Guest guest Posted November 24, 2006 Report Share Posted November 24, 2006 Firstly Pranam to all gurujis here. I'm just learning so pardon my ignorance and please correct me if I am wrong. Some basic questions for my chart. DOB : Sept 25 1972 TOB : 04:12:00 hrs Time Zone: 5:30 East of GMT POB : 86 E 14' & 22 N 48' alt:0 (1) Had 3 charts drawn 1 manually and two from computers. Rahu (/Ketu) is positioned in 6th in 2 charts (1 drawn manual and 1 from computer) while positioned 5th (same as JHora) in another. Which position is correct, and why the other is even considered by some? (2) Bit puzzled with Atmakaraka positions in Navamsa chart. Mine is at lagna and time of birth is as per hospital records. Is correctness of birth time the only answer to this? (3) Going through a not so good period in life - have no job at the moment, left one to return back to the country. Search has seemed futile for quite some time now. Will I be able to get one? Which is a better method to judge this (the good timings) - transits or dasa or both together? (4) Please guide me on Isht Devata as well. Following the texts give one result but others have suggested differently. Prayers for all again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Thank you soulsadhak for your effort. For all charts the ayanamsa is taken as Lahiri's. Warm Regards. sohamsa , " soulsadhak " <soulsadhak wrote: > > Dear Kaushik, > > I am just a learner like you and I may not be able to answer all > your queries, but will try to answer a few. > Your confusion re. variability of calculations is justified. The > various compu softwares use different Ayanamsas for calculations and > hence the variation. > If you are using the JHora chart, take a look at " Preferences " - > > " Related to Calculations " -> " Ayanamsas " . This will list the > various options ava.. You will have to study your Nav chart to > really pin point which ayanamsa works best for you. > Like for me, in my nav, Ke features in karakamsa with AK (MeR) and > Ma in the default (Lahiri A.), but the readings do not quite match > with what i expected w.r.t. placement of other planets/aspects on > karakamsa. So i had to switch to " Custom setting " with " 1 deg 20 min > more than Lahiri " to get the accurate nav. So my Ishta acc to > default is Shiva (Leo, with no plants/aspect) while with custom it's > Ganesha (Ke in Leo - i would prefer to say like Ganesha in lap of > Shiva)! > What I would suggest is that do make a detailed reading of the > planet positions/aspects wrt karakamsa and see what suits you > better. Who would know you better than yourself. > Your AK Sa comes in lagna with default Lahiri ayanamsa in jhora. > > For financial matters, it is suggested to approach your > Paalandevata, which is (deity for the planet / aspect if no planet) > seen as 6th from AmK. > > For job, use Jyotirlinga mantra for 5th lord of Dasamsa (i'm sure > you will get more concrete suggestions re. this from our respected > and more learned members). > > Kind Regards, > Soul Sadhak > > sohamsa , " astrology_student_2006 " > <kaushik_banerjee0@> wrote: > > > > Firstly Pranam to all gurujis here. > > I'm just learning so pardon my ignorance and please correct me if > I am > > wrong. > > > > Some basic questions for my chart. > > DOB : Sept 25 1972 > > TOB : 04:12:00 hrs > > Time Zone: 5:30 East of GMT > > POB : 86 E 14' & 22 N 48' alt:0 > > > > (1) Had 3 charts drawn 1 manually and two from computers. Rahu > (/Ketu) > > is positioned in 6th in 2 charts (1 drawn manual and 1 from > computer) > > while positioned 5th (same as JHora) in another. Which position is > > correct, and why the other is even considered by some? > > > > (2) Bit puzzled with Atmakaraka positions in Navamsa chart. Mine > is at > > lagna and time of birth is as per hospital records. Is correctness > of > > birth time the only answer to this? > > > > (3) Going through a not so good period in life - have no job at the > > moment, left one to return back to the country. Search has seemed > > futile for quite some time now. Will I be able to get one? Which > is a > > better method to judge this (the good timings) - transits or dasa > or > > both together? > > > > (4) Please guide me on Isht Devata as well. Following the texts > give > > one result but others have suggested differently. > > > > Prayers for all again. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Namaste SriPlease check if the Rahu is set to True or Mean in Jhora.Thanks and RegardsBharatOn 11/24/06, astrology_student_2006 < kaushik_banerjee0 wrote: Firstly Pranam to all gurujis here. I'm just learning so pardon my ignorance and please correct me if I am wrong. Some basic questions for my chart. DOB : Sept 25 1972 TOB : 04:12:00 hrs Time Zone: 5:30 East of GMT POB : 86 E 14' & 22 N 48' alt:0 (1) Had 3 charts drawn 1 manually and two from computers. Rahu (/Ketu) is positioned in 6th in 2 charts (1 drawn manual and 1 from computer) while positioned 5th (same as JHora) in another. Which position is correct, and why the other is even considered by some? (2) Bit puzzled with Atmakaraka positions in Navamsa chart. Mine is at lagna and time of birth is as per hospital records. Is correctness of birth time the only answer to this? (3) Going through a not so good period in life - have no job at the moment, left one to return back to the country. Search has seemed futile for quite some time now. Will I be able to get one? Which is a better method to judge this (the good timings) - transits or dasa or both together? (4) Please guide me on Isht Devata as well. Following the texts give one result but others have suggested differently. Prayers for all again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Namaste Bharat ji, Thank you for pointing this out. The setting is Mean when changed to True it does increment the degree of the nodes by 1 to 29 degrees 57'. However don't quite understand still why would it be considered in the next house. Thank you again. Regards. sohamsa , " Bharat Hindu Astrology " <hinduastrology wrote: > > Namaste Sri > > Please check if the Rahu is set to True or Mean in Jhora. > > Thanks and Regards > Bharat > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Namaste SriRahu's position is in the last degree. Small changes in the ephemeris used and calculation accuracy of a software can bring such discrepancies. I have checked this data in Parashara Light 7.0 (the latest version) and Rahu is in the 5th house. Thanks and RegardsBharatOn 11/25/06, astrology_student_2006 <kaushik_banerjee0 > wrote: Namaste Bharat ji, Thank you for pointing this out. The setting is Mean when changed to True it does increment the degree of the nodes by 1 to 29 degrees 57'. However don't quite understand still why would it be considered in the next house. Thank you again. Regards. sohamsa , " Bharat Hindu Astrology " <hinduastrology wrote: > > Namaste Sri > > Please check if the Rahu is set to True or Mean in Jhora. > > Thanks and Regards > Bharat > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2006 Report Share Posted November 26, 2006 Respected Bharat ji, Many many thanks. I am sensing from your post that it should be always be 5th. Much regards sir. sohamsa , " Bharat Hindu Astrology " <hinduastrology wrote: > > Namaste Sri > > Rahu's position is in the last degree. Small changes in the ephemeris used > and calculation accuracy of a software can bring such discrepancies. I have > checked this data in Parashara Light 7.0 (the latest version) and Rahu is in > the 5th house. > > Thanks and Regards > Bharat > > On 11/25/06, astrology_student_2006 <kaushik_banerjee0 wrote: > > > > Namaste Bharat ji, > > > > Thank you for pointing this out. > > > > The setting is Mean when changed to True it does increment the degree > > of the nodes by 1 to 29 degrees 57'. > > However don't quite understand still why would it be considered in the > > next house. > > > > Thank you again. > > Regards. > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%40>, " Bharat Hindu > > Astrology " > > <hinduastrology@> wrote: > > > > > > Namaste Sri > > > > > > Please check if the Rahu is set to True or Mean in Jhora. > > > > > > Thanks and Regards > > > Bharat > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.