Guest guest Posted July 27, 2009 Report Share Posted July 27, 2009 Hello Mr. Gopal: Your statement as follows:"man is not created by any god from mud/dirt,nor any brahmin is created from any god's mouth nor kshatriya from shoulder,nor any vaishya from leg nor any shudra from foot."Most of us are aware of that scientific fact. Creation from mouth, hands and feet are euphemism for the type of work the individual performs. We take euphemism for the real. Brahmana, Ksatriya, Vaishya, and Sudra are postnatal phenomena and not a birth right. But a lot of people including Gandhi did/do not accept this fact. Because Brahmanas have had a long tradition of familial association with sacred texts, intellectual studies and pursuits, there is a disproportionately high incidence of intellectual accomplishment, compared to other castes. But if you take Alvars and Nayanars, all castes are represented, meaning that all caste are intellectually gifted. Other castes did not have the opportunity and thus lacked intellectual challenge. The Brahmanas were originally interested in ritual Hinduism. The Ksatriyas introduced the philosophical aspect of Hinduism. What is your view on God? is He real or the creation of man's fertile brain? Why did Alvars experience God as Vishnu? Why did Nayanars experience God as Siva, the Muslims as Allah, the Christians as the Lord?Who created this Universe? The universe came from a point smaller than a grain of sand; that is the present view. Any opinions on these important issues.I have discussed a whole variety of topics in my web site:www.bhagavadgitausa.comவணகà¯à®•à®®à¯à®¨à®®à®¸à¯à®•ாரமà¯Veeraswamy Krishnaraj Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.