Guest guest Posted March 20, 2008 Report Share Posted March 20, 2008 Pardon us for misunderstanding the scriptures. We feel that certain statements are contradictory to each other, and we are at a loss to know what is to be accepted and what is to be rejected. One scripture says 'brahma satyam jaganmithya,' `God is truth while the world is illusion'. You said, " There is no maya. " How are we to understand the scriptural statement in the light of what you have told us about maya? Moreover, the same scripture says; `sarvarn visnumayam jagat,' `The whole Universe is Divine.' Then, what and where is delusion or maya! Of the two statements, contradictory to each other, which one is true? Both the statements are equally true though they seem opposed to each other. The whole mistake lies in your understanding or rather your misunderstanding. They apply to your own mental state; your experience determines your own level of understanding the truth. Here is an example for you. Suppose I ask you " When did you come? " your reply would be, `Just now. Swami!' Isn't it? Analyse your answer. When you said, " I have come just now " , what is it that has come here? Your " I " , does it refers., to yourself or to your body? You have identified yourself with your body. You think, you are the body. So, the one that has come now is your body (you are the body- feeling). Later, you start complaining, " My leg is paining " , " My head reels " and " My hand shakes " . Examine these statements clearly. You say " my leg " , " my hand " " my head " and so on. Now, put a question to yourself, " who is this my? " When you say, " This is my hand " , it means you are different from your hand. You are different from the limbs, senses, etc. You are the owner or master and all the rest are instruments. In these statements, you indirectly or unconsciously convey that you are .not the body. Earlier, when you said, " I have come now " you meant the body and now when you say " my leg " , " my head " , you mean you are different from your body. Similarly in sadhana when you view from body identification from the dualistic standpoint, the first statement, brahma satyam jaganmithya , is true (body identification - I have come now). But, when you speak from the atmic view, spirit, or non-dualistic approach, your second statement that you are different from your body (my leg, my hand, my head. etc) is true. So, the truth conveyed in `sarvam visnumayam jagat' holds good. You have to understand the statement in this sense. You should never consider the statements of our scriptures as contradictory to each other. They are stated to meet the needs of people of different mental levels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.