Guest guest Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 http://ph.sacred-objects/photos/view/b80f?b=1 OM Shanti Group members, I believe we have to be open minded in this group and come to a proper conclusion as per RSB's mails. I got the photo above from somewhere , I believe from Panditarjuns site. Its looks like a one mukhi round although internally it may be a 4 mukhi. Whats important is the energy emitted and perceived from the photo of this rudraksha. I had shown it to a local indonesian adept and he says its fit for a king. This guy has no idea of the difference between a one mukhi to a 14mukhi (price wise). He can only see the energy emitted. As stated in Bro RSB's mail this confirms the existense of a one mukhi unmodified rudraksha even though rare. I had been banned from Rudraksha ratna site for saying that a one mukhi exists. I believe that our scriptures cannot be wrong. If it is mentioned in the scriptures then it does exist .!! OM Shanti. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 dear friend the revelation by dasaji vindicates your belief that round ekmukh rudraksha does exist and you have heard dasaji himself narrating the miracles he has experienced with the round rudraksha for more than a decade. even brother richardji ratified the existence of round ek mukh rudraksha with reverred kalibabaji of nepal. till date i have made available only two holy beads of round ek mukh rudraksha to my customers and both are happy with it. furthermore, none of the puranas, that narrate the types of rudraksha, mentioned under the ek mukh rudraksha that it is rare or not available which in itself means that it is available. some people call nagamani a myth but it does exist. the holiness, energy and divinity lie in the belief of a believer and not in the laboratory. the shivling at varanasi (a jyotirlinga) was thrown into a pond nearby the original temple when it was invaded and the original temple destoryed. later a new temple was built and the same shivling which was removed and thrown in a nearby pond is reerected and is worshipped today. similar discontinuity and sacrilege of somnath jyotirlinga is also known to many shivbhakts. members must understand that religion itself is a matter of faith and so are mythology and divinity, dieties and their holy beads like rudraksha. once a querent asked me why we rever these shivlings at varanasi and somnath when these gods could not protect themselves from the invaders. people from various walks of life come with various arguments and questions the rationality, scientific tenability etc., which are not possible in matters of faith. with best wishes and blessings pandit arjun www.rudraksharemedy.com sacred-objects , " Kanna " <kanna63 wrote: > > http://ph.sacred-objects/photos/view/b80f?b=1 > > OM Shanti Group members, > > I believe we have to be open minded in this group and come to a proper > conclusion as per RSB's mails. > > I got the photo above from somewhere , I believe from Panditarjuns site. > > Its looks like a one mukhi round although internally it may be a 4 > mukhi. > > Whats important is the energy emitted and perceived from the photo of > this rudraksha. > I had shown it to a local indonesian adept and he says its fit for a > king. This guy has no idea of the difference between a one mukhi to a > 14mukhi (price wise). He can only see the energy emitted. > > As stated in Bro RSB's mail this confirms the existense of a one mukhi > unmodified rudraksha even though rare. > > > I had been banned from Rudraksha ratna site for saying that a one mukhi > exists. I believe that our scriptures cannot be wrong. > If it is mentioned in the scriptures then it does exist .!! > > OM Shanti. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.