Tracing evidences of Lord Rama

[Guest guest]

It is not that tracing of period of Ramayana is not done. It is clearly mentioned in Bhagavat Puran about the concept of time, yugas etc. It also mentions where the present time is. People nowadays want to have scientific proof of everything. Science has influenced the people so lot. People are not using their consciousness. Iam also giving the proof for you. It has been found that the massive submerged construction between India and SriLanka has been dated to 20 Lakh years of time and that huge construction is man-made. This information is from NASA. So what else do u need? I request all of you that whatever has been mentioned in Vedas, Puranas, Upanishats should be believed

and followed.They are eternal truths and these books are not composed by any specific person in specific time. They are composed by great rushis, sages after doing lot of tapasyas at various points in time. THANKS & REGARDS K.BALAJI SATYA RAJENDRA, M.Tech Mobile: +919986668516.--- On Wed, 27/8/08, Kishore patnaik

<kishorepatnaik09 wrote:

[Guest guest]

, BALAJI SATYA RAJENDRA KONIJETI

<balaji83it wrote:

>

> It is not that tracing of period of Ramayana is not done.. It is

clearly mentioned in Bhagavat Puran about the concept of time, yugas

etc.<

 

Did you say " clearly " ? The word " yuga " has a string of values, such

as 5 years in the Vedanga Jyotisha. Taking it as 432,000 years or

something of that order of magnitude leads to tally absurd beliefs,

such as that Rama lived a million years ago:

 

> Since Rama lived in treta yuga i.e. more than 20 Lacs of years from

>

> now, and these 20 Lacs of years, many land displacements might have

>

> occured because of earhquakes and Tsunamis.

>

>

 

And could you give us the exact explanation in the Bh. Purana?

 

 

> It also mentions where the present time is. People nowadays want to

have scientific proof of everything. Science has influenced the

people so lot. People are not using their consciousness.

>

 

That's the talk of all modern charlatans: there's too much " belief "

in science nowadays, everything has to be scientific, yet science is

oh so limited, there's other things too, " consciousness " for

instance. But at they same time when they hear rumours of scientists

saying something that fits their story-line, they don't mind relying

on the authority of those scientists, e.g.:

 

>

>    Iam also giving the proof for you. It has been found that the

massive submerged construction between India and SriLanka has been

dated to 20 Lakh years of time and that huge construction is man-

made. This information is from NASA.

>

 

That is a lie. It may not be your own lie, I am not accusing you of

being a liar, but you do seem seem naive enough to pick up lies that

legitimate liars are spreading. It is untrue that NASA has given any

such certification to this origin myth and its absurd chronology.

 

 

>

>            So what else do u need?

>

>           I request all of you that whatever has been

mentioned in Vedas, Puranas, Upanishats should be believed and

followed.They are eternal truths and these books are not composed by

any specific person in specific time. They are composed by great

rushis, sages after doing lot of tapasyas at various points in time.

>

>

 

What a sad sight. Hindus like to boast how scientific their religion

is. But then they behave like Jehovah's Witnesses and Creationists

with a downright puerile literalist reading of scripture.

 

May Allah better this sad state of affairs!

 

KE

[Guest guest]

 

Did you say " clearly " ? The word " yuga " has a string of values, such as 5 years in the Vedanga Jyotisha. Taking it as 432,000 years or something of that order of magnitude leads to tally absurd beliefs,

such as that Rama lived a million years ago:

 

As per Ramayan, Rama lived 1.75 lakhs years ago. But then, there is no astro proof or other internal proof presented in Ramayan. Even if you would want to take this on the face value, there are three major objections for this, of which I have already mentioned two before:

 

1. Ramayan, unlike Maha bharat which is professed to be History (Itihaas), is a Kavyam, a poet's story.

 

2 The number 24 seems symbolic

 

3. The Ramayan was not written by Valmiki in toto. In fact, there were major efforts before him to write this Poem, say by Cyavana.

 

 

 

That is a lie. It may not be your own lie, I am not accusing you of being a liar, but you do seem seem naive enough to pick up lies that legitimate liars are spreading. It is untrue that NASA has given any

such certification to this origin myth and its absurd chronology.

 

 

The official site of NASA does not mention about this. But there are some sites which talk of this. Dr Kalyana Sundaram is a member of this group. May be he can give some explanation on this aspect, if he wants.

 

 

What a sad sight. Hindus like to boast how scientific their religion is. But then they behave like Jehovah's Witnesses and Creationists with a downright puerile literalist reading of scripture.

 

May Allah better this sad state of affairs!

 

Let us not become too skeptical, Elst. I hope you appreciate that what is being said on some sites is certainly not shared by most of the Indians. On the other hand, interpretation of scientific facts is being done with vested interests by scholars.

 

Personally I follow the standard text books for facts but I am sad to see that there is much wanton in them with regard to the right kind of interpretations.

 

regards,

 

kishore patnaik

[Guest guest]

Dear Mr.Koenraad Elst,

The NASA indeed cameup with a report about the Adams Bridge but later NASA disowned its own report.

B.C.VENKATAKRISHNAN.

website: www.vedascience.com--- On Wed, 8/27/08, koenraad_elst <koenraad.elst wrote:

koenraad_elst <koenraad.elst Re: Tracing evidences of Lord Rama Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 6:19 PM

 

 

, BALAJI SATYA RAJENDRA KONIJETI <balaji83it@ ...> wrote:>> It is not that tracing of period of Ramayana is not done.. It is clearly mentioned in Bhagavat Puran about the concept of time, yugas etc.<Did you say "clearly"? The word "yuga" has a string of values, such as 5 years in the Vedanga Jyotisha. Taking it as 432,000 years or something of that order of magnitude leads to tally absurd beliefs, such as that Rama lived a million years ago:> Since Rama lived in treta yuga i.e. more than 20 Lacs of years from> > now, and these 20 Lacs of years, many land displacements might have> > occured because of earhquakes and Tsunamis.> > And could you give us the exact explanation in the Bh. Purana?> It also mentions

where the present time is. People nowadays want to have scientific proof of everything. Science has influenced the people so lot. People are not using their consciousness.>That's the talk of all modern charlatans: there's too much "belief" in science nowadays, everything has to be scientific, yet science is oh so limited, there's other things too, "consciousness" for instance. But at they same time when they hear rumours of scientists saying something that fits their story-line, they don't mind relying on the authority of those scientists, e.g.:> > Â Â Iam also giving the proof for you. It has been found that the massive submerged construction between India and SriLanka has been dated to 20 Lakh years of time and that huge construction is man-made. This information is from NASA.> That is a lie. It may not be your own lie, I am not accusing you of

being a liar, but you do seem seem naive enough to pick up lies that legitimate liars are spreading. It is untrue that NASA has given any such certification to this origin myth and its absurd chronology.> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â So what else do u need?> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â I request all of you that whatever has been mentioned in Vedas, Puranas, Upanishats should be believed and followed.They are eternal truths and these books are not composed by any specific person in specific time. They are composed by great rushis, sages after doing lot of tapasyas at various points in time.> > What a sad sight. Hindus like to boast how scientific their religion is. But then they behave like Jehovah's Witnesses and Creationists with a downright puerile literalist

reading of scripture.May Allah better this sad state of affairs!KE

[Guest guest]

, venkata krishnan <bcvk71

wrote:

 

 

>Dear Mr.Koenraad Elst,

>The NASA indeed cameup with a report about the Adams Bridge but

later NASA disowned its own report.<

 

 

No, the NASA disowned the " report " that was falsely attributed to it.

If the NASA had ever issued such certification, there'd be an

official investigation by now into the take-over of NASA by quacks.

 

This canard of a NASA disowning is a second lie by which liars cover

their first lie of a NASA report confirming the myth of the geological

structure being man-made.

 

KE

[Guest guest]

Sock it to 'em, Dr. Patnaik

Kathie B.

illegitimati non carborundum !