Passing of Siddha Sri DharmaDev Arya

[Guest guest]

Those of you who read the messages will already know that Rudra

Center's Dharma Dev Arya, American born Siddha and Rudraksha expert,

passed away last 21st (Feb 2008) after botched surgery. Everyone is

shocked because he was younger than me (I'm 60) and was in good health

up until the start of his Rahu Mahadasha.

 

This brings up the importance of House position of Rahu. Generally we

have seen that Rahu is only good in the 10th house or 11th house.

 

Sri DharmaDev has Rahu exalted in Taurus. And as his Rahu Mahadasha

was approaching he was hopeful of good results. I told him Rahu, even

exalted, is not good in the 12th (next life or loss). He was a bit

unhappy and unwilling to hear that. He also was wearing Hessonite

(gomeda) thinking his Rahu was Anukul (just because it was in Taurus).

I advised him against wearing Gomeda. But he wanted to wear. So I

thought, All right! Lets make experiment here.

 

In spite of his hope for his " good " Rahu period I warned him to watch

out. 12th house strong Rahu is bad news. But he remained optimistic.

 

Once his Rahu Mahadasha and Bhukti started he became increasingly

paralized, and finally needed surgery. His life was " eclipsed " by 12th

house Rahu and he passed away to everyones surprise.

 

So let this be a lesson about House Position of cruel planets. Rahu,

even exalted, is very bad in the 12th. Plus he should not have used

Rahu's gem Gomeda, which made matters worse. And matters don't get

much worse than passing away.

 

He was a really sweet soul. But now he has gone.

 

Best wishes,

Richard

[Guest guest]

Hi Richard, I am sorry to say that DharmaDev and I were not exactly on friendly terms, this after a big controversy developed involving several members at the RC forum back in 2004, where I subsequently left and created the Free Rudraksha Forum. I would have preferred things to be much different. Some of the few exchanges we had here on this forum unfortunately reflected his very negative feelings towards me. What DharmaDev and others didnt know was that we had very friendly and beneficial exchanges about Sri Rudraksha through an anonymous id that I created at the RC forum some time after. I did this because I realized that he would never accept me, he had already made up his own mind that I was a "troublemaker in the highest sense". However, I learned a lot from him through these exchanges and he seemed to enjoy answering my genuine queries through this id. Through this I was able to let go of

most of my negative feelings about our disagreement and his antagonism towards me. And I am very happy to have had that relationship at least and learned from him what I did. I am sorry he had to suffer like this. About the astrological implications that you describe; What I dont understand is that DharmaDev was wearing the most powerful Rudrakshas, so why bother with gems etc? Why didnt the Rudraksha's help and protect him? I think this a legitimate question. You yourself has said that Rudraksha is more powerful than gems to neutralize the malefic influence of planets. I have my own experience about Rudraksha and its implications with karma. I went through extreme suffering in Saturn bhukti of Ketu Mahadasha. The only thing which protected me was my Siddha Mala where all the beads was offered to Shri Pashupatinath. And I lost this mala shortly after Saturn peaked against my Sun, because I HAD to suffer the

sins of my past karma to purify me. In my situation, Lord Shiva took my beads away so that I could suffer my karma. But DharmaDev was always (as far as I know) wearing his beads and practising sadhanas. So how do we explain this end of his, of all people? I am sure a lot of Rudraksha bhaktas are wondering about this. All Glories to Dharmadev's service to Lord Mahadeva for spreading the knowledge about Sri Rudraksha in the world. ~ Ole Richard Shaw Brown <rsbj66 wrote: Those of you who read the messages will already know that RudraCenter's Dharma Dev Arya, American born Siddha and Rudraksha expert,passed away last 21st (Feb 2008) after botched surgery. Everyone isshocked because he was younger than me (I'm 60) and was in good healthup until the start of his Rahu Mahadasha.This brings up the importance of House position of Rahu. Generally wehave seen that Rahu is only good in the 10th house or 11th house.Sri DharmaDev has Rahu exalted in Taurus. And as his Rahu Mahadashawas approaching he was hopeful of good results. I told him Rahu, evenexalted, is not good in the 12th (next life or loss). He was a bitunhappy and unwilling to hear that. He also was wearing Hessonite(gomeda) thinking his Rahu was Anukul (just because it was in Taurus).I advised him against wearing Gomeda. But he wanted to wear. So Ithought, All right! Lets make experiment here.In spite

of his hope for his "good" Rahu period I warned him to watchout. 12th house strong Rahu is bad news. But he remained optimistic.Once his Rahu Mahadasha and Bhukti started he became increasinglyparalized, and finally needed surgery. His life was "eclipsed" by 12thhouse Rahu and he passed away to everyones surprise.So let this be a lesson about House Position of cruel planets. Rahu,even exalted, is very bad in the 12th. Plus he should not have usedRahu's gem Gomeda, which made matters worse. And matters don't getmuch worse than passing away.He was a really sweet soul. But now he has gone.Best wishes,Richard

 

Sent from Mail.

 

A Smarter Inbox.

[Guest guest]

Hi Ole,

 

Interesting. So DDji didn't dislike you, it was just that name

(attitude). In another name (attitude) the same YOU was his friend.

 

Concerning death, that is certainly predetermined and, like a

heartless computer, death strikes at the appointed time, regardless.

 

I don't think any member here has ever heard of a soul living in a

human body forever by wearing Rudraksha. Death is common to all who

get born. If you get a body then it will eventually be lost. And that

time is predetermined.

 

In otherwords, Rudraksha, Shalagram, etc., are not forever material Fountains of

Youth. Everyone wearing a Rudraksha will eventually die at their appointed time.

For DDji the appointed time was a combo of 12th house Rahu Dasha/Bhukti + janma

Sade Sati. And we cannot argue with reality (facts). No one ever died at their

wrong time.

 

Y/s,

Richard

 

sacred-objects , Ole Alstrup <alstrup wrote:

>

> Hi Richard,

>

> I am sorry to say that DharmaDev and I were not exactly on

friendly terms, this after a big controversy developed involving

several members at the RC forum back in 2004, where I subsequently

left and created the Free Rudraksha Forum. I would have preferred

things to be much different. Some of the few exchanges we had here on

this forum unfortunately reflected his very negative feelings towards

me. What DharmaDev and others didnt know was that we had very friendly

and beneficial exchanges about Sri Rudraksha through an anonymous id

that I created at the RC forum some time after. I did this because I

realized that he would never accept me, he had already made up his own

mind that I was a " troublemaker in the highest sense " . However, I

learned a lot from him through these exchanges and he seemed to enjoy

answering my genuine queries through this id. Through this I was able

to let go of most of my negative feelings about our disagreement and

his antagonism towards me. And I

> am very happy to have had that relationship at least and learned

from him what I did. I am sorry he had to suffer like this.

>

> About the astrological implications that you describe; What I dont

understand is that DharmaDev was wearing the most powerful Rudrakshas,

so why bother with gems etc? Why didnt the Rudraksha's help and

protect him? I think this a legitimate question. You yourself has said

that Rudraksha is more powerful than gems to neutralize the malefic

influence of planets. I have my own experience about Rudraksha and its

implications with karma. I went through extreme suffering in Saturn

bhukti of Ketu Mahadasha. The only thing which protected me was my

Siddha Mala where all the beads was offered to Shri Pashupatinath. And

I lost this mala shortly after Saturn peaked against my Sun, because I

HAD to suffer the sins of my past karma to purify me. In my situation,

Lord Shiva took my beads away so that I could suffer my karma. But

DharmaDev was always (as far as I know) wearing his beads and

practising sadhanas. So how do we explain this end of his, of all

people? I am sure a lot of

> Rudraksha bhaktas are wondering about this.

>

> All Glories to Dharmadev's service to Lord Mahadeva for spreading

the knowledge about Sri Rudraksha in the world.

>

> ~ Ole

>

> Richard Shaw Brown <rsbj66 wrote:

> Those of you who read the messages will already know that

Rudra

> Center's Dharma Dev Arya, American born Siddha and Rudraksha expert,

> passed away last 21st (Feb 2008) after botched surgery. Everyone is

> shocked because he was younger than me (I'm 60) and was in good health

> up until the start of his Rahu Mahadasha.

>

> This brings up the importance of House position of Rahu. Generally we

> have seen that Rahu is only good in the 10th house or 11th house.

>

> Sri DharmaDev has Rahu exalted in Taurus. And as his Rahu Mahadasha

> was approaching he was hopeful of good results. I told him Rahu, even

> exalted, is not good in the 12th (next life or loss). He was a bit

> unhappy and unwilling to hear that. He also was wearing Hessonite

> (gomeda) thinking his Rahu was Anukul (just because it was in Taurus).

> I advised him against wearing Gomeda. But he wanted to wear. So I

> thought, All right! Lets make experiment here.

>

> In spite of his hope for his " good " Rahu period I warned him to watch

> out. 12th house strong Rahu is bad news. But he remained optimistic.

>

> Once his Rahu Mahadasha and Bhukti started he became increasingly

> paralized, and finally needed surgery. His life was " eclipsed " by 12th

> house Rahu and he passed away to everyones surprise.

>

> So let this be a lesson about House Position of cruel planets. Rahu,

> even exalted, is very bad in the 12th. Plus he should not have used

> Rahu's gem Gomeda, which made matters worse. And matters don't get

> much worse than passing away.

>

> He was a really sweet soul. But now he has gone.

>

> Best wishes,

> Richard

 

> Sent from Mail.

> A Smarter Inbox.

>

[Guest guest]

Ole, Just a comment-- I wear rudraksha not to prevent the timing of release, but to succor the way when it comes.... MichaelRichard Shaw Brown <rsbj66 wrote: Hi Ole,Interesting. So DDji didn't dislike you, it was just that name(attitude). In another name (attitude) the same YOU was his friend.Concerning death, that is certainly predetermined and, like aheartless computer, death strikes at the appointed time, regardless.I don't think any

member here has ever heard of a soul living in ahuman body forever by wearing Rudraksha. Death is common to all whoget born. If you get a body then it will eventually be lost. And thattime is predetermined.In otherwords, Rudraksha, Shalagram, etc., are not forever material Fountains of Youth. Everyone wearing a Rudraksha will eventually die at their appointed time. For DDji the appointed time was a combo of 12th house Rahu Dasha/Bhukti + janma Sade Sati. And we cannot argue with reality (facts). No one ever died at their wrong time.Y/s,Richardsacred-objects , Ole Alstrup <alstrup wrote:>> Hi Richard,> > I am sorry to say that DharmaDev and I were not exactly onfriendly terms, this after a big controversy developed involvingseveral members at the RC forum back in 2004, where I subsequentlyleft

and created the Free Rudraksha Forum. I would have preferredthings to be much different. Some of the few exchanges we had here onthis forum unfortunately reflected his very negative feelings towardsme. What DharmaDev and others didnt know was that we had very friendlyand beneficial exchanges about Sri Rudraksha through an anonymous idthat I created at the RC forum some time after. I did this because Irealized that he would never accept me, he had already made up his ownmind that I was a "troublemaker in the highest sense". However, Ilearned a lot from him through these exchanges and he seemed to enjoyanswering my genuine queries through this id. Through this I was ableto let go of most of my negative feelings about our disagreement andhis antagonism towards me. And I> am very happy to have had that relationship at least and learnedfrom him what I did. I am sorry he had to suffer like this. > > About the

astrological implications that you describe; What I dontunderstand is that DharmaDev was wearing the most powerful Rudrakshas,so why bother with gems etc? Why didnt the Rudraksha's help andprotect him? I think this a legitimate question. You yourself has saidthat Rudraksha is more powerful than gems to neutralize the maleficinfluence of planets. I have my own experience about Rudraksha and itsimplications with karma. I went through extreme suffering in Saturnbhukti of Ketu Mahadasha. The only thing which protected me was mySiddha Mala where all the beads was offered to Shri Pashupatinath. AndI lost this mala shortly after Saturn peaked against my Sun, because IHAD to suffer the sins of my past karma to purify me. In my situation,Lord Shiva took my beads away so that I could suffer my karma. ButDharmaDev was always (as far as I know) wearing his beads andpractising sadhanas. So how do we explain this end of his, of

allpeople? I am sure a lot of> Rudraksha bhaktas are wondering about this. > > All Glories to Dharmadev's service to Lord Mahadeva for spreadingthe knowledge about Sri Rudraksha in the world.> > ~ Ole> > Richard Shaw Brown <rsbj66 wrote:> Those of you who read the messages will already know thatRudra> Center's Dharma Dev Arya, American born Siddha and Rudraksha expert,> passed away last 21st (Feb 2008) after botched surgery. Everyone is> shocked because he was younger than me (I'm 60) and was in good health> up until the start of his Rahu Mahadasha.> > This brings up the importance of House position of Rahu. Generally we> have seen that Rahu is only good in the 10th house or 11th house.> > Sri DharmaDev has Rahu exalted in Taurus. And as his Rahu Mahadasha> was approaching he was hopeful of good results. I told him Rahu,

even> exalted, is not good in the 12th (next life or loss). He was a bit> unhappy and unwilling to hear that. He also was wearing Hessonite> (gomeda) thinking his Rahu was Anukul (just because it was in Taurus).> I advised him against wearing Gomeda. But he wanted to wear. So I> thought, All right! Lets make experiment here.> > In spite of his hope for his "good" Rahu period I warned him to watch> out. 12th house strong Rahu is bad news. But he remained optimistic.> > Once his Rahu Mahadasha and Bhukti started he became increasingly> paralized, and finally needed surgery. His life was "eclipsed" by 12th> house Rahu and he passed away to everyones surprise.> > So let this be a lesson about House Position of cruel planets. Rahu,> even exalted, is very bad in the 12th. Plus he should not have used> Rahu's gem Gomeda, which made matters worse. And matters don't

get> much worse than passing away.> > He was a really sweet soul. But now he has gone.> > Best wishes,> Richard> > > > > > > > Sent from Mail.> A Smarter Inbox.>

Never miss a thing. Make your homepage.

[Guest guest]

namaskar everyone

if i may

offer my sincere condolences for the manner of his

passing. in, that i hope he did not suffer

for to suffer and not be able to meditate or make an

offering at the third eyein the last moments of

physical incarnation this is the worst. to leave the

body is a blessing when done with focus so on emay

attain in ones next incarnation the right path

towards moksh. death itself is not the worst but could

be the very best.itis how one leaves the body .truly

no matter what rudraksha. gem . shaligram mantra

meditation we do should always have the most pure

motive and foremost thought and that is bakhti and

moksh the cessation of suffering for oursleves and

all sentient beings. whatever trip we are on and

acquiring goodies and such in the end is dust in the

wind

may his next incarnation be filled with peace and the

right path

and that is for everyone

 

 

 

______________________________\

____

Be a better friend, newshound, and

know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now.

http://mobile./;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

[Guest guest]

Hi Richard,

 

Thanks for the reply. So you dont believe that Rudraksha can change

our karma(s), it is all cast in stone which is reflected in our

chart? Then why wear any talisman?

 

Thanks,

 

Ole

 

 

sacred-objects , " Richard Shaw Brown "

<rsbj66 wrote:

>

> Hi Ole,

>

> Interesting. So DDji didn't dislike you, it was just that name

> (attitude). In another name (attitude) the same YOU was his friend.

>

> Concerning death, that is certainly predetermined and, like a

> heartless computer, death strikes at the appointed time,

regardless.

>

> I don't think any member here has ever heard of a soul living in a

> human body forever by wearing Rudraksha. Death is common to all who

> get born. If you get a body then it will eventually be lost. And

that

> time is predetermined.

>

> In otherwords, Rudraksha, Shalagram, etc., are not forever

material Fountains of Youth. Everyone wearing a Rudraksha will

eventually die at their appointed time. For DDji the appointed time

was a combo of 12th house Rahu Dasha/Bhukti + janma Sade Sati. And

we cannot argue with reality (facts). No one ever died at their

wrong time.

>

> Y/s,

> Richard

>

> sacred-objects , Ole Alstrup <alstrup@>

wrote:

> >

> > Hi Richard,

> >

> > I am sorry to say that DharmaDev and I were not exactly on

> friendly terms, this after a big controversy developed involving

> several members at the RC forum back in 2004, where I subsequently

> left and created the Free Rudraksha Forum. I would have preferred

> things to be much different. Some of the few exchanges we had here

on

> this forum unfortunately reflected his very negative feelings

towards

> me. What DharmaDev and others didnt know was that we had very

friendly

> and beneficial exchanges about Sri Rudraksha through an anonymous

id

> that I created at the RC forum some time after. I did this because

I

> realized that he would never accept me, he had already made up his

own

> mind that I was a " troublemaker in the highest sense " . However, I

> learned a lot from him through these exchanges and he seemed to

enjoy

> answering my genuine queries through this id. Through this I was

able

> to let go of most of my negative feelings about our disagreement

and

> his antagonism towards me. And I

> > am very happy to have had that relationship at least and learned

> from him what I did. I am sorry he had to suffer like this.

> >

> > About the astrological implications that you describe; What I

dont

> understand is that DharmaDev was wearing the most powerful

Rudrakshas,

> so why bother with gems etc? Why didnt the Rudraksha's help and

> protect him? I think this a legitimate question. You yourself has

said

> that Rudraksha is more powerful than gems to neutralize the malefic

> influence of planets. I have my own experience about Rudraksha and

its

> implications with karma. I went through extreme suffering in Saturn

> bhukti of Ketu Mahadasha. The only thing which protected me was my

> Siddha Mala where all the beads was offered to Shri Pashupatinath.

And

> I lost this mala shortly after Saturn peaked against my Sun,

because I

> HAD to suffer the sins of my past karma to purify me. In my

situation,

> Lord Shiva took my beads away so that I could suffer my karma. But

> DharmaDev was always (as far as I know) wearing his beads and

> practising sadhanas. So how do we explain this end of his, of all

> people? I am sure a lot of

> > Rudraksha bhaktas are wondering about this.

> >

> > All Glories to Dharmadev's service to Lord Mahadeva for

spreading

> the knowledge about Sri Rudraksha in the world.

> >

> > ~ Ole

> >

> > Richard Shaw Brown <rsbj66@> wrote:

> > Those of you who read the messages will already know

that

> Rudra

> > Center's Dharma Dev Arya, American born Siddha and Rudraksha

expert,

> > passed away last 21st (Feb 2008) after botched surgery. Everyone

is

> > shocked because he was younger than me (I'm 60) and was in good

health

> > up until the start of his Rahu Mahadasha.

> >

> > This brings up the importance of House position of Rahu.

Generally we

> > have seen that Rahu is only good in the 10th house or 11th house.

> >

> > Sri DharmaDev has Rahu exalted in Taurus. And as his Rahu

Mahadasha

> > was approaching he was hopeful of good results. I told him Rahu,

even

> > exalted, is not good in the 12th (next life or loss). He was a

bit

> > unhappy and unwilling to hear that. He also was wearing Hessonite

> > (gomeda) thinking his Rahu was Anukul (just because it was in

Taurus).

> > I advised him against wearing Gomeda. But he wanted to wear. So I

> > thought, All right! Lets make experiment here.

> >

> > In spite of his hope for his " good " Rahu period I warned him to

watch

> > out. 12th house strong Rahu is bad news. But he remained

optimistic.

> >

> > Once his Rahu Mahadasha and Bhukti started he became increasingly

> > paralized, and finally needed surgery. His life was " eclipsed "

by 12th

> > house Rahu and he passed away to everyones surprise.

> >

> > So let this be a lesson about House Position of cruel planets.

Rahu,

> > even exalted, is very bad in the 12th. Plus he should not have

used

> > Rahu's gem Gomeda, which made matters worse. And matters don't

get

> > much worse than passing away.

> >

> > He was a really sweet soul. But now he has gone.

> >

> > Best wishes,

> > Richard

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Sent from Mail.

> > A Smarter Inbox.

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Ole,

 

We know that karma is not eternal and CAN be changed. For example we

have the unique case of Ajamila cheating death unintentionally.

Wearing Rudraksha, etc., is punya karma or pious karma or " sanskar "

that produces good results. Papa or sinful karma gives bad results.

The way to counteract papa-karma is by punya karma. But karma is so

unique that even such changes are possible as a result of karma. So

changing karma is karma. As for death, no one in a material body ever

kept that body eternally. So death is certain. And it never happens at

the wrong time. Krishna Himself is death (mrityu sarva-harascha aham),

as Yamaraj, and he's just doing his job based on everyones karma.

Still Krishna can intervene, but not if someone prayed to keep the

material body eternally. Even Ajamila had to finally leave his

material body. As DD was called a " Siddha " then it's possible for such

soul to depart at will. I heard that is what happened - he lost the

will to live in the body OR decided to leave his body. Either way,

what is the wonder?

 

Best wishes,

Richard

 

sacred-objects , " alstrup " <alstrup wrote:

>

> Hi Richard,

>

> Thanks for the reply. So you dont believe that Rudraksha can change

> our karma(s), it is all cast in stone which is reflected in our

> chart? Then why wear any talisman?

>

> Thanks,

>

> Ole

>

>

> sacred-objects , " Richard Shaw Brown "

> <rsbj66@> wrote:

> >

> > Hi Ole,

> >

> > Interesting. So DDji didn't dislike you, it was just that name

> > (attitude). In another name (attitude) the same YOU was his friend.

> >

> > Concerning death, that is certainly predetermined and, like a

> > heartless computer, death strikes at the appointed time,

> regardless.

> >

> > I don't think any member here has ever heard of a soul living in a

> > human body forever by wearing Rudraksha. Death is common to all who

> > get born. If you get a body then it will eventually be lost. And

> that

> > time is predetermined.

> >

> > In otherwords, Rudraksha, Shalagram, etc., are not forever

> material Fountains of Youth. Everyone wearing a Rudraksha will

> eventually die at their appointed time. For DDji the appointed time

> was a combo of 12th house Rahu Dasha/Bhukti + janma Sade Sati. And

> we cannot argue with reality (facts). No one ever died at their

> wrong time.

> >

> > Y/s,

> > Richard

> >

> > sacred-objects , Ole Alstrup <alstrup@>

> wrote:

> > >

> > > Hi Richard,

> > >

> > > I am sorry to say that DharmaDev and I were not exactly on

> > friendly terms, this after a big controversy developed involving

> > several members at the RC forum back in 2004, where I subsequently

> > left and created the Free Rudraksha Forum. I would have preferred

> > things to be much different. Some of the few exchanges we had here

> on

> > this forum unfortunately reflected his very negative feelings

> towards

> > me. What DharmaDev and others didnt know was that we had very

> friendly

> > and beneficial exchanges about Sri Rudraksha through an anonymous

> id

> > that I created at the RC forum some time after. I did this because

> I

> > realized that he would never accept me, he had already made up his

> own

> > mind that I was a " troublemaker in the highest sense " . However, I

> > learned a lot from him through these exchanges and he seemed to

> enjoy

> > answering my genuine queries through this id. Through this I was

> able

> > to let go of most of my negative feelings about our disagreement

> and

> > his antagonism towards me. And I

> > > am very happy to have had that relationship at least and learned

> > from him what I did. I am sorry he had to suffer like this.

> > >

> > > About the astrological implications that you describe; What I

> dont

> > understand is that DharmaDev was wearing the most powerful

> Rudrakshas,

> > so why bother with gems etc? Why didnt the Rudraksha's help and

> > protect him? I think this a legitimate question. You yourself has

> said

> > that Rudraksha is more powerful than gems to neutralize the malefic

> > influence of planets. I have my own experience about Rudraksha and

> its

> > implications with karma. I went through extreme suffering in Saturn

> > bhukti of Ketu Mahadasha. The only thing which protected me was my

> > Siddha Mala where all the beads was offered to Shri Pashupatinath.

> And

> > I lost this mala shortly after Saturn peaked against my Sun,

> because I

> > HAD to suffer the sins of my past karma to purify me. In my

> situation,

> > Lord Shiva took my beads away so that I could suffer my karma. But

> > DharmaDev was always (as far as I know) wearing his beads and

> > practising sadhanas. So how do we explain this end of his, of all

> > people? I am sure a lot of

> > > Rudraksha bhaktas are wondering about this.

> > >

> > > All Glories to Dharmadev's service to Lord Mahadeva for

> spreading

> > the knowledge about Sri Rudraksha in the world.

> > >

> > > ~ Ole

> > >

> > > Richard Shaw Brown <rsbj66@> wrote:

> > > Those of you who read the messages will already know

> that

> > Rudra

> > > Center's Dharma Dev Arya, American born Siddha and Rudraksha

> expert,

> > > passed away last 21st (Feb 2008) after botched surgery. Everyone

> is

> > > shocked because he was younger than me (I'm 60) and was in good

> health

> > > up until the start of his Rahu Mahadasha.

> > >

> > > This brings up the importance of House position of Rahu.

> Generally we

> > > have seen that Rahu is only good in the 10th house or 11th house.

> > >

> > > Sri DharmaDev has Rahu exalted in Taurus. And as his Rahu

> Mahadasha

> > > was approaching he was hopeful of good results. I told him Rahu,

> even

> > > exalted, is not good in the 12th (next life or loss). He was a

> bit

> > > unhappy and unwilling to hear that. He also was wearing Hessonite

> > > (gomeda) thinking his Rahu was Anukul (just because it was in

> Taurus).

> > > I advised him against wearing Gomeda. But he wanted to wear. So I

> > > thought, All right! Lets make experiment here.

> > >

> > > In spite of his hope for his " good " Rahu period I warned him to

> watch

> > > out. 12th house strong Rahu is bad news. But he remained

> optimistic.

> > >

> > > Once his Rahu Mahadasha and Bhukti started he became increasingly

> > > paralized, and finally needed surgery. His life was " eclipsed "

> by 12th

> > > house Rahu and he passed away to everyones surprise.

> > >

> > > So let this be a lesson about House Position of cruel planets.

> Rahu,

> > > even exalted, is very bad in the 12th. Plus he should not have

> used

> > > Rahu's gem Gomeda, which made matters worse. And matters don't

> get

> > > much worse than passing away.

> > >

> > > He was a really sweet soul. But now he has gone.

> > >

> > > Best wishes,

> > > Richard

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Sent from Mail.

> > > A Smarter Inbox.

> > >

> >

>