Guest guest Posted January 1, 2009 Report Share Posted January 1, 2009 Indus script From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Indus script Type Undeciphered Bronze Age writing Spoken languages Unknown (see Harappan language) Time period 2600†" 1900 BC ISO 15924 Inds Note: This page may contain IPA phonetic symbols in Unicode. Seal impression showing a typical " inscription " of five " characters " . The term Indus script (also Harappan script) refers to short strings of symbols associated with the Indus Valley Civilization, in use during the Mature Harappan period, between the 26th and 20th centuries BC. In spite of many attempts at decipherments and claims, it is as yet undeciphered. The underlying language is unknown, and the lack of a bilingual makes the decipherment unlikely pending significant new finds. The first publication of a Harappan seal dates to 1873, in the form of a drawing by Alexander Cunningham. Since then, well over 4000 symbol-bearing objects have been discovered, some as far afield as Mesopotamia.[clarification needed] Some early scholars, starting with Cunningham in 1877, thought that the script was the archetype of the Brahmi script used by Ashoka. Cunningham's ideas were supported by G.R. Hunter, Iravatham Mahadevan and a minority of scholars continue to argue for the Indus script as the predecessor of the Brahmic family. However most scholars disagree, claiming instead that the Brahmi script derived from the Aramaic script. Contents [hide] * 1 Inscription corpus o 1.1 Early Harappan o 1.2 Mature Harappan o 1.3 Late Harappan * 2 Script characteristics * 3 Attempts at decipherment o 3.1 Dravidian hypothesis o 3.2 Script vs. ideographical symbols * 4 Notes * 5 References * 6 See also * 7 External links [edit] Inscription corpus [edit] Early Harappan The script generally refers to that used in the mature Harappan phase, which perhaps evolved from a few signs found in early Harappa after 3500 BC,[1] and was followed by the mature Harappan script. [edit] Mature Harappan The Harappan signs are most commonly associated with flat, rectangular stone tablets called seals, but they are also found on at least a dozen other materials. [edit] Late Harappan After 1900 BC, the systematic use of the symbols ended, after the final stage of the Mature Harappan civilization. Late Indus script found on pottery at Bet Dwarka dated to 1528 BC based on thermoluminescence dating. A few Harappan signs appear until as late as around 1100 BC (the beginning of the Indian Iron Age). Onshore explorations near Bet Dwarka in Gujarat revealed the presence of late Indus seals depicting a 3-headed animal, earthen vessel inscribed in a late Harappan script, and a large quantity of pottery similar to Lustrous Red Ware bowl and Red Ware dishes, dish-on-stand, perforated jar and incurved bowls which are datable to the 16th century BC in Dwarka, Rangpur and Prabhas. The thermoluminescence date for the pottery in Bet Dwaraka is 1528 BC. This evidence suggests that a late Harappan script was used until around 1500 BC. [1] Other excavations in India at Vaisali, Bihar [2] and Mayiladuthurai, Tamil Nadu [3] have revealed Indus symbols being used as late as 1100 BC. [edit] Script characteristics The script is written from right to left,[2] and sometimes follows a boustrophedonic style. Since the number of principal signs is about 400-600,[3] midway between typical logographic and syllabic scripts, many scholars accept the script to be logo-syllabic[4] (typically syllabic scripts have about 50-100 signs whereas logographic scripts have a very large number of principal signs). Several scholars maintain that structural analysis indicates an agglutinative language underneath the script. However, this is contradicted by the occurrence of signs supposedly representing prefixes and infixes. [edit] Attempts at decipherment Further information: Harappan language Over the years, numerous decipherments have been proposed, but none has been accepted by the scientific community at large. The following factors are usually regarded as the biggest obstacles for a successful decipherment: * The underlying language, if any, has not been identified. * The average length of the inscriptions is less than five signs, the longest being one of only 27 signs. * No bilingual texts (like a Rosetta Stone) have been found. And since the IVC was culturally isolated, it is highly unlikely there is one. The topic is popular among amateur researchers, and there have been various (mutually exclusive) decipherment claims. None of these suggestions has found academic recognition.[5] [edit] Dravidian hypothesis The Russian scholar Yuri Knorozov, who has edited a multi-volumed corpus of the inscriptions, surmises that the symbols represent a logosyllabic script, with an underlying Dravidian language as the most likely linguistic substrate.[6] Knorozov is perhaps best known for his decisive contributions towards the decipherment of the Maya script, a pre-Columbian writing system of the Mesoamerican Maya civilization. Knorozov's investigations were the first to conclusively demonstrate that the Maya script was logosyllabic in character, an interpretation now confirmed in the subsequent decades of Mayanist epigraphic research. The Finnish scholar Asko Parpola repeated several of these suggested Indus script readings. The discovery in Tamil Nadu of a late Neolithic (early 2nd millennium BC, i.e. post-dating Harappan decline) stone celt adorned with Indus script markings has been considered to be significant for this identification.[7][8] However, their identification as Indus signs has been disputed. All scholars accept that the Dravidian theory is unproven. Iravatham Mahadevan, who supports the Dravidian hypothesis, says, " we may hopefully find that the proto-Dravidian roots of the Harappan language and South Indian Dravidian languages are similar. This is a hypothesis [...] But I have no illusions that I will decipher the Indus script, nor do I have any regret. " [9] [edit] Script vs. ideographical symbols If the signs are purely ideographical, they may contain no information about the language spoken by their creators: they would qualify either as a purely logographic script, or as a system of symbols not qualifying as a script in the true sense (pictograms). Steve Farmer, Richard Sproat, and Michael Witzel[10] make the case that the symbols were not coupled to oral language, which in part explains the extreme brevity of the inscriptions. This view has been challenged by Parpola.[11] [edit] Notes 1. ^ Whitehouse, David (1999) 'Earliest writing' found BBC 2. ^ (Lal 1966) 3. ^ (Wells 1999) 4. ^ (Bryant 2000) 5. ^ see e.g. Egbert Richter, N. S. Rajaram and Srinivasan Kalyanaraman for examples. 6. ^ (Knorozov 1965) 7. ^ (Subramanium 2006; see also A Note on the Muruku Sign of the Indus Script in light of the Mayiladuthurai Stone Axe Discovery by I. Mahadevan (2006) 8. ^ Significance of Mayiladuthurai find 9. ^ Interview at Harrappa.com 10. ^ (Farmer 2004) 11. ^ (Parpola 2005) [edit] References * Bryant, Edwin (2000), The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture : The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate Oxford University Press. * Farmer, Steve et al. (2004) The Collapse of the Indus-Script Thesis: The Myth of a Literate Harappan Civilization, EJVS, vol. 11 (2004), issue 2 (Dec) [4] (PDF). * Knorozov, Yuri V. (ed.) (1965) Predvaritel’noe soobshchenie ob issledovanii protoindiyskikh textov. Moscow. * Mahadevan, Iravatham, Murukan In the Indus Script (1999) * Mahadevan, Iravatham, Aryan or Dravidian or Neither? A Study of Recent Attempts to Decipher the Indus Script (1995-2000) EJVS (ISSN 1084-7561) vol. 8 (2002) issue 1 (March 8).[5] * Parpola, Asko (2005) Study of the Indus Script. 50th ICES Tokyo Session. * Possehl, Gregory L. (1996), Indus Age: The Writing System, University of Pennsylvania Press, ISBN 081223345X . * Rjabchikov, Sergei V. (2006a). A New Key to the Proto-Indian Writing System. AnthroGlobe Journal, 2006. * Rjabchikov, Sergei V. (2006b). Protoindiyskoe pis'mo i ego rasshifrovka. Krasnodar. * Subramanian, T. S. (2006) " Significance of Mayiladuthurai find " in The Hindu, May 01, 2006. * Wells, B. " An Introduction to Indus Writing " Independence, MO: Early Sites Research Society 1999. [edit] See also * Proto-Elamite script * Undeciphered scripts * Bronze Age writing [edit] External links * Indus Script (ancientscripts.com) * " Discovery of a century " in Tamil Nadu ( " Discovery of a century " in Tamil Nadu ) * The Indus Script (From harappa.com) * BBC - 'Earliest writing' found * How come we can't decipher the Indus script? (from The Straight Dope) * Iravatham Mahadevan, Towards a scientific study of the Indus Script * Script Image;Article * Collection of essays about the Indus script (Steve Farmer) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.