You thought you knew about GRAVITATIONAL EFFECT...

[Guest guest]

***SO DISTANCE AND THERE FORE GRAVITATIONAL EFFECT DOES NOT MATTER?***Cosmology as a science must be able to replicate in a laboratory its theories based on gravity. But so far not a single prediction of theirs has come true. And instead, the theory of an electrical universe (it is supposed by modern cosmology to be empty), has been replicated in laboratories and some of their predictions have come true already in the past 5 years.The problem is that cosmology does not want to die.See:The imaginative construct received no support from later observations. In the Crab Nebula, what we now see is not gravitational accretion, but material accelerated away from the central star. In fact, all of the weird and wonderful things said about neutron stars, such as the super-condensed "neutronium" or "quark" soup from which

they are claimed to have formed, lie outside the realm of verifiable science. They are abstractions disconnected from nature, but required to save a paradigm that has no other force than gravity to provide compact sources of radiation.*Critics of the "neutron star" hypothesis say that it is a violation of common sense to speak of matter being gravitationally compressed to the point that the orbiting electrons in an atom are forced to join with the protons in the nucleus to form neutrons. The nearly 2000-fold difference in weight between the electron and the proton will ensure charge separation in an intense gravitational field. Each atom will become a tiny radial electric dipole that assists charge separation. And the electric force of repulsion is 39 orders of magnitude stronger than gravity, so extremely weak charge separation is sufficient to resist gravitational compression. The force of gravity is effectively zero in the presence of

the electric force.All of today's popular ideas about supernovae, the supposed progenitors of neutron stars, were formulated under a gravity-only ideology that has, in recent decades, been challenged (and electric theorists would say overturned) by the discovery of plasma and powerful electric and magnetic fields in space. Supernovae have recently been identified as catastrophic stellar electrical discharges (see Supernova 1987A Decoded, http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=re6qxnz1). The remnant of such a discharge cannot be the imagined rapidly spinning super-dense object: powerful electrical forces will always prevent gravitational "super-collapse."http://www.rense.com/general69/iron123.htmThe "Iron Sun" Debate - Part IIBy David TalbottThunderbolts.info1-26-6And here there is more.For an Electric Sun, what happens in the Sun's core is of little consequence. We should expect an

incompressible solid or liquid core composed of heavy elements gathered in the primordial z-pinch and later synthesized in the continual stellar discharge. But since the glowing sphere we call the Sun is an electric discharge high in its atmosphere, we should naturally expect the lightest element, hydrogen, to predominate as the plasma medium for the discharge. There is no need to postulate an internal source of energy to support the photosphere since (as direct observation confirms) the photosphere and phenomena above the photosphere, such as flares and prominences, are not governed by gravity.http://www.rense.com/general69/iron3.htmThe 'Iron Sun' Debate - Part IIIBy David TalbottThunderbolts.info1-27-6AndAccording to Hannes Alfvén and other pioneers of plasma cosmology, a stellar system gives way to gravity only after the star is formed and as the plasma pinch subsides. In this view it is not

correct to look to gravity as the cause of star formation. It is also normal for a number of stars to be formed along the axis of the plasma pinch and subsequently scatter "like buckshot" following the collapse of the pinch. Planets are generally not formed at this stage. We should expect that stars formed in this manner would, as a group, tend to have their rotational axes aligned along the direction of the galactic magnetic field.http://www.rense.com/general69/sunp4.htmThe "Iron Sun" Debate - Part IVMeteorites and the Modern Myth of Solar System GenesisBy David TalbottThunderbolts.info1-29-6We cannot deny that gravity is a false flag when compiling enough information against it.An apple fell on Isaac Newton’s head and he conceived the gravity universe. An aurora “fell†on Kristian Birkeland’s head and he conceived the plasma universe. The story of Newton and the apple is apocryphal.

But Birkeland trekked to the Norwegian Arctic, stood under the aurora, and took measurements that revealed the presence of electric currents.http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/arch05/050503eu-1.htmMay 03, 2005The Electric Universe: Part I Bodies and CircuitsWe are at the dawn of a drastic revolution in awareness and therefore we have to divorce from the past and to embrace the future.Most of Hipparcos' observations of individual stars agrees with previous distance calculations (where available). The notable exception to that rule is the familiar star-cluster in the constellation Taurus called the Pleiades (see photo above). Hipparcos measured the distance to 50 of the brightest stars in the Pleiades and came up with a distance of 118 parsecs from Earth. Previous distance measurements converged around the value of 132 parsecs. That's a significant difference; about 12%, or almost 3 quadrillion miles. The older

measurements were re-examined, but they still produced the same 132 parsecs distance.What is happening here? Why is there a discrepancy in the Pleiades' distance, but not in the distances of single stars? All of the older methods of determining the distance to the stars involve assumptions based on either the theory of nuclear stars or the theory of gravity (or both). But from an Electric Universe point of view, stars are powered by galactic electric currents, not nuclear furnaces. And gravity isn't a constant, but a variable dependent on electrical characteristics. And you will like this as in your street. We have been misled for a long time by the so called experts and we now need to do our own homework.http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/arch05/050601pleiades-problem.htmThe Pleiades ProblemTraditional geology has over many years gradually built up a picture of the Earth's interior. Geologists assumed that

gravity pulled upper layers of rock onto lower layers, uniformly increasing the pressure toward the center. Laboratory experiments provided some indications of how rocks responded to increasing pressure and temperature, and theoretical extrapolations from these values provided a basis for guessing what could be going on far beneath the deepest drill holes.The result is the diagram above. A thin crust of light rock floats on the denser material of the mantle, which in turn surrounds an even denser core. At critical values of pressure, temperature, and/or composition, the material may change states, from solid to plastic at the asthenosphere, from solid to liquid at the outer core. Extrapolations of seismic wave behavior and deductions from theory (with appropriate adjustments) justify an interpretation of earthquake waves that confirms the expectations of pressure and temperature theories. The anomalies can probably be explained if enough funding

is allocated to study them.But becoming aware of plasma changes everything. Because gravity can distort atoms and because pressure can preferentially "squeeze" electrons out of lower layers, rock can become susceptible to electromagnetic forces. Because plasma cables and sheets (i.e., electrical currents) have been detected flowing between Earth's magnetosphere and the surface, the circuit must close by passing through the Earth. Because magma is a liquid plasma, it will preferentially carry currents. Because electrical currents in plasma pinch into filaments and tend to form "double layers" (capacitor-like formations), the distribution of currents inside the Earth will be highly inhomogeneous. Electrical heating will cause temperature discontinuities in "lines and lumps." Electromagnetic forces between current filaments and between the layers of double layers will cause enormous and sudden pressure variations.Why doesn't this show up in

seismographs of earthquakes? Or does it show up, then go unrecognized because researchers have no concept of plasma behavior? No one has ever investigated how seismic waves act in different plasma conditions. The seismograph scrawls a single wavy line, but the geologist must interpret it according to a choice among several competing theories. With the awareness of plasma, seismographs no longer provide reliable--or even understandable--information about conditions at depth.Plasma geology is a virgin field for curious and enterprising investigators. In this age of scientific conformity and consensus truth, are there any geologists left who have a sense of adventure?http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2004/arch/041027electric-earth.htmOct 27, 2004Electrical Journey to Center of the EarthAnd this paragraph is related to a long past as well.The largest dinosaurs are many times the size of an elephant. And

dinosaur skeletons aren't as well-designed for bearing weight as elephant skeletons. Dinosaurs are impossibly large for planet Earth, but their bones are proof that they must have existed. How could that be? The limit on size depends on weight, and weight depends on the force of gravity. Most conventional theories assume that gravity throughout the universe has always been and will always be a constant property of matter. But that's only an assumption, and it must be verified empirically.The Electric Universe offers a different point of view. Gravity is not a constant. It's a variable that depends on the plasma environment. So Earth in the Mesozoic Era may have had less gravity than it has today. Holden calculates that in order for the largest dinosaurs to function, gravity must have been at least 1/3 (and possibly as low as 1/4) what it is today. He also postulates that gravity increased suddenly at the close of the age of dinosaurs but not to

the present value. Lower-than-present gravity continued into the following ages of giant mammals and possibly even to the days when early humans were building giant monuments like Stonehenge.http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/arch05/050623impossible-dinosaur.htmJun 23, 2005Impossible DinosaursBigger size = low gravity = shorter distance to the sun? This is what the Srimad Bhagavatam suggests, when describing the size of bodies in different Yugas. Dinos appeared only at a certain point in the life of Brahma, who is now age 52. They were part of his evolution in consciousness, on the mental level. His first 31 years of life his main concern was about gross energy, the body, although he started creating the gods who have a very subtle body, as they are his mental creation. Now, between 31 and 63 he is in the mental level.If gravity's influence is controlled through an electric dipole

effect, it should be more properly defined. It is not the intention of this paper to present an analysis of electric gravity except to propose that gravitational fields can change with a changing electromagnetic field. In the Electric Universe, gravity is not the warping of space-time that Einstein taught. Instead, it is a variable with many inputs that define its overall field of influence.As Henri Poincaré wrote in Science and Method: "What we call mass would seem to be nothing but an appearance, and all inertia to be of electromagnetic origin."http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2007/arch07/071010trexprimaballerina.htmArtist's conception of Tyrannosaurus rex. Credit: The Field Museum. Painting by John GurcheOct 10, 2007Tyrannosaurus Rex: Prima Ballerina By Stephen SmithI am sending you all this quotations for you to realize the magnitude of the problem of following the gravity theory,

which has not being explained by science because they do not know anything about it. But instead they are pretending to be the experts and even inventing false theories like the Big Bang, Dark Holes, expanding universe, etc.Here I stop as I do have another 500 pages in my Thunderbolt file to find about gravity. But this is enough for you to see how the Electric Universe is going to change every professional activity. And in regard to my field, astrology has all the answers to that, by just changing the meaning from ‘male’ to electric, and from ‘female’ to magnetic. This has been already hinted by Raman and Jarish Johari, here and there but they did not go deeper as the readers were not ready, but they will demand for this concept very soon. So, I am getting ready to deliver this concept in astrological terms. In fact, astrology can be understood better with this electromagnetic concept, and gravity and

distance will fade.*

Get your new Email address!

Grab the Email name you've always wanted before someone else does!

[Guest guest]

im studying this

thankyou