Narayan Dasa rule - Confirmation needed

[Guest guest]

I will restate the rule:

 

if

 

[ the nodes are aspectd by Ju then they loose their power and the

other co-lord becomes the ruler. ]

 

else

 

[

1. If one co-lord is in the house, the other co-lord becomes

the ruler.

 

2. If one is conjoined with more planets.

 

3. If one is aspected by more planets out of

a> Ju

b> Me

c> Lord of the sign in which the co-lords are disposited.

 

4. If one is exalted or the other is debilitated.

 

5. If one is more advanced in longitude. In case of the

Nodes the longitude have to be reckoned from the end of sign.

 

]

 

-Narayan

 

 

 

 

 

 

varahamihira, " Frank in Austin " <fschmidt@a...> wrote:

> Namaste,

> Clearification is nedded regarding the new rule by Sanjay

> below:

> if the nodes are aspectd by Ju then they loose

> their power and the other co-lord becomes the ruler.

> that being said:

. If this rule applies ( by

> rasi or graha dristi) then the other rules below (1-5) are

> moot

> and you will not have to apply the correct?

>

> Please advise and adjust this statement as needed...

> thank you,

>

>

> Dear Solai,

>

> If you are referring to Narayana Dasa rules, then they are

> different.

> Here are the rules to find the stronger of co-lord of Aq &

> Sc:

>

> Gurudevathe nodes

> are

> aspectd by Ju then they loose their power and the other

> co-lord

> becomes the ruler recently revealed a rule saying that if . This has

to be checked first and then the

> following rules have to be applied.

>

> 1. If one co-lord is in the house, the other co-lord becomes

> the

> ruler.

>

> 2. If one is conjoined with more planets.

>

> 3. If one is aspected by more planets out of

> a> Ju

> b> Me

> c> Lord of the sign in which the co-lords are disposited.

>

> 4. If one is exalted or the other is debilitated.

>

> 5. If one is more advanced in longitude. In case of the

> Nodes the

> longitude have to be reckoned from the end of sign.

>

> Regards

> -Narayan

>

>

> varahamihira, " Solai Kannan " <solai@t...> wrote:

> > OHM SHRI RAGAVENDRAYA NAMAH

> > JAYA JAGANNATHA

> >

> > Pranam Gurudeva,

> >

> > Regarding Arudha Lagna, you taught us that for Aquarius

> and

> Scorpio, the

> > dual lordship has to be considered. As Rahu and Ketu are

> not having

> the

> > Shadbala, we are relying on the Jaimin's secondary

> strength rules.

> >

> > However, I am confused with Mr.A.B.Vajpayee's chart. It is

> given in

> SJVC

> > article and in Jaimini's Upadesa Sudra book that his AL is

> Virgo.

> His lagna

> > is Scorpio and the co-lord, Ketu is exalted in Sagittarius

> and

> conjoined

> > with Sun and Venus. But, Mars is in Aries aspected by

> Jupiter and

> Mercury

> > (AK). But, it is taught that first we should look at the

> Lord with

> more

> > planets. As per this Ketu becomes stronger.

> >

> > Can you please enlighten us about the Step by step rules

> to find

> out the

> > strength for these co-lordship for Arudha lagna

> calculation?

> >

> > What I understood based on ABV's chart is follows, please

> correct

> me. We

> > should follow the order and when a condition is satisfied

> then we

> should

> > stop there and take the lord as per that condition as the

> lord of

> the sign

> >

> > 1.If one lord is in Lagna, then other lord is stronger.

> > 2.If one of them is Atmakaraka (not applicable for Ketu),

> then that

> planet

> > is stronger.

> > 3.If one is conjoined or aspected by Atmakaraka, then that

> planet is

> > stronger.

> > 4.If a lord is Conjoined with more planets then that lord

> is

> stronger.

> > 5.If a lord has more sign aspect from Jupiter and Mercury,

> that

> lord is

> > stronger.

> >

> > I do not know the applicability of different oddity or

> advanced in

> longitude

> > rules here.

> >

> > Thanks

> > Your sisya

> > Solai Kannan

>

>

>