[Jaya Jagannath] Narayan Dasa rule - Confirmation needed

[Guest guest]

Wasn't there something about the association/aspect of the atmakaraka? I

just have a vague memory....

-

<narayaniyer

<varahamihira >

Saturday, April 07, 2001 11:11 PM

[Jaya Jagannath] Re: Narayan Dasa rule - Confirmation needed

 

 

>

> I will restate the rule:

>

> if

>

> [ the nodes are aspectd by Ju then they loose their power and the

> other co-lord becomes the ruler. ]

>

> else

>

> [

> 1. If one co-lord is in the house, the other co-lord becomes

> the ruler.

>

> 2. If one is conjoined with more planets.

>

> 3. If one is aspected by more planets out of

> a> Ju

> b> Me

> c> Lord of the sign in which the co-lords are disposited.

>

> 4. If one is exalted or the other is debilitated.

>

> 5. If one is more advanced in longitude. In case of the

> Nodes the longitude have to be reckoned from the end of sign.

>

> ]

>

> -Narayan

varahamihira, " Frank in Austin " <fschmidt@a...> wrote:

> > Namaste,

> > Clearification is nedded regarding the new rule by Sanjay

> > below:

> > if the nodes are aspectd by Ju then they loose

> > their power and the other co-lord becomes the ruler.

> > that being said:

> . If this rule applies ( by

> > rasi or graha dristi) then the other rules below (1-5) are

> > moot

> > and you will not have to apply the correct?

> >

> > Please advise and adjust this statement as needed...

> > thank you,

> >

> >

> > Dear Solai,

> >

> > If you are referring to Narayana Dasa rules, then they are

> > different.

> > Here are the rules to find the stronger of co-lord of Aq &

> > Sc:

> >

> > Gurudevathe nodes

> > are

> > aspectd by Ju then they loose their power and the other

> > co-lord

> > becomes the ruler recently revealed a rule saying that if . This has

> to be checked first and then the

> > following rules have to be applied.

> >

> > 1. If one co-lord is in the house, the other co-lord becomes

> > the

> > ruler.

> >

> > 2. If one is conjoined with more planets.

> >

> > 3. If one is aspected by more planets out of

> > a> Ju

> > b> Me

> > c> Lord of the sign in which the co-lords are disposited.

> >

> > 4. If one is exalted or the other is debilitated.

> >

> > 5. If one is more advanced in longitude. In case of the

> > Nodes the

> > longitude have to be reckoned from the end of sign.

> >

> > Regards

> > -Narayan

> >

> >

> > varahamihira, " Solai Kannan " <solai@t...> wrote:

> > > OHM SHRI RAGAVENDRAYA NAMAH

> > > JAYA JAGANNATHA

> > >

> > > Pranam Gurudeva,

> > >

> > > Regarding Arudha Lagna, you taught us that for Aquarius

> > and

> > Scorpio, the

> > > dual lordship has to be considered. As Rahu and Ketu are

> > not having

> > the

> > > Shadbala, we are relying on the Jaimin's secondary

> > strength rules.

> > >

> > > However, I am confused with Mr.A.B.Vajpayee's chart. It is

> > given in

> > SJVC

> > > article and in Jaimini's Upadesa Sudra book that his AL is

> > Virgo.

> > His lagna

> > > is Scorpio and the co-lord, Ketu is exalted in Sagittarius

> > and

> > conjoined

> > > with Sun and Venus. But, Mars is in Aries aspected by

> > Jupiter and

> > Mercury

> > > (AK). But, it is taught that first we should look at the

> > Lord with

> > more

> > > planets. As per this Ketu becomes stronger.

> > >

> > > Can you please enlighten us about the Step by step rules

> > to find

> > out the

> > > strength for these co-lordship for Arudha lagna

> > calculation?

> > >

> > > What I understood based on ABV's chart is follows, please

> > correct

> > me. We

> > > should follow the order and when a condition is satisfied

> > then we

> > should

> > > stop there and take the lord as per that condition as the

> > lord of

> > the sign

> > >

> > > 1.If one lord is in Lagna, then other lord is stronger.

> > > 2.If one of them is Atmakaraka (not applicable for Ketu),

> > then that

> > planet

> > > is stronger.

> > > 3.If one is conjoined or aspected by Atmakaraka, then that

> > planet is

> > > stronger.

> > > 4.If a lord is Conjoined with more planets then that lord

> > is

> > stronger.

> > > 5.If a lord has more sign aspect from Jupiter and Mercury,

> > that

> > lord is

> > > stronger.

> > >

> > > I do not know the applicability of different oddity or

> > advanced in

> > longitude

> > > rules here.

> > >

> > > Thanks

> > > Your sisya

> > > Solai Kannan

> >

> >

> >