Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Tsunami link to Dwarka end - Telegraph

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

*Tsunami link to Dwarka end*

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070415/asp/nation/story_7649465.asp

M.R. VENKATESH Pieces from Krishna City Puzzle A portion of a mud wall

and pieces of pottery found during the underwater excavations in the Gulf of

Cambay

 

*Chennai, April 14: *Krishna's mythological city of Dwarka may have been

destroyed by a tsunami 3,000 years ago, a group of ocean scientists have

claimed.

 

The Indian version of the ancient Greek legend of " Lost Atlantis " was

offered at a recent seminar here by a team from the National Institute of

Ocean Technology (NIOT), Chennai.

 

Researcher D. Venkata Rao suggested that undersea ruins in the Gulf of

Cambay off Gujarat are the debris of a city that suffered a " tectonic

upheaval similar to the December 2004 tsunami that submerged the entire

landmass " .

 

The discovery of the ruins in 1999-2004 by the institute had set off a

heated debate whether they were the remnants of Krishna's Dwarka.

 

The then HRD minister, Murli Manohar Joshi of the BJP, had claimed the ruins

were 9,500 years old and would lead to a rewriting of world history,

crowning a Hindu India as the cradle of civilisation over the claims of

Egypt, Mesopotamia and the Indus valley.

 

Rao and research partner B. Sasisekaran, however, dated the undersea finds

to around 2280 BC, citing tests on a piece of pottery they had sent to

Oxford University.

 

They said more evidence was needed to establish whether the finds were

indeed the ruins of the city of Dwarka mentioned in the *Mahabharat*.

 

But there was sufficient evidence, they said, that an ancient city at the

site was swallowed up by the sea sometime around 1000 BC.

 

Their paper, presented at the international symposium on " Indus civilisation

and Tamil language " , cited independent seismic surveys by Manipur University

and the Deccan College of Archaeology, Pune.

 

Both teams had suggested that the region, off Shivali and Hazira on the

Gujarat coast, had suffered " major tectonic upheavals " around 3000 BC, 1000

BC and AD 550. Given the period to which the city has been dated, it's the

second of these earthquakes that would have destroyed it, Rao said.

 

" We revisited the area and covered (it) by site scan, through underwater

high resolution seabed photography and even mapped the sea floor, " Rao said.

 

The NIOT then did its own seismic studies and found that the sea floor bore

the signature of several upheavals.

 

" The seismic sections depict that the area had undergone intense folding and

faulting. The layers are sheared and conspicuously absent with several

features of faulting at surface and subsurface, " Rao said quoting from the

paper.

 

He added that the seismic activity " seems to undergo periodic reactivation,

resulting in many neo-tectonic activities affecting the seabed " .

 

The NIOT's study suggested the tsunami waves unleashed by these earthquakes

might have been up to 12 metres tall.

 

From the artefacts the institute recovered from the seabed, it sent a piece

of pottery to the Luminescence Dating Laboratory at Oxford University. " It

gave a calibrated date of 4,287 years Before Present (around 2,280 BC) for

the pottery piece, " Rao said.

 

" The date led us to surmise that this part of the land might have had trade

links with some area falling under the Indus valley civilisation. "

 

Rao cited another significant find. " A clay seal, a glyptic, without words

found at Cambay is identical with glyptics from Mohenjodaro. "

 

The seal, a piece of baked clay with an impression, " was found on one of the

walls made of wattle and daub recovered through dredge " .

 

Rao and Sasisekaran, who were helped by NIOT director S. Kathiroli and

numismatics expert S. Srinivasan, theorise that there may have been a

migration from the Indus valley to the Gujarat coast.

 

As for the Dwarka theory, they cite how the *Mahabharat* and the*Brihatkatha —

* believed to have been written in the second century BC — mentions Dwarka

being washed undersea.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...