Guest guest Posted June 23, 2009 Report Share Posted June 23, 2009 Dear Sriman, It is good people like you we want as members. Don't forsake a 1000 strong group simply based on the behavior of TWO members. That is a very small percent. Otherwise you will have to resign from the human race if you cannot stand even 1% of problem people. Please stay with us. We are now 1,069 members, so don't care about 2 members. Kindly contribute what you know. Best wishes, Richard sacred-objects , " numismatist_1973 " <kalaindia wrote: > > Dear Mr. Richard Shaw Brown, > > I am a numismatist and a collector of antiques and curious artifacts. I am in India most of the time roaming the bazaars of old cities - Hyderabad, Chandni Chowk (New Delhi), Srirangapatnam and Jaipur to name a few. I happened to have wandered into this group out of genuine interest, and the KDY simply attracted my attention as an object of some curiosity and value. > > However, I am shocked at the manner in which I am greeted on joining this group. I had clearly (and only) stated that MY OWN enquiries revealed to me some facts which I thought was worthwhile publishing here for both bala_songyi and ishwar33. If you will kindly read the abusive language in which I have been greeted, I do not see it worthwhile being in this company. The very purpose of a forum like this (to be able to debate and arrive at the truth), the very purpose of sharing information is defeated. > > Let me state here clearly and honestly that I am neither ishwar33 or any other person already in this group. I hope I am equally coherent when I say that I will NOT stoop down to the level of these gentlemen even if I am provoked. It is not worth it. > > I am not interested to know who possesses the Talisman or how much it is going to be sold for. Like the case of the Turin Shroud or the Holy Grail, controversies are bound to rage around. But I see no reason to stoop to this level. Hence I am considering to withdraw from this group. > > (As moderator, if you wish to know who I am for your own satisfaction, you may email me privately) > > Jeremy > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2009 Report Share Posted June 23, 2009 hello rechardji nice to see ur positive reply here.. i really like ur attitude i m new in all these group but ur reply is very nice sacred-objects , " Richard Shaw Brown " <rsbj66 wrote: > > Dear Sriman, > > It is good people like you we want as members. Don't forsake a 1000 strong group simply based on the behavior of TWO members. That is a very small percent. Otherwise you will have to resign from the human race if you cannot stand even 1% of problem people. Please stay with us. We are now 1,069 members, so don't care about 2 members. Kindly contribute what you know. Best wishes, Richard > > sacred-objects , " numismatist_1973 " <kalaindia@> wrote: > > > > Dear Mr. Richard Shaw Brown, > > > > I am a numismatist and a collector of antiques and curious artifacts. I am in India most of the time roaming the bazaars of old cities - Hyderabad, Chandni Chowk (New Delhi), Srirangapatnam and Jaipur to name a few. I happened to have wandered into this group out of genuine interest, and the KDY simply attracted my attention as an object of some curiosity and value. > > > > However, I am shocked at the manner in which I am greeted on joining this group. I had clearly (and only) stated that MY OWN enquiries revealed to me some facts which I thought was worthwhile publishing here for both bala_songyi and ishwar33. If you will kindly read the abusive language in which I have been greeted, I do not see it worthwhile being in this company. The very purpose of a forum like this (to be able to debate and arrive at the truth), the very purpose of sharing information is defeated. > > > > Let me state here clearly and honestly that I am neither ishwar33 or any other person already in this group. I hope I am equally coherent when I say that I will NOT stoop down to the level of these gentlemen even if I am provoked. It is not worth it. > > > > I am not interested to know who possesses the Talisman or how much it is going to be sold for. Like the case of the Turin Shroud or the Holy Grail, controversies are bound to rage around. But I see no reason to stoop to this level. Hence I am considering to withdraw from this group. > > > > (As moderator, if you wish to know who I am for your own satisfaction, you may email me privately) > > > > Jeremy > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2009 Report Share Posted June 23, 2009 Dear Leaaned Moderator ! Your knowledgeable magnamity is well known in Sacred Natural Objects !!!! I As An non Indian born Brasilian, I acknowledged your (Learned Moderator M RS Brownji's kindness) to have wonderful knowledgable kindness !!! As we learn from every mighty as well as scum bags, as we are children of the Youth Revolution of the early SIXTIES.... My simple query is Why ???? Mr numismatist_1973 said he posted some message before June 22nd 09, when most respectable Mr numismatist_1973, only join this forum on 54 minutes before his very first post/message to Natural Sacred Objects.... My tendencies of fears of a child, who made me to some works, (like searching all my houses I lived since 1975 " that I forget in 1975, is up to " IT " again, as he did on May 9th 09. Its sheer ignorance of on my part, that We (Bala_songyi e Ishwar33) are at ODD, trying to polarize all about Kailash Dhana Raksha Tantra Yantra Square meteorite silver/nickel (magnetic) wall plaque or round brass pendant type. Dear Mr numismatist_1973, I second dear R.S.Brownji,(learned moderator, as Mr RS Brownji knows more about hinduism than me , I am only a Namesake hindu name, nothing Hindu, as Me, My dad and my grand dad need visa to visit great India as Tourists, as we are not born in India) Please be kind that you stay in this Forum and contribute your knowledge, Please forgive this 62 years old bum, drunkard associate professor of University of Michigan State, at Ann Abbor MI But our dear friend Mr numismatist_1973 join us on June 22nd 09, but claimed he has post an earlier message before June 22nd 09, a message in our forum, So Actually its not me to take my learned Mr numismatist_1973 tibetan friend to task, my students, many using my bala_songyi pseudo, who log in using my pass word. Because I am still living in my world of childhood 50s , and 60s as teenager, and adult in 70s. Those who write without bumbling mistakes are my Tibetans in USA, at School for masters. bala_songyi it me now make bubling spelling mistakes on his blackberry. I apologies for my dismeaour, as We thought its Mr Ishawar 33 at his massive game to defraud innocents, Please forgive us Mr numismatist_1973, whatever your real name... Salute sacred-objects , " Richard Shaw Brown " <rsbj66 wrote: > > Dear Sriman, > > It is good people like you we want as members. Don't forsake a 1000 strong group simply based on the behavior of TWO members. That is a very small percent. Otherwise you will have to resign from the human race if you cannot stand even 1% of problem people. Please stay with us. We are now 1,069 members, so don't care about 2 members. Kindly contribute what you know. Best wishes, Richard > > sacred-objects , " numismatist_1973 " <kalaindia@> wrote: > > > > Dear Mr. Richard Shaw Brown, > > > > I am a numismatist and a collector of antiques and curious artifacts. I am in India most of the time roaming the bazaars of old cities - Hyderabad, Chandni Chowk (New Delhi), Srirangapatnam and Jaipur to name a few. I happened to have wandered into this group out of genuine interest, and the KDY simply attracted my attention as an object of some curiosity and value. > > > > However, I am shocked at the manner in which I am greeted on joining this group. I had clearly (and only) stated that MY OWN enquiries revealed to me some facts which I thought was worthwhile publishing here for both bala_songyi and ishwar33. If you will kindly read the abusive language in which I have been greeted, I do not see it worthwhile being in this company. The very purpose of a forum like this (to be able to debate and arrive at the truth), the very purpose of sharing information is defeated. > > > > Let me state here clearly and honestly that I am neither ishwar33 or any other person already in this group. I hope I am equally coherent when I say that I will NOT stoop down to the level of these gentlemen even if I am provoked. It is not worth it. > > > > I am not interested to know who possesses the Talisman or how much it is going to be sold for. Like the case of the Turin Shroud or the Holy Grail, controversies are bound to rage around. But I see no reason to stoop to this level. Hence I am considering to withdraw from this group. > > > > (As moderator, if you wish to know who I am for your own satisfaction, you may email me privately) > > > > Jeremy > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.