Guest guest Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006  | om gurave namah |Dear Narasimha I never said something is right or wrong. I just questioned you whether you had your fathers permission, who is the giver of the gayatri to you. Anybody else, whether a crow or a human being is just a NIMITTA and not a spiritual master. A person meets spiritual master during periods associated with the ninth house from navamsa lagna and circumstances helping or otherwise are also seen from the ninth house from karakamsa. In your chart the karakamsa is Gemini and the ninth therefrom is Aquarius, so you can meet a spiritual master during Rahu antardasa in Moon dasa. That he has advised you to do the Gayatri mantra using Rudraksha beads is something between you and him and even thought you mentioned this to me, I never commented on it. try to read more about the types of beads and mantra. I have persoanlly never ever asked anyone to do Gayatri except when they have to be told so due to their charts indicating delay in children. Even then I have advised them to go and seek the mantra properly through a proper initiation, if they do not have one already. We have different views in this matter and that is fine including the use of malas for Gayatri but I have never commented on this before this moment and even now I am only asking you to read for yourself. I have no objection to your sharing the mantra as written and this is a very good thing to do. There is something very very wrong in 'humming the mantra' as then you are actually doing the mantra with the DAMANA VIJA and this is very bad. It would have been much better and correct if you had actually sung the mantra (in whatever intonation you think is right or in whatever manner you feel is correct) and put it in the web or given to others. Respect the mantra please and I am also lodging this wrong teaching protest against your spiritual teacher as well. As regards my doing the Gayatri, if you do not know anything about it then you should read my webpages. People credit me with having transformed the world of Jyotish in 10 years where more than 100,000 astrologers (including yourself and your spiritual master, whether you admit it or not) are doing Jyotish at a different level altogether. The entire Jyotish level consciousness of the world has been transformed. And don;t you know what is that power by which this was achieved? I thought every student of mine knows that. It was the one mantra that my Gurudev did all the time and that is what is my strength if there is any - the Gayatri Mantra. And that is why the name of the group is SOHAMSA.Best wishes and warm regards,Sanjay RathPersonal: WebPages â— Rath’s Rhapsody SJC WebPages: Sri Jagannath Center â— SJCERC â— JIVAPublications: The Jyotish Digest â— Sagittarius Publications---- sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of Narasimha P.V.R. RaoSunday, July 02, 2006 9:18 AMsohamsa Subject: Re: Gayatri Mantra: Text with Intonation and MP3 Dear Sanjay, Our views on mantra and initiation are different. But it does not really matter. When I was in India this year, my father has seen me give the Gayatri mantra in written form with intonation notation (like the JPG I sent to the lists) to various people and then hum it for them to get a hang of the intonation. My father did not have any objection to my approach and was in fact pleased. Moreover, he never taught me against reading mantras loud. The point about vaikhari reducing efficacy was the teaching of my spiritual guru. Before doing the same thing on a larger scale and sharing the humming with some , I wanted to get my spiritual guru's advice also, as he is the one who opened me to Gayatri fully. I got his nod and made the post with JPG and MP3. So both my father and my spiritual guru are aware of my approach and have no problem. Still, I could be wrong. If anybody thinks I committed a mistake by sharing the humming MP3 or by sending the JPEG of the scanned page, kindly leave me to face the consequences and make sure that you do not repeat my mistake. OTOH, if you find it useful, please use it to correct your reading and do a few malas everyday and see for yourself if it makes a difference in your spiritual pursuit!! BTW, I humbly suggest that BK being Surya and father or father's brother initiating in Gayatri is a coincidence in our two charts. My brother also was initiated by my father, but BK is Jupiter. In fact, father initiates into Gayatri for most Hindus. You can't expect Sun to be BK or associate with BK in all charts. When I started doing a few malas of Gayatri everyday with the correct intonation under the guidance of my spiritual guru, using the Rudraksha mala sent by him, Jupiter was transiting exactly over my natal lagna. When I made the final adjustment based on the advice of my spiritual guru when he heard me, Sun was exactly over my natal lagna, with Moon and Ketu nearby, and Jupiter had just risen. Of course, I am using the word "heard" very loosely here, to cover the "hearing" of sound vibrations made at subtler levels than vaikhari also. After all, I and my guru were sitting with eyes closed and I was chanting the mantra without moving my lips and without any audible sound, when he made an observation and suggested an adjustment. Thus, the word "heard" is used in a subtler sense here. Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, Narasimha ------------------------------- Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org ------------------------------- > | om gurave namah |> Dear Narasimha> > That is not right. There cannot be multiple initiations for one mantra. When> the mantra is given it is like a seed and will rise at the right time due to> a trigger. So your present guru has only triggered it and for this he does> deserve credit. Do you think you could have had this during Rahu antardasa?> Note that your bhratrkaraka is Surya so the Gayatri mantra has come throught> your father. In my case it was fathers brother as BK is also Surya.> > Your Vimsottari Dasa (started from Moon):> > Merc MD: 1994-12-30 - 2011-12-30> > Antardasas in this MD:> > Merc: 1994-12-30 - 1997-05-26> Ket: 1997-05-26 - 1998-05-23> Ven: 1998-05-23 - 2001-03-23> Sun: 2001-03-23 - 2002-01-28> Moon: 2002-01-28 - 2003-06-30> Mars: 2003-06-30 - 2004-06-26> Rah: 2004-06-26 - 2007-01-14> Jup: 2007-01-14 - 2009-04-19> Sat: 2009-04-19 - 2011-12-30> > Best wishes and warm regards,> Sanjay Rath> > Personal: <http://srath.com/blog/> WebPages ¡ü <http://srath.com/blog/>> Rath¡Çs Rhapsody> SJC WebPages: <http://.org/> Sri Jagannath Center ¡ü> <http://sjcerc.com/> SJCERC ¡ü <http://jiva.us/> JIVA> Publications: <http://thejyotishdigest.com/> The Jyotish Digest ¡ü> <http://sagittariuspublications.com/> Sagittarius Publications> ----> > > > > _____> > sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of> Narasimha P.V.R. Rao> Saturday, July 01, 2006 3:59 AM> sohamsa > Re: Gayatri Mantra: Text with Intonation and MP3> > > > > > Dear Sanjay,> > Yes, my father originally initiated me into the Gayatri. For most Hindus,> father initiates into the Gayatri.> > But, I did not know the correct swara, I did not read several malas of it> everyday and the prefixes etc also were slightly different. My spiritual> guru who has been guiding me for a few years was the one who intiated me> into the Gayatri mantra as I practice it now. It is with his blessings that> I have shared the humming and saying what I am saying.> > My father is aware of the changes I have made in my Gayatri reading and is> quite pleased.> > Unfortunately, I cannot share the dates.> > If anybody considers what I did to be wrong, I humbly suggest to them that> they should leave the consequences to me and just not repeat my mistake. On> the other hand, if anybody finds the JPEG and MP3 I shared to be useful, I> humbly suggest that they should benefit from it.> > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu,> Narasimha> > > | om gurave namah |> > Dear Narasimha> >> > Who initiated you into the Gayatri? Was it not your father? So did you> take> > your father's permission to do this and say what you are saying? Can we> have> > the date of your initiation into the gayatri if you have that?> > Best wishes and warm regards,> > Sanjay Rath avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0626-3, 06/29/2006Tested on: 7/2/2006 2:31:52 PMavast! - copyright © 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 Dear Sanjay, > I just questioned you whether you had your fathers permission, > who is the giver of the gayatri to you. Anybody else, whether a > crow or a human being is just a NIMITTA and not a spiritual master. It will be appropriate to trust a person to know his spiritual master. One will be ill-advised to go to Swami Vivekananda or Swami Abhedanda or Swami Akhandananda and tell him that Ramakrishna Paramahamsa is not his spiritual master because Gayatri was first given by someone else! In fact, my spiritual guru does consider himself to be just a nimitta. But that is his humility. If you say everyone who guides after the first giving of Gayatri is "just a NIMITTA", one can consider even the giver of first Gayatri to be a nimitta. At one level, everything IS a nimitta. But we normally don't speak at that level. > I have no objection to your sharing the mantra as written and this is > a very good thing to do. There is something very very wrong in > 'humming the mantra' as then you are actually doing the mantra with > the DAMANA VIJA and this is very bad. It would have been much > better and correct if you had actually sung the mantra (in whatever > intonation you think is right or in whatever manner you feel is > correct) and put it in the web or given to others.> > Respect the mantra please and I am also lodging this wrong > teaching protest against your spiritual teacher as well. I will pass on your protest to him. BTW, my comments on trying out Gayatri with the intonation I gave (which is not really mine, but given in Rigveda) were not directed at you specifically. They are generally directed at those who were taught Gayatri but either do not know the correct intonation or do not do it regularly. Those comments may not be applicable to you. Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, Narasimha ------------------------------- Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org ------------------------------- > | om gurave namah |> Dear Narasimha> > I never said something is right or wrong. I just questioned you whether you had your fathers permission, who is the giver of the gayatri to you. Anybody else, whether a crow or a human being is just a NIMITTA and not a spiritual master. A person meets spiritual master during periods associated with the ninth house from navamsa lagna and circumstances helping or otherwise are also seen from the ninth house from karakamsa.> > In your chart the karakamsa is Gemini and the ninth therefrom is Aquarius, so you can meet a spiritual master during Rahu antardasa in Moon dasa.> > That he has advised you to do the Gayatri mantra using Rudraksha beads is something between you and him and even thought you mentioned this to me, I never commented on it. try to read more about the types of beads and mantra.> > I have persoanlly never ever asked anyone to do Gayatri except when they have to be told so due to their charts indicating delay in children. Even then I have advised them to go and seek the mantra properly through a proper initiation, if they do not have one already.> > We have different views in this matter and that is fine including the use of malas for Gayatri but I have never commented on this before this moment and even now I am only asking you to read for yourself.> > I have no objection to your sharing the mantra as written and this is a very good thing to do. There is something very very wrong in 'humming the mantra' as then you are actually doing the mantra with the DAMANA VIJA and this is very bad. It would have been much better and correct if you had actually sung the mantra (in whatever intonation you think is right or in whatever manner you feel is correct) and put it in the web or given to others.> > Respect the mantra please and I am also lodging this wrong teaching protest against your spiritual teacher as well. > > As regards my doing the Gayatri, if you do not know anything about it then you should read my webpages. People credit me with having transformed the world of Jyotish in 10 years where more than 100,000 astrologers (including yourself and your spiritual master, whether you admit it or not) are doing Jyotish at a different level altogether. The entire Jyotish level consciousness of the world has been transformed. > > And don;t you know what is that power by which this was achieved? I thought every student of mine knows that. It was the one mantra that my Gurudev did all the time and that is what is my strength if there is any - the Gayatri Mantra.> > And that is why the name of the group is SOHAMSA.> Best wishes and warm regards,> Sanjay Rath Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 | om gurave namah |Dear Narasimha You are again assuming things that the Gayatri diksha alone is the one thing that can give moksha. That is wrong and hence this statement. The giver of the Gayatri is one and most important Guru and this is given in every lineage by the parents or family among the brahmins. That example you give is quite off the mark. Ramakrishna did not get the Gayatri from Totapuri Maharaj but got it at a much younger age. He may have got the sanyaasa Gayatri form him which is different. In fact there are so many types of Gayatri's. So do not try to divert the point by saying that Abhedananda did not know his spiritual master. ...and please do not compare Thakur to your new spiritual master. You will do all of us a big favor by that. I continue to state that you have done something very wrong by humming the mantra and if you want to put it in the web or in any media you should have chanted it and put it there as you did earlier with the mrityunjaya mantra. Rest is your problem. Also try to learn about the use of malas with the Gayatri mantra (savitur gayatri to be precise). To all in the lists, Also so that people may not be shocked any further by your statements, there is no obstruction to reciting the Gayatri as given in the rig veda. Please go ahead and do this. Don't listen to all this medieval brahminism about right and wrong ways to do the gayatri. None was born an expert and I am pretty sure that the temples in India have remained as pure if not pure till date due to the loud chanting of the mantras. if you want to her it loudly or in any manner, please go ahead and hear it. If gayatri was played in all government offices in India at least in a low volume, corruption would come down to nil. Rhoda I hope that answers your query. Do mantras as advised by your guru and that will depend on your own spiritual development. Mantras must be done loudly initially to become one with the mantra devata at the physical level. Thereafter it will go inwards naturally. Please pass this on to all lists where this was circulated. Best wishes and warm regards,Sanjay RathPersonal: WebPages ¡ü Rath¡Çs Rhapsody SJC WebPages: Sri Jagannath Center ¡ü SJCERC ¡ü JIVAPublications: The Jyotish Digest ¡ü Sagittarius Publications---- sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of Narasimha P.V.R. RaoSunday, July 02, 2006 10:15 PMsohamsa Subject: Re: Gayatri Mantra: Text with Very Bad Damana Vija MP3 Dear Sanjay, > I just questioned you whether you had your fathers permission, > who is the giver of the gayatri to you. Anybody else, whether a > crow or a human being is just a NIMITTA and not a spiritual master. It will be appropriate to trust a person to know his spiritual master. One will be ill-advised to go to Swami Vivekananda or Swami Abhedanda or Swami Akhandananda and tell him that Ramakrishna Paramahamsa is not his spiritual master because Gayatri was first given by someone else! In fact, my spiritual guru does consider himself to be just a nimitta. But that is his humility. If you say everyone who guides after the first giving of Gayatri is "just a NIMITTA", one can consider even the giver of first Gayatri to be a nimitta. At one level, everything IS a nimitta. But we normally don't speak at that level. > I have no objection to your sharing the mantra as written and this is > a very good thing to do. There is something very very wrong in > 'humming the mantra' as then you are actually doing the mantra with > the DAMANA VIJA and this is very bad. It would have been much > better and correct if you had actually sung the mantra (in whatever > intonation you think is right or in whatever manner you feel is > correct) and put it in the web or given to others.> > Respect the mantra please and I am also lodging this wrong > teaching protest against your spiritual teacher as well. I will pass on your protest to him. BTW, my comments on trying out Gayatri with the intonation I gave (which is not really mine, but given in Rigveda) were not directed at you specifically. They are generally directed at those who were taught Gayatri but either do not know the correct intonation or do not do it regularly. Those comments may not be applicable to you. Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, Narasimha ------------------------------- Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org ------------------------------- > | om gurave namah |> Dear Narasimha> > I never said something is right or wrong. I just questioned you whether you had your fathers permission, who is the giver of the gayatri to you. Anybody else, whether a crow or a human being is just a NIMITTA and not a spiritual master. A person meets spiritual master during periods associated with the ninth house from navamsa lagna and circumstances helping or otherwise are also seen from the ninth house from karakamsa.> > In your chart the karakamsa is Gemini and the ninth therefrom is Aquarius, so you can meet a spiritual master during Rahu antardasa in Moon dasa.> > That he has advised you to do the Gayatri mantra using Rudraksha beads is something between you and him and even thought you mentioned this to me, I never commented on it. try to read more about the types of beads and mantra.> > I have persoanlly never ever asked anyone to do Gayatri except when they have to be told so due to their charts indicating delay in children. Even then I have advised them to go and seek the mantra properly through a proper initiation, if they do not have one already.> > We have different views in this matter and that is fine including the use of malas for Gayatri but I have never commented on this before this moment and even now I am only asking you to read for yourself.> > I have no objection to your sharing the mantra as written and this is a very good thing to do. There is something very very wrong in 'humming the mantra' as then you are actually doing the mantra with the DAMANA VIJA and this is very bad. It would have been much better and correct if you had actually sung the mantra (in whatever intonation you think is right or in whatever manner you feel is correct) and put it in the web or given to others.> > Respect the mantra please and I am also lodging this wrong teaching protest against your spiritual teacher as well. > > As regards my doing the Gayatri, if you do not know anything about it then you should read my webpages. People credit me with having transformed the world of Jyotish in 10 years where more than 100,000 astrologers (including yourself and your spiritual master, whether you admit it or not) are doing Jyotish at a different level altogether. The entire Jyotish level consciousness of the world has been transformed. > > And don;t you know what is that power by which this was achieved? I thought every student of mine knows that. It was the one mantra that my Gurudev did all the time and that is what is my strength if there is any - the Gayatri Mantra.> > And that is why the name of the group is SOHAMSA.> Best wishes and warm regards,> Sanjay Rath avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0626-3, 06/29/2006Tested on: 7/2/2006 11:43:22 PMavast! - copyright © 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 Dear Sanjay, > ...and please do not compare> Thakur to your new spiritual master. You will do all of us a big favor by> that. Did I compare?? I merely gave an *example* to show that a spiritual master is not necessarily the one who taught Gayatri first and to counter your claim that "anybody else, whether a crow or a human being is just a NIMITTA and not a spiritual master." Whether X is my spiritual master or not is between me and X and not anybody else's business. Also, please realize that you are speaking about a person you know nothing about. He *could* be the re-incarnation of Swami Vivekananda for example (I am not saying he is). You simply have no idea. Your unprovoked circasm about a person you don't know, when I am calmly minding my business, is surprising to me. > You are again assuming things that the Gayatri diksha alone is the one thing> that can give moksha. I did not say it. I guess it is in my karma today to be misinterpreted... Also, I did not prohibit loud chanting. I said I personally want to chant without vaikhari due to certain beliefs which I mentioned. I did not say loud chanting is bad. I am being misrepresented there also. Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, Narasimha ------------------------------- Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org ------------------------------- > | om gurave namah |> Dear Narasimha> > You are again assuming things that the Gayatri diksha alone is the one thing> that can give moksha. That is wrong and hence this statement. The giver of> the Gayatri is one and most important Guru and this is given in every> lineage by the parents or family among the brahmins.> > That example you give is quite off the mark. Ramakrishna did not get the> Gayatri from Totapuri Maharaj but got it at a much younger age. He may have> got the sanyaasa Gayatri form him which is different. In fact there are so> many types of Gayatri's. So do not try to divert the point by saying that> Abhedananda did not know his spiritual master. ...and please do not compare> Thakur to your new spiritual master. You will do all of us a big favor by> that.> > I continue to state that you have done something very wrong by humming the> mantra and if you want to put it in the web or in any media you should have> chanted it and put it there as you did earlier with the mrityunjaya mantra.> Rest is your problem.> > Also try to learn about the use of malas with the Gayatri mantra (savitur> gayatri to be precise).> > To all in the lists,> > Also so that people may not be shocked any further by your statements, there> is no obstruction to reciting the Gayatri as given in the rig veda. Please> go ahead and do this. Don't listen to all this medieval brahminism about> right and wrong ways to do the gayatri. None was born an expert and I am> pretty sure that the temples in India have remained as pure if not pure till> date due to the loud chanting of the mantras.> > if you want to her it loudly or in any manner, please go ahead and hear it.> If gayatri was played in all government offices in India at least in a low> volume, corruption would come down to nil. Rhoda I hope that answers your> query.> > Do mantras as advised by your guru and that will depend on your own> spiritual development. Mantras must be done loudly initially to become one> with the mantra devata at the physical level. Thereafter it will go inwards> naturally.> > Please pass this on to all lists where this was circulated.> > Best wishes and warm regards,> Sanjay Rath Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 3, 2006 Report Share Posted July 3, 2006 | om gurave namah |Dear Narasimha ok you have clarified that loud chanting is very fine and that is what is to be done in the Yajya and the agnihotri. Then why is it that you are humming something and calling it gayatri mantra and not recording the gayatri mantra. What you are humming is NOT gayatri mantra. If you want, then record the Gayatri mantra but don;t do such things as after 100 years, people will say that this hamm-hum-heem-haam is the *real gayatri mantra* as Narasimha said so. So throw this out right now. Did you ask him about the reason as to why he has asked you to use rudraksha mala for the gayatri when it is well known that this is for Shiva mantra. Second point about right intonation - 1. You are aware that the Gayatri chandah has 24 syllables or sounds? 2. That Maharishi Vishwamitra informed the world about this mantra with the 24 sounds that is recorded exactly in the Rig Veda Mandala III.62.10 3. That if you add any other sound to this mantra, then the total number would increase beyond the 24 sound. Would it still be Gayatri chandah after you add two sounds before and after the mantra? If yes then what is the meaning of gayatri chandah? If not then what are you supposed to do to ensure that the 24 sound scheme does not break? Have you done that? 4. Which mala is to be used for the gayatri? Why is the Rudraksha NEVER to be used for the gayatri mantra? Why has your Guru asked you to use the Rudraksha and from which scripture did he get the reference for this deviation?Best wishes and warm regards,Sanjay RathPersonal: WebPages ¡ü Rath¡Çs Rhapsody SJC WebPages: Sri Jagannath Center ¡ü SJCERC ¡ü JIVAPublications: The Jyotish Digest ¡ü Sagittarius Publications---- sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of Narasimha P.V.R. RaoMonday, July 03, 2006 1:32 AMsohamsa Subject: RE: Re: Gayatri Mantra: Text with Very Bad Damana Vija MP3 Dear Sanjay, > ...and please do not compare> Thakur to your new spiritual master. You will do all of us a big favor by> that. Did I compare?? I merely gave an *example* to show that a spiritual master is not necessarily the one who taught Gayatri first and to counter your claim that "anybody else, whether a crow or a human being is just a NIMITTA and not a spiritual master." Whether X is my spiritual master or not is between me and X and not anybody else's business. Also, please realize that you are speaking about a person you know nothing about. He *could* be the re-incarnation of Swami Vivekananda for example (I am not saying he is). You simply have no idea. Your unprovoked circasm about a person you don't know, when I am calmly minding my business, is surprising to me. > You are again assuming things that the Gayatri diksha alone is the one thing> that can give moksha. I did not say it. I guess it is in my karma today to be misinterpreted... Also, I did not prohibit loud chanting. I said I personally want to chant without vaikhari due to certain beliefs which I mentioned. I did not say loud chanting is bad. I am being misrepresented there also. Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, Narasimha ------------------------------- Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org ------------------------------- > | om gurave namah |> Dear Narasimha> > You are again assuming things that the Gayatri diksha alone is the one thing> that can give moksha. That is wrong and hence this statement. The giver of> the Gayatri is one and most important Guru and this is given in every> lineage by the parents or family among the brahmins.> > That example you give is quite off the mark. Ramakrishna did not get the> Gayatri from Totapuri Maharaj but got it at a much younger age. He may have> got the sanyaasa Gayatri form him which is different. In fact there are so> many types of Gayatri's. So do not try to divert the point by saying that> Abhedananda did not know his spiritual master. ...and please do not compare> Thakur to your new spiritual master. You will do all of us a big favor by> that.> > I continue to state that you have done something very wrong by humming the> mantra and if you want to put it in the web or in any media you should have> chanted it and put it there as you did earlier with the mrityunjaya mantra.> Rest is your problem.> > Also try to learn about the use of malas with the Gayatri mantra (savitur> gayatri to be precise).> > To all in the lists,> > Also so that people may not be shocked any further by your statements, there> is no obstruction to reciting the Gayatri as given in the rig veda. Please> go ahead and do this. Don't listen to all this medieval brahminism about> right and wrong ways to do the gayatri. None was born an expert and I am> pretty sure that the temples in India have remained as pure if not pure till> date due to the loud chanting of the mantras.> > if you want to her it loudly or in any manner, please go ahead and hear it.> If gayatri was played in all government offices in India at least in a low> volume, corruption would come down to nil. Rhoda I hope that answers your> query.> > Do mantras as advised by your guru and that will depend on your own> spiritual development. Mantras must be done loudly initially to become one> with the mantra devata at the physical level. Thereafter it will go inwards> naturally.> > Please pass this on to all lists where this was circulated.> > Best wishes and warm regards,> Sanjay Rath avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0626-3, 06/29/2006Tested on: 7/3/2006 7:53:00 AMavast! - copyright © 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 3, 2006 Report Share Posted July 3, 2006 ~ Om Namo Narayanaya ~ Respected Sanjayji, Gurus and members, I have uploaded the voice of Gayatri mantra on my site and you may download it from the following links: http://www.neerajgupta.com/gayatri.wav http://www.neerajgupta.com/gayatri-neeraj.wav The first one is chanted by someone else (I don't know name) and the second one is chanted by myself. I request gurus and other learned members to kindly point out my mistakes in intonation and prounonciation, so that I can rectify it (it may take couple of times) and once everything is correct (intonation as well as pronounciation), it can be used by everybody and everyone can chant it in correct way to get the best effects. Regards, Neeraj --- Sanjay Rath <sanjayrath wrote: > | om gurave namah | > Dear Narasimha > > ok you have clarified that loud chanting is very > fine and that is what is to > be done in the Yajya and the agnihotri. > > Then why is it that you are humming something and > calling it gayatri mantra > and not recording the gayatri mantra. What you are > humming is NOT gayatri > mantra. If you want, then record the Gayatri mantra > but don;t do such things > as after 100 years, people will say that this > hamm-hum-heem-haam is the > *real gayatri mantra* as Narasimha said so. So throw > this out right now. > > Did you ask him about the reason as to why he has > asked you to use rudraksha > mala for the gayatri when it is well known that this > is for Shiva mantra. > > Second point about right intonation - > > 1. You are aware that the Gayatri chandah has 24 > syllables or sounds? > > 2. That Maharishi Vishwamitra informed the world > about this mantra with the > 24 sounds that is recorded exactly in the Rig Veda > Mandala III.62.10 > > 3. That if you add any other sound to this mantra, > then the total number > would increase beyond the 24 sound. Would it still > be Gayatri chandah after > you add two sounds before and after the mantra? If > yes then what is the > meaning of gayatri chandah? If not then what are you > supposed to do to > ensure that the 24 sound scheme does not break? Have > you done that? > > 4. Which mala is to be used for the gayatri? Why is > the Rudraksha NEVER to > be used for the gayatri mantra? Why has your Guru > asked you to use the > Rudraksha and from which scripture did he get the > reference for this > deviation? > Best wishes and warm regards, > Sanjay Rath > > Personal: <http://srath.com/blog/> WebPages ¡ü > <http://srath.com/blog/> > Rath¡Çs Rhapsody > SJC WebPages: <http://.org/> Sri > Jagannath Center ¡ü > <http://sjcerc.com/> SJCERC ¡ü <http://jiva.us/> > JIVA > Publications: <http://thejyotishdigest.com/> The > Jyotish Digest ¡ü > <http://sagittariuspublications.com/> Sagittarius > Publications > ---- > > > > > _____ > > sohamsa > [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of > Narasimha P.V.R. Rao > Monday, July 03, 2006 1:32 AM > sohamsa > RE: Re: Gayatri Mantra: Text with > Very Bad Damana Vija > MP3 > > > > > > Dear Sanjay, > > > ...and please do not compare > > Thakur to your new spiritual master. You will do > all of us a big favor by > > that. > > Did I compare?? > > I merely gave an *example* to show that a spiritual > master is not > necessarily the one who taught Gayatri first and to > counter your claim that > " anybody else, whether a crow or a human being is > just a NIMITTA and not a > spiritual master. " Whether X is my spiritual master > or not is between me and > X and not anybody else's business. > > Also, please realize that you are speaking about a > person you know nothing > about. He *could* be the re-incarnation of Swami > Vivekananda for example (I > am not saying he is). You simply have no idea. > > Your unprovoked circasm about a person you don't > know, when I am calmly > minding my business, is surprising to me. > > > You are again assuming things that the Gayatri > diksha alone is the one > thing > > that can give moksha. > > I did not say it. I guess it is in my karma today to > be misinterpreted... > > Also, I did not prohibit loud chanting. I said I > personally want to chant > without vaikhari due to certain beliefs which I > mentioned. I did not say > loud chanting is bad. I am being misrepresented > there also. > > Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, > Narasimha > ------------------------------- > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): > http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): > http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: > http://www.SriJagannath.org > ------------------------------- > > > | om gurave namah | > > Dear Narasimha > > > > You are again assuming things that the Gayatri > diksha alone is the one > thing > > that can give moksha. That is wrong and hence this > statement. The giver of > > the Gayatri is one and most important Guru and > this is given in every > > lineage by the parents or family among the > brahmins. > > > > That example you give is quite off the mark. > Ramakrishna did not get the > > Gayatri from Totapuri Maharaj but got it at a much > younger age. He may > have > > got the sanyaasa Gayatri form him which is > different. In fact there are so > > many types of Gayatri's. So do not try to divert > the point by saying that > > Abhedananda did not know his spiritual master. > ...and please do not > compare > > Thakur to your new spiritual master. You will do > all of us a big favor by > > that. > > > > I continue to state that you have done something > very wrong by humming the > > mantra and if you want to put it in the web or in > any media you should > have > > chanted it and put it there as you did earlier > with the mrityunjaya > mantra. > > Rest is your problem. > > > > Also try to learn about the use of malas with the > Gayatri mantra (savitur > > gayatri to be precise). > > > > To all in the lists, > > > > Also so that people may not be shocked any further > by your statements, > there > > is no obstruction to reciting the Gayatri as given > in the rig veda. Please > > go ahead and do this. Don't listen to all this > medieval brahminism about > > right and wrong ways to do the gayatri. None was > born an expert and I am > > pretty sure that the temples in India have > remained as pure if not pure > till > > date due to the loud chanting of the mantras. > > > > if you want to her it loudly or in any manner, > please go ahead and hear > === message truncated === Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 3, 2006 Report Share Posted July 3, 2006 *|| OM MAHAGANAPATAYE NAMAH ||* Dear Sirs, I am seriously trying to grasp the essence of discussion On the topic. Without any interruption to running thread i would humbly want to submit some of the real sadhak of Gyatri like Sanjay or Narsimha or any other to tell 1.How come that "Gyatri mantra picture uploaded of TEXT" is without first pada of Eight. That is " OM Bhur Bhuavah Swah " is missing. 2.How to non-initiate Listening and chanting Of Gyatri Mantra with different pronunciation going to really affect or say which one to prefer.This may be a confusion to many now, for i have chanting by Bhagwan Satya sai baba, Swami sukhabodhanand of Bangalore,Sai baba of Serdi temple website and by Pundit Jasraj From Times Music apart from Ad of Videocon.Believe me all are different in chanting and adding OM here and there.There are many other variations too. 3. I wonder how about millions of devotee of Gyatri parivar and followers of Arya samaj whose whole life spent in faith prayers and in reciting of Gyatri in form of Divine Mother and as sun god in later case of Arya samaj.Did they all lost their labours and mantra did not work for they did not chant it as per pronunciation advocated now as per secret parampara.Is Gyatri not a prassidh mantra? in this age. Hope someone says something about my doubts. || May all people be happy ||OM TAT SATR.C.Srivastava .swami_rcs mob 9412268768http://www.cosmograce.comhttp://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 4, 2006 Report Share Posted July 4, 2006 Pranaam Sanjayji, which mala is to be used for Gayatri mantra? till yesterday, i read this mail - i used to do Gayatri japa on rudrakhsa mala. Best regards jk sohamsa [sohamsa ]On Behalf Of Sanjay RathMonday, July 03, 2006 7:55 AMsohamsa Subject: RE: Re: Gayatri Mantra: Text with Very Bad Damana Vija MP3 | om gurave namah |Dear Narasimha ok you have clarified that loud chanting is very fine and that is what is to be done in the Yajya and the agnihotri. Then why is it that you are humming something and calling it gayatri mantra and not recording the gayatri mantra. What you are humming is NOT gayatri mantra. If you want, then record the Gayatri mantra but don;t do such things as after 100 years, people will say that this hamm-hum-heem-haam is the *real gayatri mantra* as Narasimha said so. So throw this out right now. Did you ask him about the reason as to why he has asked you to use rudraksha mala for the gayatri when it is well known that this is for Shiva mantra. Second point about right intonation - 1. You are aware that the Gayatri chandah has 24 syllables or sounds? 2. That Maharishi Vishwamitra informed the world about this mantra with the 24 sounds that is recorded exactly in the Rig Veda Mandala III.62.10 3. That if you add any other sound to this mantra, then the total number would increase beyond the 24 sound. Would it still be Gayatri chandah after you add two sounds before and after the mantra? If yes then what is the meaning of gayatri chandah? If not then what are you supposed to do to ensure that the 24 sound scheme does not break? Have you done that? 4. Which mala is to be used for the gayatri? Why is the Rudraksha NEVER to be used for the gayatri mantra? Why has your Guru asked you to use the Rudraksha and from which scripture did he get the reference for this deviation?Best wishes and warm regards,Sanjay RathPersonal: WebPages ¡ü Rath¡Çs Rhapsody SJC WebPages: Sri Jagannath Center ¡ü SJCERC ¡ü JIVAPublications: The Jyotish Digest ¡ü Sagittarius Publications---- sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of Narasimha P.V.R. RaoMonday, July 03, 2006 1:32 AMsohamsa Subject: RE: Re: Gayatri Mantra: Text with Very Bad Damana Vija MP3 Dear Sanjay, > ...and please do not compare> Thakur to your new spiritual master. You will do all of us a big favor by> that. Did I compare?? I merely gave an *example* to show that a spiritual master is not necessarily the one who taught Gayatri first and to counter your claim that "anybody else, whether a crow or a human being is just a NIMITTA and not a spiritual master." Whether X is my spiritual master or not is between me and X and not anybody else's business. Also, please realize that you are speaking about a person you know nothing about. He *could* be the re-incarnation of Swami Vivekananda for example (I am not saying he is). You simply have no idea. Your unprovoked circasm about a person you don't know, when I am calmly minding my business, is surprising to me. > You are again assuming things that the Gayatri diksha alone is the one thing> that can give moksha. I did not say it. I guess it is in my karma today to be misinterpreted... Also, I did not prohibit loud chanting. I said I personally want to chant without vaikhari due to certain beliefs which I mentioned. I did not say loud chanting is bad. I am being misrepresented there also. Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, Narasimha ------------------------------- Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org ------------------------------- > | om gurave namah |> Dear Narasimha> > You are again assuming things that the Gayatri diksha alone is the one thing> that can give moksha. That is wrong and hence this statement. The giver of> the Gayatri is one and most important Guru and this is given in every> lineage by the parents or family among the brahmins.> > That example you give is quite off the mark. Ramakrishna did not get the> Gayatri from Totapuri Maharaj but got it at a much younger age. He may have> got the sanyaasa Gayatri form him which is different. In fact there are so> many types of Gayatri's. So do not try to divert the point by saying that> Abhedananda did not know his spiritual master. ...and please do not compare> Thakur to your new spiritual master. You will do all of us a big favor by> that.> > I continue to state that you have done something very wrong by humming the> mantra and if you want to put it in the web or in any media you should have> chanted it and put it there as you did earlier with the mrityunjaya mantra.> Rest is your problem.> > Also try to learn about the use of malas with the Gayatri mantra (savitur> gayatri to be precise).> > To all in the lists,> > Also so that people may not be shocked any further by your statements, there> is no obstruction to reciting the Gayatri as given in the rig veda. Please> go ahead and do this. Don't listen to all this medieval brahminism about> right and wrong ways to do the gayatri. None was born an expert and I am> pretty sure that the temples in India have remained as pure if not pure till> date due to the loud chanting of the mantras.> > if you want to her it loudly or in any manner, please go ahead and hear it.> If gayatri was played in all government offices in India at least in a low> volume, corruption would come down to nil. Rhoda I hope that answers your> query.> > Do mantras as advised by your guru and that will depend on your own> spiritual development. Mantras must be done loudly initially to become one> with the mantra devata at the physical level. Thereafter it will go inwards> naturally.> > Please pass this on to all lists where this was circulated.> > Best wishes and warm regards,> Sanjay Rath avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0626-3, 06/29/2006Tested on: 7/3/2006 7:53:00 AMavast! - copyright © 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 || Om Gurave Namah ||Dear jk, As per Sanjayji in Vedic Remedies in Astrology, " Rudraksha and Rosary " Appendix 6 " Care Should be taken not to use Surya/Vishnu mantra with Rudraksha Japa Mala ORShiva/Rudra mantra with the Tulsi japa mala. For Example, a person desirous of worshipping Sri Ram will require two japa malaOne Rudraksha mala for worshipping Hanuman (Rudra Avatar) andA Tulsi Mala for Sri Rama " Warm RegardsSanjay P On 7/4/06, jk.dasgupta <jk.dasgupta wrote: Pranaam Sanjayji, which mala is to be used for Gayatri mantra? till yesterday, i read this mail - i used to do Gayatri japa on rudrakhsa mala. Best regards jk sohamsa [sohamsa ]On Behalf Of Sanjay RathMonday, July 03, 2006 7:55 AMsohamsa Subject: RE: Re: Gayatri Mantra: Text with Very Bad Damana Vija MP3 | om gurave namah |Dear Narasimha ok you have clarified that loud chanting is very fine and that is what is to be done in the Yajya and the agnihotri. Then why is it that you are humming something and calling it gayatri mantra and not recording the gayatri mantra. What you are humming is NOT gayatri mantra. If you want, then record the Gayatri mantra but don;t do such things as after 100 years, people will say that this hamm-hum-heem-haam is the *real gayatri mantra* as Narasimha said so. So throw this out right now. Did you ask him about the reason as to why he has asked you to use rudraksha mala for the gayatri when it is well known that this is for Shiva mantra. Second point about right intonation - 1. You are aware that the Gayatri chandah has 24 syllables or sounds? 2. That Maharishi Vishwamitra informed the world about this mantra with the 24 sounds that is recorded exactly in the Rig Veda Mandala III.62.10 3. That if you add any other sound to this mantra, then the total number would increase beyond the 24 sound. Would it still be Gayatri chandah after you add two sounds before and after the mantra? If yes then what is the meaning of gayatri chandah? If not then what are you supposed to do to ensure that the 24 sound scheme does not break? Have you done that? 4. Which mala is to be used for the gayatri? Why is the Rudraksha NEVER to be used for the gayatri mantra? Why has your Guru asked you to use the Rudraksha and from which scripture did he get the reference for this deviation?Best wishes and warm regards,Sanjay RathPersonal: WebPages â— Rath's Rhapsody SJC WebPages: Sri Jagannath Center â— SJCERC â— JIVAPublications: The Jyotish Digest â— Sagittarius Publications---- sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of Narasimha P.V.R. RaoMonday, July 03, 2006 1:32 AMsohamsa Subject: RE: Re: Gayatri Mantra: Text with Very Bad Damana Vija MP3 Dear Sanjay, > ...and please do not compare> Thakur to your new spiritual master. You will do all of us a big favor by> that. Did I compare?? I merely gave an *example* to show that a spiritual master is not necessarily the one who taught Gayatri first and to counter your claim that " anybody else, whether a crow or a human being is just a NIMITTA and not a spiritual master. " Whether X is my spiritual master or not is between me and X and not anybody else's business. Also, please realize that you are speaking about a person you know nothing about. He *could* be the re-incarnation of Swami Vivekananda for example (I am not saying he is). You simply have no idea. Your unprovoked circasm about a person you don't know, when I am calmly minding my business, is surprising to me. > You are again assuming things that the Gayatri diksha alone is the one thing> that can give moksha. I did not say it. I guess it is in my karma today to be misinterpreted... Also, I did not prohibit loud chanting. I said I personally want to chant without vaikhari due to certain beliefs which I mentioned. I did not say loud chanting is bad. I am being misrepresented there also. Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, Narasimha ------------------------------- Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org ------------------------------- > | om gurave namah |> Dear Narasimha> > You are again assuming things that the Gayatri diksha alone is the one thing> that can give moksha. That is wrong and hence this statement. The giver of> the Gayatri is one and most important Guru and this is given in every> lineage by the parents or family among the brahmins.> > That example you give is quite off the mark. Ramakrishna did not get the> Gayatri from Totapuri Maharaj but got it at a much younger age. He may have> got the sanyaasa Gayatri form him which is different. In fact there are so> many types of Gayatri's. So do not try to divert the point by saying that> Abhedananda did not know his spiritual master. ...and please do not compare> Thakur to your new spiritual master. You will do all of us a big favor by> that.> > I continue to state that you have done something very wrong by humming the> mantra and if you want to put it in the web or in any media you should have> chanted it and put it there as you did earlier with the mrityunjaya mantra.> Rest is your problem.> > Also try to learn about the use of malas with the Gayatri mantra (savitur> gayatri to be precise).> > To all in the lists,> > Also so that people may not be shocked any further by your statements, there> is no obstruction to reciting the Gayatri as given in the rig veda. Please> go ahead and do this. Don't listen to all this medieval brahminism about> right and wrong ways to do the gayatri. None was born an expert and I am> pretty sure that the temples in India have remained as pure if not pure till> date due to the loud chanting of the mantras.> > if you want to her it loudly or in any manner, please go ahead and hear it.> If gayatri was played in all government offices in India at least in a low> volume, corruption would come down to nil. Rhoda I hope that answers your> query.> > Do mantras as advised by your guru and that will depend on your own> spiritual development. Mantras must be done loudly initially to become one> with the mantra devata at the physical level. Thereafter it will go inwards> naturally.> > Please pass this on to all lists where this was circulated.> > Best wishes and warm regards,> Sanjay Rath avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0626-3, 06/29/2006Tested on: 7/3/2006 7:53:00 AMavast! - copyright © 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006  Dear Sanjay, Thanks for pointing out. Regards jk sohamsa [sohamsa ]On Behalf Of Sanjay PrabhakaranWednesday, July 05, 2006 4:13 AMsohamsa Subject: Re: Re: Gayatri Mantra: Text with Very Bad Damana Vija MP3 || Om Gurave Namah ||Dear jk, As per Sanjayji in Vedic Remedies in Astrology, "Rudraksha and Rosary" Appendix 6 "Care Should be taken not to use Surya/Vishnu mantra with Rudraksha Japa Mala ORShiva/Rudra mantra with the Tulsi japa mala.For Example, a person desirous of worshipping Sri Ram will require two japa malaOne Rudraksha mala for worshipping Hanuman (Rudra Avatar) andA Tulsi Mala for Sri Rama"Warm RegardsSanjay P On 7/4/06, jk.dasgupta <jk.dasgupta wrote: Pranaam Sanjayji, which mala is to be used for Gayatri mantra? till yesterday, i read this mail - i used to do Gayatri japa on rudrakhsa mala. Best regards jk sohamsa [sohamsa ]On Behalf Of Sanjay RathMonday, July 03, 2006 7:55 AMsohamsa Subject: RE: Re: Gayatri Mantra: Text with Very Bad Damana Vija MP3 | om gurave namah |Dear Narasimha ok you have clarified that loud chanting is very fine and that is what is to be done in the Yajya and the agnihotri. Then why is it that you are humming something and calling it gayatri mantra and not recording the gayatri mantra. What you are humming is NOT gayatri mantra. If you want, then record the Gayatri mantra but don;t do such things as after 100 years, people will say that this hamm-hum-heem-haam is the *real gayatri mantra* as Narasimha said so. So throw this out right now. Did you ask him about the reason as to why he has asked you to use rudraksha mala for the gayatri when it is well known that this is for Shiva mantra. Second point about right intonation - 1. You are aware that the Gayatri chandah has 24 syllables or sounds? 2. That Maharishi Vishwamitra informed the world about this mantra with the 24 sounds that is recorded exactly in the Rig Veda Mandala III.62.10 3. That if you add any other sound to this mantra, then the total number would increase beyond the 24 sound. Would it still be Gayatri chandah after you add two sounds before and after the mantra? If yes then what is the meaning of gayatri chandah? If not then what are you supposed to do to ensure that the 24 sound scheme does not break? Have you done that? 4. Which mala is to be used for the gayatri? Why is the Rudraksha NEVER to be used for the gayatri mantra? Why has your Guru asked you to use the Rudraksha and from which scripture did he get the reference for this deviation?Best wishes and warm regards,Sanjay RathPersonal: WebPages â— Rath's Rhapsody SJC WebPages: Sri Jagannath Center â— SJCERC â— JIVAPublications: The Jyotish Digest â— Sagittarius Publications---- sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of Narasimha P.V.R. RaoMonday, July 03, 2006 1:32 AMsohamsa Subject: RE: Re: Gayatri Mantra: Text with Very Bad Damana Vija MP3 Dear Sanjay, > ...and please do not compare> Thakur to your new spiritual master. You will do all of us a big favor by> that. Did I compare?? I merely gave an *example* to show that a spiritual master is not necessarily the one who taught Gayatri first and to counter your claim that "anybody else, whether a crow or a human being is just a NIMITTA and not a spiritual master." Whether X is my spiritual master or not is between me and X and not anybody else's business. Also, please realize that you are speaking about a person you know nothing about. He *could* be the re-incarnation of Swami Vivekananda for example (I am not saying he is). You simply have no idea. Your unprovoked circasm about a person you don't know, when I am calmly minding my business, is surprising to me. > You are again assuming things that the Gayatri diksha alone is the one thing> that can give moksha. I did not say it. I guess it is in my karma today to be misinterpreted... Also, I did not prohibit loud chanting. I said I personally want to chant without vaikhari due to certain beliefs which I mentioned. I did not say loud chanting is bad. I am being misrepresented there also. Sarvam SreeKrishnaarpanamastu, Narasimha ------------------------------- Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org ------------------------------- > | om gurave namah |> Dear Narasimha> > You are again assuming things that the Gayatri diksha alone is the one thing> that can give moksha. That is wrong and hence this statement. The giver of> the Gayatri is one and most important Guru and this is given in every> lineage by the parents or family among the brahmins.> > That example you give is quite off the mark. Ramakrishna did not get the> Gayatri from Totapuri Maharaj but got it at a much younger age. He may have> got the sanyaasa Gayatri form him which is different. In fact there are so> many types of Gayatri's. So do not try to divert the point by saying that> Abhedananda did not know his spiritual master. ...and please do not compare> Thakur to your new spiritual master. You will do all of us a big favor by> that.> > I continue to state that you have done something very wrong by humming the> mantra and if you want to put it in the web or in any media you should have> chanted it and put it there as you did earlier with the mrityunjaya mantra.> Rest is your problem.> > Also try to learn about the use of malas with the Gayatri mantra (savitur> gayatri to be precise).> > To all in the lists,> > Also so that people may not be shocked any further by your statements, there> is no obstruction to reciting the Gayatri as given in the rig veda. Please> go ahead and do this. Don't listen to all this medieval brahminism about> right and wrong ways to do the gayatri. None was born an expert and I am> pretty sure that the temples in India have remained as pure if not pure till> date due to the loud chanting of the mantras.> > if you want to her it loudly or in any manner, please go ahead and hear it.> If gayatri was played in all government offices in India at least in a low> volume, corruption would come down to nil. Rhoda I hope that answers your> query.> > Do mantras as advised by your guru and that will depend on your own> spiritual development. Mantras must be done loudly initially to become one> with the mantra devata at the physical level. Thereafter it will go inwards> naturally.> > Please pass this on to all lists where this was circulated.> > Best wishes and warm regards,> Sanjay Rath avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0626-3, 06/29/2006Tested on: 7/3/2006 7:53:00 AMavast! - copyright © 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.