Guest guest Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 Dear Sanjay Ji, Namaskar. Upon reading the analysis of Gandhi Ji's Navamsha Chakra in the January issue of the Jyotish Digest, I am a bit perplexed as to the computation of the Ishta Devata in the instant case. You have taught in Vedic Remedies in Astrology that for the determination of the deities, the Grahas in the 12th Bhava from the Karakamsha (for Ishta Devata) is to be seen first. If there are no Grahas, then Grahas having Rashi Drishti must be seen. If no Grahas have Rashi Drishti, then the lord(s) of the Rashi must be seen.This is given right at the beginning of Chapter III on Page 55 on 'Astrological principles'. In Gandhi Ji's Navamsha Chakra, though Shani and Budh both aspect the Dwadash Bhava from the Lagnamsha and the Karakamsha, their Rashi Drishti has not been considered and Mangal as the lord of the relevant Bhava has been seen instead. Why has this departure from the standard rules been made? Are there any special reasons for the same? Kindly instruct in this regard. Best Wishes. Anurag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 || Hare Rama Krishna || Dear Anurag-ji, Namaskar. Actually, we were discussing this issue in the Varahamihira site and Freedom-ji gave a nice insight. The rule is first graha(s) in the jivanmuktaamsa, if no graha then lord and associations of the lord. The aspector(s) indicate devata(s)help the worship of whom help develop bhakti and finally lead to the correct form indicated by lord of this house. In the case we discussed, Jivanmuktamsa was in Vrisabha w/o any graha there. Exalted Mangal was aspecting it and induced the native to pursue Hanuman-ji's worship. However, the native's mother seems to be very eager that her son worship Lakshmi also. Best wishes, Sourav =================================================================sohamsa , "anuraagsharma27" <anuraagsharma27 wrote:>> Dear Sanjay Ji,> > Namaskar.> > Upon reading the analysis of Gandhi Ji's Navamsha Chakra in the > January issue of the Jyotish Digest, I am a bit perplexed as to the > computation of the Ishta Devata in the instant case.> > You have taught in Vedic Remedies in Astrology that for the > determination of the deities, the Grahas in the 12th Bhava from the > Karakamsha (for Ishta Devata) is to be seen first. If there are no > Grahas, then Grahas having Rashi Drishti must be seen. If no Grahas > have Rashi Drishti, then the lord(s) of the Rashi must be seen.This > is > given right at the beginning of Chapter III on Page 55 > on 'Astrological principles'.> > In Gandhi Ji's Navamsha Chakra, though Shani and Budh both aspect > the > Dwadash Bhava from the Lagnamsha and the Karakamsha, their Rashi > Drishti has not been considered and Mangal as the lord of the > relevant > Bhava has been seen instead. > > Why has this departure from the standard rules been made? Are there > any special reasons for the same?> > Kindly instruct in this regard.> > Best Wishes.> > Anurag.> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 Dear Sourav Ji, Thank you. But this would be a departure/ a modification of the Rule given in Sanjay Ji's text. Which is fine. But it is expressed differently in the Astrological Principles given in the book where the Lord comes last, after the Rashi Drishtis. Even generally, in some classes that I attended at SJC Attri, even more different matters, first the Grahas posited in the Rashi, then the Aspects and only then the lord appears to be the sequence. But I am grateful for your inputs. Anurag. sohamsa , " Sourav " <souravc108 wrote: > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > Dear Anurag-ji, > > Namaskar. Actually, we were discussing > this issue in the Varahamihira site and Freedom-ji gave a nice insight. > The rule is first graha(s) in the jivanmuktaamsa, if no graha then lord > and associations of the lord. The aspector(s) indicate devata(s) help the > worship of whom help develop bhakti and finally lead to the correct form > indicated by lord of this house. In the case we discussed, Jivanmuktamsa > was in Vrisabha w/o any graha there. Exalted Mangal was aspecting it and > induced the native to pursue Hanuman-ji's worship. However, the native's > mother seems to be very eager that her son worship Lakshmi also. > > Best wishes, > > Sourav > > ================================================================= > sohamsa , " anuraagsharma27 " <anuraagsharma27@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Sanjay Ji, > > > > Namaskar. > > > > Upon reading the analysis of Gandhi Ji's Navamsha Chakra in the > > January issue of the Jyotish Digest, I am a bit perplexed as to the > > computation of the Ishta Devata in the instant case. > > > > You have taught in Vedic Remedies in Astrology that for the > > determination of the deities, the Grahas in the 12th Bhava from the > > Karakamsha (for Ishta Devata) is to be seen first. If there are no > > Grahas, then Grahas having Rashi Drishti must be seen. If no Grahas > > have Rashi Drishti, then the lord(s) of the Rashi must be seen.This > > is > > given right at the beginning of Chapter III on Page 55 > > on 'Astrological principles'. > > > > In Gandhi Ji's Navamsha Chakra, though Shani and Budh both aspect > > the > > Dwadash Bhava from the Lagnamsha and the Karakamsha, their Rashi > > Drishti has not been considered and Mangal as the lord of the > > relevant > > Bhava has been seen instead. > > > > Why has this departure from the standard rules been made? Are there > > any special reasons for the same? > > > > Kindly instruct in this regard. > > > > Best Wishes. > > > > Anurag. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.