cashewnut shaped 1 faced is not a REAL rudraksha

[Guest guest]

Once a person came to visit me. They showed me they were wearing cashewnut type

- and proud of having such " eka-mukhi " - and I remember thinking to him, " better

get yourself a 5 mukhi Rudraksha for Good luck, too! " Or the forumla: One

cashewnut type + one 5 mukhi= ONE Rudraksha.

 

Best wishes,

Richard

 

sacred-objects , " panditarjun2004 " <panditarjun2004

wrote:

>

> dear friends

>

> few years ago, since few customers demanded, i too got these

> cashewnut type rudrakshalooking beads made available to few

> customers. soon i realised that i am doing a wrong thing by

> promoting something which DOES NOT have scriptural substantiation. i

> have the convinction of truth to admit this publicly in all groups.

>

> fact # 1

> all scriptures that narrate rudraksha unanimously says that rudraksha

> are round in shape. no scripture even vaguely mention existence of

> other types of rudraksha other than round.

>

> fact # 2

> all scriptures also narrate about a rudraksha having a hole naturally

> as better and have a couple of verses on the hole of the rudrakhsa.

> since this cashewnut looking bead DOES NOT have any hole provision

> nor it has any possibility to have a natural hole, it is simple human

> logic to understand that THIS IS NOT THE RUDRAKSHA the scriptures are

> mentioning.

>

> above all, scientists like doctor chandrasekhar phadkeji ratified

> earlier in this group (unaware members can search the archives) that

> this cashnewnut looking bead does not exactly fall into the round

> rudraksha variety of the tree in botanical terms. since this

> cashnewut bead does not fall into the same rudraksha jaat trees, that

> itself is reason enough to shun this, at least by me if not others.

>

> accordingly i stopped selling this cashnewnut looking bead and have

> REMOVED the photographs from my website as well. to a couple of old

> customers who bought this cashewnut bead from me earlier, i even

> offered to recall and pay their monies back, but they appreciated my

> honesty and truthspeaking and said that since they were made to

> believe by other rudraksha sellers as if CASHEWNUT BEAD IS THE REAL

> EKMUKH, they dont feel cheated for buying this cashewnut from me

> earlier.

>

> here as a dealer of rudraksha, i must mince no words in telling the

> world that if someone sells this cashewnut bead and customers buy it,

> there is no problem as both knew beforehand what the product is. BUT

> IF THE SELLER GOES TO THE EXTENT OF SAYING THAT THIS IS THE ONLY

> GENUINE EKMUKHI, that is wrong. some overenthusiastic cashewnut

> sellers went to the extent of saying that round ekmukh is fake and

> cashewnut shaped bead is genuine.

>

> it is buyers choice as to which product they shall get, genuine or

> substitute.

>

> in the bylanes of delhi, the shopkeeper asks the customers of any

> product, you want original company good or a local make. mind you,

> many people wilfully ask and buy the local (duplicate) good just

> because it is easily available and cheap.

>

> so, customer is the king and he knows everything beforehand and it is

> is his well informed decision and discretion whether to buy a

> cashewnut bead or a round bead and none of us shall find fault with

> customers.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy.com

>

> sacred-objects , " Richard Shaw Brown "

> <rsbj66@> wrote:

> >

> > It, like, might be Bhadraksha. But it's STILL supposed to have

> powers of like, ahh, who knows?

> >

> > sacred-objects , " Vienna Jones "

> <butterfly_lovers_85@> wrote:

> > >

> > > hi all

> > > Just wanted to let all of you 1 faced rudraksha enthusiasts know

> that

> > > the 1 faced cashewnut shaped rudraksha is not really a rudraksha

> but it

> > > is a species of rudraksha commonly known as bhadraksha.

> > >

> > > Vienna

> > >

> >

>