ncient names of regions in Jambudveepa

[Guest guest]

Sun, 14 Jan 2001 16:09:47 +0000

Indology <[log in to unmask]>

Sender: Indology <[log in to unmask]>

" Narayan R.Joshi " <[log in to unmask]>

Ancient names of regions in Jambudveepa

 

(1)Raveen(Jan1)said he had knowledge about

Kamboja,Maurya,Murunda,Mlecha and Dravida from Prakrit versions of

tribal groups in ancient ShriLanka but could not find reference to

Kurus.My question to Raveen and to all-what is the difference between

Kurus and Kambojas? (2)I did not have any intension to relate Karave

to Kurus because I have no information about the castes or JAtis from

Shri LankA. I was referring to the time period between 1000 BCE to 326

BCE.In the past 2500 years of known history many many changes might

have happened in the names of castes and JAtis. (3)This is also true

for the names of different geographical and political regions of

India. Geographically India was Jambudveepa and Lanka, Ratnadveepa or

Sinhalayo.To the best of my knowledge, in the known history of 2500

years of India , there never existed liguistic states before 1950.NOw

I am talking about the situation before 326 BCE. Alexanders historians

knew South India by the name Tabropane (TAmraparNI-river and port

name) because Indian ships from the port of TAmraparNI near Madras

were bigger in size than ships from Middle-east.However Indians were

not calling South India by that name because names of kingdoms all

over in the ancientr India were derived from dynasty names which in

turn were derived from proper names of the celebrated kings. Ishwaku,

Magadha,Kosal,Anga,Vanga,Kalinga, Cola, Cher, Pandya, Shibi, Sauvira,

GAndhara,Kuru, Kamboja were all propers names of kings given to their

kingdoms. In the same way the ancient name of some region ofthe

present Karnatak was " Kuntala Desha " after the proper name of the king

" Kuntala " .THere are exceptions to the rule. Also I do not say Kuntal

and Kannada are related because I do not have information how the

names had changed after 326 BCE. The modern languages is continuous

dynamic linguistic process. I , single person, cannot study every

detail of every part of India from 550 BCE to this day, Languages are

changing even today.However pre-history of India to me looks very

different when I find the Kerala king signing trade agreement with

king Soloman(1000 BCE) in Sanskrit. Persian king Daurius called his

mother tongue Arya BhA.sA. HIs order to build Suvez canal was in that

language. One can rename Arya BhA.sA by different fabricated name in

the way the old Periplus was suppressed and replaced by new Periplus

of Erythrean seas.Fabricated labels is the trick.

 

http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0101 & L=INDOLOGY & P=R7943 & D=1 & F=P & I=-3 & \

O=D

[Guest guest]

Jambhooddwipa was not In dia , it was Eurasia and Antartica. India is HINDUSTAAN, and not Bhaaratavarsha but India is part of Bhaaratavarsha. Bhaaratavarsha is a geographical division and a Nation. Bhaaratavarsha extends from Persia (i.e.) modern Iran in the West to Vietnam in the East and from Kazakhstan in the North to Antartica in the South.An Istumas from Gangotri connects Antartica via Bay of Bengal and Indian Ocean.According to one theory Humans originated from Lemuria and spread worldover and not from Africa.Lemuria is a large continant south of India which was physically connected to SouthIndia and Modern Sri Lanka.And Lemuria is called KUMARIKKANDAM in Sanskrit and Tamil which extended from Kanyakumari.And Lemuria at present is submerged under the Indian Ocean

Modern Ayodhya is the ancient city of Ayodhya of Lord Raama mentioned in Raamaayana by Maharshi Vaalmiki.Saaketa is another name of Ayodhya and is on the banks of River Sarayu, a tributary of River Ganges.Dravidan like the word Aryan was originally never used to refer any Race but were both used only culturally.The word Draavida refers to any Brahmin of any of the five brahmin tribes of South India and not any Non-Brahmin.So the Dravidian is also an Aryan and Vedic.Indus Valley Civilization was a Vedic Civilization.The Aryan Invasion Theory is a myth.All these I have already explained with proof in this group.

B.C.VENKATAKRISHNAN.

website: www.vedascience.com

 

 

 

Kishore patnaik <kishorepatnaik09 Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 2:04:11 PM ncient names of regions in Jambudveepa

 

Sun, 14 Jan 2001 16:09:47 +0000Indology <[log in to unmask]>Sender: Indology <[log in to unmask]>"Narayan R.Joshi" <[log in to unmask]>Ancient names of regions in Jambudveepa(1)Raveen(Jan1) said he had knowledge aboutKamboja,Maurya, Murunda,Mlecha and Dravida from Prakrit versions oftribal groups in ancient ShriLanka but could not find reference toKurus.My question to Raveen and to all-what is the difference betweenKurus and Kambojas? (2)I did not have any intension to relate Karaveto Kurus because I have no information about the castes or JAtis fromShri LankA. I was referring to the time period between 1000 BCE to 326BCE.In the past 2500 years of known history many many changes mighthave happened in the names of castes and JAtis. (3)This is also truefor the names of different geographical and political regions ofIndia. Geographically India

was Jambudveepa and Lanka, Ratnadveepa orSinhalayo.To the best of my knowledge, in the known history of 2500years of India , there never existed liguistic states before 1950.NOwI am talking about the situation before 326 BCE. Alexanders historiansknew South India by the name Tabropane (TAmraparNI- river and portname) because Indian ships from the port of TAmraparNI near Madraswere bigger in size than ships from Middle-east. However Indians werenot calling South India by that name because names of kingdoms allover in the ancientr India were derived from dynasty names which inturn were derived from proper names of the celebrated kings. Ishwaku,Magadha,Kosal, Anga,Vanga, Kalinga, Cola, Cher, Pandya, Shibi, Sauvira,GAndhara,Kuru, Kamboja were all propers names of kings given to theirkingdoms. In the same way the ancient name of some region ofthepresent Karnatak was "Kuntala Desha" after the proper name of

the king"Kuntala".THere are exceptions to the rule. Also I do not say Kuntaland Kannada are related because I do not have information how thenames had changed after 326 BCE. The modern languages is continuousdynamic linguistic process. I , single person, cannot study everydetail of every part of India from 550 BCE to this day, Languages arechanging even today.However pre-history of India to me looks verydifferent when I find the Kerala king signing trade agreement withking Soloman(1000 BCE) in Sanskrit. Persian king Daurius called hismother tongue Arya BhA.sA. HIs order to build Suvez canal was in thatlanguage. One can rename Arya BhA.sA by different fabricated name inthe way the old Periplus was suppressed and replaced by new Periplusof Erythrean seas.Fabricated labels is the trick. http://listserv. liv.ac.uk/ cgi-bin/wa? A2=ind0101 & L=INDOLOGY & P=R7943 & D= 1 & F=P & I=- 3 & O=D