retrogression- planet ex.jupiter: att: Dr.Rath

[Guest guest]

Dear Dr.Rath,Sir,

You are not allowing me to be passive. You are making me active on the site.

Mathematical formulae for retrogression is – example

Jupiter gets retrograde when it is 245 degs. away from Sun’s position – and and starts direct motion when it is 115 degs away from Sun. These degrees distance is measured from the ephemeris made for our geo-centric charts-

Distanceses are measured on the sun's apparent path i.e., zodiac-

So when the planet is away from sun - it is less exposed to sun and emit more independent rays to earth which is at the centre - in a geo-centric chart.

rao chitturu--- On Tue, 3/3/09, Luther Rath <rathluther wrote:

Luther Rath <rathlutherRe: retrogression- planet is more independent-less exposed to sun Date: Tuesday, 3 March, 2009, 8:54 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir,

At least I do not have a reference that when a planet is in retrogression it is far from the Sun. But it is sure that it is nearer to the Earth. And when it is at 180 degrees from the Sun it is nearest to our planet. So when it is not far off from Sun then its exposure to Sun does not diminish. Though the orbits of the planets are eliptical the extent of exposure may not be effected much. There is no doubt that etrogression is apparent only.

With due regards.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

rao chitturu <csr162002 >@gro ups.comTuesday, March 3, 2009 12:40:39 PMRe: retrogression- planet is more independent- less exposed to sun

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

While agreeing with Mr. Rath -I wish to mention- a retrograde planet is stronger than when it is in normal motion.

A planet while in retrogation it is far from Sun - in an oval shape zodiac (keplar theory)- in other words it is less exposed to Sun and exits more indepenent rays.. Goes away from Sun- BUT It will not change the malefic / benefic nature .

Retrogation is considered for motional strength in traditional system.

No planet actually travels back - Retrogation is an apparent phenomena when you look at oval shaped zodiac from earth.

pl.recollect the schooldays scince experiment- when a rod is put in a glass with water - the rod look like bending below the water level- the rod has not got any bend - it is an apparent phenamena- this experiment was given to show retrogation.

rao chitturu--- On Mon, 2/3/09, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:ci

Luther Rath <rathluther >Re: retrogression@gro ups.comMonday, 2 March, 2009, 8:49 PM

 

 

 

 

Respected Madam,

What I understand is that a planet when turns retrograde does not change its quality.. If it is good for a particular Bhava, it is good; if it is evil, it is evil during retrogression also. When a planet, a superior planet,

is in retrograde motion, it is very near to the Earth. So its effect shall be more pronounced whether good or evil. The result it gives again depends on its associates among the DBAS lords. A single planet does not give any perceptable result. If I am not wrong.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

 

sujata das <sujatadash1@ .co. in>kp system <@gro ups.com>Sunday, March 1, 2009 9:38:43 PM retrogression

 

DearFriendsSa In 10th is supposed to take you to the top and drop u in an ocean. Is retrogade sa in 11th responsible or my secret enemies responsibleIn 1980, I was a sub-divisional officer cum magistrate in a sub division of a district. I was famous as a just, compassionate officer, most concerned about people's grievances and development. On 27 3 1982, I met with an accident and was on leave for 3 months. In 1988, I was doing extremely well in career and then my husband was shot dead within 3 months of my joining this posting.Success in career is dogged by misfotunes.Is it because of retrogade sa in 11th as I have been on useless postings since oct. 1995 except for a period of 9 months from 10-5-05 to 27-2-06. RegardsSujataAdd more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger. /

invite/

 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

[Guest guest]

Respected Sir,

I had no ill-intention at all. I am extremely sorry if I troubled you. On discussion sake only I opined what I believed. We may differ at this moment. But in due course of interaction we shall come closer, definitely. I am not able to catch the measurements from Sun and do not understand its implication. I may take some time. OK. But at the moment please check my calculation. On 16th June 2009 Jupiter begins retrogression. On that day Sun shall be at 2 degrees in Gemini and Jupiter (J)at 4 degrees Aquarius. I consider another point at 180 degrees to Sun. Let the point be 'C' and it falls at 2 degrees at Sagittarius. From 'C' to 'J' the distance is 62 degrees. On 14th October 2009 Jupiter (J) takes direct course. On that day Sun shall be at 28 degrees in Virgo and Jupiter(J) at 25 degrees Capricorn. 'C' shall fall at 180 degrees to Sun, i.e. 28 degrees Pisces. The distance between 'C' and 'J' shall be 63 degrees, almost equall to the distance

when Jupiter began retrogression. If the locations are correctly calculated the distance will be same on both the dates. In other words Jupiter oscillates to and fro with in this distance 'C' being the centre point. You can calculate on any other year you will find the same result. You may calculate for Mars and Saturn as well. You will find the oscillation pattern and also you will find the distance to be same on both the dates. But the distance in degrees will differ from planet to planet. How is this?

Let us not stop inter-acting. It's a learning process. Excuse me if I am on off side.

With due regards. Namaskar.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

rao chitturu <csr162002 Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2009 6:29:05 PMRe: retrogression- planet ex.jupiter: att: Dr.Rath

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Dr.Rath,Sir, You are not allowing me to be passive. You are making me active on the site. Mathematical formulae for retrogression is – example Jupiter gets retrograde when it is 245 degs. away from Sun’s position – and and starts direct motion when it is 115 degs away from Sun. These degrees distance is measured from the ephemeris made for our geo-centric charts-

Distanceses are measured on the sun's apparent path i.e., zodiac- So when the planet is away from sun - it is less exposed to sun and emit more independent rays to earth which is at the centre - in a geo-centric chart. rao chitturu--- On Tue, 3/3/09, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

Luther Rath <rathluther >Re: retrogression- planet is more independent- less exposed to sun@gro ups.comTuesday, 3 March, 2009, 8:54 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir,

At least I do not have a reference that when a planet is in retrogression it is far from the Sun. But it is sure that it is nearer to the Earth. And when it is at 180 degrees from the Sun it is nearest to our planet. So when it is not far off from Sun then its exposure to Sun does not diminish. Though the orbits of the planets are eliptical the extent of exposure may not be effected much. There is no doubt that etrogression is apparent only.

With due regards.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

rao chitturu <csr162002 >@gro ups.comTuesday, March 3, 2009 12:40:39 PMRe: retrogression- planet is more independent- less exposed to sun

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

While agreeing with Mr. Rath -I wish to mention- a retrograde planet is stronger than when it is in normal motion.

A planet while in retrogation it is far from Sun - in an oval shape zodiac (keplar theory)- in other words it is less exposed to Sun and exits more indepenent rays.. Goes away from Sun- BUT It will not change the malefic / benefic nature .

Retrogation is considered for motional strength in traditional system.

No planet actually travels back - Retrogation is an apparent phenomena when you look at oval shaped zodiac from earth.

pl.recollect the schooldays scince experiment- when a rod is put in a glass with water - the rod look like bending below the water level- the rod has not got any bend - it is an apparent phenamena- this experiment was given to show retrogation.

rao chitturu--- On Mon, 2/3/09, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:ci

Luther Rath <rathluther >Re: retrogression@gro ups.comMonday, 2 March, 2009, 8:49 PM

 

 

 

 

Respected Madam,

What I understand is that a planet when turns retrograde does not change its quality.. If it is good for a particular Bhava, it is good; if it is evil, it is evil during retrogression also. When a planet, a superior planet,

is in retrograde motion, it is very near to the Earth. So its effect shall be more pronounced whether good or evil. The result it gives again depends on its associates among the DBAS lords. A single planet does not give any perceptable result. If I am not wrong.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

 

sujata das <sujatadash1@ .co. in>kp system <@gro ups.com>Sunday, March 1, 2009 9:38:43 PM retrogression

 

DearFriendsSa In 10th is supposed to take you to the top and drop u in an ocean. Is retrogade sa in 11th responsible or my secret enemies responsibleIn 1980, I was a sub-divisional officer cum magistrate in a sub division of a district. I was famous as a just, compassionate officer, most concerned about people's grievances and development. On 27 3 1982, I met with an accident and was on leave for 3 months. In 1988, I was doing extremely well in career and then my husband was shot dead within 3 months of my joining this posting.Success in career is dogged by misfotunes.Is it because of retrogade sa in 11th as I have been on useless postings since oct. 1995 except for a period of 9 months from 10-5-05 to 27-2-06. RegardsSujataAdd more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger. /

invite/

 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

[Guest guest]

Dear all members of this forum,

I am coinciding with the idea of Sri.Rao Chittor about the retrogression planets.

thanks & regards,

VSN. Murthy.--- On Wed, 4/3/09, rao chitturu <csr162002 wrote:

rao chitturu <csr162002Re: retrogression- planet ex.jupiter: att: Dr.Rath Date: Wednesday, 4 March, 2009, 6:29 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Dr.Rath,Sir, You are not allowing me to be passive. You are making me active on the site. Mathematical formulae for retrogression is – example Jupiter gets retrograde when it is 245 degs. away from Sun’s position – and and starts direct motion when it is 115 degs away from Sun. These degrees distance is measured from the ephemeris made for our geo-centric charts-

Distanceses are measured on the sun's apparent path i.e., zodiac- So when the planet is away from sun - it is less exposed to sun and emit more independent rays to earth which is at the centre - in a geo-centric chart. rao chitturu--- On Tue, 3/3/09, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

Luther Rath <rathluther >Re: retrogression- planet is more independent- less exposed to sun@gro ups.comTuesday, 3 March, 2009, 8:54 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir,

At least I do not have a reference that when a planet is in retrogression it is far from the Sun. But it is sure that it is nearer to the Earth. And when it is at 180 degrees from the Sun it is nearest to our planet. So when it is not far off from Sun then its exposure to Sun does not diminish. Though the orbits of the planets are eliptical the extent of exposure may not be effected much. There is no doubt that etrogression is apparent only.

With due regards.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

rao chitturu <csr162002 >@gro ups.comTuesday, March 3, 2009 12:40:39 PMRe: retrogression- planet is more independent- less exposed to sun

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

While agreeing with Mr. Rath -I wish to mention- a retrograde planet is stronger than when it is in normal motion.

A planet while in retrogation it is far from Sun - in an oval shape zodiac (keplar theory)- in other words it is less exposed to Sun and exits more indepenent rays.. Goes away from Sun- BUT It will not change the malefic / benefic nature .

Retrogation is considered for motional strength in traditional system.

No planet actually travels back - Retrogation is an apparent phenomena when you look at oval shaped zodiac from earth.

pl.recollect the schooldays scince experiment- when a rod is put in a glass with water - the rod look like bending below the water level- the rod has not got any bend - it is an apparent phenamena- this experiment was given to show retrogation.

rao chitturu--- On Mon, 2/3/09, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:ci

Luther Rath <rathluther >Re: retrogression@gro ups.comMonday, 2 March, 2009, 8:49 PM

 

 

 

 

Respected Madam,

What I understand is that a planet when turns retrograde does not change its quality.. If it is good for a particular Bhava, it is good; if it is evil, it is evil during retrogression also. When a planet, a superior planet,

is in retrograde motion, it is very near to the Earth. So its effect shall be more pronounced whether good or evil. The result it gives again depends on its associates among the DBAS lords. A single planet does not give any perceptable result. If I am not wrong.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

 

sujata das <sujatadash1@ .co. in>kp system <@gro ups.com>Sunday, March 1, 2009 9:38:43 PM retrogression

 

DearFriendsSa In 10th is supposed to take you to the top and drop u in an ocean. Is retrogade sa in 11th responsible or my secret enemies responsibleIn 1980, I was a sub-divisional officer cum magistrate in a sub division of a district. I was famous as a just, compassionate officer, most concerned about people's grievances and development. On 27 3 1982, I met with an accident and was on leave for 3 months. In 1988, I was doing extremely well in career and then my husband was shot dead within 3 months of my joining this posting.Success in career is dogged by misfotunes.Is it because of retrogade sa in 11th as I have been on useless postings since oct. 1995 except for a period of 9 months from 10-5-05 to 27-2-06. RegardsSujataAdd more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger. /

invite/

 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

 

Check out the all-new Messenger 9.0!

[Guest guest]

Dear Dr.Rath

Sir, I am late in replying your mail- because I could not open the computer for few days for some other reason.

I do not mean bad comment on your curiosity- to go in to deep in the subject - somehow you are making me active. I am happy- One reason I am afraid is if I do not take enough time on the site I cannot give you full reasons in the subject and my explanation is not fulfilled. Another point - when we are going in to these subjects some members feel that we are on KP form and it is all away from Kp - exaltation etc., _ BUT I appreciate the information for knowledge - let it be on any system-

COMMING to the subject of your calculations - EVERY planet besides going around SUN the have their own revolution on their own axis - When geo-centric ephimeries are made - it is all with reference to - CSo calculation of astronomical distanceses is not so simple as you have mentione d- So I take the information given in these books as they are- without going deep into the calculations.

Regarding the Neechabhanga and sharing/exchange of planets strength in conjunction what others like Dhanabalamji are correct-

But I wish to add when two planeta like - JUPITER and Saturn - join - whether in exaltation or not - the net result depepnds on their temporary benefic/malefic nature with refence to lagna and in their transit positions-

But if you just take the combination of a benefic and malefic - the malefic is likely to influence the benefic and reduce its good effect- i.e., when milk and water is added milk defineltly looses its quality- BUt again here - when you come top predictive part - when jupiter and Saturn conjoined / aspected - (subject his birth chart) he is likely to be sucessful in material life rather than spiritual matters - because Jupiter's strength is reduced- So predict as per the chart a/natal /transit and DBAa positions.

rao chitturu

 

--- On Wed, 4/3/09, Luther Rath <rathluther wrote:

Luther Rath <rathlutherRe: retrogression- planet ex.jupiter: att: Dr.Rath Date: Wednesday, 4 March, 2009, 7:47 PM

 

 

 

 

Respected Sir,

I had no ill-intention at all. I am extremely sorry if I troubled you. On discussion sake only I opined what I believed. We may differ at this moment. But in due course of interaction we shall come closer, definitely. I am not able to catch the measurements from Sun and do not understand its implication. I may take some time. OK. But at the moment please check my calculation. On 16th June 2009 Jupiter begins retrogression. On that day Sun shall be at 2 degrees in Gemini and Jupiter (J)at 4 degrees Aquarius. I consider another point at 180 degrees to Sun. Let the point be 'C' and it falls at 2 degrees at Sagittarius. From 'C' to 'J' the distance is 62 degrees. On 14th October 2009 Jupiter (J) takes direct course. On that day Sun shall be at 28 degrees in Virgo and Jupiter(J) at 25 degrees Capricorn. 'C' shall fall at 180 degrees to Sun, i.e. 28 degrees Pisces. The distance between 'C' and 'J' shall be 63 degrees, almost equall to the distance

when Jupiter began retrogression. If the locations are correctly calculated the distance will be same on both the dates. In other words Jupiter oscillates to and fro with in this distance 'C' being the centre point. You can calculate on any other year you will find the same result. You may calculate for Mars and Saturn as well. You will find the oscillation pattern and also you will find the distance to be same on both the dates. But the distance in degrees will differ from planet to planet. How is this?

Let us not stop inter-acting. It's a learning process. Excuse me if I am on off side.

With due regards. Namaskar.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

rao chitturu <csr162002 >@gro ups.comWednesday, March 4, 2009 6:29:05 PMRe: retrogression- planet ex.jupiter: att: Dr.Rath

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Dr.Rath,Sir, You are not allowing me to be passive. You are making me active on the site. Mathematical formulae for retrogression is – example Jupiter gets retrograde when it is 245 degs. away from Sun’s position – and and starts direct motion when it is 115 degs away from Sun. These degrees distance is measured from the ephemeris made for our geo-centric charts-

Distanceses are measured on the sun's apparent path i.e., zodiac- So when the planet is away from sun - it is less exposed to sun and emit more independent rays to earth which is at the centre - in a geo-centric chart. rao chitturu--- On Tue, 3/3/09, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

Luther Rath <rathluther >Re: retrogression- planet is more independent- less exposed to sun@gro ups.comTuesday, 3 March, 2009, 8:54 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir,

At least I do not have a reference that when a planet is in retrogression it is far from the Sun. But it is sure that it is nearer to the Earth. And when it is at 180 degrees from the Sun it is nearest to our planet. So when it is not far off from Sun then its exposure to Sun does not diminish. Though the orbits of the planets are eliptical the extent of exposure may not be effected much. There is no doubt that etrogression is apparent only.

With due regards.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

rao chitturu <csr162002 >@gro ups.comTuesday, March 3, 2009 12:40:39 PMRe: retrogression- planet is more independent- less exposed to sun

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

While agreeing with Mr. Rath -I wish to mention- a retrograde planet is stronger than when it is in normal motion.

A planet while in retrogation it is far from Sun - in an oval shape zodiac (keplar theory)- in other words it is less exposed to Sun and exits more indepenent rays.. Goes away from Sun- BUT It will not change the malefic / benefic nature .

Retrogation is considered for motional strength in traditional system.

No planet actually travels back - Retrogation is an apparent phenomena when you look at oval shaped zodiac from earth.

pl.recollect the schooldays scince experiment- when a rod is put in a glass with water - the rod look like bending below the water level- the rod has not got any bend - it is an apparent phenamena- this experiment was given to show retrogation.

rao chitturu--- On Mon, 2/3/09, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:ci

Luther Rath <rathluther >Re: retrogression@gro ups.comMonday, 2 March, 2009, 8:49 PM

 

 

 

 

Respected Madam,

What I understand is that a planet when turns retrograde does not change its quality.. If it is good for a particular Bhava, it is good; if it is evil, it is evil during retrogression also. When a planet, a superior planet,

is in retrograde motion, it is very near to the Earth. So its effect shall be more pronounced whether good or evil. The result it gives again depends on its associates among the DBAS lords. A single planet does not give any perceptable result. If I am not wrong.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

 

sujata das <sujatadash1@ .co. in>kp system <@gro ups.com>Sunday, March 1, 2009 9:38:43 PM retrogression

 

DearFriendsSa In 10th is supposed to take you to the top and drop u in an ocean. Is retrogade sa in 11th responsible or my secret enemies responsibleIn 1980, I was a sub-divisional officer cum magistrate in a sub division of a district. I was famous as a just, compassionate officer, most concerned about people's grievances and development. On 27 3 1982, I met with an accident and was on leave for 3 months. In 1988, I was doing extremely well in career and then my husband was shot dead within 3 months of my joining this posting.Success in career is dogged by misfotunes.Is it because of retrogade sa in 11th as I have been on useless postings since oct. 1995 except for a period of 9 months from 10-5-05 to 27-2-06. RegardsSujataAdd more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger. /

invite/

 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

[Guest guest]

Dear Sir,

Thank you very much for the details. It will definitely help learning.

Namaskar.

Dr. Rath.

 

 

 

rao chitturu <csr162002 Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 8:19:48 AMRe: retrogression- planet ex.jupiter: att: Dr.Rath

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Dr.Rath

Sir, I am late in replying your mail- because I could not open the computer for few days for some other reason.

I do not mean bad comment on your curiosity- to go in to deep in the subject - somehow you are making me active. I am happy- One reason I am afraid is if I do not take enough time on the site I cannot give you full reasons in the subject and my explanation is not fulfilled. Another point - when we are going in to these subjects some members feel that we are on KP form and it is all away from Kp - exaltation etc., _ BUT I appreciate the information for knowledge - let it be on any system-

COMMING to the subject of your calculations - EVERY planet besides going around SUN the have their own revolution on their own axis - When geo-centric ephimeries are made - it is all with reference to - CSo calculation of astronomical distanceses is not so simple as you have mentione d- So I take the information given in these books as they are- without going deep into the calculations.

Regarding the Neechabhanga and sharing/exchange of planets strength in conjunction what others like Dhanabalamji are correct-

But I wish to add when two planeta like - JUPITER and Saturn - join - whether in exaltation or not - the net result depepnds on their temporary benefic/malefic nature with refence to lagna and in their transit positions-

But if you just take the combination of a benefic and malefic - the malefic is likely to influence the benefic and reduce its good effect- i.e., when milk and water is added milk defineltly looses its quality- BUt again here - when you come top predictive part - when jupiter and Saturn conjoined / aspected - (subject his birth chart) he is likely to be sucessful in material life rather than spiritual matters - because Jupiter's strength is reduced- So predict as per the chart a/natal /transit and DBAa positions.

rao chitturu

 

--- On Wed, 4/3/09, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

Luther Rath <rathluther >Re: retrogression- planet ex.jupiter: att: Dr.Rath@gro ups.comWednesday, 4 March, 2009, 7:47 PM

 

 

 

 

Respected Sir,

I had no ill-intention at all. I am extremely sorry if I troubled you. On discussion sake only I opined what I believed. We may differ at this moment. But in due course of interaction we shall come closer, definitely. I am not able to catch the measurements from Sun and do not understand its implication. I may take some time. OK. But at the moment please check my calculation. On 16th June 2009 Jupiter begins retrogression. On that day Sun shall be at 2 degrees in Gemini and Jupiter (J)at 4 degrees Aquarius. I consider another point at 180 degrees to Sun. Let the point be 'C' and it falls at 2 degrees at Sagittarius. From 'C' to 'J' the distance is 62 degrees. On 14th October 2009 Jupiter (J) takes direct course. On that day Sun shall be at 28 degrees in Virgo and Jupiter(J) at 25 degrees Capricorn. 'C' shall fall at 180 degrees to Sun, i.e. 28 degrees Pisces. The distance between 'C' and 'J' shall be 63 degrees, almost equall to the distance

when Jupiter began retrogression. If the locations are correctly calculated the distance will be same on both the dates. In other words Jupiter oscillates to and fro with in this distance 'C' being the centre point. You can calculate on any other year you will find the same result. You may calculate for Mars and Saturn as well. You will find the oscillation pattern and also you will find the distance to be same on both the dates. But the distance in degrees will differ from planet to planet. How is this?

Let us not stop inter-acting. It's a learning process. Excuse me if I am on off side.

With due regards. Namaskar.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

rao chitturu <csr162002 >@gro ups.comWednesday, March 4, 2009 6:29:05 PMRe: retrogression- planet ex.jupiter: att: Dr.Rath

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Dr.Rath,Sir, You are not allowing me to be passive. You are making me active on the site. Mathematical formulae for retrogression is – example Jupiter gets retrograde when it is 245 degs. away from Sun’s position – and and starts direct motion when it is 115 degs away from Sun. These degrees distance is measured from the ephemeris made for our geo-centric charts-

Distanceses are measured on the sun's apparent path i.e., zodiac- So when the planet is away from sun - it is less exposed to sun and emit more independent rays to earth which is at the centre - in a geo-centric chart. rao chitturu--- On Tue, 3/3/09, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

Luther Rath <rathluther >Re: retrogression- planet is more independent- less exposed to sun@gro ups.comTuesday, 3 March, 2009, 8:54 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir,

At least I do not have a reference that when a planet is in retrogression it is far from the Sun. But it is sure that it is nearer to the Earth. And when it is at 180 degrees from the Sun it is nearest to our planet. So when it is not far off from Sun then its exposure to Sun does not diminish. Though the orbits of the planets are eliptical the extent of exposure may not be effected much. There is no doubt that etrogression is apparent only.

With due regards.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

rao chitturu <csr162002 >@gro ups.comTuesday, March 3, 2009 12:40:39 PMRe: retrogression- planet is more independent- less exposed to sun

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

While agreeing with Mr. Rath -I wish to mention- a retrograde planet is stronger than when it is in normal motion.

A planet while in retrogation it is far from Sun - in an oval shape zodiac (keplar theory)- in other words it is less exposed to Sun and exits more indepenent rays.. Goes away from Sun- BUT It will not change the malefic / benefic nature .

Retrogation is considered for motional strength in traditional system.

No planet actually travels back - Retrogation is an apparent phenomena when you look at oval shaped zodiac from earth.

pl.recollect the schooldays scince experiment- when a rod is put in a glass with water - the rod look like bending below the water level- the rod has not got any bend - it is an apparent phenamena- this experiment was given to show retrogation.

rao chitturu--- On Mon, 2/3/09, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:ci

Luther Rath <rathluther >Re: retrogression@gro ups.comMonday, 2 March, 2009, 8:49 PM

 

 

 

 

Respected Madam,

What I understand is that a planet when turns retrograde does not change its quality.. If it is good for a particular Bhava, it is good; if it is evil, it is evil during retrogression also. When a planet, a superior planet,

is in retrograde motion, it is very near to the Earth. So its effect shall be more pronounced whether good or evil. The result it gives again depends on its associates among the DBAS lords. A single planet does not give any perceptable result. If I am not wrong.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

 

sujata das <sujatadash1@ .co. in>kp system <@gro ups.com>Sunday, March 1, 2009 9:38:43 PM retrogression

 

DearFriendsSa In 10th is supposed to take you to the top and drop u in an ocean. Is retrogade sa in 11th responsible or my secret enemies responsibleIn 1980, I was a sub-divisional officer cum magistrate in a sub division of a district. I was famous as a just, compassionate officer, most concerned about people's grievances and development. On 27 3 1982, I met with an accident and was on leave for 3 months. In 1988, I was doing extremely well in career and then my husband was shot dead within 3 months of my joining this posting..Success in career is dogged by misfotunes.Is it because of retrogade sa in 11th as I have been on useless postings since oct. 1995 except for a period of 9 months from 10-5-05 to 27-2-06. RegardsSujataAdd more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger. ..com/

invite/

 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.