Guest guest Posted July 23, 2009 Report Share Posted July 23, 2009 The arguements we mentioned weeks back, that vary from The legendary Syamantaka Ruby of Surya being now in the Tower of London, as either the Koh i noor diamonds OR the Timur Ruby (spinel) - are in no way associated with Krishna's Syamantaka Gem. How do I know? Because I went to the Tower of London, went inside, and LOOKED at both the Koh i noor AND Timur Ruby close up... and if those little stones (dwarfed by the gigantic Callinan diamonds) if those unimpressive stones are the Syamantaka then Vyasa is a liar (or gross exaduration), which we know is not the case. So if you have any interest then go to the Tower of London, look at the puny Koh i noor diamond, and then tell me... is THAT the legendary Syamantaka gem? Seeing is disbelieving!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 dear friends accordig to the legend as described in the scriptures, this great syamantaka ruby with mythical and mystical or magical properties was existing somewhere in gujarat in dwaparayuga which is an itihasa i.e. history of india. to my best comprehension, it is still within india somehwere within the western region (gujarat and maharashtra) which is why two thirds of india's money is in this region. ambanis have not become the biggest oil refiners and other polymer manufacturers in the world just like that. the younger ambani has bought hundreds of theatres in usa and is buying production houses too ike steven spielberg and is on the way to become the biggest name in film world soon. the gujarati akshardham mandirs are the most richest in the world. though unrelated, gujarat is the only successful hindu state which could reclaim the original somanth jyotirling unlike kashi and mathura. before independence, gujarat and maharashtra were almost same and hence the western region due to having the syamantaka ruby was and is still getting the quoted addition of extra gold or equivalent wealth daily. in conclusion, i still believe syamantaka ruby is still there somewhere in western india. any historians may add value from their findings or research. with best wishes and blessings pandit arjun www.rudraksharemedy.com sacred-objects , " Richard Shaw Brown " <rsbj66 wrote: > > The arguements we mentioned weeks back, that vary from The legendary Syamantaka Ruby of Surya being now in the Tower of London, as either the Koh i noor diamonds OR the Timur Ruby (spinel) - are in no way associated with Krishna's Syamantaka Gem. How do I know? Because I went to the Tower of London, went inside, and LOOKED at both the Koh i noor AND Timur Ruby close up... and if those little stones (dwarfed by the gigantic Callinan diamonds) if those unimpressive stones are the Syamantaka then Vyasa is a liar (or gross exaduration), which we know is not the case. So if you have any interest then go to the Tower of London, look at the puny Koh i noor diamond, and then tell me... is THAT the legendary Syamantaka gem? Seeing is disbelieving!!! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 Yes, now this sounds like the truth. Even if it was in the sea in Dwarka it's power would be the same on the area. And as you point out 2/3 or India'a substantial wealth is in Gujarat. Which would easily = the amount of wealth generated by Syamantaka. It may be under the sea, or in some temple, but it IS there. NOT in the Tower of LOndon. sacred-objects , " panditarjun2004 " <panditarjun2004 wrote: > > dear friends > > accordig to the legend as described in the scriptures, this great syamantaka ruby with mythical and mystical or magical properties was existing somewhere in gujarat in dwaparayuga which is an itihasa i.e. history of india. > > to my best comprehension, it is still within india somehwere within the western region (gujarat and maharashtra) which is why two thirds of india's money is in this region. > > ambanis have not become the biggest oil refiners and other polymer manufacturers in the world just like that. the younger ambani has bought hundreds of theatres in usa and is buying production houses too ike steven spielberg and is on the way to become the biggest name in film world soon. the gujarati akshardham mandirs are the most richest in the world. though unrelated, gujarat is the only successful hindu state which could reclaim the original somanth jyotirling unlike kashi and mathura. > > before independence, gujarat and maharashtra were almost same and hence the western region due to having the syamantaka ruby was and is still getting the quoted addition of extra gold or equivalent wealth daily. > > in conclusion, i still believe syamantaka ruby is still there somewhere in western india. any historians may add value from their findings or research. > > with best wishes and blessings > pandit arjun > www.rudraksharemedy.com > > sacred-objects , " Richard Shaw Brown " <rsbj66@> wrote: > > > > The arguements we mentioned weeks back, that vary from The legendary Syamantaka Ruby of Surya being now in the Tower of London, as either the Koh i noor diamonds OR the Timur Ruby (spinel) - are in no way associated with Krishna's Syamantaka Gem. How do I know? Because I went to the Tower of London, went inside, and LOOKED at both the Koh i noor AND Timur Ruby close up... and if those little stones (dwarfed by the gigantic Callinan diamonds) if those unimpressive stones are the Syamantaka then Vyasa is a liar (or gross exaduration), which we know is not the case. So if you have any interest then go to the Tower of London, look at the puny Koh i noor diamond, and then tell me... is THAT the legendary Syamantaka gem? Seeing is disbelieving!!! > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 2009 Report Share Posted July 25, 2009 dear jiwhat you said is exact as per logicas we all believe in the validity of puranasit is said to be very very lustrous,as you previously described days back,and generates gold dailynobody has til now mentioned any gem presently in the worlddue to the dark age of kali,there is very rare chance that such DIvine items are made open to the greedy present people who do not value spiritual articles,as even in our forums many people are valuing these ild mysterious rarest articles in terms of reserve bank paper currency,ridiculous is not?thanks krisna--- On Thu, 23/7/09, Richard Shaw Brown <rsbj66 wrote:Richard Shaw Brown <rsbj66 Koh i noor diamond is no big dealsacred-objects Date: Thursday, 23 July, 2009, 10:50 PM The arguements we mentioned weeks back, that vary from The legendary Syamantaka Ruby of Surya being now in the Tower of London, as either the Koh i noor diamonds OR the Timur Ruby (spinel) - are in no way associated with Krishna's Syamantaka Gem. How do I know? Because I went to the Tower of London, went inside, and LOOKED at both the Koh i noor AND Timur Ruby close up... and if those little stones (dwarfed by the gigantic Callinan diamonds) if those unimpressive stones are the Syamantaka then Vyasa is a liar (or gross exaduration) , which we know is not the case. So if you have any interest then go to the Tower of London, look at the puny Koh i noor diamond, and then tell me... is THAT the legendary Syamantaka gem? Seeing is disbelieving! !! New Email addresses available on Get the Email name you've always wanted on the new @ymail and @rocketmail. Hurry before someone else does! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.