Planets in signs from Sri B. V. Raman-errata in second para

[Guest guest]

Errata for the above message please :

 

2nd para;

 

Very often, you will come across him cautioning the reader that he

should NOT apply the readings ad verbatim and sometimes, candidly

admitting that it is not possible to predict certain things

 

Kindly note. Inconvenience regretted.

 

kishore patnaik

 

 

 

 

On 10/7/06, kishore patnaik <kishorepatnaik09 wrote:

> dear krupa,

>

> Sri BV Raman is the pioneering figure of Modern Vedic Astrology. He

> has written several books in simple and easy to understand English,

> with no pretentions of so called neo astrologers.

>

> Very often, you will come across him cautioning the reader that he

> should apply the readings ad verbatim and sometimes, candidly

> admitting that it is not possible to predict certain things. You

> would be astonished to find such humility and simplicity in such great

> a personality.

>

> Coming to your querry, most of his readings are based on the classical

> texts and his own interpretations of the same, however with more

> understandable bias towards the south indian texts such as prasna

> marga, manasagari and Bhavartha ratnakara.

>

> Obviously, a planet's position in a chart depends upon the sign, the

> bhava and the planet's nature and significations, so as its lordships.

> In deeper analysis, the planet's position within the sign also matters

> such as its position in a particular lunar mansion and its quadrant,

> the position of the planet in various divisonal charts and its

> position vis a vis other significant planets.

>

> Readings pertaining to palnetary positions given in the books, either

> in sri Raman's books or in classics, are the stand alone positions.

> They have to be suitably changed, by looking at the entireity of the

> chart.

>

> Hope this helps,

>

> kishore patnaik

>

>

> On 10/7/06, adhyaayin <adhyaayin wrote:

> > Om Sri Gurubhyo Namah

> >

> >

> > Dear members:

> >

> > In Sri. B.V. Raman's Hindu Predictive Astrology and other text books

> > the results of planets in rasis or signs are given.

> >

> > For e.g: Mars in Gemini: Loving family and children, scientific,

> > taste in refinement, skilled in music, etc.

> >

> > Are these just based on a combination of planet signification, sign

> > signification and relationship between lords of the signs ?

> >

> > I would appreciate any guidance on this.

> >

> > Regards.

> >

> > Krupa

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Om Sri Gurubhyo Namah

 

Pranaams Kishore-ji:

 

I totally agree with you about not applying these readings verbatim

and a comprehensive analysis of the chart is necessary.

 

I also have great respect and admiration for Sri Raman.

 

However I was wondering how he has specifically derived that meaning.

For example, Mars in Gemini is supposed to give " loving family and

children " .

 

Thanks for the information.

 

Kind regards.

 

Krupa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sohamsa , " kishore patnaik "

<kishorepatnaik09 wrote:

>

> Errata for the above message please :

>

> 2nd para;

>

> Very often, you will come across him cautioning the reader that he

> should NOT apply the readings ad verbatim and sometimes, candidly

> admitting that it is not possible to predict certain things

>

> Kindly note. Inconvenience regretted.

>

> kishore patnaik

>

>

>

>

> On 10/7/06, kishore patnaik <kishorepatnaik09 wrote:

> > dear krupa,

> >

> > Sri BV Raman is the pioneering figure of Modern Vedic Astrology.

He

> > has written several books in simple and easy to understand

English,

> > with no pretentions of so called neo astrologers.

> >

> > Very often, you will come across him cautioning the reader that he

> > should apply the readings ad verbatim and sometimes, candidly

> > admitting that it is not possible to predict certain things. You

> > would be astonished to find such humility and simplicity in such

great

> > a personality.

> >

> > Coming to your querry, most of his readings are based on the

classical

> > texts and his own interpretations of the same, however with more

> > understandable bias towards the south indian texts such as prasna

> > marga, manasagari and Bhavartha ratnakara.

> >

> > Obviously, a planet's position in a chart depends upon the sign,

the

> > bhava and the planet's nature and significations, so as its

lordships.

> > In deeper analysis, the planet's position within the sign also

matters

> > such as its position in a particular lunar mansion and its

quadrant,

> > the position of the planet in various divisonal charts and its

> > position vis a vis other significant planets.

> >

> > Readings pertaining to palnetary positions given in the books,

either

> > in sri Raman's books or in classics, are the stand alone

positions.

> > They have to be suitably changed, by looking at the entireity of

the

> > chart.

> >

> > Hope this helps,

> >

> > kishore patnaik

> >

> >

> > On 10/7/06, adhyaayin <adhyaayin wrote:

> > > Om Sri Gurubhyo Namah

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear members:

> > >

> > > In Sri. B.V. Raman's Hindu Predictive Astrology and other text

books

> > > the results of planets in rasis or signs are given.

> > >

> > > For e.g: Mars in Gemini: Loving family and children, scientific,

> > > taste in refinement, skilled in music, etc.

> > >

> > > Are these just based on a combination of planet signification,

sign

> > > signification and relationship between lords of the signs ?

> > >

> > > I would appreciate any guidance on this.

> > >

> > > Regards.

> > >

> > > Krupa

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

>