Guest guest Posted October 16, 2008 Report Share Posted October 16, 2008 Dear Kishore, I would like to share with you a recent message I post to IndiaArchaeology group related to Greeks-India conection. Best regards, Carlos ********** Re: The Yavana Presence in Ancient India by Himanshu P. Ray Francesco Brighenti wrote: > Please provide evidence of a continuity of trade between India > and countries to her West after the end of the Indus Valley > civilization. In the lack of such evidence, the aforesaid > 'assumption' remains unchallenged. Moreover, the Harappans traded > with the Gulf and Mesopotamia, but there is no evidence that thay > ever traded with countries situated in the eastern Mediterranean > basin. > Dear friends, To say that Harappans did not have relation with countries situated in the Mediterranean is to be ill-informed of related findings commented long ago by Kenoyer or Possehl. The thing is that Francesco is eager to negate even what he ignores. And on the other hand he criticizes others many times in this group without seing his own lack of knowledge. He should have read first the work: Art of the First Cities: the third millennium BCE from the Mediterranean to the Indus, 2005, Joan Aruz (ed), Yale University Press, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. In this work we can see the case of necklaces made of flat gold and (or) silver beads found in a wide range of territory from MEDITERRANEAN to INDUS VALLEY, wich proves the CONTACT or at least relation between these two regions in manufacturing THE SAME type of jewel. The work of Joan Aruz also mentions Gregory Possehl 1996 as reference: " One particular bead type made of gold and silver, a flat disk with a tubular midrib string-hole, appears to have been distributed, and probably manufactured as well, at sites along the same routes as the etched carnelian beads (see Fig. 72). Such beads were found at many Indus sites, including the port of Lothal, at Altyn-depe in Turkmenistan, at Tepe Hissar in Iran, in the Royal Cemetery at Ur, at Eskiyapar and Troy in Anatolia, and on Aigina in the Aegean (Possehl 1996: 161-62) " (Art of the First Cities 2005: 244). As everyone, with no hiden agenda, can see ESKIYAPAR AND TROY IN ANATOLIA and AIGINA IN THE AEGEAN are in the MEDITERRANEAN. On the other hand, these Troy beads were found by Heinrich Schleiman much long ago!! but Francesco Brighenti, Phd in History, DID NOT KNOW IT!!!! He did not even read Gregg!!!, as Farmer and Francesco call Gregory Possehl trying to make believe their close relationship with him. " Gregg's " article is: Possehl, Gregory L. 1996. 'Meluha', in The Indian Ocean in Antiquity, edited by Julia Reade, pp. 133-208. We can also find Art and First Cities' passages and pictures of the necklaces at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/6346256/Interconnections (Please take a look at the first four pages and the Map at page 3) Best regards, Carlos ******** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.