!). > > > > Rao reports that the earliest archaeological layers he found at > > Bhirrana should be identified with the pre-Early Harappan Hakra Ware > > Cultures, whose beginnings are dated to the first half of the fourth > > millennium BCE by archaeologist Rafique Mughal. > > > > As ever, Francesco obviously did not read L S Rao 2005 paper or B B > Lal's article from the same year and subsequent papers. > > Of course, it is not JUST a fantasy of Dr K. > > B B Lal commented on possible Vedic people also. > > Bhirrana's early datings were also mentioned in Sarasvati Conference, > Delhi, October 2008, and are shown in a table in a ppt in an article > related to this meeting. > > Carlos Are you referring to slide 3 of the L.S. Rao's ppt presentation regarding dates? M. Kelkar > > --- End forwarded message --- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 There is definitive continuity between Bhirrana and later sites. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhirrana " The (Bhirrana) site is one of the many sites seen along the channels of the ancient Saraswati riverine systems, now represented by the seasonal Ghaggar River which flows in modern Haryana from Nahan to Sirsa " That means the site belongs to the Vedic people! " The excavation has revealed cultural periods viz., Period IA: Hakra Wares Culture, Period IB: Early Harappan Culture, Period IIA: Early Mature Harappan and Period IIB: Mature Harappan Culture. Period IA: Hakra Wares Culture: The excavation has revealed the remains of the Harappan culture right from its nascent stage, i.e. Hakra Wares Culture (antedating the Known Early Harappan Culture in the subcontinent, also known as Kalibangan-I.) to a full-fledged Mature Harappan city. " http://asi.nic.in/asi_exca_2007_bhirrana_images.asp# http://tinyurl.com/aj3624 " For the first time in the post-Independence period, artefacts called Hakra ware, belonging to the pre-early Harappan period, were found as independent, stratified deposits at Bhirrana. " Could that mean 7000 BCE? http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2502/stories/20080201504012900.htm L.S. Rao called the discovery " the only one of its kind " because " no parallel to the Dancing Girl, either in bronze or in any other medium, was known " until the potsherd was found. Bhirrana is an " exemplary site " because, for the first time in post-Independence India, Hakra ware belonging to the pre-early Harappan period were found as independent, stratified deposits. L.S. Rao also called it a " paradigmatic site " because " to put it in a nutshell, the importance of the excavation at Bhirrana lies in the fact that we have strong evidence for the first time of an unbroken cultural sequence, starting from the village culture represented by Hakra ware and its evolution gradually into semi-urban and urban cultures till the site was finally abandoned. " Excavations at Bhirrana conclusively show that during the period of Hakra ware culture, people lived in circular pits cut into the soil. There were auxiliary pits for cooking and for industrial activities (such as melting copper) and for religious purposes, including animal sacrifices. " In the present state of knowledge, " L.S. Rao said, " the Hakra ware culture belongs to the fourth millennium B.C., or 6,000 years before the present. " L. S. Rao goes as far back as 4000 BCE. http://www.orientalthane.com/archaeology/news_2008_03_11_1.htm M. Kelkar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 I wrote: > As ever, Francesco obviously did not read L S Rao 2005 paper or B > B Lal's article from the same year and subsequent papers. > Of course, it is not JUST a fantasy of Dr K. > > B B Lal commented on possible Vedic people also. > > Bhirrana's early datings were also mentioned in Sarasvati > Conference,Delhi, October 2008, and are shown in a table in a ppt > in an article > related to this meeting. M. Kelkar wrote: > Are you referring to slide 3 of the L.S. Rao's ppt presentation > regarding dates? > Dear Mayuresh, I'm refering to table of C14 datings in page 69 of Rao's ppt found at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/7577484/lsraobhirrana (Please scroll down to p.69) I also refer to B B Lal's article " Can the Vedic people be identified archaeologically? " 2005. You can also find these C14 datings at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/7753728/The-Sarasvati-bb-Lal (Scroll down to pages 9-10): " The Birbal SahniInstitute of Palaeobotany, Lucknow has provided the following C-14 dates for the early (not the earliest) levels of the site (Rao et al.2005). Sample No. BS 2314. Calibrated age: 1 Sigma 4770 (4536,4506, 4504 BC) 4353 BCE Sample No. BS 2318. Calibrated age: 1 Sigma 5336 (5041)4721 BCE Sample No. BS 2333. Calibrated age: 1 Sigma 6647 (6439)6221 BCE Even if we temporarily ignore Sample No. BS 2333, the other two samples clearly show that the ancestry of the Harappa Culture in the Sarasvati Valley goes back to the beginning of the fifth millennium BCE. " Best regards, Carlos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 If the term 'Pakistani' is used, historical perspective is seriously diluted, although present geographical cum political positioning is maintained. The phrase should read somewhat like 'in present day Paki.....". Possibly should be Indus people or something alike that takes us back to the place instantaneously in relation to the time---- as there has been at least sporadic efflux of sub-populations if not on a near continuous manner. Dr. db - Bhalchandra Thattey Sunday, February 15, 2009 12:07 PM Re: Re: Site older than Mohenjodaro ? How can you call them Pakistanis when Pakistan itself was not there during those times of civilization. On 2/15/09, Kishore patnaik <kishorepatnaik09 > wrote: IndiaArchaeology , "Carlos Aramayo"<cararam50 wrote:IndiaArchaeology , "Francesco Brighenti" <frabrig@> wrote:>> > Nowhere in Dr. Rao's paper are archaeological remains at Bhirrana > dating from the seventh millennium BCE mentioned (and there is, of > course, no mention at all of "Vedic people" in the paper -- that's > entirely a fantasy of your own!).> > Rao reports that the earliest archaeological layers he found at > Bhirrana should be identified with the pre-Early Harappan Hakra Ware > Cultures, whose beginnings are dated to the first half of the fourth > millennium BCE by archaeologist Rafique Mughal.> As ever, Francesco obviously did not read L S Rao 2005 paper or B B Lal's article from the same year and subsequent papers.Of course, it is not JUST a fantasy of Dr K. B B Lal commented on possible Vedic people also.Bhirrana's early datings were also mentioned in Sarasvati Conference, Delhi, October 2008, and are shown in a table in a ppt in an article related to this meeting.On the other hand, Francesco still uses his offensive words against ANOTHER member of the present group without academic support. Hey! Moderator! Are you there???Best regards,Carlos--- End forwarded message --- -- Bhalchandra G. ThatteyShubham BhavatuSvalpasya Yogasya Trayate Mahato Bhayat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 , " Carlos Aramayo " <cararam50 wrote: > > I wrote: > > > As ever, Francesco obviously did not read L S Rao 2005 paper or B > > B Lal's article from the same year and subsequent papers. > > Of course, it is not JUST a fantasy of Dr K. > > > > B B Lal commented on possible Vedic people also. > > > > Bhirrana's early datings were also mentioned in Sarasvati > > Conference,Delhi, October 2008, and are shown in a table in a ppt > > in an article > > related to this meeting. > > M. Kelkar wrote: > > > Are you referring to slide 3 of the L.S. Rao's ppt presentation > > regarding dates? > > > > Dear Mayuresh, > > I'm refering to table of C14 datings in page 69 of Rao's ppt found > at: > > http://www.scribd.com/doc/7577484/lsraobhirrana > > (Please scroll down to p.69) > > I also refer to B B Lal's article " Can the Vedic people be > identified archaeologically? " 2005. > > You can also find these C14 datings at: > > http://www.scribd.com/doc/7753728/The-Sarasvati-bb-Lal > > (Scroll down to pages 9-10): > > " The Birbal SahniInstitute of Palaeobotany, Lucknow has provided the > following C-14 dates for the early (not the earliest) levels of the > site (Rao et al.2005). > > Sample No. BS 2314. Calibrated age: 1 Sigma 4770 (4536,4506, 4504 > BC) 4353 BCE > Sample No. BS 2318. Calibrated age: 1 Sigma 5336 (5041)4721 BCE > Sample No. BS 2333. Calibrated age: 1 Sigma 6647 (6439)6221 BCE > > Even if we temporarily ignore Sample No. BS 2333, the other two > samples clearly show that the ancestry of the Harappa Culture in > the Sarasvati Valley goes back to the beginning of the fifth > millennium BCE. " > > Best regards, > > Carlos > Thanks Carlos! That is consistant with what Rao had said in news media. B. B. Lal has left no doubt about where he stands on the " Harrapan " civilization. mayuresh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.