Divorce: The emperical rule - to Sarajit ji

[Guest guest]

Respected Sarajit ji and other learned members,

 

Herewith attaching the birth details of a couple. Could you please

let us know about the chances of divorce.

 

Man - Aug 20, 1967; 4:02am; 75E41, 11N27

Woman - July 29,1973; 7:50am; 76E55, 8N29

 

Thanks,

Sia

 

sohamsa , " Sarajit Poddar " <sarajit.poddar

wrote:

>

> || Jaya Jagannath ||

> Dear Sourav,

>

> I am happy to see so many questions you have posed. I am not sure,

if I can

> satisfacority answer all of them. Let me try.

>

> On 10/8/06, Sourav Chowdhury <souravc108 wrote:

> >

> > *|| Hare Raama Krsna ||*

> > *|| Durga Smaranam ||*

> >

> > Dear Sarajit-ji,

> > Pranam. Thank you for your response and

sending me

> > the file. Your article is very detailed and comprehensive. I will

write a

> > few questions/points on your article which I just finished

reading, but

> > first permit me to write a thought on why 7th from AL (if

stronger) is not

> > seen as a reference for money etc.

> >

> > 7th being the Dwara of the AL (as also mentioned in your nice

article)

> > shows what is allowed to the AL. Hence if 7th is stronger that AL

(by having

> > more grahas etc) then it means that 7th should be seen to

determine the

> > ability (or disability) of the rise of Arudha lagna. AL always

shows the

> > tangible self and every other information of the self,

surroundings,

> > siblings etc. 7th from AL (especially when strong) will show the

rise and

> > fall of AL. For example, 7th house is like the ports of a

country. The

> > status of the country is seen from the AL but if the ports are

shut down,

> > then flow or wealth, medicines, raw materials etc will not come

into the

> > country and the country will deteriotate. Hence for health etc

matters 7th

> > house is important (if stronger).

> >

> > Now I have been reading your article and collected a few points

with

> > reference to this article:

> >

> > a. Page 2, left col., you mentioned that exalted/debilitated graha

> > associating with 11th from AL gives a lot of wealth and friendly

placement

> > of such a graha gives average wealth, whereas inimical signs give

> > below-average wealth. It is not understood why debilitated graha

will give a

> > lot of wealth and a graha in inimical sign is giving average

wealth.

> > Sanjay-ji mentioned that exalted graha shows wealth coming from

people who

> > give happily, debilitation shows wealth coming from people who

feel forced

> > to give. Why shouldn't we extend that to friendly and inimical

signs ?

> >

>

> [sarajit] There is a specific dictum in JS " Tasmin Ucche Niche va

> Srimantah " , which indicate that both exalted and debilitated planet

can make

> person Srimantah or blessed by Sri (Laxmi). Pt. Rath has explained

the

> concept, which you have already mentioned in your comments.

>

> b. Page 2, left col., you said we can use astakavarga w.r.t AL.

However, you

> > mentioned elsewhere in blog that if sum of rekhas in 6, 8 and

12th houses is

> > greater than 9, 10 and 11 houses then the person will have more

expenses

> > than savings. So it AL is in the 10th house then this is not

compatible with

> > the above rule. So also, AL in the 3rd house, with 2nd house

being 12th from

> > AL. I think 11th house from AL shows income, 12-th shows expenses

(and also

> > further investments, being 2nd from 11th) and 2nd house shows

savings. So it

> > should be a relativity between 2nd and 12th and not between 11th

and 12th

> > from AL. Also, lots of rekhas in the 11th and 12-th houses

indicate lots of

> > wealth and expenses (i.e. overall richness) even though one may

be greater

> > than the other.

> >

>

> [sarajit] Astakavarga is one of the way of seeing the strength of

houses.

> What Maharishi Parashara tries to say is that if the 11th from AL is

> stronger that 12th from AL, by having more planets there or aspect

of them,

> then the gains will be un-interrupted. I have just extended to

Astakavarga.

>

>

> In this connection, let me recall another rule given in one of Sri

C S

> > Patel's book: if a house has lesser bindus that the 2nd from it,

the said

> > house prospers; if the house has more bindus from the next to it,

the said

> > house suffers -- this is from the principle of more 'food'. We

should also

> > note that graha in the 12-th from AL gives dhanaargala to the

11th house.

> > Please clarify and correct me in this matter.

> >

>

>

> [sarajit] 12th is the maraka to the 11th house. Hence malefics in

12th can

> reduce the gains shown in the 12th substantially. Benefics in the

12th shows

> expenses in charity or controlled expenses. For that matter planets

in the

> 2nd from Lagna have dhanargala...but aren't they serve as maraka in

their

> periods?

>

> c. Page 3 right col., BPHS 29.25: This shows that benefics in the

7th also

> > indicates wealth or what is coming through the Dwara. Jupiter is

the

> > significator of wealth (2nd and 11th houses), Sukra owns the

natural 2nd

> > house and is significator of luxorious items, Chandra is istelf

the kaaraka

> > of AL and placement of Chandra in 1-7 from AL will show the tides

affecting

> > the AL positively.

> >

>

> [sarajit] Precisely. Well stated.

>

> d. Page 3 right col., debilitated Malefics causes obstruction and

> > debilitated benefics causes all sorts of bad things to enter

through thw

> > 'Dwara' i.e. has no strength to prevent. This is one of the

reason why 7th

> > house is called the maaraka.

> >

>

> [sarajit] Good point.

>

> e. Page 4 left col., You mentioned that debilitated graha (even

benefic) in

> > the 2nd from AL shows bad finances; what happens when this

debilitated graha

> > is aspecting the 11th from AL ? I think 2nd house is not only for

finances

> > but also to be seen for fame, scandals etc. For example, Rahu in

the second

> > from UL indicates breaking of marriage from scandals etc.

> >

>

> [sarajit] Yes, nice point. We can see the 2nd from AL for

sustainance of the

> AL. I mentioned the points as given in BPHS and JS only. Thus

malefics in

> the 2nd from AL can show health troubles... as indicated from 2nd

from UL

> for the spouse. It is seen that 2nd from AL having afflicted

Mercury can

> make a peson suffer with weight problems.

>

> f. Page 4 left col., you mentioned benefics in the 2nd from AL

brings

> > wealth; Narasimha-ji also taught to include Surya in this list as

Surya is

> > giver of resources.

> >

>

> [sarajit] I am skeptical with this.

>

> g. Page 5 right col., you mentioned that malefics in the 9th from

AL will

> > cause bad finances and social status. I have previously learned

that any

> > graha (including malefics) in the 9th from AL will protect (9th

house) the

> > UL through its means.

> >

>

> [sarajit] Yes, Jaimini Sutras say that even a upagraha in the 9th

from AL

> can make a person wealthy. What I can say is that, that rule

mentioned is a

> general rule and 9th is an exception. In addition, malefics in the

9th from

> AL can show finances, however after struggles.

>

>

> h. Page 5 left col., why does Vahana yoga include Chandra? Because

Chandra

> > is sukha-kaaraka ?

> >

>

> [sarajit] Vahana is a comfort ruled by Jala Tattva and Moon and

Venus both

> can indicate Vahana. Anyway, mother becomes the vahana for the

child for 9

> months before birth as she carries the child during that time.

>

> i. Page 5 right col., in the weightage of various grahas in the

said houses,

> > the 7th, 11th and 12th houses are not included; further, the

status of the

> > grahas and rasi aspects to these houses are also left outside.

> >

>

> [sarajit] I have just illustrated the examples based on Pt. Rath's

> suggestion. As you say, this can be further enhanced based on

dignity and

> aspects. However for them, the weightage need to be properly worked

out.

>

> This is what Pt. Rath says:

>

> * * * * * * *

> The planets have the following numerical values: Sun (1) Moon (1 or

> 3 depending on its pakashabala i.e. from sukla ekadasi to krsna

> panchami 3 points); Mars (1); Mercury (1); Jupiter (3); Venus (2);

> Saturn (2); Rahu (3); Ketu (2);

>

> Add the numerical values of the benefics in 2nd, 4th, 5th, 8th & 9th

> houses and malefics in 3rd & 6th and subtract the values of the

> benefics in 3rd & 6th and malefics in 2nd, 4th, 5th, 8th & 9th

houses.

> * * * * * * *

>

> >

> > j. Page 7, left col. For Rule 1.3.44, why Gaunapada is of

concern ? Why

> > will kaaraka of sights (Surya) aspecting Sukra cause blindness ?

Shouldn't

> > it try to save the situation instead ?

> >

>

> [sarajit] Note that Gaunapada or Upapada is the arudha of the house

of

> losses too.

>

> k. Page 7, right col., you mentioned that Guru is kaaraka of UL and

Sukra of

> > A7. Why is Guru Kaaraka of UL, because of dharma and children ?

> >

>

> [sarajit] Yes.

>

> l. Page 9, left col. (table), you mentined Sani and Rahu in the 2nd

from UL

> > will disrupt digestion especially in Pisces. If so then Sani and

Rahu will

> > rule UL and still damage it ? Also you mentioned Guru as kaaraka

for

> > digestion, I believe its Surya (agni). Please clarify.

> >

>

> [sarajit] Yes, even if they rule UL they will cause the problem.

You need to

> be cautious over malefic rulership of something. It is said that

Malefics

> being the ruler of 5th can cause troubles to the native due to bad

mantras,

> even if it happens to be the lord of 5th (this is just an example).

>

> Jupiter is the karaka for digestion and not surya and the whole

digestive

> system is governed by Jupiter. Surya (agni) helps Jupiter in

digestion.

> Digestion is different from Burning. It is getting the fruit out of

a

> churning process... the fruit could be energy, which we get after

digestion;

> the knowledge which we get after introspection; the children we get

after

> co-habilitation or whatever it it.

>

> m. Same, you mentioned that Sukra rules blood immune system. Isn't

Chandra

> > the kaaraka of blood ?

> >

>

> [sarajit] Blood in general is ruled by Moon, since Moon is the

jala Tattva.

> However, there are three main components ruled by three different

planets.

> The RBCs are ruled by Mars, Immune system (WBCs) are ruled by Venus

and

> Blood plasma (the carrier of the blood cells) is ruled by Moon.

>

> Due to Venus's rulership over immune system, Diamond is suggested

for Cancer

> patients to increase they immune system. Venus has the power of

> Mrityunjaya.. which protect against all evils... like the immunce

system

> fights against all antigens.

>

> n. Same, For Guru-Sani, you mentioned Sani as ruler of nervous

system. I

> > think it is Mangal who rules nerves. Here we should note that

Guru gets

> > debilitated in presence of Sani (Sani rules the debility rasi of

Guru) and

> > hence the Aakasa tattva is vitiated.

> >

>

> [sarajit] Read what Maharishi Parashara says on this topic in

Chapter 3.

> असà¥à¤¥à¤¿ रकà¥à¤¤à¤¸à¥à¤¤à¤¥à¤¾ मजà¥à¤œà¤¾

तà¥à¤µà¤—à¥â€Œ वसा वीरà¥à¤¯à¤®à¥‡à¤µ च।

> सà¥à¤¨à¤¾à¤¯à¥à¤°à¥‡à¤·à¤¾à¤®à¤§à¥€à¤¶à¤¾à¤¶à¥à¤š कà¥à¤°

मातà¥â€Œ सूरà¥à¤¯à¤¾à¤¦à¤¯à¥‹ दà¥à¤µà¤¿à¤œà¥¥

३१॥

> asthi raktastathÄ majjÄ tvag vasÄ vÄ«ryameva ca |

> snÄyureá¹£ÄmadhÄ«Å›ÄÅ›ca kramÄt sÅ«ryÄdayo dvija || 31||

>

> Asthi (Bones) - Sun

> Rakta (Blood) - Moon

> Majja (Bone Marrow) - Mars

> Tvak (Skin) - Mercury

> Vasa (fats) - Jupiter

> Virya (Semen) - Venus

> Snayu (Nerves) This is interpreted by some as muscles. - Saturn

>

> o. Why would Mangal and Budha cause dental troubles ? Teeth and

bones are

> > ruled by Surya.

> >

>

> [sarajit] I have vague explanation on this. Possibly becuase teeth

is ruled

> by 2nd house and Mercury and Mars are maraka for the 2nd in the

natural

> zodiac. Can I have explanation from other learned members of this

forum?

>

> p. Page 9 right col., you mentioned that 7th from UL shows native.

But

> > native is already shown by AL and Lagna ! It is similar to saying

that 7th

> > from A4 will show father or 7th from A9 will show mother. I think

this sutra

> > says 7th from is maaraka to UL hence shows those afflicting

conditions just

> > like 2nd from UL.

> >

>

> [sarajit] You are right. Like malefic in the 7th from AL shows

trouble to

> the native, 7th from UL can show trouble to the spouse. However, in

the

> following slokas, it is clear that from the 7th lord from UL,

things about

> the native can be found too.

> * * * * * *

> Rahu in the second from the Lord of the seventh sign from

> Upapada shows the native will have grotesque dentition. Ketu in the

> second from 7th Lord from upapada (replacing Rahu in this

> preceding stanza) causes the native to stammer. Saturn in the

> second from the seventh lord from upapada gives an ugly

> appearence. (JS 1.4.39-1.4.41)

> * * * * * *

> >

> > q. Page 10, left col., I think there is a typo as there is

mismatch

> > between the stated sutra and your explanation. The sutra states

Simha in UL,

> > whereas you are taking Simha as 9th from UL.

> >

>

>

>

> If Simha is UL then 9th is Mesha (odd rasi) ruled by male graha

Mangal; If

> > Kanya is UL the 9th is Vrisabha (even rasi) ruled by female graha

Sukra. So

> > both sign and lords are either male or female. Now, Chandra

himself is

> > predisposed to female issues and hence with strong male influence

in the

> > 9th, gives lesser issues and with strong female influence in the

9th from

> > UL, gives many female offsprings. We should note that Chandra is

kaaraka of

> > 'human' offsprings. That is why in Human charts, we rectify

Navamsa by

> > taking PP in trines or 7th from Chandra.

> > If instead of Chandra, Guru was giving drishti then more male

issues can

> > be expected in the first case and lesser female issues in the 2nd

case.

> >

>

> [sarajit] Yes. you are right. There is a typo in the explanation.

>

> r. Page 10, right col., Why does Sukra in the 3, 11from AL destroy

siblings?

> > I heard that Sukra causes premature birth.

> >

>

> [sarajit] There is one more side to Venus. Venus rules semen and

there

> are millions of semens compete with each other to fertilise an

egg. Thus it

> also represent the nature of competition, which cannot stand with

anyone in

> the same padestal but want to be alone, superior than others.

>

> This is what Pt. Rath says in COVA:

> * * * * * *

> Co-borns are seen from the third house (younger) and eleventh house

(elder)

> from lagna and Arudha lagna. These houses from lagna determines

their

> physical presence (body) while from the Arudha lagna their numbers,

ruling

> stars etc. are known. Malefics in strength in the third house from

lagna

> destroys younger co-borns while weak malefics gives them physical

strength.

> For example, Mars in the third generally denies younger co-borns,

but if

> Mars is in Cancer a very strong younger brother is born. Saturn in

the 3rd

> /11th from Arudha Lagna is detrimen­tal to younger/elder co-born

and in

> conjunction/ asso­ciation with Rahu, it causes death. Venus rules

the sperm

> through which the native attains the birth, hence the name

*'Sukra'*. Since

> for conception various spermatozoa, each 'carrying a different soul

put up

> an intense competition to fertilize the ovum, the sperma­tozoa that

succeeds

> is the soul carrier of the native represented by Venus. Thus Venus

indicates

> the 'selfish' nature of all animals (and specifically of the native

himself

> in the chart) and will tend to eliminate all competition with whom

the

> native has to share the blessings of this world. Hence a Venus in

the eighth

> will indicate a premature delivery / still born child before the

native

> birth. Similarly Venus conjoining / aspecting the third/ eleventh

will tend

> to eliminate younger/ elder co-barns respectively. [*The count from

Arudha

> lagna for third & eleventh houses should be zodiacal or reverse

depending on

> whether the sign is odd or even re­spectively*.] The number of

younger/elder

> co borns is the numbers of planets conjoining/ aspecting the lord

of the

> third/ eleventh house respectively. The Rasi dristi of planets be

considered

> for this purpose.

> * * * * * *

>

>

> s. Page 11, left col., Why lord of 2nd from UL in the Dhanabhava

with a

> > malefic make native a thief ?

> >

>

> [sarajit] I do not have a better explanation that what I mentioned

in the

> article. Malefics in the 8th house or lagna lord's affliction in

the 8th

> house gives thieving nature. Since 7th from UL also represent the

native,

> lord of 8th therefrom if afflicted in the 2nd house.. can show such

nature

> too.

>

> t. Page 12, left col., Point 6 is not correct. If Rahu is in 5th

house, Ketu

> > is in 11th house. Then how does 11th house contain A5. Arudha of

a house

> > cannot be 7th from it.

> >

>

> [sarajit] That is an OR condition and not AND condition.

>

> Sanjay-ji also mentioned another interesting concept. He said that

if Surya

> > is in the 12-th from AL, then after the death of father, the

native starts

> > to rise in life. If it is Chandra then after death of mother.

> >

>

> [sarajit] Hmm.. nice point. If there are no source of expenditure/

> opposition, the income with rise :-)

>

> Sorry for asking a lot of questions. You have given a lot of

classical

> > reference. However it will take time to decode the reason behind

each of

> > them

> >

>

> [sarajit] I appreciate your effort in generating so many questions.

>

> Thank you once again for the Pdf file.

> >

>

> [sarajit] You are welcome.

>

> Best Wishes

> Sarajit

>

> Best wishes,

> >

> > Sourav

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Sarajit Poddar <sarajit.poddar

> > sohamsa

> > Cc: souravc108

> > Friday, October 6, 2006 9:49:58 PM

> > Re: Re: Divorce: The emperical rule

> >

> > || Jaya Jagannath ||

> > Dear Sourav,

> >

> > About the UL, very nice point. Frankly speaking, I have never

considered

> > 7th from UL to have any implication on marriage. Even if we

consider

> > stronger of arudhas for various other things. We can take note

that we do

> > not do it for certain other things such as:

> >

> > 1. Financial gains and losses are only seen from 11th and 12th

from AL and

> > not from 11th/ 12th from 7th from AL.

> > 2. Children can be seen from 9th from UL, here we do not consider

7th from

> > UL too.

> > 3. 3rd and 11th from AL can show siblings, here also we do not

consider

> > 7th from AL.

> >

> > Among few places we consider, we see death from 3rd and 8th from

AL or the

> > 7th .., whichever is stronger. Another view is to see 3rd and 7th

from A7.

> >

> > For timing death transit of Sun in trine to A8 is seen. In such

cases also

> > we consider 7th from A8 and see Sun's transit from there.

> >

> > There could be other cases where we see the 7th from Arudha in

the same

> > manner we see Arudha. However such instances would be much lower.

> >

> > For the benefit of the members, I am posting an Article here on

the

> > Arudhas, which can be referred.

> >

> > Thanks for your appreciation on the blog-spot. Now a days I can

hardly

> > make out any time for contributing on Jyotish.

> >

> > Best Wishes

> > Sarajit

> >

> >

> > On 10/6/06, Sourav <souravc108 wrote:

> > >

> > > *|| Hare Raama Krsna ||*

> > >

> > > Dear Sarajit-ji,

> > >

> > > Pranaam. Yes I agree with your

> > > comments about marital discord, lasting of marriage etc. from

Rasi and

> > > spouse's role in native's life from Navaamsa. However, I didn't

touch on

> > > that, actually, and the comments are specifically on the

sexuality aspect

> > > only. Sri Siv Pujan-ji's lecture in the 2003 West Coast

Conference on that

> > > was illuminating. Perhaps the specific point I discussed, in

response to Sri

> > > Souvik-j, is tangent to the topic of marriage/divorce, but

somehow related.

> > > Yes, to 'break' marriage the marakas to the UL in the rasi

chart has to be

> > > strong and under malefic influences.

> > >

> > > I have one question here. UL is an arudha and we are taught

that either

> > > the Arudha or the 7th from it needs to be considered, whichever

is stronger

> > > bhava. So do we treat the same for UL also ?

> > >

> > > A point aside, I am very appreciative of your varahamihira

blogs as they

> > > are very useful references. Thank you for providing us those.

> > >

> > > Best wishes,

> > >

> > > Sourav

> > >

> > > ================================================================

> > >

> > >

> > > sohamsa , " Sarajit Poddar "

<sarajit.poddar@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > || Jaya Jagannath ||

> > > > Dear Sourav,

> > > >

> > > > Good explanation on the kama trikona. However, I chose to see

matters

> > > > related to the spouse from the Navamsa chart, when it comes

to marital

> > > > relationships. Things like Spouse's role in native's life,

nature,

> > > > profession, siblings etc. can be seen very well from Navamsa

chart.

> > > > However, when it comes to the sustainance, even though

Navamsa has a

> > > say, I

> > > > consider Rasi Chart to be more important. If placements/

yogas etc are

> > > good

> > > > in the Rasi, then blemishes in the Navamsa can be over

ridden. For

> > > example,

> > > > if 2nd lord from UL in the rasi chart is fortified and the 2nd

> > > receives

> > > > aspects/ conjoined with benefics, even if there are dire

malefics in

> > > the 8th

> > > > house in Navamsa, the marriage will not break. However, the

spouse

> > > might

> > > > suffer severe health troubles.

> > > >

> > > > Best Wishes

> > > > Sarajit

> > > >

> > > > On 10/4/06, Sourav souravc108@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > *|| Hare Raama Krsna ||*

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Sri Souvik-ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > namaskar. Reserving the opportunity

> > > > > to be educated by Learned Gurus, kindly permit me to

comment on the

> > > > > situation.

> > > > >

> > > > > In Navamsa, sexuality, desire for the same and fulfillment

of the

> > > same

> > > > > should be seen from the 7th, 3rd and 11th houses

respectively (i.e.

> > > the

> > > > > kaama trikona). 3rd house is the origin of desire, 7th

house is the

> > > sexual

> > > > > act (and also indicates the sexual preference of the

native), and

> > > the 11th

> > > > > house indicated the fulfillment and the persons from who

such

> > > fulfillment

> > > > > can come. Sukra is karaka for the sexual act and Mangal is

the

> > > karaka for

> > > > > the energy (Male). In case of Sukra being in debility in

the 11th,

> > > notice

> > > > > that Sukra rules 7th house. Thus this is dissatisfaction of

the

> > > partner of

> > > > > the native. In case of Mangal in debility, notice that

Mangal is 3rd

> > > lord

> > > > > and hence indicates lack of desire of the native being the

cause.

> > > Usually,

> > > > > planets in the 7th and trines indicate the people/partners.

Debility

> > > can

> > > > > also show partners coming from poorer section of society or

not from

> > > high

> > > > > status (relative to the native).

> > > > >

> > > > > Ketu aspecting (rasi drishti) the 11th greatly reduces the

> > > tendencies

> > > > > towards excess. Ketu aspecting the 2nd house from Navamsa

lagna

> > > reduces the

> > > > > tendencies towards extramarital affairs.

> > > > >

> > > > > I refer you to the Navamsa and Sexuality - a lecture in one

of the

> > > SJC

> > > > > Conferences.

> > > > >

> > > > > Best wishes,

> > > > >

> > > > > Sourav

> > > > >

> > > > >

================================================================

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > sohamsa , " Souvik Dutta "

explore_vulcan@

> > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sarajit da, Goelji and other members,

> > > > > > My personal observation.

> > > > > > A debilitated plabet in the 11th. House in D-9 is very

detrimental

> > > in

> > > > > > continuity of marriage and if the planet concerned is

Mars and/or

> > > > > > Venus sexual dissatisfaction with the partner can cause

> > > separation.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Any views on this.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Souvik

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sohamsa , angel angelgoel@ wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Hi Sarajit ji

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > All the Rules *specially regarding UL* are to be

analysed only

> > > in

> > > > > > rasi (D-1) or also in Navmasa ( D-9) chart.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > angel goel

> > > > > > > ===================

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Sarajit Poddar sarajit.poddar@

> > > > > > > sohamsa

> > > > > > > Wednesday, September 27, 2006 5:48:43 AM

> > > > > > > Re: Divorce: The emperical rule

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > || Jaya Jagannath ||

> > > > > > > Dear Souvik,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > If somebody submits some cases, then we can work on

this...,

> > > there

> > > > > > are plenty though...

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I follow these principles.

> > > > > > > 1. 2nd from UL / 2nd long from UL.. weak and/or

afflicted and

> > > there

> > > > > > are no beneficial aspects.

> > > > > > > 2. 8th from Lagna afflicted and there are no beneficial

aspects.

> > > > > > > 3. Venus the karaka for marriage is badly placed in the

Navamsa

> > > > > > (primarily) and / or in Rasi (secondarily) .

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Best Wishes

> > > > > > > Sarajit

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > On 9/26/06, Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@ >

wrote:

> > > > > > > Dear members,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I had a question in my mind for long.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I have seen many couples mentally separated but still

pulling

> > > along

> > > > > > > the marriage for many diverse reasons.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > What exactly in a chart indicates the legal separation?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Any views will be appreciated in this.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Thanks

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Souvik

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > --

> > > > > > > Best Wishes

> > > > > > > Sarajit Poddar

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > --

> > > > Best Wishes

> > > > Sarajit Poddar

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> > --

> > Best Wishes

> > Sarajit Poddar

> >

> >

>

>

> --

> Best Wishes

> Sarajit Poddar

>