Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Dear All, (And Hello Mr. Richard Shaw Brown) I had once posted a message about the KDY on the message board in which I stood opposed to the ridiculous claims being made by " bala_songyi " . I hope everyone has read and understood its contents. Controversies of this nature have been perpetrated by fraud claimants throughout history. I do not believe that " ishwar33 " is in possession of the original KDY. He may perhaps know its location or who the present owner is. He may have also seen it at some time as his description and historical analogy is very accurate and in keeping with the known facts about the KDY. The raging war-of-words between bala_songyi and ishwar33 has so far dwelt on the question of " WHICH IS THE REAL KAILASH DHANARAKSHA YANTRA TALISMAN? " I have taken the pains to speak to many senior Tibetan monks in Dharamshala, Ladakh (Leh), Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan and Darjeeling since I lasted posted my message on the board. I now hereby wish to inform everyone that there is no controversy in their minds as to what the original KDY is or what it looks like. They all described it to me in Nepali language (common dialect of the region) as a " gol peetal bostu jis ta vajan do-sow bees gram hoi " – meaning that " it is a round brass item whose weight is two hundred and twenty grams " . This is the traditional belief of every spiritually evolved Buddhist monk of the Himalayan region who has heard of the Kailash Dhanaraksha Yantra. When asked if there was any other item called the KDY, or any other shape it was created in, they answered – " choi-na " – meaning " No " . When they were told of the claims made by bala_songyi (aka Muthuraku), they did not only laugh, but showed absolute contempt at the source of such information. They were of the opinion that there is no scope for debate. There is only one KDY in existence, and it is a round brass pendant-type metal plate with a loop on the top for wearing with a thong. It weighs 220 gms and it was created between 812 and 824 AD on the slopes of Mount Kailash by Padmasambhava as a " terma " to be discovered by future generations. It never went to Hitler and has never had a Russian owner, claimant or connection. That whole story is a fabrication. Many Buddhist leaders are even aware that the KDY is now somewhere in a city in South India (being the reason why I feel ishwar33 has perhaps seen it and definitely knows what he is talking about) I am personally happy and at peace for having made my own enquiries rather than go by what either bala_songyi or ishwar33 said. Surely the statements of so many senior and learned Buddhist monks far outweigh the claims any one can make on this topic. This case can definitely be put to rest. bala-songyi may perhaps be a little peeved at being exposed. My apologies for having to state the painful truth. Let's forgive him for his lack of knowledge and indiscretion. A debate is a healthy thing, as it brings out the truth and exposes the hoax. The round talisman will not become square just because someone is begging it to be, and even prepared to warp and contort history to prove his arguement. One cannot change history or the nature of things by flogging this dead horse. What amazes and amuses me about bala_songyi is how true Oliver Goldsmith was when he wrote in his famous poem - THE VILLAGE SCHOOLMASTER " for even though vanquished, he could argue still... " ishwar33, thanks to all your detailed and accurate research. You were right all along when you said the KDY is a round pendant/locket type object. Now, surely there are many other wonderful things in the world to discuss in this group. Jeremy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 dear sri RSBthanks and that is ityour wonderful valid information and how you obtained it is a DIVINE DISPENSATIONThanks God bless allKrisna--- On Mon, 22/6/09, numismatist_1973 <kalaindia wrote:numismatist_1973 <kalaindia KDY CONTROVERSY FINALLY RESOLVEDsacred-objects Date: Monday, 22 June, 2009, 2:38 PM Dear All, (And Hello Mr. Richard Shaw Brown) I had once posted a message about the KDY on the message board in which I stood opposed to the ridiculous claims being made by "bala_songyi" . I hope everyone has read and understood its contents. Controversies of this nature have been perpetrated by fraud claimants throughout history. I do not believe that "ishwar33" is in possession of the original KDY. He may perhaps know its location or who the present owner is. He may have also seen it at some time as his description and historical analogy is very accurate and in keeping with the known facts about the KDY. The raging war-of-words between bala_songyi and ishwar33 has so far dwelt on the question of "WHICH IS THE REAL KAILASH DHANARAKSHA YANTRA TALISMAN?" I have taken the pains to speak to many senior Tibetan monks in Dharamshala, Ladakh (Leh), Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan and Darjeeling since I lasted posted my message on the board. I now hereby wish to inform everyone that there is no controversy in their minds as to what the original KDY is or what it looks like. They all described it to me in Nepali language (common dialect of the region) as a "gol peetal bostu jis ta vajan do-sow bees gram hoi" – meaning that "it is a round brass item whose weight is two hundred and twenty grams". This is the traditional belief of every spiritually evolved Buddhist monk of the Himalayan region who has heard of the Kailash Dhanaraksha Yantra. When asked if there was any other item called the KDY, or any other shape it was created in, they answered – "choi-na" – meaning "No". When they were told of the claims made by bala_songyi (aka Muthuraku), they did not only laugh, but showed absolute contempt at the source of such information. They were of the opinion that there is no scope for debate. There is only one KDY in existence, and it is a round brass pendant-type metal plate with a loop on the top for wearing with a thong. It weighs 220 gms and it was created between 812 and 824 AD on the slopes of Mount Kailash by Padmasambhava as a "terma" to be discovered by future generations. It never went to Hitler and has never had a Russian owner, claimant or connection. That whole story is a fabrication. Many Buddhist leaders are even aware that the KDY is now somewhere in a city in South India (being the reason why I feel ishwar33 has perhaps seen it and definitely knows what he is talking about) I am personally happy and at peace for having made my own enquiries rather than go by what either bala_songyi or ishwar33 said. Surely the statements of so many senior and learned Buddhist monks far outweigh the claims any one can make on this topic. This case can definitely be put to rest. bala-songyi may perhaps be a little peeved at being exposed. My apologies for having to state the painful truth. Let's forgive him for his lack of knowledge and indiscretion. A debate is a healthy thing, as it brings out the truth and exposes the hoax. The round talisman will not become square just because someone is begging it to be, and even prepared to warp and contort history to prove his arguement. One cannot change history or the nature of things by flogging this dead horse. What amazes and amuses me about bala_songyi is how true Oliver Goldsmith was when he wrote in his famous poem - THE VILLAGE SCHOOLMASTER "for even though vanquished, he could argue still..." ishwar33, thanks to all your detailed and accurate research. You were right all along when you said the KDY is a round pendant/locket type object. Now, surely there are many other wonderful things in the world to discuss in this group. Jeremy Get your preferred Email name! Now you can @ymail.com and @rocketmail.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Haha haha !!! another A.Hole ..... under pseudo name for Ishwar Nagwani who is desparate to sell for US$ 1.5 million. Bala_songyi has no real interest which is real Round ? or Square ??? or tiny new Kailash Dhana Raksha Tantra Yantra ??? in meteorite silver ???? .....or as the young as 36 years old bumbling blunder idot owning a software company in Banglore on MG road..... trying to pass off the round brass pendant as he is in trouble to believe the crap and spend 10 lacks to buy it, and in big finacial difficulties...NOW You call me names that I am not Muthuraku,nor Viral Patel, etc.... You are dead with with your greed..... HAHAHA !!!! Good luck to your Deal of US$ 1.5 million. Keep your Brass Round Crap Kailash Dhana Raksha Yantra for for good luck. sacred-objects , " numismatist_1973 " <kalaindia wrote: > > Dear All, > (And Hello Mr. Richard Shaw Brown) > > I had once posted a message about the KDY on the message board in which I stood opposed to the ridiculous claims being made by " bala_songyi " . I hope everyone has read and understood its contents. Controversies of this nature have been perpetrated by fraud claimants throughout history. I do not believe that " ishwar33 " is in possession of the original KDY. He may perhaps know its location or who the present owner is. He may have also seen it at some time as his description and historical analogy is very accurate and in keeping with the known facts about the KDY. > > The raging war-of-words between bala_songyi and ishwar33 has so far dwelt on the question of " WHICH IS THE REAL KAILASH DHANARAKSHA YANTRA TALISMAN? " > > I have taken the pains to speak to many senior Tibetan monks in Dharamshala, Ladakh (Leh), Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan and Darjeeling since I lasted posted my message on the board. I now hereby wish to inform everyone that there is no controversy in their minds as to what the original KDY is or what it looks like. > > They all described it to me in Nepali language (common dialect of the region) as a " gol peetal bostu jis ta vajan do-sow bees gram hoi " – meaning that " it is a round brass item whose weight is two hundred and twenty grams " . This is the traditional belief of every spiritually evolved Buddhist monk of the Himalayan region who has heard of the Kailash Dhanaraksha Yantra. When asked if there was any other item called the KDY, or any other shape it was created in, they answered – " choi-na " – meaning " No " . > > When they were told of the claims made by bala_songyi (aka Muthuraku), they did not only laugh, but showed absolute contempt at the source of such information. They were of the opinion that there is no scope for debate. There is only one KDY in existence, and it is a round brass pendant-type metal plate with a loop on the top for wearing with a thong. It weighs 220 gms and it was created between 812 and 824 AD on the slopes of Mount Kailash by Padmasambhava as a " terma " to be discovered by future generations. It never went to Hitler and has never had a Russian owner, claimant or connection. That whole story is a fabrication. Many Buddhist leaders are even aware that the KDY is now somewhere in a city in South India (being the reason why I feel ishwar33 has perhaps seen it and definitely knows what he is talking about) > > I am personally happy and at peace for having made my own enquiries rather than go by what either bala_songyi or ishwar33 said. Surely the statements of so many senior and learned Buddhist monks far outweigh the claims any one can make on this topic. > > This case can definitely be put to rest. bala-songyi may perhaps be a little peeved at being exposed. My apologies for having to state the painful truth. Let's forgive him for his lack of knowledge and indiscretion. A debate is a healthy thing, as it brings out the truth and exposes the hoax. The round talisman will not become square just because someone is begging it to be, and even prepared to warp and contort history to prove his arguement. One cannot change history or the nature of things by flogging this dead horse. What amazes and amuses me about bala_songyi is how true Oliver Goldsmith was when he wrote in his famous poem - THE VILLAGE SCHOOLMASTER > > " for even though vanquished, he could argue still... " > > ishwar33, thanks to all your detailed and accurate research. You were right all along when you said the KDY is a round pendant/locket type object. > > Now, surely there are many other wonderful things in the world to discuss in this group. > > Jeremy > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 The game is up my friend Numisticas 1978, Ishwar have claimed himself as the owner of round Brass Pendant Kailash Dhana Raksha Tantra Yantra on May 23rd 09 on this forum.... You are very new member, check out your details of joining, on the right upper column of the message you sent..... Thanks Ishwar, aka Numisticas !!!!!! Cheers sacred-objects , " numismatist_1973 " <kalaindia wrote: > > Dear All, > (And Hello Mr. Richard Shaw Brown) > > I had once posted a message about the KDY on the message board in which I stood opposed to the ridiculous claims being made by " bala_songyi " . I hope everyone has read and understood its contents. Controversies of this nature have been perpetrated by fraud claimants throughout history. I do not believe that " ishwar33 " is in possession of the original KDY. He may perhaps know its location or who the present owner is. He may have also seen it at some time as his description and historical analogy is very accurate and in keeping with the known facts about the KDY. > > The raging war-of-words between bala_songyi and ishwar33 has so far dwelt on the question of " WHICH IS THE REAL KAILASH DHANARAKSHA YANTRA TALISMAN? " > > I have taken the pains to speak to many senior Tibetan monks in Dharamshala, Ladakh (Leh), Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan and Darjeeling since I lasted posted my message on the board. I now hereby wish to inform everyone that there is no controversy in their minds as to what the original KDY is or what it looks like. > > They all described it to me in Nepali language (common dialect of the region) as a " gol peetal bostu jis ta vajan do-sow bees gram hoi " – meaning that " it is a round brass item whose weight is two hundred and twenty grams " . This is the traditional belief of every spiritually evolved Buddhist monk of the Himalayan region who has heard of the Kailash Dhanaraksha Yantra. When asked if there was any other item called the KDY, or any other shape it was created in, they answered – " choi-na " – meaning " No " . > > When they were told of the claims made by bala_songyi (aka Muthuraku), they did not only laugh, but showed absolute contempt at the source of such information. They were of the opinion that there is no scope for debate. There is only one KDY in existence, and it is a round brass pendant-type metal plate with a loop on the top for wearing with a thong. It weighs 220 gms and it was created between 812 and 824 AD on the slopes of Mount Kailash by Padmasambhava as a " terma " to be discovered by future generations. It never went to Hitler and has never had a Russian owner, claimant or connection. That whole story is a fabrication. Many Buddhist leaders are even aware that the KDY is now somewhere in a city in South India (being the reason why I feel ishwar33 has perhaps seen it and definitely knows what he is talking about) > > I am personally happy and at peace for having made my own enquiries rather than go by what either bala_songyi or ishwar33 said. Surely the statements of so many senior and learned Buddhist monks far outweigh the claims any one can make on this topic. > > This case can definitely be put to rest. bala-songyi may perhaps be a little peeved at being exposed. My apologies for having to state the painful truth. Let's forgive him for his lack of knowledge and indiscretion. A debate is a healthy thing, as it brings out the truth and exposes the hoax. The round talisman will not become square just because someone is begging it to be, and even prepared to warp and contort history to prove his arguement. One cannot change history or the nature of things by flogging this dead horse. What amazes and amuses me about bala_songyi is how true Oliver Goldsmith was when he wrote in his famous poem - THE VILLAGE SCHOOLMASTER > > " for even though vanquished, he could argue still... " > > ishwar33, thanks to all your detailed and accurate research. You were right all along when you said the KDY is a round pendant/locket type object. > > Now, surely there are many other wonderful things in the world to discuss in this group. > > Jeremy > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Hello Everybody !!!!! If any doe not know how to 1st track an email, its simple and it can be confusing as I can forward a messgage from Italy, while I live in USA.... Help yourselves to this NUMISMATIST_1973, aka Ishwar33 (aka Ishwar Nagwani) recorded email as in our forum, as I said " He is a trouble maker " turning Sacred Object into a clowning site.... QUOTE " From kalaindia Mon Jun 22 05:51:42 2009 Return-Path: <kalaindia Received: (qmail 52111 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2009 12:51:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (69.147.108.201) by m3.grp.sp2. with QMQP; 22 Jun 2009 12:51:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n41b.bullet.mail.sp1.) (66.163.168.155) by mta2.grp.re1. with SMTP; 22 Jun 2009 12:51:42 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=; s=lima; t=1245675063; bh=Z32Ls73CvzR+A5eYLXKNesl411+mG5NYk4EukgkimpU=; h=Received:Received:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-\ Received:X-Received:Date:To:Message-ID:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Cont\ ent-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X--Newman-Property:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroup\ s-Msg-Info:X--Post-IP:Subject:X--Group-Post:X--Profile:X-YGr\ oups-SubInfo:Sender:X-eGroups-Approved-By:X-eGroups-Auth; b=TFQfV/Z0XXUjcQl1i0sfFr5Hqr2LvJPl/kBQwSd0gUk/OixuaWWT7P+dysAJWMU90quoWXtohLjnzX\ yiJ/PtPh0RBE5J+phjeUmgiP7Tfs3eIj5DJgLmJjkUgT1jbwUf Received: from [69.147.65.149] by n41.bullet.mail.sp1. with NNFMP; 22 Jun 2009 12:51:03 -0000 Received: from [98.137.35.15] by t9.bullet.mail.sp1. with NNFMP; 22 Jun 2009 12:51:03 -0000 X-Sender: kalaindia X-Apparently-sacred-objects X-Received: (qmail 59180 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2009 09:09:28 -0000 X-Received: from unknown (69.147.108.201) by m8.grp.re1. with QMQP; 22 Jun 2009 09:09:28 -0000 X-Received: from unknown (HELO n40b.bullet.mail.sp1.) (66.163.168.154) by mta2.grp.re1. with SMTP; 22 Jun 2009 09:09:28 -0000 X-Received: from [69.147.65.173] by n40.bullet.mail.sp1. with NNFMP; 22 Jun 2009 09:08:25 -0000 X-Received: from [98.137.34.33] by t15.bullet.mail.sp1. with NNFMP; 22 Jun 2009 09:08:25 -0000 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:08:25 -0000 sacred-objects Message-ID: <h1nhm9+1cbj (AT) eGroups (DOT) com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset= " ISO-8859-1 " Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Message Poster X--Newman-Property: groups-system X-Originating-IP: 66.163.168.154 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:6:0:0:0 X--Post-IP: 122.167.2.75 " numismatist_1973 " <kalaindia KDY CONTROVERSY FINALLY RESOLVED X--Group-Post: member; u=404197860; y=DszZ26yoEcNmz4RH3efH33hg38VYYciHkioouPY6-TWACkjrx-MurPbnmw X--Profile: numismatist_1973 X-YGroups-SubInfo: t=0;f=16;g=ODB0RNHPoobyKjzPEKva0yq7oyRhIHoz3QrI3aRN1m6NwVe4eTWZwN4Iy85cCBJJmdE; X-eGroups-Approved-By: rsbj66 <rsbj66 via web; 22 Jun 2009 12:51:03 -0000 Dear All, (And Hello Mr. Richard Shaw Brown) I had once posted a message about the KDY on the message board in which I s= tood opposed to the ridiculous claims being made by " bala_songyi " . I hope e= " " " " " Unquote Cheers Viral Patel Muthraku MutuSamy Balasubramaniam Ishwar PATEL Ishwar Nagwani HAHAHA sacred-objects , " numismatist_1973 " <kalaindia wrote: > > Dear All, > (And Hello Mr. Richard Shaw Brown) > > I had once posted a message about the KDY on the message board in which I stood opposed to the ridiculous claims being made by " bala_songyi " . I hope everyone has read and understood its contents. Controversies of this nature have been perpetrated by fraud claimants throughout history. I do not believe that " ishwar33 " is in possession of the original KDY. He may perhaps know its location or who the present owner is. He may have also seen it at some time as his description and historical analogy is very accurate and in keeping with the known facts about the KDY. > > The raging war-of-words between bala_songyi and ishwar33 has so far dwelt on the question of " WHICH IS THE REAL KAILASH DHANARAKSHA YANTRA TALISMAN? " > > I have taken the pains to speak to many senior Tibetan monks in Dharamshala, Ladakh (Leh), Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan and Darjeeling since I lasted posted my message on the board. I now hereby wish to inform everyone that there is no controversy in their minds as to what the original KDY is or what it looks like. > > They all described it to me in Nepali language (common dialect of the region) as a " gol peetal bostu jis ta vajan do-sow bees gram hoi " – meaning that " it is a round brass item whose weight is two hundred and twenty grams " . This is the traditional belief of every spiritually evolved Buddhist monk of the Himalayan region who has heard of the Kailash Dhanaraksha Yantra. When asked if there was any other item called the KDY, or any other shape it was created in, they answered – " choi-na " – meaning " No " . > > When they were told of the claims made by bala_songyi (aka Muthuraku), they did not only laugh, but showed absolute contempt at the source of such information. They were of the opinion that there is no scope for debate. There is only one KDY in existence, and it is a round brass pendant-type metal plate with a loop on the top for wearing with a thong. It weighs 220 gms and it was created between 812 and 824 AD on the slopes of Mount Kailash by Padmasambhava as a " terma " to be discovered by future generations. It never went to Hitler and has never had a Russian owner, claimant or connection. That whole story is a fabrication. Many Buddhist leaders are even aware that the KDY is now somewhere in a city in South India (being the reason why I feel ishwar33 has perhaps seen it and definitely knows what he is talking about) > > I am personally happy and at peace for having made my own enquiries rather than go by what either bala_songyi or ishwar33 said. Surely the statements of so many senior and learned Buddhist monks far outweigh the claims any one can make on this topic. > > This case can definitely be put to rest. bala-songyi may perhaps be a little peeved at being exposed. My apologies for having to state the painful truth. Let's forgive him for his lack of knowledge and indiscretion. A debate is a healthy thing, as it brings out the truth and exposes the hoax. The round talisman will not become square just because someone is begging it to be, and even prepared to warp and contort history to prove his arguement. One cannot change history or the nature of things by flogging this dead horse. What amazes and amuses me about bala_songyi is how true Oliver Goldsmith was when he wrote in his famous poem - THE VILLAGE SCHOOLMASTER > > " for even though vanquished, he could argue still... " > > ishwar33, thanks to all your detailed and accurate research. You were right all along when you said the KDY is a round pendant/locket type object. > > Now, surely there are many other wonderful things in the world to discuss in this group. > > Jeremy > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 Dear Forumers ! Please see the Date of Numismatists_1973 join us at Sacred Objects, its Asia's June 22 2009, yet he claim a lie, that he posted on Kailash Dhana Raksh Yantra, before June 22nd 09... Its that same 36 years old kid, who is manipulating websites and emails to sell his Kailash Dhana Raksha Yantra, for US$ 1.5 million, and calling Bala_songyi with confusing Names like Viral Patel, Mutusamay, Muthuraku, BalaSubramaniam, etc etc Here is our forum joining as member date " Member ID Email Delivery Joined numismatist_... JUNE 22ND 2009, 9.02 AM Offline Send Message -name- -age- -gender- -location- " " " " " UNQUOTE THANKS AND BEWARE OF KAILASH DHANA RAKSHA YANTRA, IT DOESN'T EXIST.... OUT OF RUSSIA, NEVER IN BANGALORE AT ALL.... BEST REGARDS sacred-objects , " numismatist_1973 " <kalaindia wrote: > > Dear All, > (And Hello Mr. Richard Shaw Brown) > > I had once posted a message about the KDY on the message board in which I stood opposed to the ridiculous claims being made by " bala_songyi " . I hope everyone has read and understood its contents. Controversies of this nature have been perpetrated by fraud claimants throughout history. I do not believe that " ishwar33 " is in possession of the original KDY. He may perhaps know its location or who the present owner is. He may have also seen it at some time as his description and historical analogy is very accurate and in keeping with the known facts about the KDY. > > The raging war-of-words between bala_songyi and ishwar33 has so far dwelt on the question of " WHICH IS THE REAL KAILASH DHANARAKSHA YANTRA TALISMAN? " > > I have taken the pains to speak to many senior Tibetan monks in Dharamshala, Ladakh (Leh), Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan and Darjeeling since I lasted posted my message on the board. I now hereby wish to inform everyone that there is no controversy in their minds as to what the original KDY is or what it looks like. > > They all described it to me in Nepali language (common dialect of the region) as a " gol peetal bostu jis ta vajan do-sow bees gram hoi " – meaning that " it is a round brass item whose weight is two hundred and twenty grams " . This is the traditional belief of every spiritually evolved Buddhist monk of the Himalayan region who has heard of the Kailash Dhanaraksha Yantra. When asked if there was any other item called the KDY, or any other shape it was created in, they answered – " choi-na " – meaning " No " . > > When they were told of the claims made by bala_songyi (aka Muthuraku), they did not only laugh, but showed absolute contempt at the source of such information. They were of the opinion that there is no scope for debate. There is only one KDY in existence, and it is a round brass pendant-type metal plate with a loop on the top for wearing with a thong. It weighs 220 gms and it was created between 812 and 824 AD on the slopes of Mount Kailash by Padmasambhava as a " terma " to be discovered by future generations. It never went to Hitler and has never had a Russian owner, claimant or connection. That whole story is a fabrication. Many Buddhist leaders are even aware that the KDY is now somewhere in a city in South India (being the reason why I feel ishwar33 has perhaps seen it and definitely knows what he is talking about) > > I am personally happy and at peace for having made my own enquiries rather than go by what either bala_songyi or ishwar33 said. Surely the statements of so many senior and learned Buddhist monks far outweigh the claims any one can make on this topic. > > This case can definitely be put to rest. bala-songyi may perhaps be a little peeved at being exposed. My apologies for having to state the painful truth. Let's forgive him for his lack of knowledge and indiscretion. A debate is a healthy thing, as it brings out the truth and exposes the hoax. The round talisman will not become square just because someone is begging it to be, and even prepared to warp and contort history to prove his arguement. One cannot change history or the nature of things by flogging this dead horse. What amazes and amuses me about bala_songyi is how true Oliver Goldsmith was when he wrote in his famous poem - THE VILLAGE SCHOOLMASTER > > " for even though vanquished, he could argue still... " > > ishwar33, thanks to all your detailed and accurate research. You were right all along when you said the KDY is a round pendant/locket type object. > > Now, surely there are many other wonderful things in the world to discuss in this group. > > Jeremy > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.