Guest guest Posted September 9, 2001 Report Share Posted September 9, 2001 --- " Krsna Shakti (dd) TVS (Radhadesh - B) " <Krsna.Shakti.TVS wrote: > ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > > Letter PAMHO:4488349 (73 lines) > Dhira Krsna (das) BCS (Radhadesh - B) > 15-Jul-01 16:58 > " Varahamihira " > <varahamihira > > vedic astrology > Reference: Text PAMHO:4457652 by Internet: Gauranga > Das > [Jaya Jagannath] Re: [vedic astrology] > Lahiri/ayanamsa puzzle - > --------------------------- > Dear Gauranga Prabhu, > > Hare Rama Krsna. > > Sorry for the delay in answering. I had an intense > week of taking care of > Lord Jagannath, Baladeva and Subhadra after They got > sick from the snana > yatra. We had Ratha Yatra in The Hague, Holland, > yesterday. > > >I'd love to give th exact reference, but > unfortunately I don't have it. I > >just remember reading it in an issue of the > Astrological Magazine. But it > >must be Pancasiddhantika. Maybe Shiv Chadha or > someone can give the exact > >quote. > > Sadaputa Prabhu mentions this number of ayanamsa > value in his new book > " Mysteries of the Sacred Universe " as written in the > Pancasiddhantika. Do > you remember also if it was mentioned why he came to > this ayanamsa? > > As I had very intimate days with Lord Jagannath, He > gave me a lot of mercy > and realizations. The ayanamsa value of Varaha > Mihira can be obtained by the > movement of the cosmic clock represented by the line > described in this verse > of Srimad-Bhagavatam, and by the progression of the > Rahu-ketu axis. > > <<SB. 12.2.27-28: Of the seven stars forming the > constellation of the seven > sages, Pulaha and Kratu are the first to rise in the > night sky. If a line > running north and south were drawn through their > midpoint, whichever of the > lunar mansions this line passes through is said to > be the ruling asterism of > the constellation for that time. The Seven Sages > will remain connected with > that particular lunar mansion for one hundred human > years. Currently, during > your lifetime, they are situated in the naksatra > called Magha.>> > > The Saptarsi constellation is known as Ursa Major in > the Western astronomy. > The first rising stars are Pulaha and Kratu, the > stars on the edge of the > cart. Notice that these stars point exactly to the > North Pole of the sky. > Extending this line to the zodiac, it will touch a > particular naksatra. That > is the ruling naksatra for 100 human years. > Rahu-Ketu pass through one rasi > in 1.5 year. One rasi is 2.25 naksatras, so in > 0.66666 years one naksatra > is passed. Now in 100 years the Rahu-Ketu axis will > progress for 150 > naksatras + 1 = 151 naksatras, indicating in this > way that the 7 Sages are > connected with one rasi for 100 years. And 151/3 = > 50.33333. > > Then calculating further on the information that in > 46.6666 degrees 1.200 > years have passed, if we consider the 2 edges of the > line from Pulaha-Kratu > (note that in Krsna's time these 2 lines were > diametrically opposite to each > other in 90 degrees) 3.5 naksatras are passed on > either side, so that gives > us an amount of 7 naksatras. 2 x 7 x 100 = 1.400 > years. Then why 1.200 > years? Note also that the line will have passed > Abhijit, which is an > intercalary naksatra, because Abhijit went to the > forest to meditate, so she > left the heavens. Because of Abhijit 200 years must > be deducted, as the > total number for Abhijit will be 400 years divided > over the 2 transits of > this line over it. > > Regarding the actual ayanamsa degree at present, > that will depend on the > position of Rahu-Ketu at the time of the beginning > of the kali-yuga. > Definitely they should have been exalted in > Rohini-Anuradha respectively. > Regarding the actual positions, I have some ideas, > but it still needs some > refinement. Definitely the amount of years from the > start of kali-yuga till > the next year Rahu-Ketu become exalted in > Rohini-Anuradha should be a > multiple of 18 (the amount of years they travel over > 360 degrees) and then > 50 years after should be the Battle of Kuruksetra > which should be a subha > krit year, going in multiples of 60. The most > probable and close date I > could find would be 3.127 BC for the start of > kali-yuga and 3.077 or 3.078 > BC for the Battle of Kuruksetra. > > Maybe Narasimha or Shiv Chadha can check the dates > of Yudhisthira and > Krsna's charts for the respective dates. Note that > Krsna left the world 36 > years after the Battle of Kuruksetra and that the > age of kali only then > manifested, although it would have started 50 years > before the birth of > Maharaja Pariksit. > > Hare Krsna! > > Your sishya, > Dhira Krsna dasa > (Text PAMHO:4488349) > ------ > > ------- End of Forwarded Message ------ > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Messenger http://im. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.