(To Visti)ratna and sambandha (Vistiji's Lecture on GemStones- questions

[Guest guest]

Dear Bharatji,

 

Responses inlined, some confusion remains:

 

sohamsa , " Bharat Hindu Astrology "

<hinduastrology wrote:

>

> Namaste Sri Sundeep

>

> Responses below in Blue:

> 1) When you say Emerald is the right stone, are you taking into

> account the fact that Emerald would give the results of the Sun,

due

> to Mercury's conjuction with the Sun in my chart? Similarly, would

> Ruby give the results of Mercury?

> No, I am not. Mercury has its own nature and it does not exchange

it. Two

> grahas can work for each other but do not change their inherent

nature.

> Mercury would give its own results. Sun its own.

>

 

So you are in direct contradiction with the conjunction principle

cited in earlier posts, then? That when two planets are in

conjunction, then one gives the results of the other? I recall

someone posting a few days ago that Sanjay Rathji told him to wear a

Ruby for debilitated AK Sun conjunct Mercury in the 11th house, in

order to benefit his *career*. It seemed to me that in that case,

the conjunction principle worked - i.e. Sun was 9L in 11, and

Mercury was 7 and 10L. If the conjunction principle isnt effective,

then why would boosting the Sun help career? However, if you take

Ruby as boosting Mercury (due to Sun's conjunction with it), then

the results are clear, since Mercury is 10L.

 

So my question is - do you disagree with that principle, and on what

basis?

 

 

 

 

>

> 2) In general, you seem to also be saying that wearing a gem for

the

> lord of a house which is a maraka house for some relation (father,

> mother, children, siblings etc) will not bring about any negative

> karma for them. If this is true, then say a person has huge

problems

> with his wife, and wears a gem to alleviate the problem. Lets say

it

> does alleviate the problem - then from the wife's point of view,

she

> was going through some bad karma, and then it suddenly stopped. How

> would you explain this - since you say that wearing a gem cannot

> affect other people's karma. I'm specifically interested in this

> because in my case, the 5th house gem would automatically be the

2nd

> from the 4th i.e. maraka for the mother.

> Given a similar logic one should not wear the lagna lord's

gemstone since it

> is 12th for family and markesh for wife. The chart is of oneself

and not of

> others. Others have their own charts. When we give a remedy or a

gemstone to

> alleviate problems with wife or so, it is not to mould the wife

but to seek

> protection from forces causing harm Or to bring internal change

such that

> certain reactiveness, non-acceptance, etc. is countered, etc..

That is why

> we match charts for matchmaking too - such that two person combine

in their

> natural energies towards positivity and prosperity. If only one

chart was to

> dictate everything, then, no need for matching charts either. Many

such

> examples can be given. Therefore, 5th Lord strengthening is not

for causing

> harm to your mother but to strengthen dharma in you. Your mother's

chart

> will dictate what gemstone is harmful for her to wear.

>

> I hope it is clear.

>

 

Actually, it still isnt totally clear. You havent answered the

question - if by wearing a gem for improving one's relationship with

his wife, the relationship improved, then the wife felt the results,

didnt she? But she wore no gem. So what happened to her bad karma

for marriage then? Or was it destined that that her bad karma was to

end exactly then anyway? In which case, for relationship cases,

whether a gem is going to work for one spouse can be seen by looking

for changes in the *other* spouse's chart - the one that isnt going

to start wearing a gem.

 

Thanks,

 

Sundeep