Conjunction and Parivartan( Visti ji)

[Guest guest]

Om Gurave NamahHare Ram KrishnaDear Visti ji,

 

Namaskar,

 

Thanks for your guidance, for Ishta Devta, which is quite clear now.

 

I am posting another Q for you, which I did some time back perhaps you did not notice it.

Your observation of Gemstones giving result of another planet in Yuti/Parivartan with the original planet, is very enlightening.I will appreciate your observation on the following where Yuti and Parivartan both are seen:

 

Libra Asc, Venus(Lagnesh) in 5H( Aquarius ) with Sun (AK) and Mercury(combust). Rahu is in Lagan.

 

1 . In this case the Yuti is (from most benefic to malefic) : Ve-Me-Sun, hence if Venus is strengthened( as Lagnesh) by a Diamond , it will give results of the Sun( which is Lord of Badhak house as there is no other planet in Leo).

Is this correct? Will this reverse if Sun is strenghtened by Ruby?

 

2. However, Rahu is in Lagan AND in Parivartan with Venus( Lagnesh).

 

Will Diamond give results of Rahu as well?

 

3. My understanding is that in Parivartan the focus is where Lagnesh goes, and not Lagan, when there is Parivartan between Lagan and another house. Also if Lagnesh is in Yuti and in Parivartan with a malefic, it is not recommended that malefic be strengthened by a gemstone.

 

Thus in this case Diamond is : Giving result of Sun( as badhakesh- foreign assignment; harm to significations of 5H- children) and Rahu( Foreign significations, benefit for 5H).

 

Please help in this analysis as it becomes quite complicated to understand. Also what will you recommend?

 

Many thanks

 

Sharat

 

sohamsa , Visti Larsen <visti wrote:>> > ??? ??? ??????> > Dear Sharat, Namaskar> The rule you quote about the Ishta Devata is from VRA, but is only half > right i must say. However, your confusion is justified and i will > explain why the rule of aspects has been omitted by Freedom Cole in his > lectures. I have personally taught this to my students 'off session' as > it can give rise to alot of confusion.> > Let there be no doubt that the planets placed in the 12th from > karakamsa, or if none, the lord of 12th from the karakamsa is the Ishta > Devata. This is the REAL form of the Ishta Devata and how the person > looks at God in their lives.> > However, the aspect of planets on the 12th from karakamsa is useful in > understanding whether the person can be LED to the Ishta Devata through > another Devata. You will find that not everyone has a natural liking for > their Ishta Devata and this can depend on other factors such as Ketu, > Rasi, Vimsamsa, etc. I.e. Ramakrishna Paramahamsa preferred Kali over > Rama in his worship, yet he had very deep spiritual experiences which > can only be attributed to the Ishta devata/Paramatma.> > So we do use aspects, but only when we wanto lead the person to the > Ishta Devata through a Devata they may prefer more.> > I hope this clears things.> > Yours sincerely,> > -- > Visti Larsen>