Guest guest Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 Dear Punit ji and Friends, 1. That is the book " Nadi Astrology, Accurate Predictive Methodology by Umang Taneja, First Published in 1999, Fourth Edition 2004 " . 2. In fact it is a good KP book where the significations at 3 levels of Planet, Star Lord and Sub Lord are SIMULTANEOUSLY considered like C.K. Bahatt and Kanak Bosmia. 3. The House Grouping from that book are incorporated in my KP House Grouping. There are the House Grouping for DBA only, not mentioning the cusps concerned. 4. More detailed house grouping for marriage can be found in " Astrology, Marriage and Relationship, by the same author, 2006 " . 5. For examples, when the combination of 5 (love) ,8 (sexual organ) or 5,12 (bed comfort) is signified in the DBA, the love affairmay invole the physical relations and bed pleasure. It is consistent with a finding in " Progeny and Romance, 2007 " that the signification of 5,8 without 7,11 may indicate thinking of enjoying sex without marriage. In Umang Taneja's book, like in KP Readers and C.R. Bhatt's books, it is found that 8, 12 (ego, hurdles, quarrel, disappointment, loss of all kinds etc) are signified with 1,6,10, it will increase the probability of divorce. In K.M. Subramaniam's books also, 8 is in UNFAVOR of marriage. 6. It is interseting how and when 5,8 can replace 2,7,11? 7. Is there any KP astrologer considering 8 in FAVOR of marriage in the KP latrature like Astrosecrets & KP, K.P. & Astrlogy Year Books etc? 8. My house grouping is not taking word by word from the KP Readers or other KP latrature. For examples, the foreign settlement rule from KP Reader VI is not mentioned because it doesn't work as per my study of 100 charts. For imprisonment, it is not strict for 12 CSL to be Rahu as C.R. Bhatt has done because it is found many welknown prisioners like Mahatma Gandhi, Punit Nehru, Mrs. Gandhi (even as per TOB rectified by Guruji KSK), Nelson Mandela etc. 9. Another very important point is that in KP which based on the signignification of house lordship and occupation of a planet, the Karaka planet can play a supporting role only not a major role like in Verdic. What I mean is that without 12CSL being Rahu one may be imprisoned, if the required house grouping is signified; Venus alone without 2,7,11 can't give marrige; Jupiter alone without 2,5,11 can give child. 10. I need to take a break from the Group to prove that many prisoners are not with 12 CSL Rahu on the basis of birth data of over 90 executed prisoners and over 500 prisoners from AstroDatabank. Thanks and regards, tw , Punit Pandey <punitp wrote: > > Last time when I was at the place of my favorite astrology bookseller KK > Goyal in Delhi, I also remember seeing a book by Umang Taneja in English. > The whole book was dedicated to house grouping in KP. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:11 AM, tw853 tw853 wrote: > > > KPEzine Oct 2007 to February 2008 > > KP House Grouping Part 1 to 5 > > > > > > > > > > , Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@ wrote: > > > > > > KPEzine January 2008 > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, sujata das sujatadash1@ wrote: > > > > > > sujata das sujatadash1@ > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 2:46 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr Dhanbalan and TWji, > > > Where are the house groupings by TWji available. Putting them in File > > section of KP groups will be appreciated > > > Regards > > > Sujata > > > > > > --- On Thu, 12/2/09, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > wrote: > > > > > > Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > @gro ups.com > > > Thursday, 12 February, 2009, 3:10 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Adith > > > My another doubt in the quiz3 is, the house 8 is also for chronic > > diseases. 6th house is disease. If the first cuspal sublord signifies > > 1,6,8,12 then the native may be admitted in the hospital due to chronic > > disease and need not be due to accident. > > > Another doubt is for occuring accident, the houses 4,8,12 have to be > > considered. Mr.TinWin has given a table " House grouping -part 4 " . In that > > table, whether he will met accident or not, he asked to look into the houses > > 8,12 mainly with 6 as supporting house. What way 6th house is related to > > accident? Why not he taken 4th house as supporting house for accident? > > > In the same table, he asked to consider houses 8,12 mainly and houses 4,6 > > as supporting houses to arrive Dasa Bukthi Antharam for accident. Why he > > included the houses 4, 6 here? > > > Dhanabalan > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > @gro ups.com > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 9:14 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > We dont have such answers also for Sun is weaker than nodes in this case. > > Here we have the example with the result. Also the strength does not depend > > just as Nodes or the Planets. As you know many points to be considered. > > > > > > Also in this case , as first cum first. Sun has come first as dasa Lord > > prior to Nodes . > > > > > > For instance , if I have not given the Sub as Dasa lord and asked the > > question " when he will meet with accidents in his life time? " , then the > > answer will be quite different. Many answers would have come. But may be > > some would have not chosen Sun dasa also. > > > So how to do the correct predictions? Here we have the answer,from which > > why cant we try to find some points which we might have missed also. Thats > > my opinion only to my my little knowledge. > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji, I do respect your expertise. Also you consistent > > questions on the results is always good to make the importance of such > > points embedded in the minds. Definitely your queries are valuable. > > > > > > I duly appreciate your thoughts! > > > > > > Regards > > > Adith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Adith > > > I want supporting evidence in KP Readers that Sun is stronger than > > Rahu/Ketu. > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > @gro ups.com > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 6:57 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani ji > > > > > > I do agree with your statement of Nodes replacing the signlord they > > occupy.And they are capable of giving the qualities of the planets which > > aspect them. Also as I have said why dont we think of the any importance of > > the Sun being star lord of 4 and 8 th cusps??.Though Ketu is in Sun star. > > Ketu is with close conjucntion with Sun itself. Having all these qualities > > would have caused Sun to give the result?? > > > > > > Also both Mercury and Sat are in Sat sub. Hence Sat is not dropped ?? > > > > > > Regards > > > Adith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > As I have said in my previous mail, it is Dr.Kar's theory of > > > substitution of nodes for planets. I am not aware whether this is the > > finding of KSK. Planets aspecting node will give the aspected planet's > > qualities to the nodes and not vice versa. As Saturn is quite strong here > > being placed in 8th sign, place of accident along with its star lord Mars, > > karaka for accident is very strong with additional portfolio of Lagna > > signification, which is essential for accidents, I am not for dropping > > Saturn for Rahu. As regards to Mercury, sign lord in which the node is > > placed is Agent of Mercury and Mercury can be replaced for Rahu. This has > > been emphasised by late Dri K.S.K. strongly to include nodes in place of > > planets while selecting Ruling Planets and also while scrutinizing the > > Planets. As such inclusion of Rahu for Mercury and dropping the later is in > > accordance with > > > Guruji's advice. > > > While discussing about the main Dasa lord Sun, Kethu is in close > > conjunction with Sun. Kethu is burnt with the rays of Sun, it loosss > > whatever strength he has and the Sun emerges as strong. Hence Sun as prime > > Dasa lord is > > > quite in order. > > > > > > ..With best wishes, > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani. . > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:05 PM > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > Mercury has no planet in its star. So Mercury is stronger. Why the > > Mercury was dropped? > > > Saturn has no planet in its star. Why Saturn was not dropped? > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 3:53 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > Among the two nodes Rahu and Kethu (Head & Tail of snake demonin Purana), > > Kethu is weaker than Rahu in strength according to traditional astrology. I > > am unable to > > > quote the reference. Similarly, the aspects of node are not considered in > > K..P, though some use the aspects of 5th, 9th and 12th attributed to them. > > But other planets' aspecton them qill be there. It is only in Dr.K.R.Kar's > > sub sub theory, the theory of substitution for nodes have been > > > introduced replacing the planet aspecting by the node. > > > In the quiz 3, Rahu;s aspect on Sun need not be considered. Sun though in > > conjunction with Kethu is strong > > > by its own constellation and he is in the sub of Mars in > > > whoose steps Kethu is supposed to follow (Kujawat Kethu) > > > In view of this Sun can be considered as prime Dasa lord, > > > as it is the earliest Dasa concerning with all the relevant > > > houses of accident and hospitalisation etc. > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > > > I a > > > > > > - > > > Dhanabalan R > > > @gro ups.com > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:41 PM > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > Sun may be in its own star but rapt conjunction with Ketu. So Ketu > > represents Sun. Ketu will give the result of Sun. The Sun has to be dropped > > from the sugnificator list. Is there any exemption? > > > Saturn aspects Rahu. Rahu represents Saturn. The Saturn has to be > > dropped from the significator list. Is there any exemption? > > > Dhanabalan > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > @gro ups.com > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 11:34 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalan, > > > > > > My observation is that the native was born in Kethu Dasa > > > balance left was only few days. When we look tor lagna > > > cusp for longevity, it is Rahu in the star of Jupiter at 9, lord of 11th > > and 12th Bhavam. Rahu is aspected strongly by the Karaka for Ayul Saturn and > > Rahu is not involved either with > > > Bhadhaka or Maraka. Hence longevity is fairly good. > > > Next Venus Dasa too has no strong connection with Maraka or Bhadhaka, > > though he is in the star of Moon, 7th lord, but feeble in strength, as Moon > > is not strong for 7th. So Venus is also ruled out as she is not significator > > of 8th > > > too as 2 malefic planets are placed in 8th. Venus is S/L of 4th & 11th > > (not an evil house). Next to Venus Dasa, Sun comes in the picture. Sun is > > in his own star fairly strong. > > > Sun with his own star (equivalent to self strength) is Star lord of 4th, > > 8th and 12th all the houses for accident. > > > Sun is in the sub of Mars in 8tth (accident house) associatd with another > > natural malefic Saturrn lord of > > > Lagna having connection to both 1 and 8th, being in his own sub. Thus S/L > > of Sun, Mars is strongly connected to > > > 1 and 8th houses required for causing severe accident. > > > Hence Sun Dasa is justified. Moreover, it is the earliest > > > Dasa lord (Prime Minister) coming earlier than the other > > > evil dasas of Mars, Saturn, Mercury etc. > > > > > > Thanking you for your sharing your obstacle with me. > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani . > > > > > > - > > > Dhanabalan R > > > @gro ups.com > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 2:06 PM > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > I have tried this quiz3 according to KP but got struck. I request > > somebody to guide me and correct me to proceed. > > > > > > For accident: For DBA, houses to be considered 8,12,(6), (4) as per > > TinWinJi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House > > > > > > > > > Planets in the sub of planets occupied > > > > > > > > > Planets in the star of planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets occupied > > > > > > > > > Planets in the sub of house lord > > > > > > > > > Planets in the star of house lord > > > > > > > > > House lord > > > > > > > > > > > > 8 > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu > > > > > > > > > Sat > > > > > > > > > Mar,Sat > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer > > > > > > > > > > > > 12 > > > > > > > > > Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup, > > > > > > Sun, Ketu, Moon, > > > > > > Sun, Mer, Ven, Ketu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > Jup > > > > > > > > > (6) > > > > > > Ven > > > > > > Jup, > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer > > > > > > > > > (4) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Venus > > > > > > Strong significators for > > > House 8: Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu > > > House 12: Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup, > > > House 6: Venus > > > House 4: Venus > > > Planets close to the Cusp 6 within 3 degrees: Rahu > > > Planets close to the Cusp 12 within 3 degrees: Ketu, Sun > > > Saturn aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees > > > Sun is aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees > > > Sun and Ketu are in rapt conjunction > > > Badhaka lord:Mars. Saturn is in Mars star. Sun and Ketu are in Mars sub > > > Maraka lord: Saturn/Jupiter, Moon. Mars and Mercury are in Moon star. > > Mercury and Saturn are in Saturn sub. Rahu is in Jupiter star > > > > > > Mer,Sat,Sun, Ketu,Rahu, Moon,Mar, Jup,Ven(All the nine planets have come > > as significators) > > > In the normal practice, > > > Rahu represents mercury. So I eliminated Mercury > > > Ketu represents Jupiter. So I eliminated Jupiter > > > Rahu represents Saturn. So I eliminated Saturn > > > Ketu represents Sun. So I should have eliminated Sun also. But it is > > told that the accident happened in Sun dasa. Here I got struck. > > > > > > Significators are: Ketu,Rahu,Moon, Mars,Venus > > > > > > > > > Ruling planets on 9-2-2009 at 17.47.35 PM in Vennandur, near Salem > > > Day lord :Moon > > > Rasi lord :Moon > > > Rasi star :Mercury > > > Lagna lord :Moon > > > Lagna star :Mercury > > > > > > Moon aspects sun(opposition) > > > > > > Sun,Moon,Mercury are in RP. But Mercury and Sun are not in significator > > list. So I eliminated Mercury and Sun. Remaining common planet is Moon only. > > > > > To pinpoint the event, I need 3 significators. So I have included lagna > > sublord and moon sublord in the RP list. > > > Lagna sublord :Venus > > > Moon Sublord :Rahu > > > Common planets are :Moon,Venus and Rahu > > > Dasa period is combination of Moon,Venus and Rahu. > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > @gro ups.com > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 7:07 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalanji, > > > > > > My desie is also same as yours. Most seniors, who are considered as > > authentic and authoritative in the field may feel the quiz programme as > > childish and it is below their > > > dignity to partake.. Professional astrologers may feel that their > > reputation will affect, if the answer given by them.goes wrong. Majority > > of beginners may feel shy to participate due to their ignorance or for study > > and understanding of astrology. In the absence of such majority members, > > only few members who have fair > > > knowledge and study and who are really interested to > > > improve their ability to gain practical experience will come > > > forward to answer the quiz. Such numbers may be a dozen are slightly > > more. My suggestion is the quiz master should put about 6 simple questions > > daily and gradually increasing the standard. He may give the answers to > > the quiz next day. This w ill help a lot for beginners and interested > > persons to gain experience. In the mean time > > > the quiz like 1 to 3 so far conducted may be continued > > > giving 1 week time for solution. By this way, the debate will > > > be lively and at the same time acquire more knowlege by > > > way of discussion with members. I wish that you should > > > initiate this with your abundant knowledge. > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > > > > > > goes wrong. - > > > Dhanabalan R > > > @gro ups.com > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 7:44 AM > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji > > > If experienced astrologers are participating and sharing in the quiz, it > > would be more lively and useful to other members. Because I read so many > > books, books confused me. I hope this quiz program will guide me. > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> wrote: > > > > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > @gro ups.com > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 5:12 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji, > > > Such responses to those who have not participated in the Quiz, would > > prove to be a deterrant and aversion to further members from participating > > in the quiz. > > > Participation in the quiz is unot a measure or scale of measurement or > > yardstick to judge whether one knows KP or not. > > > There could be many reasons for one not participating, including lack of > > time, other pre-occupations, some bad memories associated with cases such as > > accidents, a feeling of imcompetency, suspicions of the quiz being > > fabricated to downsize certain astrologers , not wishing failures, > > embarassment at the prospects of not arriving at the clear answer, and so > > many other such reasons looming , from individual to individual. Which > > reason is linked to which astrologer, we are not anyone to judge. > > > You seem to be a knowledgable person. Shri Raoji is a elderly person and > > they must be allowed their eccentricities if any , dont you think ? After > > all he has proved himself over and over again on innumerable occasions that > > he is knowledgable in KP. He does not require certificates from passing in > > Quizzes. Or does he ? > > > Indian culture teaches us to respect Gnana(Knowledge) and Umra (Age) both > > which Shri Rao Sahab possesses. > > > Please take this positively. > > > best wishes, > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ ....> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear L.Y.Rao > > > > If you understand the KP correctly, why cant you participate in the > > quiz? > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ . wrote: > > > > > > > > Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ . > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > @gro ups.com, " Tin Win " tw853@ > > > > Cc: " Punit Pandey " punitp@ > > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 8:11 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dears TW & Punit, > > > > I just cannot comprehend as to just what > > people like Dhanabalan et al,are trying to prove... > > > > Krishnamurthi Padhdhati clearly says that > > KSK derived inspiration from Nadi Astrology... the name of the Nadi is also > > given by him... > > > > But what is the hullabuloo about ? Does > > it matter as to from which Nadi KSK derived his Padhdhati... > > > > Unless of course, the objective seems to > > be, to prove how knowledgeable one is...about the history of the development > > of K.P.(FULL STOP)... > > > > What is more important,to my mind, is the > > useful application of K.P., to practical prognosis... and not wasting the > > groups' time over fruitless discussuions and semantics about who discovered > > what,when,how, borrowed this knowledge from where and whom ?...and for > > example,raising Newton's theory even ater the Quantum theory has now taken > > over...and in time to come many more theories are bound to be be > > discovered.. . > > > > Improvements in the existing Padhdhati in > > order to enable it to deliver more accurate results should be the objective > > of all inquiring students of astrology. > > > > I hope more and more students of astrology > > curb their desire for instant fame... or even notoriety just to draw > > attention towards themselves.. . . > > > > I am sure that you both and Kanak Bosmia > > certainly believe likewise... > > > > With kind regards, > > > > L.Y..Rao. > > > > GOOD LUCK ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tw853 tw853 > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > Tuesday, 10 February, 2009 10:38:16 AM > > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Punit ji, Dhanabalan ji, > > > > > > > > 1. It seems Dhanabalan ji has switched from Brihat Jatak to Satya Jatak > > and Punit ji prefers Brihat Jatak.. > > > > > > > > 2. Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary has given two posibilities. First one is > > similarity to Satya Jatak and second one is as follows: > > > > > > > > Krishnamurthi himself doesn't tell where he got the idea of Ruling > > planets from. But other astrologers who interacted with him, suggest that he > > got the idea from his researches on prenatal epoch, that certain ruling > > planets of the prenatal epoch, become ruling planets at the birth time, and > > also dominate the individual's life. > > > > > > > > 3. This second one seems getting the idea of connection between the > > planets ruling at birth and at the moment of major life events from Brihat > > Jatak.. > > > > > > > > 4. Such kind of connection idea is not found in Satya Jatak as > > mentioned by Punit ji, but some similar RPs are mentioned in sloka 6: > > > > > > > > 6. The fortunes of a native are to be studied with reference to: > > > > (1) the ascendant lord; (2) the lord of the ascendant in the navamsa > > diagram (3)The lord of the birth star; and (4) the lords of the rasis > > occupied by the above three. > > > > > > > > 5. In sloka 7, it is said to choose the birth star, Moon or Lagna, > > whichever is stronger. > > > > > > > > 7. Birth-star : Consider the strengths of the Moon and the ascendant. > > If the ascendant is Stronger than the Moon, the lord of the star in which > > the ascendant falls, is to be taken as the birth star. If, on the other > > hand, the Moon is stronger than the ascendant, the lord of the star in which > > it is posited is to be taken as the birth star...... > > > > > > > > 6. The birth time to take is mentioned in sloka 5: > > > > > > > > 5. There are three different moments which can be taken as the tune of > > birth and for which the horoscope can be cast. These are(1) Adhana lagna > > i.e. the moment of conception. (2) Siro-darshma lagna i.e., the moment at > > which the head of the child is first sighted. (3) Bhupatana 1agnathe moment > > at which the child leaves the body of the mother and touches the earth.. As > > it is difficult to determine the first two moments accurately, the third one > > should be taken for preparing the horoscope > > > > > > > > 7. In Satya Jatak there are similar RPs and the idea of taking Moon or > > Lagna, whichever is stronger (which Guru ji KSK had used at early stage) and > > in Brihat Jatak, idea of connection between but similar RPs. > > > > > > > > 8. Therefore in my opinion, it is possible that the RPs are the > > combined idea of both Brihat Jatak and Satya Jatak, whatever Dhanabalan ji > > may call. > > > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > > > tw > > > > @gro ups.com, " Punit Pandey " punitp@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan ji, > > > > > > > > > > The quoted text seems a little misleading to me. What Satyacharya > > said > > > > > in " Satya Jatak " that these planets should be used for determining > > the > > > > > destiny (or may be general nativity by common interpretation) .. In > > > > > " Satya Jatak " , I don't find " determination of any moment " using these > > > > > planets. " Satya Jatak " deesn't talk about rectification or horary > > > > > astrology, as far as I know. > > > > > > > > > > The application of ruling planets came, I believe, from " Brihat > > Jatak " > > > > > of Varahmihira where Varahamihira told that there is connection > > > > > between the planets ruling the moment of question and planets ruling > > > > > the moment of birth. It seems that Shri KSK improvised upon the ideas > > > > > taken from these two texts. > > > > > > > > > > Also, from the Hindi edition of " Jatak Satyacharya " , following are > > the > > > > > planets for judging destiny of a native - > > > > > > > > > > 1. Lord of Ascendant Sign > > > > > 2. Lord of Ascendant Navamsa > > > > > 3. Lord of Ascendant or Moon Nakshatra (whichever is powerful) > > > > > 4. Lord of the signs where are all above planets are located > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Punitji > > > > > > Please go through the article " Ruling planets " by Dr.Satya Prakash > > > > > Choudry. He stated that the RP concept is Naadi concept. I am > > > > > reproducing the sentences, " The determinants of any moment according > > > > > to the sage are: > > > > > > * Birth lagna (ascendant lord) lord > > > > > > * Moon or lagna star lord (whichever is stronger) > > > > > > * Moon signlord > > > > > > * Navamsa lagna lord > > > > > > * Lord of rasi (in the rasi chart) occupied by the Navamsa lagna > > lord > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr.KSK has taken both starlord of moon and lagna. He has taken > > > > > daylord instead of Navamsa lagna lord. It is what I told you already > > > > > as japanese style. > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get perfect Email ID for your Resume. Get before others grab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2009 Report Share Posted February 14, 2009 Dear Tw ji,1. I am not referring " Nadi Astrology, Accurate Predictive Methodology by Umang Taneja. " There is another book by him and the whole book is dedicated to house grouping only, as far as I remember. I'll find out the name and post in the forum. 2. Is Punit Nehru a typo?3. Wish you all the best for your study on prisoners. Wish to see the results soon. Thanks & Regards,Punit PandeyOn Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:53 AM, tw853 <tw853 wrote: Dear Punit ji and Friends, 1. That is the book " Nadi Astrology, Accurate Predictive Methodology by Umang Taneja, First Published in 1999, Fourth Edition 2004 " . 2. In fact it is a good KP book where the significations at 3 levels of Planet, Star Lord and Sub Lord are SIMULTANEOUSLY considered like C.K. Bahatt and Kanak Bosmia. 3. The House Grouping from that book are incorporated in my KP House Grouping. There are the House Grouping for DBA only, not mentioning the cusps concerned. 4. More detailed house grouping for marriage can be found in " Astrology, Marriage and Relationship, by the same author, 2006 " . 5. For examples, when the combination of 5 (love) ,8 (sexual organ) or 5,12 (bed comfort) is signified in the DBA, the love affairmay invole the physical relations and bed pleasure. It is consistent with a finding in " Progeny and Romance, 2007 " that the signification of 5,8 without 7,11 may indicate thinking of enjoying sex without marriage. In Umang Taneja's book, like in KP Readers and C.R. Bhatt's books, it is found that 8, 12 (ego, hurdles, quarrel, disappointment, loss of all kinds etc) are signified with 1,6,10, it will increase the probability of divorce. In K.M. Subramaniam's books also, 8 is in UNFAVOR of marriage. 6. It is interseting how and when 5,8 can replace 2,7,11? 7. Is there any KP astrologer considering 8 in FAVOR of marriage in the KP latrature like Astrosecrets & KP, K.P. & Astrlogy Year Books etc? 8. My house grouping is not taking word by word from the KP Readers or other KP latrature. For examples, the foreign settlement rule from KP Reader VI is not mentioned because it doesn't work as per my study of 100 charts. For imprisonment, it is not strict for 12 CSL to be Rahu as C.R. Bhatt has done because it is found many welknown prisioners like Mahatma Gandhi, Punit Nehru, Mrs. Gandhi (even as per TOB rectified by Guruji KSK), Nelson Mandela etc. 9. Another very important point is that in KP which based on the signignification of house lordship and occupation of a planet, the Karaka planet can play a supporting role only not a major role like in Verdic. What I mean is that without 12CSL being Rahu one may be imprisoned, if the required house grouping is signified; Venus alone without 2,7,11 can't give marrige; Jupiter alone without 2,5,11 can give child. 10. I need to take a break from the Group to prove that many prisoners are not with 12 CSL Rahu on the basis of birth data of over 90 executed prisoners and over 500 prisoners from AstroDatabank. Thanks and regards, tw , Punit Pandey <punitp wrote: > > Last time when I was at the place of my favorite astrology bookseller KK > Goyal in Delhi, I also remember seeing a book by Umang Taneja in English. > The whole book was dedicated to house grouping in KP. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:11 AM, tw853 tw853 wrote: > > > KPEzine Oct 2007 to February 2008 > > KP House Grouping Part 1 to 5 > > > > > > > > > > , Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@ wrote: > > > > > > KPEzine January 2008 > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, sujata das sujatadash1@ wrote: > > > > > > sujata das sujatadash1@ > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 2:46 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr Dhanbalan and TWji, > > > Where are the house groupings by TWji available. Putting them in File > > section of KP groups will be appreciated > > > Regards > > > Sujata > > > > > > --- On Thu, 12/2/09, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > wrote: > > > > > > Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > @gro ups.com > > > Thursday, 12 February, 2009, 3:10 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Adith > > > My another doubt in the quiz3 is, the house 8 is also for chronic > > diseases. 6th house is disease. If the first cuspal sublord signifies > > 1,6,8,12 then the native may be admitted in the hospital due to chronic > > disease and need not be due to accident. > > > Another doubt is for occuring accident, the houses 4,8,12 have to be > > considered. Mr.TinWin has given a table " House grouping -part 4 " . In that > > table, whether he will met accident or not, he asked to look into the houses > > 8,12 mainly with 6 as supporting house. What way 6th house is related to > > accident? Why not he taken 4th house as supporting house for accident? > > > In the same table, he asked to consider houses 8,12 mainly and houses 4,6 > > as supporting houses to arrive Dasa Bukthi Antharam for accident. Why he > > included the houses 4, 6 here? > > > Dhanabalan > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > @gro ups.com > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 9:14 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > We dont have such answers also for Sun is weaker than nodes in this case. > > Here we have the example with the result. Also the strength does not depend > > just as Nodes or the Planets. As you know many points to be considered. > > > > > > Also in this case , as first cum first. Sun has come first as dasa Lord > > prior to Nodes . > > > > > > For instance , if I have not given the Sub as Dasa lord and asked the > > question " when he will meet with accidents in his life time? " , then the > > answer will be quite different. Many answers would have come. But may be > > some would have not chosen Sun dasa also. > > > So how to do the correct predictions? Here we have the answer,from which > > why cant we try to find some points which we might have missed also. Thats > > my opinion only to my my little knowledge. > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji, I do respect your expertise. Also you consistent > > questions on the results is always good to make the importance of such > > points embedded in the minds. Definitely your queries are valuable. > > > > > > I duly appreciate your thoughts! > > > > > > Regards > > > Adith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Adith > > > I want supporting evidence in KP Readers that Sun is stronger than > > Rahu/Ketu. > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > @gro ups.com > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 6:57 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani ji > > > > > > I do agree with your statement of Nodes replacing the signlord they > > occupy.And they are capable of giving the qualities of the planets which > > aspect them. Also as I have said why dont we think of the any importance of > > the Sun being star lord of 4 and 8 th cusps??.Though Ketu is in Sun star. > > Ketu is with close conjucntion with Sun itself. Having all these qualities > > would have caused Sun to give the result?? > > > > > > Also both Mercury and Sat are in Sat sub. Hence Sat is not dropped ?? > > > > > > Regards > > > Adith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > As I have said in my previous mail, it is Dr.Kar's theory of > > > substitution of nodes for planets. I am not aware whether this is the > > finding of KSK. Planets aspecting node will give the aspected planet's > > qualities to the nodes and not vice versa. As Saturn is quite strong here > > being placed in 8th sign, place of accident along with its star lord Mars, > > karaka for accident is very strong with additional portfolio of Lagna > > signification, which is essential for accidents, I am not for dropping > > Saturn for Rahu. As regards to Mercury, sign lord in which the node is > > placed is Agent of Mercury and Mercury can be replaced for Rahu. This has > > been emphasised by late Dri K.S.K. strongly to include nodes in place of > > planets while selecting Ruling Planets and also while scrutinizing the > > Planets. As such inclusion of Rahu for Mercury and dropping the later is in > > accordance with > > > Guruji's advice. > > > While discussing about the main Dasa lord Sun, Kethu is in close > > conjunction with Sun. Kethu is burnt with the rays of Sun, it loosss > > whatever strength he has and the Sun emerges as strong. Hence Sun as prime > > Dasa lord is > > > quite in order. > > > > > > ..With best wishes, > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani. . > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:05 PM > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > Mercury has no planet in its star. So Mercury is stronger. Why the > > Mercury was dropped? > > > Saturn has no planet in its star. Why Saturn was not dropped? > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 3:53 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > Among the two nodes Rahu and Kethu (Head & Tail of snake demonin Purana), > > Kethu is weaker than Rahu in strength according to traditional astrology. I > > am unable to > > > quote the reference. Similarly, the aspects of node are not considered in > > K..P, though some use the aspects of 5th, 9th and 12th attributed to them. > > But other planets' aspecton them qill be there. It is only in Dr.K.R.Kar's > > sub sub theory, the theory of substitution for nodes have been > > > introduced replacing the planet aspecting by the node. > > > In the quiz 3, Rahu;s aspect on Sun need not be considered. Sun though in > > conjunction with Kethu is strong > > > by its own constellation and he is in the sub of Mars in > > > whoose steps Kethu is supposed to follow (Kujawat Kethu) > > > In view of this Sun can be considered as prime Dasa lord, > > > as it is the earliest Dasa concerning with all the relevant > > > houses of accident and hospitalisation etc. > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > > > I a > > > > > > - > > > Dhanabalan R > > > @gro ups.com > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:41 PM > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > Sun may be in its own star but rapt conjunction with Ketu. So Ketu > > represents Sun. Ketu will give the result of Sun. The Sun has to be dropped > > from the sugnificator list. Is there any exemption? > > > Saturn aspects Rahu. Rahu represents Saturn. The Saturn has to be > > dropped from the significator list. Is there any exemption? > > > Dhanabalan > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > @gro ups.com > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 11:34 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalan, > > > > > > My observation is that the native was born in Kethu Dasa > > > balance left was only few days. When we look tor lagna > > > cusp for longevity, it is Rahu in the star of Jupiter at 9, lord of 11th > > and 12th Bhavam. Rahu is aspected strongly by the Karaka for Ayul Saturn and > > Rahu is not involved either with > > > Bhadhaka or Maraka. Hence longevity is fairly good. > > > Next Venus Dasa too has no strong connection with Maraka or Bhadhaka, > > though he is in the star of Moon, 7th lord, but feeble in strength, as Moon > > is not strong for 7th. So Venus is also ruled out as she is not significator > > of 8th > > > too as 2 malefic planets are placed in 8th. Venus is S/L of 4th & 11th > > (not an evil house). Next to Venus Dasa, Sun comes in the picture. Sun is > > in his own star fairly strong. > > > Sun with his own star (equivalent to self strength) is Star lord of 4th, > > 8th and 12th all the houses for accident. > > > Sun is in the sub of Mars in 8tth (accident house) associatd with another > > natural malefic Saturrn lord of > > > Lagna having connection to both 1 and 8th, being in his own sub. Thus S/L > > of Sun, Mars is strongly connected to > > > 1 and 8th houses required for causing severe accident. > > > Hence Sun Dasa is justified. Moreover, it is the earliest > > > Dasa lord (Prime Minister) coming earlier than the other > > > evil dasas of Mars, Saturn, Mercury etc. > > > > > > Thanking you for your sharing your obstacle with me. > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani . > > > > > > - > > > Dhanabalan R > > > @gro ups.com > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 2:06 PM > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > I have tried this quiz3 according to KP but got struck. I request > > somebody to guide me and correct me to proceed. > > > > > > For accident: For DBA, houses to be considered 8,12,(6), (4) as per > > TinWinJi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House > > > > > > > > > Planets in the sub of planets occupied > > > > > > > > > Planets in the star of planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets occupied > > > > > > > > > Planets in the sub of house lord > > > > > > > > > Planets in the star of house lord > > > > > > > > > House lord > > > > > > > > > > > > 8 > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu > > > > > > > > > Sat > > > > > > > > > Mar,Sat > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer > > > > > > > > > > > > 12 > > > > > > > > > Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup, > > > > > > Sun, Ketu, Moon, > > > > > > Sun, Mer, Ven, Ketu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > Jup > > > > > > > > > (6) > > > > > > Ven > > > > > > Jup, > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer > > > > > > > > > (4) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Venus > > > > > > Strong significators for > > > House 8: Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu > > > House 12: Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup, > > > House 6: Venus > > > House 4: Venus > > > Planets close to the Cusp 6 within 3 degrees: Rahu > > > Planets close to the Cusp 12 within 3 degrees: Ketu, Sun > > > Saturn aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees > > > Sun is aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees > > > Sun and Ketu are in rapt conjunction > > > Badhaka lord:Mars. Saturn is in Mars star. Sun and Ketu are in Mars sub > > > Maraka lord: Saturn/Jupiter, Moon. Mars and Mercury are in Moon star. > > Mercury and Saturn are in Saturn sub. Rahu is in Jupiter star > > > > > > Mer,Sat,Sun, Ketu,Rahu, Moon,Mar, Jup,Ven(All the nine planets have come > > as significators) > > > In the normal practice, > > > Rahu represents mercury. So I eliminated Mercury > > > Ketu represents Jupiter. So I eliminated Jupiter > > > Rahu represents Saturn. So I eliminated Saturn > > > Ketu represents Sun. So I should have eliminated Sun also. But it is > > told that the accident happened in Sun dasa. Here I got struck. > > > > > > Significators are: Ketu,Rahu,Moon, Mars,Venus > > > > > > > > > Ruling planets on 9-2-2009 at 17.47.35 PM in Vennandur, near Salem > > > Day lord :Moon > > > Rasi lord :Moon > > > Rasi star :Mercury > > > Lagna lord :Moon > > > Lagna star :Mercury > > > > > > Moon aspects sun(opposition) > > > > > > Sun,Moon,Mercury are in RP. But Mercury and Sun are not in significator > > list. So I eliminated Mercury and Sun. Remaining common planet is Moon only. > > > > > To pinpoint the event, I need 3 significators. So I have included lagna > > sublord and moon sublord in the RP list. > > > Lagna sublord :Venus > > > Moon Sublord :Rahu > > > Common planets are :Moon,Venus and Rahu > > > Dasa period is combination of Moon,Venus and Rahu. > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > @gro ups.com > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 7:07 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalanji, > > > > > > My desie is also same as yours. Most seniors, who are considered as > > authentic and authoritative in the field may feel the quiz programme as > > childish and it is below their > > > dignity to partake.. Professional astrologers may feel that their > > reputation will affect, if the answer given by them.goes wrong. Majority > > of beginners may feel shy to participate due to their ignorance or for study > > and understanding of astrology. In the absence of such majority members, > > only few members who have fair > > > knowledge and study and who are really interested to > > > improve their ability to gain practical experience will come > > > forward to answer the quiz. Such numbers may be a dozen are slightly > > more. My suggestion is the quiz master should put about 6 simple questions > > daily and gradually increasing the standard. He may give the answers to > > the quiz next day. This w ill help a lot for beginners and interested > > persons to gain experience. In the mean time > > > the quiz like 1 to 3 so far conducted may be continued > > > giving 1 week time for solution. By this way, the debate will > > > be lively and at the same time acquire more knowlege by > > > way of discussion with members. I wish that you should > > > initiate this with your abundant knowledge. > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > > > > > > goes wrong. - > > > Dhanabalan R > > > @gro ups.com > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 7:44 AM > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji > > > If experienced astrologers are participating and sharing in the quiz, it > > would be more lively and useful to other members. Because I read so many > > books, books confused me. I hope this quiz program will guide me. > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> wrote: > > > > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > @gro ups.com > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 5:12 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji, > > > Such responses to those who have not participated in the Quiz, would > > prove to be a deterrant and aversion to further members from participating > > in the quiz. > > > Participation in the quiz is unot a measure or scale of measurement or > > yardstick to judge whether one knows KP or not. > > > There could be many reasons for one not participating, including lack of > > time, other pre-occupations, some bad memories associated with cases such as > > accidents, a feeling of imcompetency, suspicions of the quiz being > > fabricated to downsize certain astrologers , not wishing failures, > > embarassment at the prospects of not arriving at the clear answer, and so > > many other such reasons looming , from individual to individual. Which > > reason is linked to which astrologer, we are not anyone to judge. > > > You seem to be a knowledgable person. Shri Raoji is a elderly person and > > they must be allowed their eccentricities if any , dont you think ? After > > all he has proved himself over and over again on innumerable occasions that > > he is knowledgable in KP. He does not require certificates from passing in > > Quizzes. Or does he ? > > > Indian culture teaches us to respect Gnana(Knowledge) and Umra (Age) both > > which Shri Rao Sahab possesses. > > > Please take this positively. > > > best wishes, > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ ....> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear L.Y.Rao > > > > If you understand the KP correctly, why cant you participate in the > > quiz? > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ . wrote: > > > > > > > > Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ . > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > @gro ups.com, " Tin Win " tw853@ > > > > Cc: " Punit Pandey " punitp@ > > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 8:11 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dears TW & Punit, > > > > I just cannot comprehend as to just what > > people like Dhanabalan et al,are trying to prove... > > > > Krishnamurthi Padhdhati clearly says that > > KSK derived inspiration from Nadi Astrology... the name of the Nadi is also > > given by him... > > > > But what is the hullabuloo about ? Does > > it matter as to from which Nadi KSK derived his Padhdhati... > > > > Unless of course, the objective seems to > > be, to prove how knowledgeable one is...about the history of the development > > of K.P.(FULL STOP)... > > > > What is more important,to my mind, is the > > useful application of K.P., to practical prognosis... and not wasting the > > groups' time over fruitless discussuions and semantics about who discovered > > what,when,how, borrowed this knowledge from where and whom ?...and for > > example,raising Newton's theory even ater the Quantum theory has now taken > > over...and in time to come many more theories are bound to be be > > discovered.. . > > > > Improvements in the existing Padhdhati in > > order to enable it to deliver more accurate results should be the objective > > of all inquiring students of astrology. > > > > I hope more and more students of astrology > > curb their desire for instant fame... or even notoriety just to draw > > attention towards themselves.. . . > > > > I am sure that you both and Kanak Bosmia > > certainly believe likewise... > > > > With kind regards, > > > > L.Y..Rao. > > > > GOOD LUCK ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tw853 tw853 > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > Tuesday, 10 February, 2009 10:38:16 AM > > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Punit ji, Dhanabalan ji, > > > > > > > > 1. It seems Dhanabalan ji has switched from Brihat Jatak to Satya Jatak > > and Punit ji prefers Brihat Jatak.. > > > > > > > > 2. Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary has given two posibilities. First one is > > similarity to Satya Jatak and second one is as follows: > > > > > > > > Krishnamurthi himself doesn't tell where he got the idea of Ruling > > planets from. But other astrologers who interacted with him, suggest that he > > got the idea from his researches on prenatal epoch, that certain ruling > > planets of the prenatal epoch, become ruling planets at the birth time, and > > also dominate the individual's life. > > > > > > > > 3. This second one seems getting the idea of connection between the > > planets ruling at birth and at the moment of major life events from Brihat > > Jatak.. > > > > > > > > 4. Such kind of connection idea is not found in Satya Jatak as > > mentioned by Punit ji, but some similar RPs are mentioned in sloka 6: > > > > > > > > 6. The fortunes of a native are to be studied with reference to: > > > > (1) the ascendant lord; (2) the lord of the ascendant in the navamsa > > diagram (3)The lord of the birth star; and (4) the lords of the rasis > > occupied by the above three. > > > > > > > > 5. In sloka 7, it is said to choose the birth star, Moon or Lagna, > > whichever is stronger. > > > > > > > > 7. Birth-star : Consider the strengths of the Moon and the ascendant. > > If the ascendant is Stronger than the Moon, the lord of the star in which > > the ascendant falls, is to be taken as the birth star. If, on the other > > hand, the Moon is stronger than the ascendant, the lord of the star in which > > it is posited is to be taken as the birth star...... > > > > > > > > 6. The birth time to take is mentioned in sloka 5: > > > > > > > > 5. There are three different moments which can be taken as the tune of > > birth and for which the horoscope can be cast. These are(1) Adhana lagna > > i.e. the moment of conception. (2) Siro-darshma lagna i.e., the moment at > > which the head of the child is first sighted. (3) Bhupatana 1agnathe moment > > at which the child leaves the body of the mother and touches the earth.. As > > it is difficult to determine the first two moments accurately, the third one > > should be taken for preparing the horoscope > > > > > > > > 7. In Satya Jatak there are similar RPs and the idea of taking Moon or > > Lagna, whichever is stronger (which Guru ji KSK had used at early stage) and > > in Brihat Jatak, idea of connection between but similar RPs. > > > > > > > > 8. Therefore in my opinion, it is possible that the RPs are the > > combined idea of both Brihat Jatak and Satya Jatak, whatever Dhanabalan ji > > may call. > > > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > > > tw > > > > @gro ups.com, " Punit Pandey " punitp@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan ji, > > > > > > > > > > The quoted text seems a little misleading to me. What Satyacharya > > said > > > > > in " Satya Jatak " that these planets should be used for determining > > the > > > > > destiny (or may be general nativity by common interpretation) .. In > > > > > " Satya Jatak " , I don't find " determination of any moment " using these > > > > > planets. " Satya Jatak " deesn't talk about rectification or horary > > > > > astrology, as far as I know. > > > > > > > > > > The application of ruling planets came, I believe, from " Brihat > > Jatak " > > > > > of Varahmihira where Varahamihira told that there is connection > > > > > between the planets ruling the moment of question and planets ruling > > > > > the moment of birth. It seems that Shri KSK improvised upon the ideas > > > > > taken from these two texts. > > > > > > > > > > Also, from the Hindi edition of " Jatak Satyacharya " , following are > > the > > > > > planets for judging destiny of a native - > > > > > > > > > > 1. Lord of Ascendant Sign > > > > > 2. Lord of Ascendant Navamsa > > > > > 3. Lord of Ascendant or Moon Nakshatra (whichever is powerful) > > > > > 4. Lord of the signs where are all above planets are located > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Punitji > > > > > > Please go through the article " Ruling planets " by Dr.Satya Prakash > > > > > Choudry. He stated that the RP concept is Naadi concept. I am > > > > > reproducing the sentences, " The determinants of any moment according > > > > > to the sage are: > > > > > > * Birth lagna (ascendant lord) lord > > > > > > * Moon or lagna star lord (whichever is stronger) > > > > > > * Moon signlord > > > > > > * Navamsa lagna lord > > > > > > * Lord of rasi (in the rasi chart) occupied by the Navamsa lagna > > lord > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr.KSK has taken both starlord of moon and lagna. He has taken > > > > > daylord instead of Navamsa lagna lord. It is what I told you already > > > > > as japanese style. > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get perfect Email ID for your Resume. Get before others grab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2009 Report Share Posted February 14, 2009 Dear Pundit ji, 1. I'm sorry for typo for Pundit Nehru. 2. It may be Dictionary of Significators in Astrology by Umang Taneja & P K Sarna, 2000 and there are pictures of Rasi signs on the yellow- pink color. But it is the same of Rex E Bill's Rulership Book. 3. I would be grateful, if you could mention the name of his book to order it. Thanks and regards, tw , Punit Pandey <punitp wrote: > > Dear Tw ji, > > 1. I am not referring " Nadi Astrology, Accurate Predictive Methodology by > Umang Taneja. " There is another book by him and the whole book is dedicated > to house grouping only, as far as I remember. I'll find out the name and > post in the forum. > > 2. Is Punit Nehru a typo? > > 3. Wish you all the best for your study on prisoners. Wish to see the > results soon. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:53 AM, tw853 <tw853 wrote: > > > Dear Punit ji and Friends, > > > > 1. That is the book " Nadi Astrology, Accurate Predictive Methodology by > > Umang Taneja, First Published in 1999, Fourth Edition 2004 " . > > > > 2. In fact it is a good KP book where the significations at 3 levels of > > Planet, Star Lord and Sub Lord are SIMULTANEOUSLY considered like C.K. > > Bahatt and Kanak Bosmia. > > > > 3. The House Grouping from that book are incorporated in my KP House > > Grouping. There are the House Grouping for DBA only, not mentioning the > > cusps concerned. > > > > 4. More detailed house grouping for marriage can be found in " Astrology, > > Marriage and Relationship, by the same author, 2006 " . > > > > 5. For examples, when the combination of 5 (love) ,8 (sexual organ) or > > 5,12 (bed comfort) is signified in the DBA, the love affairmay invole > > the physical relations and bed pleasure. It is consistent with a finding > > in " Progeny and Romance, 2007 " that the signification of 5,8 without > > 7,11 may indicate thinking of enjoying sex without marriage. In Umang > > Taneja's book, like in KP Readers and C.R. Bhatt's books, it is found > > that 8, 12 (ego, hurdles, quarrel, disappointment, loss of all kinds > > etc) are signified with 1,6,10, it will increase the probability of > > divorce. In K.M. Subramaniam's books also, 8 is in UNFAVOR of marriage. > > > > 6. It is interseting how and when 5,8 can replace 2,7,11? > > > > 7. Is there any KP astrologer considering 8 in FAVOR of marriage in the > > KP latrature like Astrosecrets & KP, K.P. & Astrlogy Year Books etc? > > > > 8. My house grouping is not taking word by word from the KP Readers or > > other KP latrature. For examples, the foreign settlement rule from KP > > Reader VI is not mentioned because it doesn't work as per my study of > > 100 charts. For imprisonment, it is not strict for 12 CSL to be Rahu as > > C.R. Bhatt has done because it is found many welknown prisioners like > > Mahatma Gandhi, Punit Nehru, Mrs. Gandhi (even as per TOB rectified by > > Guruji KSK), Nelson Mandela etc. > > > > 9. Another very important point is that in KP which based on the > > signignification of house lordship and occupation of a planet, the > > Karaka planet can play a supporting role only not a major role like in > > Verdic. What I mean is that without 12CSL being Rahu one may be > > imprisoned, if the required house grouping is signified; Venus alone > > without 2,7,11 can't give marrige; Jupiter alone without 2,5,11 can give > > child. > > > > 10. I need to take a break from the Group to prove that many prisoners > > are not with 12 CSL Rahu on the basis of birth data of over 90 executed > > prisoners and over 500 prisoners from AstroDatabank. > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > tw > > > > <%40>, Punit > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > Last time when I was at the place of my favorite astrology bookseller > > KK > > > Goyal in Delhi, I also remember seeing a book by Umang Taneja in > > English. > > > The whole book was dedicated to house grouping in KP. > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:11 AM, tw853 tw853@ wrote: > > > > > > > KPEzine Oct 2007 to February 2008 > > > > KP House Grouping Part 1 to 5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <% 40>, > > Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > KPEzine January 2008 > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, sujata das sujatadash1@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > sujata das sujatadash1@ > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > <% 40> > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 2:46 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr Dhanbalan and TWji, > > > > > Where are the house groupings by TWji available. Putting them in > > File > > > > section of KP groups will be appreciated > > > > > Regards > > > > > Sujata > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 12/2/09, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Thursday, 12 February, 2009, 3:10 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Adith > > > > > My another doubt in the quiz3 is, the house 8 is also for chronic > > > > diseases. 6th house is disease. If the first cuspal sublord > > signifies > > > > 1,6,8,12 then the native may be admitted in the hospital due to > > chronic > > > > disease and need not be due to accident. > > > > > Another doubt is for occuring accident, the houses 4,8,12 have to > > be > > > > considered. Mr.TinWin has given a table " House grouping -part 4 " . In > > that > > > > table, whether he will met accident or not, he asked to look into > > the houses > > > > 8,12 mainly with 6 as supporting house. What way 6th house is > > related to > > > > accident? Why not he taken 4th house as supporting house for > > accident? > > > > > In the same table, he asked to consider houses 8,12 mainly and > > houses 4,6 > > > > as supporting houses to arrive Dasa Bukthi Antharam for accident. > > Why he > > > > included the houses 4, 6 here? > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ > > gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 9:14 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > We dont have such answers also for Sun is weaker than nodes in > > this case. > > > > Here we have the example with the result. Also the strength does not > > depend > > > > just as Nodes or the Planets. As you know many points to be > > considered. > > > > > > > > > > Also in this case , as first cum first. Sun has come first as dasa > > Lord > > > > prior to Nodes . > > > > > > > > > > For instance , if I have not given the Sub as Dasa lord and asked > > the > > > > question " when he will meet with accidents in his life time? " , then > > the > > > > answer will be quite different. Many answers would have come. But > > may be > > > > some would have not chosen Sun dasa also. > > > > > So how to do the correct predictions? Here we have the answer,from > > which > > > > why cant we try to find some points which we might have missed also. > > Thats > > > > my opinion only to my my little knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji, I do respect your expertise. Also you > > consistent > > > > questions on the results is always good to make the importance of > > such > > > > points embedded in the minds. Definitely your queries are valuable. > > > > > > > > > > I duly appreciate your thoughts! > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > Adith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Adith > > > > > I want supporting evidence in KP Readers that Sun is stronger than > > > > Rahu/Ketu. > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ > > gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 6:57 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani ji > > > > > > > > > > I do agree with your statement of Nodes replacing the signlord > > they > > > > occupy.And they are capable of giving the qualities of the planets > > which > > > > aspect them. Also as I have said why dont we think of the any > > importance of > > > > the Sun being star lord of 4 and 8 th cusps??.Though Ketu is in Sun > > star. > > > > Ketu is with close conjucntion with Sun itself. Having all these > > qualities > > > > would have caused Sun to give the result?? > > > > > > > > > > Also both Mercury and Sat are in Sat sub. Hence Sat is not dropped > > ?? > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > Adith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ > > gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > As I have said in my previous mail, it is Dr.Kar's theory of > > > > > substitution of nodes for planets. I am not aware whether this is > > the > > > > finding of KSK. Planets aspecting node will give the aspected > > planet's > > > > qualities to the nodes and not vice versa. As Saturn is quite strong > > here > > > > being placed in 8th sign, place of accident along with its star lord > > Mars, > > > > karaka for accident is very strong with additional portfolio of > > Lagna > > > > signification, which is essential for accidents, I am not for > > dropping > > > > Saturn for Rahu. As regards to Mercury, sign lord in which the node > > is > > > > placed is Agent of Mercury and Mercury can be replaced for Rahu. > > This has > > > > been emphasised by late Dri K.S.K. strongly to include nodes in > > place of > > > > planets while selecting Ruling Planets and also while scrutinizing > > the > > > > Planets. As such inclusion of Rahu for Mercury and dropping the > > later is in > > > > accordance with > > > > > Guruji's advice. > > > > > While discussing about the main Dasa lord Sun, Kethu is in close > > > > conjunction with Sun. Kethu is burnt with the rays of Sun, it > > loosss > > > > whatever strength he has and the Sun emerges as strong. Hence Sun > > as prime > > > > Dasa lord is > > > > > quite in order. > > > > > > > > > > ..With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani. . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:05 PM > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > > > Mercury has no planet in its star. So Mercury is stronger. Why the > > > > Mercury was dropped? > > > > > Saturn has no planet in its star. Why Saturn was not dropped? > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 3:53 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > Among the two nodes Rahu and Kethu (Head & Tail of snake demonin > > Purana), > > > > Kethu is weaker than Rahu in strength according to traditional > > astrology. I > > > > am unable to > > > > > quote the reference. Similarly, the aspects of node are not > > considered in > > > > K..P, though some use the aspects of 5th, 9th and 12th attributed to > > them. > > > > But other planets' aspecton them qill be there. It is only in > > Dr.K.R.Kar's > > > > sub sub theory, the theory of substitution for nodes have been > > > > > introduced replacing the planet aspecting by the node. > > > > > In the quiz 3, Rahu;s aspect on Sun need not be considered. Sun > > though in > > > > conjunction with Kethu is strong > > > > > by its own constellation and he is in the sub of Mars in > > > > > whoose steps Kethu is supposed to follow (Kujawat Kethu) > > > > > In view of this Sun can be considered as prime Dasa lord, > > > > > as it is the earliest Dasa concerning with all the relevant > > > > > houses of accident and hospitalisation etc. > > > > > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > > > > > > > I a > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:41 PM > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > > > Sun may be in its own star but rapt conjunction with Ketu. So Ketu > > > > represents Sun. Ketu will give the result of Sun. The Sun has to be > > dropped > > > > from the sugnificator list. Is there any exemption? > > > > > Saturn aspects Rahu. Rahu represents Saturn. The Saturn has to be > > > > dropped from the significator list. Is there any exemption? > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 11:34 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > My observation is that the native was born in Kethu Dasa > > > > > balance left was only few days. When we look tor lagna > > > > > cusp for longevity, it is Rahu in the star of Jupiter at 9, lord > > of 11th > > > > and 12th Bhavam. Rahu is aspected strongly by the Karaka for Ayul > > Saturn and > > > > Rahu is not involved either with > > > > > Bhadhaka or Maraka. Hence longevity is fairly good. > > > > > Next Venus Dasa too has no strong connection with Maraka or > > Bhadhaka, > > > > though he is in the star of Moon, 7th lord, but feeble in strength, > > as Moon > > > > is not strong for 7th. So Venus is also ruled out as she is not > > significator > > > > of 8th > > > > > too as 2 malefic planets are placed in 8th. Venus is S/L of 4th & > > 11th > > > > (not an evil house). Next to Venus Dasa, Sun comes in the picture. > > Sun is > > > > in his own star fairly strong. > > > > > Sun with his own star (equivalent to self strength) is Star lord > > of 4th, > > > > 8th and 12th all the houses for accident. > > > > > Sun is in the sub of Mars in 8tth (accident house) associatd with > > another > > > > natural malefic Saturrn lord of > > > > > Lagna having connection to both 1 and 8th, being in his own sub. > > Thus S/L > > > > of Sun, Mars is strongly connected to > > > > > 1 and 8th houses required for causing severe accident. > > > > > Hence Sun Dasa is justified. Moreover, it is the earliest > > > > > Dasa lord (Prime Minister) coming earlier than the other > > > > > evil dasas of Mars, Saturn, Mercury etc. > > > > > > > > > > Thanking you for your sharing your obstacle with me. > > > > > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani . > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 2:06 PM > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > > > I have tried this quiz3 according to KP but got struck. I request > > > > somebody to guide me and correct me to proceed. > > > > > > > > > > For accident: For DBA, houses to be considered 8,12,(6), (4) as > > per > > > > TinWinJi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the sub of planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the star of planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the sub of house lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the star of house lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mar,Sat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup, > > > > > > > > > > Sun, Ketu, Moon, > > > > > > > > > > Sun, Mer, Ven, Ketu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > > > > > Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (6) > > > > > > > > > > Ven > > > > > > > > > > Jup, > > > > > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (4) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Venus > > > > > > > > > > Strong significators for > > > > > House 8: Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu > > > > > House 12: Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup, > > > > > House 6: Venus > > > > > House 4: Venus > > > > > Planets close to the Cusp 6 within 3 degrees: Rahu > > > > > Planets close to the Cusp 12 within 3 degrees: Ketu, Sun > > > > > Saturn aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees > > > > > Sun is aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees > > > > > Sun and Ketu are in rapt conjunction > > > > > Badhaka lord:Mars. Saturn is in Mars star. Sun and Ketu are in > > Mars sub > > > > > Maraka lord: Saturn/Jupiter, Moon. Mars and Mercury are in Moon > > star. > > > > Mercury and Saturn are in Saturn sub. Rahu is in Jupiter star > > > > > > > > > > Mer,Sat,Sun, Ketu,Rahu, Moon,Mar, Jup,Ven(All the nine planets > > have come > > > > as significators) > > > > > In the normal practice, > > > > > Rahu represents mercury. So I eliminated Mercury > > > > > Ketu represents Jupiter. So I eliminated Jupiter > > > > > Rahu represents Saturn. So I eliminated Saturn > > > > > Ketu represents Sun. So I should have eliminated Sun also. But it > > is > > > > told that the accident happened in Sun dasa. Here I got struck. > > > > > > > > > > Significators are: Ketu,Rahu,Moon, Mars,Venus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ruling planets on 9-2-2009 at 17.47.35 PM in Vennandur, near Salem > > > > > Day lord :Moon > > > > > Rasi lord :Moon > > > > > Rasi star :Mercury > > > > > Lagna lord :Moon > > > > > Lagna star :Mercury > > > > > > > > > > Moon aspects sun(opposition) > > > > > > > > > > Sun,Moon,Mercury are in RP. But Mercury and Sun are not in > > significator > > > > list. So I eliminated Mercury and Sun. Remaining common planet is > > Moon only. > > > > > > > > > To pinpoint the event, I need 3 significators. So I have included > > lagna > > > > sublord and moon sublord in the RP list. > > > > > Lagna sublord :Venus > > > > > Moon Sublord :Rahu > > > > > Common planets are :Moon,Venus and Rahu > > > > > Dasa period is combination of Moon,Venus and Rahu. > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 7:07 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalanji, > > > > > > > > > > My desie is also same as yours. Most seniors, who are considered > > as > > > > authentic and authoritative in the field may feel the quiz programme > > as > > > > childish and it is below their > > > > > dignity to partake.. Professional astrologers may feel that their > > > > reputation will affect, if the answer given by them.goes wrong. > > Majority > > > > of beginners may feel shy to participate due to their ignorance or > > for study > > > > and understanding of astrology. In the absence of such majority > > members, > > > > only few members who have fair > > > > > knowledge and study and who are really interested to > > > > > improve their ability to gain practical experience will come > > > > > forward to answer the quiz. Such numbers may be a dozen are > > slightly > > > > more. My suggestion is the quiz master should put about 6 simple > > questions > > > > daily and gradually increasing the standard. He may give the > > answers to > > > > the quiz next day. This w ill help a lot for beginners and > > interested > > > > persons to gain experience. In the mean time > > > > > the quiz like 1 to 3 so far conducted may be continued > > > > > giving 1 week time for solution. By this way, the debate will > > > > > be lively and at the same time acquire more knowlege by > > > > > way of discussion with members. I wish that you should > > > > > initiate this with your abundant knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > goes wrong. - > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 7:44 AM > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji > > > > > If experienced astrologers are participating and sharing in the > > quiz, it > > > > would be more lively and useful to other members. Because I read so > > many > > > > books, books confused me. I hope this quiz program will guide me. > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 5:12 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji, > > > > > Such responses to those who have not participated in the Quiz, > > would > > > > prove to be a deterrant and aversion to further members from > > participating > > > > in the quiz. > > > > > Participation in the quiz is unot a measure or scale of > > measurement or > > > > yardstick to judge whether one knows KP or not. > > > > > There could be many reasons for one not participating, including > > lack of > > > > time, other pre-occupations, some bad memories associated with cases > > such as > > > > accidents, a feeling of imcompetency, suspicions of the quiz being > > > > fabricated to downsize certain astrologers , not wishing failures, > > > > embarassment at the prospects of not arriving at the clear answer, > > and so > > > > many other such reasons looming , from individual to individual. > > Which > > > > reason is linked to which astrologer, we are not anyone to judge. > > > > > You seem to be a knowledgable person. Shri Raoji is a elderly > > person and > > > > they must be allowed their eccentricities if any , dont you think ? > > After > > > > all he has proved himself over and over again on innumerable > > occasions that > > > > he is knowledgable in KP. He does not require certificates from > > passing in > > > > Quizzes. Or does he ? > > > > > Indian culture teaches us to respect Gnana(Knowledge) and Umra > > (Age) both > > > > which Shri Rao Sahab possesses. > > > > > Please take this positively. > > > > > best wishes, > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > ...> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear L.Y.Rao > > > > > > If you understand the KP correctly, why cant you participate in > > the > > > > quiz? > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ . wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ . > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from > > Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com, " Tin Win " tw853@ > > > > > > Cc: " Punit Pandey " punitp@ > > > > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 8:11 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dears TW & Punit, > > > > > > I just cannot comprehend as to just > > what > > > > people like Dhanabalan et al,are trying to prove... > > > > > > Krishnamurthi Padhdhati clearly > > says that > > > > KSK derived inspiration from Nadi Astrology... the name of the Nadi > > is also > > > > given by him... > > > > > > But what is the hullabuloo about ? > > Does > > > > it matter as to from which Nadi KSK derived his Padhdhati... > > > > > > Unless of course, the objective > > seems to > > > > be, to prove how knowledgeable one is...about the history of the > > development > > > > of K.P.(FULL STOP)... > > > > > > What is more important,to my mind, > > is the > > > > useful application of K.P., to practical prognosis... and not > > wasting the > > > > groups' time over fruitless discussuions and semantics about who > > discovered > > > > what,when,how, borrowed this knowledge from where and whom ?...and > > for > > > > example,raising Newton's theory even ater the Quantum theory has now > > taken > > > > over...and in time to come many more theories are bound to be be > > > > discovered.. . > > > > > > Improvements in the existing > > Padhdhati in > > > > order to enable it to deliver more accurate results should be the > > objective > > > > of all inquiring students of astrology. > > > > > > I hope more and more students of > > astrology > > > > curb their desire for instant fame... or even notoriety just to draw > > > > attention towards themselves.. . . > > > > > > I am sure that you both and Kanak > > Bosmia > > > > certainly believe likewise... > > > > > > With kind regards, > > > > > > L.Y..Rao. > > > > > > GOOD > > LUCK ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tw853 tw853 > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Tuesday, 10 February, 2009 10:38:16 AM > > > > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Punit ji, Dhanabalan ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. It seems Dhanabalan ji has switched from Brihat Jatak to > > Satya Jatak > > > > and Punit ji prefers Brihat Jatak.. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary has given two posibilities. First > > one is > > > > similarity to Satya Jatak and second one is as follows: > > > > > > > > > > > > Krishnamurthi himself doesn't tell where he got the idea of > > Ruling > > > > planets from. But other astrologers who interacted with him, suggest > > that he > > > > got the idea from his researches on prenatal epoch, that certain > > ruling > > > > planets of the prenatal epoch, become ruling planets at the birth > > time, and > > > > also dominate the individual's life. > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. This second one seems getting the idea of connection between > > the > > > > planets ruling at birth and at the moment of major life events from > > Brihat > > > > Jatak.. > > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Such kind of connection idea is not found in Satya Jatak as > > > > mentioned by Punit ji, but some similar RPs are mentioned in sloka > > 6: > > > > > > > > > > > > 6. The fortunes of a native are to be studied with reference to: > > > > > > (1) the ascendant lord; (2) the lord of the ascendant in the > > navamsa > > > > diagram (3)The lord of the birth star; and (4) the lords of the > > rasis > > > > occupied by the above three. > > > > > > > > > > > > 5. In sloka 7, it is said to choose the birth star, Moon or > > Lagna, > > > > whichever is stronger. > > > > > > > > > > > > 7. Birth-star : Consider the strengths of the Moon and the > > ascendant. > > > > If the ascendant is Stronger than the Moon, the lord of the star in > > which > > > > the ascendant falls, is to be taken as the birth star. If, on the > > other > > > > hand, the Moon is stronger than the ascendant, the lord of the star > > in which > > > > it is posited is to be taken as the birth star...... > > > > > > > > > > > > 6. The birth time to take is mentioned in sloka 5: > > > > > > > > > > > > 5. There are three different moments which can be taken as the > > tune of > > > > birth and for which the horoscope can be cast. These are(1) Adhana > > lagna > > > > i.e. the moment of conception. (2) Siro-darshma lagna i.e., the > > moment at > > > > which the head of the child is first sighted. (3) Bhupatana 1agnathe > > moment > > > > at which the child leaves the body of the mother and touches the > > earth.. As > > > > it is difficult to determine the first two moments accurately, the > > third one > > > > should be taken for preparing the horoscope > > > > > > > > > > > > 7. In Satya Jatak there are similar RPs and the idea of taking > > Moon or > > > > Lagna, whichever is stronger (which Guru ji KSK had used at early > > stage) and > > > > in Brihat Jatak, idea of connection between but similar RPs. > > > > > > > > > > > > 8. Therefore in my opinion, it is possible that the RPs are the > > > > combined idea of both Brihat Jatak and Satya Jatak, whatever > > Dhanabalan ji > > > > may call. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > tw > > > > > > @gro ups.com, " Punit Pandey " punitp@ > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The quoted text seems a little misleading to me. What > > Satyacharya > > > > said > > > > > > > in " Satya Jatak " that these planets should be used for > > determining > > > > the > > > > > > > destiny (or may be general nativity by common interpretation) > > . In > > > > > > > " Satya Jatak " , I don't find " determination of any moment " > > using these > > > > > > > planets. " Satya Jatak " deesn't talk about rectification or > > horary > > > > > > > astrology, as far as I know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The application of ruling planets came, I believe, from > > " Brihat > > > > Jatak " > > > > > > > of Varahmihira where Varahamihira told that there is > > connection > > > > > > > between the planets ruling the moment of question and planets > > ruling > > > > > > > the moment of birth. It seems that Shri KSK improvised upon > > the ideas > > > > > > > taken from these two texts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, from the Hindi edition of " Jatak Satyacharya " , > > following are > > > > the > > > > > > > planets for judging destiny of a native - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Lord of Ascendant Sign > > > > > > > 2. Lord of Ascendant Navamsa > > > > > > > 3. Lord of Ascendant or Moon Nakshatra (whichever is powerful) > > > > > > > 4. Lord of the signs where are all above planets are located > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > > r.dhanabalan@wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Punitji > > > > > > > > Please go through the article " Ruling planets " by Dr.Satya > > Prakash > > > > > > > Choudry. He stated that the RP concept is Naadi concept. I am > > > > > > > reproducing the sentences, " The determinants of any moment > > according > > > > > > > to the sage are: > > > > > > > > * Birth lagna (ascendant lord) lord > > > > > > > > * Moon or lagna star lord (whichever is stronger) > > > > > > > > * Moon signlord > > > > > > > > * Navamsa lagna lord > > > > > > > > * Lord of rasi (in the rasi chart) occupied by the Navamsa > > lagna > > > > lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr.KSK has taken both starlord of moon and lagna. He has > > taken > > > > > > > daylord instead of Navamsa lagna lord. It is what I told you > > already > > > > > > > as japanese style. > > > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get perfect Email ID for your Resume. Get before others grab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Hi,Umang Taneja has written four books so far, i have all of them and i have attended around 4 workshops so far conducted by him delhi. his website is nadi-astrology.com. You will find all the contact details there, the system taught by him is very simple and easy to learn.Gautamtw853 <tw853 Sent: Saturday, 14 February, 2009 6:30:45 PM Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi - - - - KP House Grouping Dear Pundit ji, 1. I'm sorry for typo for Pundit Nehru. 2. It may be Dictionary of Significators in Astrology by Umang Taneja & P K Sarna, 2000 and there are pictures of Rasi signs on the yellow- pink color. But it is the same of Rex E Bill's Rulership Book. 3. I would be grateful, if you could mention the name of his book to order it. Thanks and regards, tw @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote: > > Dear Tw ji, > > 1. I am not referring "Nadi Astrology, Accurate Predictive Methodology by > Umang Taneja." There is another book by him and the whole book is dedicated > to house grouping only, as far as I remember. I'll find out the name and > post in the forum. > > 2. Is Punit Nehru a typo? > > 3. Wish you all the best for your study on prisoners. Wish to see the > results soon. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Punit Pandey > > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:53 AM, tw853 <tw853 wrote: > > > Dear Punit ji and Friends, > > > > 1. That is the book "Nadi Astrology, Accurate Predictive Methodology by > > Umang Taneja, First Published in 1999, Fourth Edition 2004". > > > > 2. In fact it is a good KP book where the significations at 3 levels of > > Planet, Star Lord and Sub Lord are SIMULTANEOUSLY considered like C.K. > > Bahatt and Kanak Bosmia. > > > > 3. The House Grouping from that book are incorporated in my KP House > > Grouping. There are the House Grouping for DBA only, not mentioning the > > cusps concerned. > > > > 4. More detailed house grouping for marriage can be found in "Astrology, > > Marriage and Relationship, by the same author, 2006". > > > > 5. For examples, when the combination of 5 (love) ,8 (sexual organ) or > > 5,12 (bed comfort) is signified in the DBA, the love affairmay invole > > the physical relations and bed pleasure. It is consistent with a finding > > in "Progeny and Romance, 2007" that the signification of 5,8 without > > 7,11 may indicate thinking of enjoying sex without marriage. In Umang > > Taneja's book, like in KP Readers and C.R. Bhatt's books, it is found > > that 8, 12 (ego, hurdles, quarrel, disappointment, loss of all kinds > > etc) are signified with 1,6,10, it will increase the probability of > > divorce. In K.M. Subramaniam' s books also, 8 is in UNFAVOR of marriage. > > > > 6. It is interseting how and when 5,8 can replace 2,7,11? > > > > 7. Is there any KP astrologer considering 8 in FAVOR of marriage in the > > KP latrature like Astrosecrets & KP, K.P. & Astrlogy Year Books etc? > > > > 8. My house grouping is not taking word by word from the KP Readers or > > other KP latrature. For examples, the foreign settlement rule from KP > > Reader VI is not mentioned because it doesn't work as per my study of > > 100 charts. For imprisonment, it is not strict for 12 CSL to be Rahu as > > C.R. Bhatt has done because it is found many welknown prisioners like > > Mahatma Gandhi, Punit Nehru, Mrs. Gandhi (even as per TOB rectified by > > Guruji KSK), Nelson Mandela etc. > > > > 9. Another very important point is that in KP which based on the > > signignification of house lordship and occupation of a planet, the > > Karaka planet can play a supporting role only not a major role like in > > Verdic. What I mean is that without 12CSL being Rahu one may be > > imprisoned, if the required house grouping is signified; Venus alone > > without 2,7,11 can't give marrige; Jupiter alone without 2,5,11 can give > > child. > > > > 10. I need to take a break from the Group to prove that many prisoners > > are not with 12 CSL Rahu on the basis of birth data of over 90 executed > > prisoners and over 500 prisoners from AstroDatabank. > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > tw > > > > @gro ups.com <% 40.. com>, Punit > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > Last time when I was at the place of my favorite astrology bookseller > > KK > > > Goyal in Delhi, I also remember seeing a book by Umang Taneja in > > English. > > > The whole book was dedicated to house grouping in KP. > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:11 AM, tw853 tw853@ wrote: > > > > > > > KPEzine Oct 2007 to February 2008 > > > > KP House Grouping Part 1 to 5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com>, > > Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > KPEzine January 2008 > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, sujata das sujatadash1@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > sujata das sujatadash1@ > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com> > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 2:46 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr Dhanbalan and TWji, > > > > > Where are the house groupings by TWji available. Putting them in > > File > > > > section of KP groups will be appreciated > > > > > Regards > > > > > Sujata > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 12/2/09, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Thursday, 12 February, 2009, 3:10 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Adith > > > > > My another doubt in the quiz3 is, the house 8 is also for chronic > > > > diseases. 6th house is disease. If the first cuspal sublord > > signifies > > > > 1,6,8,12 then the native may be admitted in the hospital due to > > chronic > > > > disease and need not be due to accident. > > > > > Another doubt is for occuring accident, the houses 4,8,12 have to > > be > > > > considered. Mr.TinWin has given a table "House grouping -part 4". In > > that > > > > table, whether he will met accident or not, he asked to look into > > the houses > > > > 8,12 mainly with 6 as supporting house. What way 6th house is > > related to > > > > accident? Why not he taken 4th house as supporting house for > > accident? > > > > > In the same table, he asked to consider houses 8,12 mainly and > > houses 4,6 > > > > as supporting houses to arrive Dasa Bukthi Antharam for accident. > > Why he > > > > included the houses 4, 6 here? > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ > > gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 9:14 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > We dont have such answers also for Sun is weaker than nodes in > > this case. > > > > Here we have the example with the result. Also the strength does not > > depend > > > > just as Nodes or the Planets. As you know many points to be > > considered. > > > > > > > > > > Also in this case , as first cum first. Sun has come first as dasa > > Lord > > > > prior to Nodes . > > > > > > > > > > For instance , if I have not given the Sub as Dasa lord and asked > > the > > > > question "when he will meet with accidents in his life time?", then > > the > > > > answer will be quite different. Many answers would have come. But > > may be > > > > some would have not chosen Sun dasa also. > > > > > So how to do the correct predictions? Here we have the answer,from > > which > > > > why cant we try to find some points which we might have missed also. > > Thats > > > > my opinion only to my my little knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji, I do respect your expertise. Also you > > consistent > > > > questions on the results is always good to make the importance of > > such > > > > points embedded in the minds. Definitely your queries are valuable. > > > > > > > > > > I duly appreciate your thoughts! > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > Adith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Adith > > > > > I want supporting evidence in KP Readers that Sun is stronger than > > > > Rahu/Ketu. > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ > > gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 6:57 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani ji > > > > > > > > > > I do agree with your statement of Nodes replacing the signlord > > they > > > > occupy.And they are capable of giving the qualities of the planets > > which > > > > aspect them. Also as I have said why dont we think of the any > > importance of > > > > the Sun being star lord of 4 and 8 th cusps??.Though Ketu is in Sun > > star.. > > > > Ketu is with close conjucntion with Sun itself. Having all these > > qualities > > > > would have caused Sun to give the result?? > > > > > > > > > > Also both Mercury and Sat are in Sat sub. Hence Sat is not dropped > > ?? > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > Adith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ > > gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > As I have said in my previous mail, it is Dr.Kar's theory of > > > > > substitution of nodes for planets. I am not aware whether this is > > the > > > > finding of KSK. Planets aspecting node will give the aspected > > planet's > > > > qualities to the nodes and not vice versa. As Saturn is quite strong > > here > > > > being placed in 8th sign, place of accident along with its star lord > > Mars, > > > > karaka for accident is very strong with additional portfolio of > > Lagna > > > > signification, which is essential for accidents, I am not for > > dropping > > > > Saturn for Rahu. As regards to Mercury, sign lord in which the node > > is > > > > placed is Agent of Mercury and Mercury can be replaced for Rahu. > > This has > > > > been emphasised by late Dri K.S.K. strongly to include nodes in > > place of > > > > planets while selecting Ruling Planets and also while scrutinizing > > the > > > > Planets. As such inclusion of Rahu for Mercury and dropping the > > later is in > > > > accordance with > > > > > Guruji's advice. > > > > > While discussing about the main Dasa lord Sun, Kethu is in close > > > > conjunction with Sun. Kethu is burnt with the rays of Sun, it > > loosss > > > > whatever strength he has and the Sun emerges as strong. Hence Sun > > as prime > > > > Dasa lord is > > > > > quite in order. > > > > > > > > > > ..With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani. . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:05 PM > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > > > Mercury has no planet in its star. So Mercury is stronger. Why the > > > > Mercury was dropped? > > > > > Saturn has no planet in its star. Why Saturn was not dropped? > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 3:53 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > Among the two nodes Rahu and Kethu (Head & Tail of snake demonin > > Purana), > > > > Kethu is weaker than Rahu in strength according to traditional > > astrology. I > > > > am unable to > > > > > quote the reference. Similarly, the aspects of node are not > > considered in > > > > K..P, though some use the aspects of 5th, 9th and 12th attributed to > > them. > > > > But other planets' aspecton them qill be there. It is only in > > Dr.K.R.Kar's > > > > sub sub theory, the theory of substitution for nodes have been > > > > > introduced replacing the planet aspecting by the node. > > > > > In the quiz 3, Rahu;s aspect on Sun need not be considered. Sun > > though in > > > > conjunction with Kethu is strong > > > > > by its own constellation and he is in the sub of Mars in > > > > > whoose steps Kethu is supposed to follow (Kujawat Kethu) > > > > > In view of this Sun can be considered as prime Dasa lord, > > > > > as it is the earliest Dasa concerning with all the relevant > > > > > houses of accident and hospitalisation etc. > > > > > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > > > > > > > I a > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:41 PM > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > > > Sun may be in its own star but rapt conjunction with Ketu. So Ketu > > > > represents Sun. Ketu will give the result of Sun. The Sun has to be > > dropped > > > > from the sugnificator list. Is there any exemption? > > > > > Saturn aspects Rahu. Rahu represents Saturn. The Saturn has to be > > > > dropped from the significator list. Is there any exemption? > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 11:34 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > My observation is that the native was born in Kethu Dasa > > > > > balance left was only few days. When we look tor lagna > > > > > cusp for longevity, it is Rahu in the star of Jupiter at 9, lord > > of 11th > > > > and 12th Bhavam.. Rahu is aspected strongly by the Karaka for Ayul > > Saturn and > > > > Rahu is not involved either with > > > > > Bhadhaka or Maraka. Hence longevity is fairly good.. > > > > > Next Venus Dasa too has no strong connection with Maraka or > > Bhadhaka, > > > > though he is in the star of Moon, 7th lord, but feeble in strength, > > as Moon > > > > is not strong for 7th. So Venus is also ruled out as she is not > > significator > > > > of 8th > > > > > too as 2 malefic planets are placed in 8th. Venus is S/L of 4th & > > 11th > > > > (not an evil house). Next to Venus Dasa, Sun comes in the picture. > > Sun is > > > > in his own star fairly strong. > > > > > Sun with his own star (equivalent to self strength) is Star lord > > of 4th, > > > > 8th and 12th all the houses for accident. > > > > > Sun is in the sub of Mars in 8tth (accident house) associatd with > > another > > > > natural malefic Saturrn lord of > > > > > Lagna having connection to both 1 and 8th, being in his own sub. > > Thus S/L > > > > of Sun, Mars is strongly connected to > > > > > 1 and 8th houses required for causing severe accident. > > > > > Hence Sun Dasa is justified. Moreover, it is the earliest > > > > > Dasa lord (Prime Minister) coming earlier than the other > > > > > evil dasas of Mars, Saturn, Mercury etc. > > > > > > > > > > Thanking you for your sharing your obstacle with me. > > > > > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani . > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 2:06 PM > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > > > I have tried this quiz3 according to KP but got struck. I request > > > > somebody to guide me and correct me to proceed. > > > > > > > > > > For accident: For DBA, houses to be considered 8,12,(6), (4) as > > per > > > > TinWinJi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the sub of planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the star of planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the sub of house lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the star of house lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mar,Sat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup, > > > > > > > > > > Sun, Ketu, Moon, > > > > > > > > > > Sun, Mer, Ven, Ketu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > > > > > Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (6) > > > > > > > > > > Ven > > > > > > > > > > Jup, > > > > > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (4) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Venus > > > > > > > > > > Strong significators for > > > > > House 8: Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu > > > > > House 12: Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup, > > > > > House 6: Venus > > > > > House 4: Venus > > > > > Planets close to the Cusp 6 within 3 degrees: Rahu > > > > > Planets close to the Cusp 12 within 3 degrees: Ketu, Sun > > > > > Saturn aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees > > > > > Sun is aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees > > > > > Sun and Ketu are in rapt conjunction > > > > > Badhaka lord:Mars. Saturn is in Mars star. Sun and Ketu are in > > Mars sub > > > > > Maraka lord: Saturn/Jupiter, Moon. Mars and Mercury are in Moon > > star. > > > > Mercury and Saturn are in Saturn sub. Rahu is in Jupiter star > > > > > > > > > > Mer,Sat,Sun, Ketu,Rahu, Moon,Mar, Jup,Ven(All the nine planets > > have come > > > > as significators) > > > > > In the normal practice, > > > > > Rahu represents mercury. So I eliminated Mercury > > > > > Ketu represents Jupiter. So I eliminated Jupiter > > > > > Rahu represents Saturn. So I eliminated Saturn > > > > > Ketu represents Sun. So I should have eliminated Sun also. But it > > is > > > > told that the accident happened in Sun dasa. Here I got struck. > > > > > > > > > > Significators are: Ketu,Rahu,Moon, Mars,Venus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ruling planets on 9-2-2009 at 17.47.35 PM in Vennandur, near Salem > > > > > Day lord :Moon > > > > > Rasi lord :Moon > > > > > Rasi star :Mercury > > > > > Lagna lord :Moon > > > > > Lagna star :Mercury > > > > > > > > > > Moon aspects sun(opposition) > > > > > > > > > > Sun,Moon,Mercury are in RP. But Mercury and Sun are not in > > significator > > > > list. So I eliminated Mercury and Sun. Remaining common planet is > > Moon only. > > > > > > > > > To pinpoint the event, I need 3 significators. So I have included > > lagna > > > > sublord and moon sublord in the RP list. > > > > > Lagna sublord :Venus > > > > > Moon Sublord :Rahu > > > > > Common planets are :Moon,Venus and Rahu > > > > > Dasa period is combination of Moon,Venus and Rahu. > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 7:07 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalanji, > > > > > > > > > > My desie is also same as yours. Most seniors, who are considered > > as > > > > authentic and authoritative in the field may feel the quiz programme > > as > > > > childish and it is below their > > > > > dignity to partake.. Professional astrologers may feel that their > > > > reputation will affect, if the answer given by them.goes wrong. > > Majority > > > > of beginners may feel shy to participate due to their ignorance or > > for study > > > > and understanding of astrology. In the absence of such majority > > members, > > > > only few members who have fair > > > > > knowledge and study and who are really interested to > > > > > improve their ability to gain practical experience will come > > > > > forward to answer the quiz. Such numbers may be a dozen are > > slightly > > > > more. My suggestion is the quiz master should put about 6 simple > > questions > > > > daily and gradually increasing the standard. He may give the > > answers to > > > > the quiz next day. This w ill help a lot for beginners and > > interested > > > > persons to gain experience. In the mean time > > > > > the quiz like 1 to 3 so far conducted may be continued > > > > > giving 1 week time for solution. By this way, the debate will > > > > > be lively and at the same time acquire more knowlege by > > > > > way of discussion with members. I wish that you should > > > > > initiate this with your abundant knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > goes wrong. - > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 7:44 AM > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji > > > > > If experienced astrologers are participating and sharing in the > > quiz, it > > > > would be more lively and useful to other members. Because I read so > > many > > > > books, books confused me. I hope this quiz program will guide me. > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 5:12 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji, > > > > > Such responses to those who have not participated in the Quiz, > > would > > > > prove to be a deterrant and aversion to further members from > > participating > > > > in the quiz. > > > > > Participation in the quiz is unot a measure or scale of > > measurement or > > > > yardstick to judge whether one knows KP or not. > > > > > There could be many reasons for one not participating, including > > lack of > > > > time, other pre-occupations, some bad memories associated with cases > > such as > > > > accidents, a feeling of imcompetency, suspicions of the quiz being > > > > fabricated to downsize certain astrologers , not wishing failures, > > > > embarassment at the prospects of not arriving at the clear answer, > > and so > > > > many other such reasons looming , from individual to individual. > > Which > > > > reason is linked to which astrologer, we are not anyone to judge. > > > > > You seem to be a knowledgable person. Shri Raoji is a elderly > > person and > > > > they must be allowed their eccentricities if any , dont you think ? > > After > > > > all he has proved himself over and over again on innumerable > > occasions that > > > > he is knowledgable in KP. He does not require certificates from > > passing in > > > > Quizzes. Or does he ? > > > > > Indian culture teaches us to respect Gnana(Knowledge) and Umra > > (Age) both > > > > which Shri Rao Sahab possesses. > > > > > Please take this positively. > > > > > best wishes, > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > ...> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear L.Y.Rao > > > > > > If you understand the KP correctly, why cant you participate in > > the > > > > quiz? > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ . wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ . > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept from > > Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com, "Tin Win" tw853@ > > > > > > Cc: "Punit Pandey" punitp@ > > > > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 8:11 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dears TW & Punit, > > > > > > I just cannot comprehend as to just > > what > > > > people like Dhanabalan et al,are trying to prove... > > > > > > Krishnamurthi Padhdhati clearly > > says that > > > > KSK derived inspiration from Nadi Astrology... the name of the Nadi > > is also > > > > given by him... > > > > > > But what is the hullabuloo about ? > > Does > > > > it matter as to from which Nadi KSK derived his Padhdhati... > > > > > > Unless of course, the objective > > seems to > > > > be, to prove how knowledgeable one is...about the history of the > > development > > > > of K.P..(FULL STOP)... > > > > > > What is more important,to my mind, > > is the > > > > useful application of K.P., to practical prognosis... and not > > wasting the > > > > groups' time over fruitless discussuions and semantics about who > > discovered > > > > what,when,how, borrowed this knowledge from where and whom ?...and > > for > > > > example,raising Newton's theory even ater the Quantum theory has now > > taken > > > > over...and in time to come many more theories are bound to be be > > > > discovered.. . > > > > > > Improvements in the existing > > Padhdhati in > > > > order to enable it to deliver more accurate results should be the > > objective > > > > of all inquiring students of astrology. > > > > > > I hope more and more students of > > astrology > > > > curb their desire for instant fame... or even notoriety just to draw > > > > attention towards themselves.. .. . > > > > > > I am sure that you both and Kanak > > Bosmia > > > > certainly believe likewise.... > > > > > > With kind regards, > > > > > > L.Y..Rao. > > > > > > GOOD > > LUCK ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tw853 tw853 > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Tuesday, 10 February, 2009 10:38:16 AM > > > > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Punit ji, Dhanabalan ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. It seems Dhanabalan ji has switched from Brihat Jatak to > > Satya Jatak > > > > and Punit ji prefers Brihat Jatak.. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary has given two posibilities. First > > one is > > > > similarity to Satya Jatak and second one is as follows: > > > > > > > > > > > > Krishnamurthi himself doesn't tell where he got the idea of > > Ruling > > > > planets from. But other astrologers who interacted with him, suggest > > that he > > > > got the idea from his researches on prenatal epoch, that certain > > ruling > > > > planets of the prenatal epoch, become ruling planets at the birth > > time, and > > > > also dominate the individual's life. > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. This second one seems getting the idea of connection between > > the > > > > planets ruling at birth and at the moment of major life events from > > Brihat > > > > Jatak.. > > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Such kind of connection idea is not found in Satya Jatak as > > > > mentioned by Punit ji, but some similar RPs are mentioned in sloka > > 6: > > > > > > > > > > > > 6. The fortunes of a native are to be studied with reference to: > > > > > > (1) the ascendant lord; (2) the lord of the ascendant in the > > navamsa > > > > diagram (3)The lord of the birth star; and (4) the lords of the > > rasis > > > > occupied by the above three. > > > > > > > > > > > > 5. In sloka 7, it is said to choose the birth star, Moon or > > Lagna, > > > > whichever is stronger. > > > > > > > > > > > > 7. Birth-star : Consider the strengths of the Moon and the > > ascendant. > > > > If the ascendant is Stronger than the Moon, the lord of the star in > > which > > > > the ascendant falls, is to be taken as the birth star. If, on the > > other > > > > hand, the Moon is stronger than the ascendant, the lord of the star > > in which > > > > it is posited is to be taken as the birth star...... > > > > > > > > > > > > 6. The birth time to take is mentioned in sloka 5: > > > > > > > > > > > > 5. There are three different moments which can be taken as the > > tune of > > > > birth and for which the horoscope can be cast. These are(1) Adhana > > lagna > > > > i.e. the moment of conception. (2) Siro-darshma lagna i.e., the > > moment at > > > > which the head of the child is first sighted. (3) Bhupatana 1agnathe > > moment > > > > at which the child leaves the body of the mother and touches the > > earth.. As > > > > it is difficult to determine the first two moments accurately, the > > third one > > > > should be taken for preparing the horoscope > > > > > > > > > > > > 7. In Satya Jatak there are similar RPs and the idea of taking > > Moon or > > > > Lagna, whichever is stronger (which Guru ji KSK had used at early > > stage) and > > > > in Brihat Jatak, idea of connection between but similar RPs. > > > > > > > > > > > > 8. Therefore in my opinion, it is possible that the RPs are the > > > > combined idea of both Brihat Jatak and Satya Jatak, whatever > > Dhanabalan ji > > > > may call. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > tw > > > > > > @gro ups.com, "Punit Pandey" punitp@ > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The quoted text seems a little misleading to me. What > > Satyacharya > > > > said > > > > > > > in "Satya Jatak" that these planets should be used for > > determining > > > > the > > > > > > > destiny (or may be general nativity by common interpretation) > > . In > > > > > > > "Satya Jatak", I don't find "determination of any moment" > > using these > > > > > > > planets. "Satya Jatak" deesn't talk about rectification or > > horary > > > > > > > astrology, as far as I know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The application of ruling planets came, I believe, from > > "Brihat > > > > Jatak" > > > > > > > of Varahmihira where Varahamihira told that there is > > connection > > > > > > > between the planets ruling the moment of question and planets > > ruling > > > > > > > the moment of birth. It seems that Shri KSK improvised upon > > the ideas > > > > > > > taken from these two texts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, from the Hindi edition of "Jatak Satyacharya" , > > following are > > > > the > > > > > > > planets for judging destiny of a native - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Lord of Ascendant Sign > > > > > > > 2. Lord of Ascendant Navamsa > > > > > > > 3. Lord of Ascendant or Moon Nakshatra (whichever is powerful) > > > > > > > 4. Lord of the signs where are all above planets are located > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > > r.dhanabalan@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Punitji > > > > > > > > Please go through the article "Ruling planets" by Dr.Satya > > Prakash > > > > > > > Choudry. He stated that the RP concept is Naadi concept. I am > > > > > > > reproducing the sentences, "The determinants of any moment > > according > > > > > > > to the sage are: > > > > > > > > * Birth lagna (ascendant lord) lord > > > > > > > > * Moon or lagna star lord (whichever is stronger) > > > > > > > > * Moon signlord > > > > > > > > * Navamsa lagna lord > > > > > > > > * Lord of rasi (in the rasi chart) occupied by the Navamsa > > lagna > > > > lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr.KSK has taken both starlord of moon and lagna. He has > > taken > > > > > > > daylord instead of Navamsa lagna lord. It is what I told you > > already > > > > > > > as japanese style. > > > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get perfect Email ID for your Resume. Get before others grab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 Not 4, I've 5 books, namely 1) Accurate Predictive Astrology (1999, 4th Edition 2002); 2) Dictionary of Significators in Astrology (2000); 3) The Text Book of Astrology (2001); 4)Marriage and Relationships (2006) and 5) Prashna (2007). Some ideas are interesting, for instance,The strength of the house is drawn from the strength of the Cuspal Sub Lord. If the Cuspal Sub Lord signifies the combinations connected with the house, the house is strong; For countries where divorce is considered as sacrosanct, the involvement of 8,12 houses, in addition to 1,6,10 houses, is essential for divorce, and in cosmopolitan cities in India divorce is possible without the presence of 8 and 12 with 1,6,10, which amounts to divorce with mutual consent.What Punit ji is referring may be " Dictionary of Significators in Astrology " ,which is the same of Rex E Bill's Rulership Book, but not KP House Grouping. , kumar gautam <swami_gautam wrote: > > Hi, > > Umang Taneja has written four books so far, i have all of them and i have attended around 4 workshops so far conducted by him delhi. his website is nadi-astrology.com. > > You will find all the contact details there, the system taught by him is very simple and easy to learn. > > Gautam > > > > > > ________________________________ > tw853 <tw853 > > Saturday, 14 February, 2009 6:30:45 PM > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi - - - - KP House Grouping > > > Dear Pundit ji, > > 1. I'm sorry for typo for Pundit Nehru. > > 2. It may be Dictionary of Significators in Astrology by Umang Taneja > & P K Sarna, 2000 and there are pictures of Rasi signs on the yellow- > pink color. But it is the same of Rex E Bill's Rulership Book. > > 3. I would be grateful, if you could mention the name of his book to > order it. > > Thanks and regards, > > tw > > @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote: > > > > Dear Tw ji, > > > > 1. I am not referring " Nadi Astrology, Accurate Predictive > Methodology by > > Umang Taneja. " There is another book by him and the whole book is > dedicated > > to house grouping only, as far as I remember. I'll find out the > name and > > post in the forum. > > > > 2. Is Punit Nehru a typo? > > > > 3. Wish you all the best for your study on prisoners. Wish to see > the > > results soon. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:53 AM, tw853 <tw853@> wrote: > > > > > Dear Punit ji and Friends, > > > > > > 1. That is the book " Nadi Astrology, Accurate Predictive > Methodology by > > > Umang Taneja, First Published in 1999, Fourth Edition 2004 " . > > > > > > 2. In fact it is a good KP book where the significations at 3 > levels of > > > Planet, Star Lord and Sub Lord are SIMULTANEOUSLY considered like > C.K. > > > Bahatt and Kanak Bosmia. > > > > > > 3. The House Grouping from that book are incorporated in my KP > House > > > Grouping. There are the House Grouping for DBA only, not > mentioning the > > > cusps concerned. > > > > > > 4. More detailed house grouping for marriage can be found > in " Astrology, > > > Marriage and Relationship, by the same author, 2006 " . > > > > > > 5. For examples, when the combination of 5 (love) ,8 (sexual > organ) or > > > 5,12 (bed comfort) is signified in the DBA, the love affairmay > invole > > > the physical relations and bed pleasure. It is consistent with a > finding > > > in " Progeny and Romance, 2007 " that the signification of 5,8 > without > > > 7,11 may indicate thinking of enjoying sex without marriage. In > Umang > > > Taneja's book, like in KP Readers and C.R. Bhatt's books, it is > found > > > that 8, 12 (ego, hurdles, quarrel, disappointment, loss of all > kinds > > > etc) are signified with 1,6,10, it will increase the probability > of > > > divorce. In K.M. Subramaniam' s books also, 8 is in UNFAVOR of > marriage. > > > > > > 6. It is interseting how and when 5,8 can replace 2,7,11? > > > > > > 7. Is there any KP astrologer considering 8 in FAVOR of marriage > in the > > > KP latrature like Astrosecrets & KP, K.P. & Astrlogy Year Books > etc? > > > > > > 8. My house grouping is not taking word by word from the KP > Readers or > > > other KP latrature. For examples, the foreign settlement rule > from KP > > > Reader VI is not mentioned because it doesn't work as per my > study of > > > 100 charts. For imprisonment, it is not strict for 12 CSL to be > Rahu as > > > C.R. Bhatt has done because it is found many welknown prisioners > like > > > Mahatma Gandhi, Punit Nehru, Mrs. Gandhi (even as per TOB > rectified by > > > Guruji KSK), Nelson Mandela etc. > > > > > > 9. Another very important point is that in KP which based on the > > > signignification of house lordship and occupation of a planet, the > > > Karaka planet can play a supporting role only not a major role > like in > > > Verdic. What I mean is that without 12CSL being Rahu one may be > > > imprisoned, if the required house grouping is signified; Venus > alone > > > without 2,7,11 can't give marrige; Jupiter alone without 2,5,11 > can give > > > child. > > > > > > 10. I need to take a break from the Group to prove that many > prisoners > > > are not with 12 CSL Rahu on the basis of birth data of over 90 > executed > > > prisoners and over 500 prisoners from AstroDatabank. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > tw > > > > > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com>, > Punit > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Last time when I was at the place of my favorite astrology > bookseller > > > KK > > > > Goyal in Delhi, I also remember seeing a book by Umang Taneja in > > > English. > > > > The whole book was dedicated to house grouping in KP. > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:11 AM, tw853 tw853@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > KPEzine Oct 2007 to February 2008 > > > > > KP House Grouping Part 1 to 5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com <% > 40. com>, > > > Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > KPEzine January 2008 > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, sujata das sujatadash1@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > sujata das sujatadash1@ > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com <% > 40. com> > > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 2:46 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr Dhanbalan and TWji, > > > > > > Where are the house groupings by TWji available. Putting > them in > > > File > > > > > section of KP groups will be appreciated > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Sujata > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 12/2/09, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Thursday, 12 February, 2009, 3:10 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Adith > > > > > > My another doubt in the quiz3 is, the house 8 is also for > chronic > > > > > diseases. 6th house is disease. If the first cuspal sublord > > > signifies > > > > > 1,6,8,12 then the native may be admitted in the hospital due > to > > > chronic > > > > > disease and need not be due to accident. > > > > > > Another doubt is for occuring accident, the houses 4,8,12 > have to > > > be > > > > > considered. Mr.TinWin has given a table " House grouping -part > 4 " . In > > > that > > > > > table, whether he will met accident or not, he asked to look > into > > > the houses > > > > > 8,12 mainly with 6 as supporting house. What way 6th house is > > > related to > > > > > accident? Why not he taken 4th house as supporting house for > > > accident? > > > > > > In the same table, he asked to consider houses 8,12 mainly > and > > > houses 4,6 > > > > > as supporting houses to arrive Dasa Bukthi Antharam for > accident. > > > Why he > > > > > included the houses 4, 6 here? > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ > > > gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 9:14 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > > > We dont have such answers also for Sun is weaker than nodes > in > > > this case. > > > > > Here we have the example with the result. Also the strength > does not > > > depend > > > > > just as Nodes or the Planets. As you know many points to be > > > considered. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also in this case , as first cum first. Sun has come first > as dasa > > > Lord > > > > > prior to Nodes . > > > > > > > > > > > > For instance , if I have not given the Sub as Dasa lord and > asked > > > the > > > > > question " when he will meet with accidents in his life > time? " , then > > > the > > > > > answer will be quite different.. Many answers would have come. > But > > > may be > > > > > some would have not chosen Sun dasa also. > > > > > > So how to do the correct predictions? Here we have the > answer,from > > > which > > > > > why cant we try to find some points which we might have > missed also. > > > Thats > > > > > my opinion only to my my little knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji, I do respect your expertise. Also you > > > consistent > > > > > questions on the results is always good to make the > importance of > > > such > > > > > points embedded in the minds. Definitely your queries are > valuable. > > > > > > > > > > > > I duly appreciate your thoughts! > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Adith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Adith > > > > > > I want supporting evidence in KP Readers that Sun is > stronger than > > > > > Rahu/Ketu. > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ > > > gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 6:57 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani ji > > > > > > > > > > > > I do agree with your statement of Nodes replacing the > signlord > > > they > > > > > occupy.And they are capable of giving the qualities of the > planets > > > which > > > > > aspect them. Also as I have said why dont we think of the any > > > importance of > > > > > the Sun being star lord of 4 and 8 th cusps??.Though Ketu is > in Sun > > > star. > > > > > Ketu is with close conjucntion with Sun itself. Having all > these > > > qualities > > > > > would have caused Sun to give the result?? > > > > > > > > > > > > Also both Mercury and Sat are in Sat sub. Hence Sat is not > dropped > > > ?? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Adith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ > > > gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > > > As I have said in my previous mail, it is Dr.Kar's theory of > > > > > > substitution of nodes for planets. I am not aware whether > this is > > > the > > > > > finding of KSK. Planets aspecting node will give the aspected > > > planet's > > > > > qualities to the nodes and not vice versa. As Saturn is quite > strong > > > here > > > > > being placed in 8th sign, place of accident along with its > star lord > > > Mars, > > > > > karaka for accident is very strong with additional portfolio > of > > > Lagna > > > > > signification, which is essential for accidents, I am not for > > > dropping > > > > > Saturn for Rahu. As regards to Mercury, sign lord in which > the node > > > is > > > > > placed is Agent of Mercury and Mercury can be replaced for > Rahu. > > > This has > > > > > been emphasised by late Dri K.S.K. strongly to include nodes > in > > > place of > > > > > planets while selecting Ruling Planets and also while > scrutinizing > > > the > > > > > Planets. As such inclusion of Rahu for Mercury and dropping > the > > > later is in > > > > > accordance with > > > > > > Guruji's advice. > > > > > > While discussing about the main Dasa lord Sun, Kethu is in > close > > > > > conjunction with Sun. Kethu is burnt with the rays of Sun, it > > > loosss > > > > > whatever strength he has and the Sun emerges as strong. Hence > Sun > > > as prime > > > > > Dasa lord is > > > > > > quite in order. > > > > > > > > > > > > ..With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani. . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:05 PM > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > > > > Mercury has no planet in its star. So Mercury is stronger. > Why the > > > > > Mercury was dropped? > > > > > > Saturn has no planet in its star. Why Saturn was not > dropped? > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 3:53 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > > > Among the two nodes Rahu and Kethu (Head & Tail of snake > demonin > > > Purana), > > > > > Kethu is weaker than Rahu in strength according to traditional > > > astrology. I > > > > > am unable to > > > > > > quote the reference. Similarly, the aspects of node are not > > > considered in > > > > > K..P, though some use the aspects of 5th, 9th and 12th > attributed to > > > them. > > > > > But other planets' aspecton them qill be there. It is only in > > > Dr.K.R.Kar's > > > > > sub sub theory, the theory of substitution for nodes have been > > > > > > introduced replacing the planet aspecting by the node. > > > > > > In the quiz 3, Rahu;s aspect on Sun need not be considered. > Sun > > > though in > > > > > conjunction with Kethu is strong > > > > > > by its own constellation and he is in the sub of Mars in > > > > > > whoose steps Kethu is supposed to follow (Kujawat Kethu) > > > > > > In view of this Sun can be considered as prime Dasa lord, > > > > > > as it is the earliest Dasa concerning with all the relevant > > > > > > houses of accident and hospitalisation etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > > > > > > > > > I a > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:41 PM > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > > > > Sun may be in its own star but rapt conjunction with Ketu. > So Ketu > > > > > represents Sun. Ketu will give the result of Sun. The Sun has > to be > > > dropped > > > > > from the sugnificator list. Is there any exemption? > > > > > > Saturn aspects Rahu. Rahu represents Saturn. The Saturn has > to be > > > > > dropped from the significator list. Is there any exemption? > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail..com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 11:34 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > > > My observation is that the native was born in Kethu Dasa > > > > > > balance left was only few days. When we look tor lagna > > > > > > cusp for longevity, it is Rahu in the star of Jupiter at 9, > lord > > > of 11th > > > > > and 12th Bhavam. Rahu is aspected strongly by the Karaka for > Ayul > > > Saturn and > > > > > Rahu is not involved either with > > > > > > Bhadhaka or Maraka. Hence longevity is fairly good. > > > > > > Next Venus Dasa too has no strong connection with Maraka or > > > Bhadhaka, > > > > > though he is in the star of Moon, 7th lord, but feeble in > strength, > > > as Moon > > > > > is not strong for 7th. So Venus is also ruled out as she is > not > > > significator > > > > > of 8th > > > > > > too as 2 malefic planets are placed in 8th. Venus is S/L of > 4th & > > > 11th > > > > > (not an evil house). Next to Venus Dasa, Sun comes in the > picture. > > > Sun is > > > > > in his own star fairly strong. > > > > > > Sun with his own star (equivalent to self strength) is Star > lord > > > of 4th, > > > > > 8th and 12th all the houses for accident. > > > > > > Sun is in the sub of Mars in 8tth (accident house) > associatd with > > > another > > > > > natural malefic Saturrn lord of > > > > > > Lagna having connection to both 1 and 8th, being in his own > sub. > > > Thus S/L > > > > > of Sun, Mars is strongly connected to > > > > > > 1 and 8th houses required for causing severe accident. > > > > > > Hence Sun Dasa is justified. Moreover, it is the earliest > > > > > > Dasa lord (Prime Minister) coming earlier than the other > > > > > > evil dasas of Mars, Saturn, Mercury etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanking you for your sharing your obstacle with me. > > > > > > > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani . > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 2:06 PM > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > > > > I have tried this quiz3 according to KP but got struck. I > request > > > > > somebody to guide me and correct me to proceed. > > > > > > > > > > > > For accident: For DBA, houses to be considered 8,12,(6), > (4) as > > > per > > > > > TinWinJi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the sub of planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the star of planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the sub of house lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the star of house lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mar,Sat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup, > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun, Ketu, Moon, > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun, Mer, Ven, Ketu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > > > > > > > Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (6) > > > > > > > > > > > > Ven > > > > > > > > > > > > Jup, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (4) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Venus > > > > > > > > > > > > Strong significators for > > > > > > House 8: Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu > > > > > > House 12: Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup, > > > > > > House 6: Venus > > > > > > House 4: Venus > > > > > > Planets close to the Cusp 6 within 3 degrees: Rahu > > > > > > Planets close to the Cusp 12 within 3 degrees: Ketu, Sun > > > > > > Saturn aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees > > > > > > Sun is aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees > > > > > > Sun and Ketu are in rapt conjunction > > > > > > Badhaka lord:Mars. Saturn is in Mars star. Sun and Ketu are > in > > > Mars sub > > > > > > Maraka lord: Saturn/Jupiter, Moon. Mars and Mercury are in > Moon > > > star. > > > > > Mercury and Saturn are in Saturn sub. Rahu is in Jupiter star > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer,Sat,Sun, Ketu,Rahu, Moon,Mar, Jup,Ven(All the nine > planets > > > have come > > > > > as significators) > > > > > > In the normal practice, > > > > > > Rahu represents mercury. So I eliminated Mercury > > > > > > Ketu represents Jupiter. So I eliminated Jupiter > > > > > > Rahu represents Saturn. So I eliminated Saturn > > > > > > Ketu represents Sun. So I should have eliminated Sun also. > But it > > > is > > > > > told that the accident happened in Sun dasa. Here I got > struck. > > > > > > > > > > > > Significators are: Ketu,Rahu,Moon, Mars,Venus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ruling planets on 9-2-2009 at 17.47.35 PM in Vennandur, > near Salem > > > > > > Day lord :Moon > > > > > > Rasi lord :Moon > > > > > > Rasi star :Mercury > > > > > > Lagna lord :Moon > > > > > > Lagna star :Mercury > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon aspects sun(opposition) > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun,Moon,Mercury are in RP. But Mercury and Sun are not in > > > significator > > > > > list. So I eliminated Mercury and Sun. Remaining common > planet is > > > Moon only. > > > > > > > > > > > To pinpoint the event, I need 3 significators. So I have > included > > > lagna > > > > > sublord and moon sublord in the RP list. > > > > > > Lagna sublord :Venus > > > > > > Moon Sublord :Rahu > > > > > > Common planets are :Moon,Venus and Rahu > > > > > > Dasa period is combination of Moon,Venus and Rahu. > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 7:07 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalanji, > > > > > > > > > > > > My desie is also same as yours. Most seniors, who are > considered > > > as > > > > > authentic and authoritative in the field may feel the quiz > programme > > > as > > > > > childish and it is below their > > > > > > dignity to partake.. Professional astrologers may feel that > their > > > > > reputation will affect, if the answer given by them.goes > wrong. > > > Majority > > > > > of beginners may feel shy to participate due to their > ignorance or > > > for study > > > > > and understanding of astrology. In the absence of such > majority > > > members, > > > > > only few members who have fair > > > > > > knowledge and study and who are really interested to > > > > > > improve their ability to gain practical experience will come > > > > > > forward to answer the quiz. Such numbers may be a dozen are > > > slightly > > > > > more. My suggestion is the quiz master should put about 6 > simple > > > questions > > > > > daily and gradually increasing the standard. He may give the > > > answers to > > > > > the quiz next day.. This w ill help a lot for beginners and > > > interested > > > > > persons to gain experience. In the mean time > > > > > > the quiz like 1 to 3 so far conducted may be continued > > > > > > giving 1 week time for solution. By this way, the debate > will > > > > > > be lively and at the same time acquire more knowlege by > > > > > > way of discussion with members. I wish that you should > > > > > > initiate this with your abundant knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > goes wrong. - > > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 7:44 AM > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji > > > > > > If experienced astrologers are participating and sharing in > the > > > quiz, it > > > > > would be more lively and useful to other members. Because I > read so > > > many > > > > > books, books confused me. I hope this quiz program will guide > me. > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > > > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from > Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 5:12 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji, > > > > > > Such responses to those who have not participated in the > Quiz, > > > would > > > > > prove to be a deterrant and aversion to further members from > > > participating > > > > > in the quiz. > > > > > > Participation in the quiz is unot a measure or scale of > > > measurement or > > > > > yardstick to judge whether one knows KP or not. > > > > > > There could be many reasons for one not participating, > including > > > lack of > > > > > time, other pre-occupations, some bad memories associated > with cases > > > such as > > > > > accidents, a feeling of imcompetency, suspicions of the quiz > being > > > > > fabricated to downsize certain astrologers , not wishing > failures, > > > > > embarassment at the prospects of not arriving at the clear > answer, > > > and so > > > > > many other such reasons looming , from individual to > individual. > > > Which > > > > > reason is linked to which astrologer, we are not anyone to > judge. > > > > > > You seem to be a knowledgable person. Shri Raoji is a > elderly > > > person and > > > > > they must be allowed their eccentricities if any , dont you > think ? > > > After > > > > > all he has proved himself over and over again on innumerable > > > occasions that > > > > > he is knowledgable in KP. He does not require certificates > from > > > passing in > > > > > Quizzes. Or does he ? > > > > > > Indian culture teaches us to respect Gnana(Knowledge) and > Umra > > > (Age) both > > > > > which Shri Rao Sahab possesses. > > > > > > Please take this positively. > > > > > > best wishes, > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > <r.dhanabalan@ > > > ...> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear L.Y.Rao > > > > > > > If you understand the KP correctly, why cant you > participate in > > > the > > > > > quiz? > > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ . wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ . > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from > > > Naadi > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, " Tin Win " tw853@ > > > > > > > Cc: " Punit Pandey " punitp@ > > > > > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 8:11 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dears TW & Punit, > > > > > > > I just cannot comprehend as to just > > > what > > > > > people like Dhanabalan et al,are trying to prove... > > > > > > > Krishnamurthi Padhdhati clearly > > > says that > > > > > KSK derived inspiration from Nadi Astrology... the name of > the Nadi > > > is also > > > > > given by him.... > > > > > > > But what is the hullabuloo about ? > > > Does > > > > > it matter as to from which Nadi KSK derived his Padhdhati... > > > > > > > Unless of course, the objective > > > seems to > > > > > be, to prove how knowledgeable one is...about the history of > the > > > development > > > > > of K.P.(FULL STOP)... > > > > > > > What is more important,to my mind, > > > is the > > > > > useful application of K.P., to practical prognosis... and not > > > wasting the > > > > > groups' time over fruitless discussuions and semantics about > who > > > discovered > > > > > what,when,how, borrowed this knowledge from where and > whom ?...and > > > for > > > > > example,raising Newton's theory even ater the Quantum theory > has now > > > taken > > > > > over...and in time to come many more theories are bound to be > be > > > > > discovered.. . > > > > > > > Improvements in the existing > > > Padhdhati in > > > > > order to enable it to deliver more accurate results should be > the > > > objective > > > > > of all inquiring students of astrology. > > > > > > > I hope more and more students of > > > astrology > > > > > curb their desire for instant fame... or even notoriety just > to draw > > > > > attention towards themselves.. . . > > > > > > > I am sure that you both and Kanak > > > Bosmia > > > > > certainly believe likewise... > > > > > > > With kind regards, > > > > > > > L.Y..Rao. > > > > > > > GOOD > > > LUCK ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tw853 tw853 > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > > Tuesday, 10 February, 2009 10:38:16 AM > > > > > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from > Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Punit ji, Dhanabalan ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. It seems Dhanabalan ji has switched from Brihat Jatak > to > > > Satya Jatak > > > > > and Punit ji prefers Brihat Jatak.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary has given two > posibilities. First > > > one is > > > > > similarity to Satya Jatak and second one is as follows: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Krishnamurthi himself doesn't tell where he got the idea > of > > > Ruling > > > > > planets from. But other astrologers who interacted with him, > suggest > > > that he > > > > > got the idea from his researches on prenatal epoch, that > certain > > > ruling > > > > > planets of the prenatal epoch, become ruling planets at the > birth > > > time, and > > > > > also dominate the individual's life. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. This second one seems getting the idea of connection > between > > > the > > > > > planets ruling at birth and at the moment of major life > events from > > > Brihat > > > > > Jatak.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Such kind of connection idea is not found in Satya > Jatak as > > > > > mentioned by Punit ji, but some similar RPs are mentioned in > sloka > > > 6: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6. The fortunes of a native are to be studied with > reference to: > > > > > > > (1) the ascendant lord; (2) the lord of the ascendant in > the > > > navamsa > > > > > diagram (3)The lord of the birth star; and (4) the lords of > the > > > rasis > > > > > occupied by the above three. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5. In sloka 7, it is said to choose the birth star, Moon > or > > > Lagna, > > > > > whichever is stronger. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7. Birth-star : Consider the strengths of the Moon and the > > > ascendant. > > > > > If the ascendant is Stronger than the Moon, the lord of the > star in > > > which > > > > > the ascendant falls, is to be taken as the birth star. If, on > the > > > other > > > > > hand, the Moon is stronger than the ascendant, the lord of > the star > > > in which > > > > > it is posited is to be taken as the birth star...... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6. The birth time to take is mentioned in sloka 5: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5. There are three different moments which can be taken > as the > > > tune of > > > > > birth and for which the horoscope can be cast. These are(1) > Adhana > > > lagna > > > > > i.e. the moment of conception. (2) Siro-darshma lagna i.e., > the > > > moment at > > > > > which the head of the child is first sighted. (3) Bhupatana > 1agnathe > > > moment > > > > > at which the child leaves the body of the mother and touches > the > > > earth.. As > > > > > it is difficult to determine the first two moments > accurately, the > > > third one > > > > > should be taken for preparing the horoscope > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7. In Satya Jatak there are similar RPs and the idea of > taking > > > Moon or > > > > > Lagna, whichever is stronger (which Guru ji KSK had used at > early > > > stage) and > > > > > in Brihat Jatak, idea of connection between but similar RPs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8. Therefore in my opinion, it is possible that the RPs > are the > > > > > combined idea of both Brihat Jatak and Satya Jatak, whatever > > > Dhanabalan ji > > > > > may call. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tw > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, " Punit Pandey " punitp@ > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The quoted text seems a little misleading to me. What > > > Satyacharya > > > > > said > > > > > > > > in " Satya Jatak " that these planets should be used for > > > determining > > > > > the > > > > > > > > destiny (or may be general nativity by common > interpretation) > > > . In > > > > > > > > " Satya Jatak " , I don't find " determination of any > moment " > > > using these > > > > > > > > planets. " Satya Jatak " deesn't talk about rectification > or > > > horary > > > > > > > > astrology, as far as I know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The application of ruling planets came, I believe, from > > > " Brihat > > > > > Jatak " > > > > > > > > of Varahmihira where Varahamihira told that there is > > > connection > > > > > > > > between the planets ruling the moment of question and > planets > > > ruling > > > > > > > > the moment of birth. It seems that Shri KSK improvised > upon > > > the ideas > > > > > > > > taken from these two texts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, from the Hindi edition of " Jatak Satyacharya " , > > > following are > > > > > the > > > > > > > > planets for judging destiny of a native - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Lord of Ascendant Sign > > > > > > > > 2. Lord of Ascendant Navamsa > > > > > > > > 3. Lord of Ascendant or Moon Nakshatra (whichever is > powerful) > > > > > > > > 4. Lord of the signs where are all above planets are > located > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > > > r.dhanabalan@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Punitji > > > > > > > > > Please go through the article " Ruling planets " by > Dr.Satya > > > Prakash > > > > > > > > Choudry. He stated that the RP concept is Naadi > concept. I am > > > > > > > > reproducing the sentences, " The determinants of any > moment > > > according > > > > > > > > to the sage are: > > > > > > > > > * Birth lagna (ascendant lord) lord > > > > > > > > > * Moon or lagna star lord (whichever is stronger) > > > > > > > > > * Moon signlord > > > > > > > > > * Navamsa lagna lord > > > > > > > > > * Lord of rasi (in the rasi chart) occupied by the > Navamsa > > > lagna > > > > > lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr.KSK has taken both starlord of moon and lagna. He > has > > > taken > > > > > > > > daylord instead of Navamsa lagna lord. It is what I > told you > > > already > > > > > > > > as japanese style. > > > > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get perfect Email ID for your Resume. Get before others > grab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them > now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 Dear Tw ji,I think you are correct. It is " Dictionary of Significators in Astrology. " Thanks & Regards,Punit PandeyOn Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:49 PM, tw853 <tw853 wrote: Not 4, I've 5 books, namely 1) Accurate Predictive Astrology (1999, 4th Edition 2002); 2) Dictionary of Significators in Astrology (2000); 3) The Text Book of Astrology (2001); 4)Marriage and Relationships (2006) and 5) Prashna (2007). Some ideas are interesting, for instance,The strength of the house is drawn from the strength of the Cuspal Sub Lord. If the Cuspal Sub Lord signifies the combinations connected with the house, the house is strong; For countries where divorce is considered as sacrosanct, the involvement of 8,12 houses, in addition to 1,6,10 houses, is essential for divorce, and in cosmopolitan cities in India divorce is possible without the presence of 8 and 12 with 1,6,10, which amounts to divorce with mutual consent.What Punit ji is referring may be " Dictionary of Significators in Astrology " ,which is the same of Rex E Bill's Rulership Book, but not KP House Grouping. , kumar gautam <swami_gautam wrote: > > Hi, > > Umang Taneja has written four books so far, i have all of them and i have attended around 4 workshops so far conducted by him delhi. his website is nadi-astrology.com. > > You will find all the contact details there, the system taught by him is very simple and easy to learn. > > Gautam > > > > > > ________________________________ > tw853 <tw853 > > Saturday, 14 February, 2009 6:30:45 PM > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi - - - - KP House Grouping > > > Dear Pundit ji, > > 1. I'm sorry for typo for Pundit Nehru. > > 2. It may be Dictionary of Significators in Astrology by Umang Taneja > & P K Sarna, 2000 and there are pictures of Rasi signs on the yellow- > pink color. But it is the same of Rex E Bill's Rulership Book. > > 3. I would be grateful, if you could mention the name of his book to > order it. > > Thanks and regards, > > tw > > @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote: > > > > Dear Tw ji, > > > > 1. I am not referring " Nadi Astrology, Accurate Predictive > Methodology by > > Umang Taneja. " There is another book by him and the whole book is > dedicated > > to house grouping only, as far as I remember. I'll find out the > name and > > post in the forum. > > > > 2. Is Punit Nehru a typo? > > > > 3. Wish you all the best for your study on prisoners. Wish to see > the > > results soon. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:53 AM, tw853 <tw853@> wrote: > > > > > Dear Punit ji and Friends, > > > > > > 1. That is the book " Nadi Astrology, Accurate Predictive > Methodology by > > > Umang Taneja, First Published in 1999, Fourth Edition 2004 " . > > > > > > 2. In fact it is a good KP book where the significations at 3 > levels of > > > Planet, Star Lord and Sub Lord are SIMULTANEOUSLY considered like > C.K. > > > Bahatt and Kanak Bosmia. > > > > > > 3. The House Grouping from that book are incorporated in my KP > House > > > Grouping. There are the House Grouping for DBA only, not > mentioning the > > > cusps concerned. > > > > > > 4. More detailed house grouping for marriage can be found > in " Astrology, > > > Marriage and Relationship, by the same author, 2006 " . > > > > > > 5. For examples, when the combination of 5 (love) ,8 (sexual > organ) or > > > 5,12 (bed comfort) is signified in the DBA, the love affairmay > invole > > > the physical relations and bed pleasure. It is consistent with a > finding > > > in " Progeny and Romance, 2007 " that the signification of 5,8 > without > > > 7,11 may indicate thinking of enjoying sex without marriage. In > Umang > > > Taneja's book, like in KP Readers and C.R. Bhatt's books, it is > found > > > that 8, 12 (ego, hurdles, quarrel, disappointment, loss of all > kinds > > > etc) are signified with 1,6,10, it will increase the probability > of > > > divorce. In K.M. Subramaniam' s books also, 8 is in UNFAVOR of > marriage. > > > > > > 6. It is interseting how and when 5,8 can replace 2,7,11? > > > > > > 7. Is there any KP astrologer considering 8 in FAVOR of marriage > in the > > > KP latrature like Astrosecrets & KP, K.P. & Astrlogy Year Books > etc? > > > > > > 8. My house grouping is not taking word by word from the KP > Readers or > > > other KP latrature. For examples, the foreign settlement rule > from KP > > > Reader VI is not mentioned because it doesn't work as per my > study of > > > 100 charts. For imprisonment, it is not strict for 12 CSL to be > Rahu as > > > C.R. Bhatt has done because it is found many welknown prisioners > like > > > Mahatma Gandhi, Punit Nehru, Mrs. Gandhi (even as per TOB > rectified by > > > Guruji KSK), Nelson Mandela etc. > > > > > > 9. Another very important point is that in KP which based on the > > > signignification of house lordship and occupation of a planet, the > > > Karaka planet can play a supporting role only not a major role > like in > > > Verdic. What I mean is that without 12CSL being Rahu one may be > > > imprisoned, if the required house grouping is signified; Venus > alone > > > without 2,7,11 can't give marrige; Jupiter alone without 2,5,11 > can give > > > child. > > > > > > 10. I need to take a break from the Group to prove that many > prisoners > > > are not with 12 CSL Rahu on the basis of birth data of over 90 > executed > > > prisoners and over 500 prisoners from AstroDatabank. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > tw > > > > > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com>, > Punit > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Last time when I was at the place of my favorite astrology > bookseller > > > KK > > > > Goyal in Delhi, I also remember seeing a book by Umang Taneja in > > > English. > > > > The whole book was dedicated to house grouping in KP. > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:11 AM, tw853 tw853@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > KPEzine Oct 2007 to February 2008 > > > > > KP House Grouping Part 1 to 5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com <% > 40. com>, > > > Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > KPEzine January 2008 > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, sujata das sujatadash1@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > sujata das sujatadash1@ > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com <% > 40. com> > > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 2:46 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr Dhanbalan and TWji, > > > > > > Where are the house groupings by TWji available. Putting > them in > > > File > > > > > section of KP groups will be appreciated > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Sujata > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 12/2/09, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Thursday, 12 February, 2009, 3:10 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Adith > > > > > > My another doubt in the quiz3 is, the house 8 is also for > chronic > > > > > diseases. 6th house is disease. If the first cuspal sublord > > > signifies > > > > > 1,6,8,12 then the native may be admitted in the hospital due > to > > > chronic > > > > > disease and need not be due to accident. > > > > > > Another doubt is for occuring accident, the houses 4,8,12 > have to > > > be > > > > > considered. Mr.TinWin has given a table " House grouping -part > 4 " . In > > > that > > > > > table, whether he will met accident or not, he asked to look > into > > > the houses > > > > > 8,12 mainly with 6 as supporting house. What way 6th house is > > > related to > > > > > accident? Why not he taken 4th house as supporting house for > > > accident? > > > > > > In the same table, he asked to consider houses 8,12 mainly > and > > > houses 4,6 > > > > > as supporting houses to arrive Dasa Bukthi Antharam for > accident. > > > Why he > > > > > included the houses 4, 6 here? > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ > > > gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 9:14 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > > > We dont have such answers also for Sun is weaker than nodes > in > > > this case. > > > > > Here we have the example with the result. Also the strength > does not > > > depend > > > > > just as Nodes or the Planets. As you know many points to be > > > considered. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also in this case , as first cum first. Sun has come first > as dasa > > > Lord > > > > > prior to Nodes . > > > > > > > > > > > > For instance , if I have not given the Sub as Dasa lord and > asked > > > the > > > > > question " when he will meet with accidents in his life > time? " , then > > > the > > > > > answer will be quite different.. Many answers would have come. > But > > > may be > > > > > some would have not chosen Sun dasa also. > > > > > > So how to do the correct predictions? Here we have the > answer,from > > > which > > > > > why cant we try to find some points which we might have > missed also. > > > Thats > > > > > my opinion only to my my little knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji, I do respect your expertise. Also you > > > consistent > > > > > questions on the results is always good to make the > importance of > > > such > > > > > points embedded in the minds. Definitely your queries are > valuable. > > > > > > > > > > > > I duly appreciate your thoughts! > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Adith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Adith > > > > > > I want supporting evidence in KP Readers that Sun is > stronger than > > > > > Rahu/Ketu. > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ > > > gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 6:57 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani ji > > > > > > > > > > > > I do agree with your statement of Nodes replacing the > signlord > > > they > > > > > occupy.And they are capable of giving the qualities of the > planets > > > which > > > > > aspect them. Also as I have said why dont we think of the any > > > importance of > > > > > the Sun being star lord of 4 and 8 th cusps??.Though Ketu is > in Sun > > > star. > > > > > Ketu is with close conjucntion with Sun itself. Having all > these > > > qualities > > > > > would have caused Sun to give the result?? > > > > > > > > > > > > Also both Mercury and Sat are in Sat sub. Hence Sat is not > dropped > > > ?? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Adith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ > > > gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > > > As I have said in my previous mail, it is Dr.Kar's theory of > > > > > > substitution of nodes for planets. I am not aware whether > this is > > > the > > > > > finding of KSK. Planets aspecting node will give the aspected > > > planet's > > > > > qualities to the nodes and not vice versa. As Saturn is quite > strong > > > here > > > > > being placed in 8th sign, place of accident along with its > star lord > > > Mars, > > > > > karaka for accident is very strong with additional portfolio > of > > > Lagna > > > > > signification, which is essential for accidents, I am not for > > > dropping > > > > > Saturn for Rahu. As regards to Mercury, sign lord in which > the node > > > is > > > > > placed is Agent of Mercury and Mercury can be replaced for > Rahu. > > > This has > > > > > been emphasised by late Dri K.S.K. strongly to include nodes > in > > > place of > > > > > planets while selecting Ruling Planets and also while > scrutinizing > > > the > > > > > Planets. As such inclusion of Rahu for Mercury and dropping > the > > > later is in > > > > > accordance with > > > > > > Guruji's advice. > > > > > > While discussing about the main Dasa lord Sun, Kethu is in > close > > > > > conjunction with Sun. Kethu is burnt with the rays of Sun, it > > > loosss > > > > > whatever strength he has and the Sun emerges as strong. Hence > Sun > > > as prime > > > > > Dasa lord is > > > > > > quite in order. > > > > > > > > > > > > ..With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani. . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:05 PM > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > > > > Mercury has no planet in its star. So Mercury is stronger. > Why the > > > > > Mercury was dropped? > > > > > > Saturn has no planet in its star. Why Saturn was not > dropped? > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 3:53 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > > > Among the two nodes Rahu and Kethu (Head & Tail of snake > demonin > > > Purana), > > > > > Kethu is weaker than Rahu in strength according to traditional > > > astrology. I > > > > > am unable to > > > > > > quote the reference. Similarly, the aspects of node are not > > > considered in > > > > > K..P, though some use the aspects of 5th, 9th and 12th > attributed to > > > them. > > > > > But other planets' aspecton them qill be there. It is only in > > > Dr.K.R.Kar's > > > > > sub sub theory, the theory of substitution for nodes have been > > > > > > introduced replacing the planet aspecting by the node. > > > > > > In the quiz 3, Rahu;s aspect on Sun need not be considered. > Sun > > > though in > > > > > conjunction with Kethu is strong > > > > > > by its own constellation and he is in the sub of Mars in > > > > > > whoose steps Kethu is supposed to follow (Kujawat Kethu) > > > > > > In view of this Sun can be considered as prime Dasa lord, > > > > > > as it is the earliest Dasa concerning with all the relevant > > > > > > houses of accident and hospitalisation etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > > > > > > > > > I a > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:41 PM > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > > > > Sun may be in its own star but rapt conjunction with Ketu. > So Ketu > > > > > represents Sun. Ketu will give the result of Sun. The Sun has > to be > > > dropped > > > > > from the sugnificator list. Is there any exemption? > > > > > > Saturn aspects Rahu. Rahu represents Saturn. The Saturn has > to be > > > > > dropped from the significator list. Is there any exemption? > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail..com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 11:34 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > > > My observation is that the native was born in Kethu Dasa > > > > > > balance left was only few days. When we look tor lagna > > > > > > cusp for longevity, it is Rahu in the star of Jupiter at 9, > lord > > > of 11th > > > > > and 12th Bhavam. Rahu is aspected strongly by the Karaka for > Ayul > > > Saturn and > > > > > Rahu is not involved either with > > > > > > Bhadhaka or Maraka. Hence longevity is fairly good. > > > > > > Next Venus Dasa too has no strong connection with Maraka or > > > Bhadhaka, > > > > > though he is in the star of Moon, 7th lord, but feeble in > strength, > > > as Moon > > > > > is not strong for 7th. So Venus is also ruled out as she is > not > > > significator > > > > > of 8th > > > > > > too as 2 malefic planets are placed in 8th. Venus is S/L of > 4th & > > > 11th > > > > > (not an evil house). Next to Venus Dasa, Sun comes in the > picture. > > > Sun is > > > > > in his own star fairly strong. > > > > > > Sun with his own star (equivalent to self strength) is Star > lord > > > of 4th, > > > > > 8th and 12th all the houses for accident. > > > > > > Sun is in the sub of Mars in 8tth (accident house) > associatd with > > > another > > > > > natural malefic Saturrn lord of > > > > > > Lagna having connection to both 1 and 8th, being in his own > sub. > > > Thus S/L > > > > > of Sun, Mars is strongly connected to > > > > > > 1 and 8th houses required for causing severe accident. > > > > > > Hence Sun Dasa is justified. Moreover, it is the earliest > > > > > > Dasa lord (Prime Minister) coming earlier than the other > > > > > > evil dasas of Mars, Saturn, Mercury etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanking you for your sharing your obstacle with me. > > > > > > > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani . > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 2:06 PM > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > > > > I have tried this quiz3 according to KP but got struck. I > request > > > > > somebody to guide me and correct me to proceed. > > > > > > > > > > > > For accident: For DBA, houses to be considered 8,12,(6), > (4) as > > > per > > > > > TinWinJi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the sub of planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the star of planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the sub of house lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the star of house lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mar,Sat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup, > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun, Ketu, Moon, > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun, Mer, Ven, Ketu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > > > > > > > Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (6) > > > > > > > > > > > > Ven > > > > > > > > > > > > Jup, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (4) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Venus > > > > > > > > > > > > Strong significators for > > > > > > House 8: Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu > > > > > > House 12: Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup, > > > > > > House 6: Venus > > > > > > House 4: Venus > > > > > > Planets close to the Cusp 6 within 3 degrees: Rahu > > > > > > Planets close to the Cusp 12 within 3 degrees: Ketu, Sun > > > > > > Saturn aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees > > > > > > Sun is aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees > > > > > > Sun and Ketu are in rapt conjunction > > > > > > Badhaka lord:Mars. Saturn is in Mars star. Sun and Ketu are > in > > > Mars sub > > > > > > Maraka lord: Saturn/Jupiter, Moon. Mars and Mercury are in > Moon > > > star. > > > > > Mercury and Saturn are in Saturn sub. Rahu is in Jupiter star > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer,Sat,Sun, Ketu,Rahu, Moon,Mar, Jup,Ven(All the nine > planets > > > have come > > > > > as significators) > > > > > > In the normal practice, > > > > > > Rahu represents mercury. So I eliminated Mercury > > > > > > Ketu represents Jupiter. So I eliminated Jupiter > > > > > > Rahu represents Saturn. So I eliminated Saturn > > > > > > Ketu represents Sun. So I should have eliminated Sun also. > But it > > > is > > > > > told that the accident happened in Sun dasa. Here I got > struck. > > > > > > > > > > > > Significators are: Ketu,Rahu,Moon, Mars,Venus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ruling planets on 9-2-2009 at 17.47.35 PM in Vennandur, > near Salem > > > > > > Day lord :Moon > > > > > > Rasi lord :Moon > > > > > > Rasi star :Mercury > > > > > > Lagna lord :Moon > > > > > > Lagna star :Mercury > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon aspects sun(opposition) > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun,Moon,Mercury are in RP. But Mercury and Sun are not in > > > significator > > > > > list. So I eliminated Mercury and Sun. Remaining common > planet is > > > Moon only. > > > > > > > > > > > To pinpoint the event, I need 3 significators. So I have > included > > > lagna > > > > > sublord and moon sublord in the RP list. > > > > > > Lagna sublord :Venus > > > > > > Moon Sublord :Rahu > > > > > > Common planets are :Moon,Venus and Rahu > > > > > > Dasa period is combination of Moon,Venus and Rahu. > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 7:07 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalanji, > > > > > > > > > > > > My desie is also same as yours. Most seniors, who are > considered > > > as > > > > > authentic and authoritative in the field may feel the quiz > programme > > > as > > > > > childish and it is below their > > > > > > dignity to partake.. Professional astrologers may feel that > their > > > > > reputation will affect, if the answer given by them.goes > wrong. > > > Majority > > > > > of beginners may feel shy to participate due to their > ignorance or > > > for study > > > > > and understanding of astrology. In the absence of such > majority > > > members, > > > > > only few members who have fair > > > > > > knowledge and study and who are really interested to > > > > > > improve their ability to gain practical experience will come > > > > > > forward to answer the quiz. Such numbers may be a dozen are > > > slightly > > > > > more. My suggestion is the quiz master should put about 6 > simple > > > questions > > > > > daily and gradually increasing the standard. He may give the > > > answers to > > > > > the quiz next day.. This w ill help a lot for beginners and > > > interested > > > > > persons to gain experience. In the mean time > > > > > > the quiz like 1 to 3 so far conducted may be continued > > > > > > giving 1 week time for solution. By this way, the debate > will > > > > > > be lively and at the same time acquire more knowlege by > > > > > > way of discussion with members. I wish that you should > > > > > > initiate this with your abundant knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > goes wrong. - > > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 7:44 AM > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji > > > > > > If experienced astrologers are participating and sharing in > the > > > quiz, it > > > > > would be more lively and useful to other members. Because I > read so > > > many > > > > > books, books confused me. I hope this quiz program will guide > me. > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > > > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from > Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 5:12 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji, > > > > > > Such responses to those who have not participated in the > Quiz, > > > would > > > > > prove to be a deterrant and aversion to further members from > > > participating > > > > > in the quiz. > > > > > > Participation in the quiz is unot a measure or scale of > > > measurement or > > > > > yardstick to judge whether one knows KP or not. > > > > > > There could be many reasons for one not participating, > including > > > lack of > > > > > time, other pre-occupations, some bad memories associated > with cases > > > such as > > > > > accidents, a feeling of imcompetency, suspicions of the quiz > being > > > > > fabricated to downsize certain astrologers , not wishing > failures, > > > > > embarassment at the prospects of not arriving at the clear > answer, > > > and so > > > > > many other such reasons looming , from individual to > individual. > > > Which > > > > > reason is linked to which astrologer, we are not anyone to > judge. > > > > > > You seem to be a knowledgable person. Shri Raoji is a > elderly > > > person and > > > > > they must be allowed their eccentricities if any , dont you > think ? > > > After > > > > > all he has proved himself over and over again on innumerable > > > occasions that > > > > > he is knowledgable in KP. He does not require certificates > from > > > passing in > > > > > Quizzes. Or does he ? > > > > > > Indian culture teaches us to respect Gnana(Knowledge) and > Umra > > > (Age) both > > > > > which Shri Rao Sahab possesses. > > > > > > Please take this positively. > > > > > > best wishes, > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > <r.dhanabalan@ > > > ...> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear L.Y.Rao > > > > > > > If you understand the KP correctly, why cant you > participate in > > > the > > > > > quiz? > > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ . wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ . > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from > > > Naadi > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, " Tin Win " tw853@ > > > > > > > Cc: " Punit Pandey " punitp@ > > > > > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 8:11 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dears TW & Punit, > > > > > > > I just cannot comprehend as to just > > > what > > > > > people like Dhanabalan et al,are trying to prove... > > > > > > > Krishnamurthi Padhdhati clearly > > > says that > > > > > KSK derived inspiration from Nadi Astrology... the name of > the Nadi > > > is also > > > > > given by him.... > > > > > > > But what is the hullabuloo about ? > > > Does > > > > > it matter as to from which Nadi KSK derived his Padhdhati... > > > > > > > Unless of course, the objective > > > seems to > > > > > be, to prove how knowledgeable one is...about the history of > the > > > development > > > > > of K.P.(FULL STOP)... > > > > > > > What is more important,to my mind, > > > is the > > > > > useful application of K.P., to practical prognosis... and not > > > wasting the > > > > > groups' time over fruitless discussuions and semantics about > who > > > discovered > > > > > what,when,how, borrowed this knowledge from where and > whom ?...and > > > for > > > > > example,raising Newton's theory even ater the Quantum theory > has now > > > taken > > > > > over...and in time to come many more theories are bound to be > be > > > > > discovered.. . > > > > > > > Improvements in the existing > > > Padhdhati in > > > > > order to enable it to deliver more accurate results should be > the > > > objective > > > > > of all inquiring students of astrology. > > > > > > > I hope more and more students of > > > astrology > > > > > curb their desire for instant fame... or even notoriety just > to draw > > > > > attention towards themselves.. . . > > > > > > > I am sure that you both and Kanak > > > Bosmia > > > > > certainly believe likewise... > > > > > > > With kind regards, > > > > > > > L.Y..Rao. > > > > > > > GOOD > > > LUCK ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tw853 tw853 > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > > Tuesday, 10 February, 2009 10:38:16 AM > > > > > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from > Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Punit ji, Dhanabalan ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. It seems Dhanabalan ji has switched from Brihat Jatak > to > > > Satya Jatak > > > > > and Punit ji prefers Brihat Jatak.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary has given two > posibilities. First > > > one is > > > > > similarity to Satya Jatak and second one is as follows: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Krishnamurthi himself doesn't tell where he got the idea > of > > > Ruling > > > > > planets from. But other astrologers who interacted with him, > suggest > > > that he > > > > > got the idea from his researches on prenatal epoch, that > certain > > > ruling > > > > > planets of the prenatal epoch, become ruling planets at the > birth > > > time, and > > > > > also dominate the individual's life. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. This second one seems getting the idea of connection > between > > > the > > > > > planets ruling at birth and at the moment of major life > events from > > > Brihat > > > > > Jatak.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Such kind of connection idea is not found in Satya > Jatak as > > > > > mentioned by Punit ji, but some similar RPs are mentioned in > sloka > > > 6: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6. The fortunes of a native are to be studied with > reference to: > > > > > > > (1) the ascendant lord; (2) the lord of the ascendant in > the > > > navamsa > > > > > diagram (3)The lord of the birth star; and (4) the lords of > the > > > rasis > > > > > occupied by the above three. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5. In sloka 7, it is said to choose the birth star, Moon > or > > > Lagna, > > > > > whichever is stronger. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7. Birth-star : Consider the strengths of the Moon and the > > > ascendant. > > > > > If the ascendant is Stronger than the Moon, the lord of the > star in > > > which > > > > > the ascendant falls, is to be taken as the birth star. If, on > the > > > other > > > > > hand, the Moon is stronger than the ascendant, the lord of > the star > > > in which > > > > > it is posited is to be taken as the birth star...... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6. The birth time to take is mentioned in sloka 5: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5. There are three different moments which can be taken > as the > > > tune of > > > > > birth and for which the horoscope can be cast. These are(1) > Adhana > > > lagna > > > > > i.e. the moment of conception. (2) Siro-darshma lagna i.e., > the > > > moment at > > > > > which the head of the child is first sighted. (3) Bhupatana > 1agnathe > > > moment > > > > > at which the child leaves the body of the mother and touches > the > > > earth.. As > > > > > it is difficult to determine the first two moments > accurately, the > > > third one > > > > > should be taken for preparing the horoscope > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7. In Satya Jatak there are similar RPs and the idea of > taking > > > Moon or > > > > > Lagna, whichever is stronger (which Guru ji KSK had used at > early > > > stage) and > > > > > in Brihat Jatak, idea of connection between but similar RPs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8. Therefore in my opinion, it is possible that the RPs > are the > > > > > combined idea of both Brihat Jatak and Satya Jatak, whatever > > > Dhanabalan ji > > > > > may call. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tw > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, " Punit Pandey " punitp@ > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The quoted text seems a little misleading to me. What > > > Satyacharya > > > > > said > > > > > > > > in " Satya Jatak " that these planets should be used for > > > determining > > > > > the > > > > > > > > destiny (or may be general nativity by common > interpretation) > > > . In > > > > > > > > " Satya Jatak " , I don't find " determination of any > moment " > > > using these > > > > > > > > planets. " Satya Jatak " deesn't talk about rectification > or > > > horary > > > > > > > > astrology, as far as I know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The application of ruling planets came, I believe, from > > > " Brihat > > > > > Jatak " > > > > > > > > of Varahmihira where Varahamihira told that there is > > > connection > > > > > > > > between the planets ruling the moment of question and > planets > > > ruling > > > > > > > > the moment of birth. It seems that Shri KSK improvised > upon > > > the ideas > > > > > > > > taken from these two texts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, from the Hindi edition of " Jatak Satyacharya " , > > > following are > > > > > the > > > > > > > > planets for judging destiny of a native - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Lord of Ascendant Sign > > > > > > > > 2. Lord of Ascendant Navamsa > > > > > > > > 3. Lord of Ascendant or Moon Nakshatra (whichever is > powerful) > > > > > > > > 4. Lord of the signs where are all above planets are > located > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > > > r.dhanabalan@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Punitji > > > > > > > > > Please go through the article " Ruling planets " by > Dr.Satya > > > Prakash > > > > > > > > Choudry. He stated that the RP concept is Naadi > concept. I am > > > > > > > > reproducing the sentences, " The determinants of any > moment > > > according > > > > > > > > to the sage are: > > > > > > > > > * Birth lagna (ascendant lord) lord > > > > > > > > > * Moon or lagna star lord (whichever is stronger) > > > > > > > > > * Moon signlord > > > > > > > > > * Navamsa lagna lord > > > > > > > > > * Lord of rasi (in the rasi chart) occupied by the > Navamsa > > > lagna > > > > > lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr.KSK has taken both starlord of moon and lagna. He > has > > > taken > > > > > > > > daylord instead of Navamsa lagna lord. It is what I > told you > > > already > > > > > > > > as japanese style. > > > > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get perfect Email ID for your Resume. Get before others > grab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them > now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 yes you are righttw853 <tw853 Sent: Tuesday, 17 February, 2009 11:49:37 PM Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi - - - - KP House Grouping Not 4, I've 5 books, namely 1) Accurate Predictive Astrology (1999, 4th Edition 2002); 2) Dictionary of Significators in Astrology (2000); 3) The Text Book of Astrology (2001); 4)Marriage and Relationships (2006) and 5) Prashna (2007). Some ideas are interesting, for instance,The strength of the house is drawn from the strength of the Cuspal Sub Lord. If the Cuspal Sub Lord signifies the combinations connected with the house, the house is strong; For countries where divorce is considered as sacrosanct, the involvement of 8,12 houses, in addition to 1,6,10 houses, is essential for divorce, and in cosmopolitan cities in India divorce is possible without the presence of 8 and 12 with 1,6,10, which amounts to divorce with mutual consent.What Punit ji is referring may be "Dictionary of Significators in Astrology",which is the same of Rex E Bill's Rulership Book, but not KP House Grouping. @gro ups.com, kumar gautam <swami_gautam@ ...> wrote: > > Hi, > > Umang Taneja has written four books so far, i have all of them and i have attended around 4 workshops so far conducted by him delhi. his website is nadi-astrology. com. > > You will find all the contact details there, the system taught by him is very simple and easy to learn. > > Gautam > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > tw853 <tw853 > @gro ups.com > Saturday, 14 February, 2009 6:30:45 PM > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi - - - - KP House Grouping > > > Dear Pundit ji, > > 1. I'm sorry for typo for Pundit Nehru. > > 2. It may be Dictionary of Significators in Astrology by Umang Taneja > & P K Sarna, 2000 and there are pictures of Rasi signs on the yellow- > pink color. But it is the same of Rex E Bill's Rulership Book. > > 3. I would be grateful, if you could mention the name of his book to > order it. > > Thanks and regards, > > tw > > @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote: > > > > Dear Tw ji, > > > > 1. I am not referring "Nadi Astrology, Accurate Predictive > Methodology by > > Umang Taneja." There is another book by him and the whole book is > dedicated > > to house grouping only, as far as I remember. I'll find out the > name and > > post in the forum. > > > > 2. Is Punit Nehru a typo? > > > > 3. Wish you all the best for your study on prisoners. Wish to see > the > > results soon. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:53 AM, tw853 <tw853@> wrote: > > > > > Dear Punit ji and Friends, > > > > > > 1. That is the book "Nadi Astrology, Accurate Predictive > Methodology by > > > Umang Taneja, First Published in 1999, Fourth Edition 2004". > > > > > > 2. In fact it is a good KP book where the significations at 3 > levels of > > > Planet, Star Lord and Sub Lord are SIMULTANEOUSLY considered like > C.K. > > > Bahatt and Kanak Bosmia. > > > > > > 3. The House Grouping from that book are incorporated in my KP > House > > > Grouping. There are the House Grouping for DBA only, not > mentioning the > > > cusps concerned. > > > > > > 4. More detailed house grouping for marriage can be found > in "Astrology, > > > Marriage and Relationship, by the same author, 2006". > > > > > > 5. For examples, when the combination of 5 (love) ,8 (sexual > organ) or > > > 5,12 (bed comfort) is signified in the DBA, the love affairmay > invole > > > the physical relations and bed pleasure. It is consistent with a > finding > > > in "Progeny and Romance, 2007" that the signification of 5,8 > without > > > 7,11 may indicate thinking of enjoying sex without marriage. In > Umang > > > Taneja's book, like in KP Readers and C.R. Bhatt's books, it is > found > > > that 8, 12 (ego, hurdles, quarrel, disappointment, loss of all > kinds > > > etc) are signified with 1,6,10, it will increase the probability > of > > > divorce. In K.M. Subramaniam' s books also, 8 is in UNFAVOR of > marriage. > > > > > > 6. It is interseting how and when 5,8 can replace 2,7,11? > > > > > > 7. Is there any KP astrologer considering 8 in FAVOR of marriage > in the > > > KP latrature like Astrosecrets & KP, K.P. & Astrlogy Year Books > etc? > > > > > > 8. My house grouping is not taking word by word from the KP > Readers or > > > other KP latrature. For examples, the foreign settlement rule > from KP > > > Reader VI is not mentioned because it doesn't work as per my > study of > > > 100 charts. For imprisonment, it is not strict for 12 CSL to be > Rahu as > > > C.R. Bhatt has done because it is found many welknown prisioners > like > > > Mahatma Gandhi, Punit Nehru, Mrs. Gandhi (even as per TOB > rectified by > > > Guruji KSK), Nelson Mandela etc. > > > > > > 9. Another very important point is that in KP which based on the > > > signignification of house lordship and occupation of a planet, the > > > Karaka planet can play a supporting role only not a major role > like in > > > Verdic. What I mean is that without 12CSL being Rahu one may be > > > imprisoned, if the required house grouping is signified; Venus > alone > > > without 2,7,11 can't give marrige; Jupiter alone without 2,5,11 > can give > > > child. > > > > > > 10. I need to take a break from the Group to prove that many > prisoners > > > are not with 12 CSL Rahu on the basis of birth data of over 90 > executed > > > prisoners and over 500 prisoners from AstroDatabank.. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > tw > > > > > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com>, > Punit > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Last time when I was at the place of my favorite astrology > bookseller > > > KK > > > > Goyal in Delhi, I also remember seeing a book by Umang Taneja in > > > English. > > > > The whole book was dedicated to house grouping in KP. > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:11 AM, tw853 tw853@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > KPEzine Oct 2007 to February 2008 > > > > > KP House Grouping Part 1 to 5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com <% > 40. com>, > > > Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > KPEzine January 2008 > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, sujata das sujatadash1@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > sujata das sujatadash1@ > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com <% > 40. com> > > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 2:46 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr Dhanbalan and TWji, > > > > > > Where are the house groupings by TWji available. Putting > them in > > > File > > > > > section of KP groups will be appreciated > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Sujata > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 12/2/09, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Thursday, 12 February, 2009, 3:10 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Adith > > > > > > My another doubt in the quiz3 is, the house 8 is also for > chronic > > > > > diseases. 6th house is disease. If the first cuspal sublord > > > signifies > > > > > 1,6,8,12 then the native may be admitted in the hospital due > to > > > chronic > > > > > disease and need not be due to accident. > > > > > > Another doubt is for occuring accident, the houses 4,8,12 > have to > > > be > > > > > considered. Mr.TinWin has given a table "House grouping -part > 4". In > > > that > > > > > table, whether he will met accident or not, he asked to look > into > > > the houses > > > > > 8,12 mainly with 6 as supporting house. What way 6th house is > > > related to > > > > > accident? Why not he taken 4th house as supporting house for > > > accident? > > > > > > In the same table, he asked to consider houses 8,12 mainly > and > > > houses 4,6 > > > > > as supporting houses to arrive Dasa Bukthi Antharam for > accident. > > > Why he > > > > > included the houses 4, 6 here? > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ > > > gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 9:14 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > > > We dont have such answers also for Sun is weaker than nodes > in > > > this case. > > > > > Here we have the example with the result. Also the strength > does not > > > depend > > > > > just as Nodes or the Planets. As you know many points to be > > > considered. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also in this case , as first cum first. Sun has come first > as dasa > > > Lord > > > > > prior to Nodes . > > > > > > > > > > > > For instance , if I have not given the Sub as Dasa lord and > asked > > > the > > > > > question "when he will meet with accidents in his life > time?", then > > > the > > > > > answer will be quite different.. Many answers would have come. > But > > > may be > > > > > some would have not chosen Sun dasa also. > > > > > > So how to do the correct predictions? Here we have the > answer,from > > > which > > > > > why cant we try to find some points which we might have > missed also. > > > Thats > > > > > my opinion only to my my little knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji, I do respect your expertise. Also you > > > consistent > > > > > questions on the results is always good to make the > importance of > > > such > > > > > points embedded in the minds. Definitely your queries are > valuable. > > > > > > > > > > > > I duly appreciate your thoughts! > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Adith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Adith > > > > > > I want supporting evidence in KP Readers that Sun is > stronger than > > > > > Rahu/Ketu. > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ > > > gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 6:57 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani ji > > > > > > > > > > > > I do agree with your statement of Nodes replacing the > signlord > > > they > > > > > occupy.And they are capable of giving the qualities of the > planets > > > which > > > > > aspect them. Also as I have said why dont we think of the any > > > importance of > > > > > the Sun being star lord of 4 and 8 th cusps??..Though Ketu is > in Sun > > > star. > > > > > Ketu is with close conjucntion with Sun itself. Having all > these > > > qualities > > > > > would have caused Sun to give the result?? > > > > > > > > > > > > Also both Mercury and Sat are in Sat sub. Hence Sat is not > dropped > > > ?? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Adith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ > > > gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > > > As I have said in my previous mail, it is Dr.Kar's theory of > > > > > > substitution of nodes for planets. I am not aware whether > this is > > > the > > > > > finding of KSK. Planets aspecting node will give the aspected > > > planet's > > > > > qualities to the nodes and not vice versa. As Saturn is quite > strong > > > here > > > > > being placed in 8th sign, place of accident along with its > star lord > > > Mars, > > > > > karaka for accident is very strong with additional portfolio > of > > > Lagna > > > > > signification, which is essential for accidents, I am not for > > > dropping > > > > > Saturn for Rahu. As regards to Mercury, sign lord in which > the node > > > is > > > > > placed is Agent of Mercury and Mercury can be replaced for > Rahu. > > > This has > > > > > been emphasised by late Dri K.S.K. strongly to include nodes > in > > > place of > > > > > planets while selecting Ruling Planets and also while > scrutinizing > > > the > > > > > Planets. As such inclusion of Rahu for Mercury and dropping > the > > > later is in > > > > > accordance with > > > > > > Guruji's advice. > > > > > > While discussing about the main Dasa lord Sun, Kethu is in > close > > > > > conjunction with Sun. Kethu is burnt with the rays of Sun, it > > > loosss > > > > > whatever strength he has and the Sun emerges as strong. Hence > Sun > > > as prime > > > > > Dasa lord is > > > > > > quite in order. > > > > > > > > > > > > ..With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani. . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:05 PM > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > > > > Mercury has no planet in its star. So Mercury is stronger. > Why the > > > > > Mercury was dropped? > > > > > > Saturn has no planet in its star. Why Saturn was not > dropped? > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 3:53 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > > > Among the two nodes Rahu and Kethu (Head & Tail of snake > demonin > > > Purana), > > > > > Kethu is weaker than Rahu in strength according to traditional > > > astrology. I > > > > > am unable to > > > > > > quote the reference. Similarly, the aspects of node are not > > > considered in > > > > > K..P, though some use the aspects of 5th, 9th and 12th > attributed to > > > them. > > > > > But other planets' aspecton them qill be there. It is only in > > > Dr.K.R.Kar's > > > > > sub sub theory, the theory of substitution for nodes have been > > > > > > introduced replacing the planet aspecting by the node. > > > > > > In the quiz 3, Rahu;s aspect on Sun need not be considered. > Sun > > > though in > > > > > conjunction with Kethu is strong > > > > > > by its own constellation and he is in the sub of Mars in > > > > > > whoose steps Kethu is supposed to follow (Kujawat Kethu) > > > > > > In view of this Sun can be considered as prime Dasa lord, > > > > > > as it is the earliest Dasa concerning with all the relevant > > > > > > houses of accident and hospitalisation etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > > > > > > > > > I a > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:41 PM > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > > > > Sun may be in its own star but rapt conjunction with Ketu. > So Ketu > > > > > represents Sun. Ketu will give the result of Sun. The Sun has > to be > > > dropped > > > > > from the sugnificator list. Is there any exemption? > > > > > > Saturn aspects Rahu. Rahu represents Saturn. The Saturn has > to be > > > > > dropped from the significator list. Is there any exemption? > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail..com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 11:34 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalan, > > > > > > > > > > > > My observation is that the native was born in Kethu Dasa > > > > > > balance left was only few days. When we look tor lagna > > > > > > cusp for longevity, it is Rahu in the star of Jupiter at 9, > lord > > > of 11th > > > > > and 12th Bhavam. Rahu is aspected strongly by the Karaka for > Ayul > > > Saturn and > > > > > Rahu is not involved either with > > > > > > Bhadhaka or Maraka. Hence longevity is fairly good. > > > > > > Next Venus Dasa too has no strong connection with Maraka or > > > Bhadhaka, > > > > > though he is in the star of Moon, 7th lord, but feeble in > strength, > > > as Moon > > > > > is not strong for 7th. So Venus is also ruled out as she is > not > > > significator > > > > > of 8th > > > > > > too as 2 malefic planets are placed in 8th. Venus is S/L of > 4th & > > > 11th > > > > > (not an evil house). Next to Venus Dasa, Sun comes in the > picture. > > > Sun is > > > > > in his own star fairly strong. > > > > > > Sun with his own star (equivalent to self strength) is Star > lord > > > of 4th, > > > > > 8th and 12th all the houses for accident. > > > > > > Sun is in the sub of Mars in 8tth (accident house) > associatd with > > > another > > > > > natural malefic Saturrn lord of > > > > > > Lagna having connection to both 1 and 8th, being in his own > sub. > > > Thus S/L > > > > > of Sun, Mars is strongly connected to > > > > > > 1 and 8th houses required for causing severe accident. > > > > > > Hence Sun Dasa is justified. Moreover, it is the earliest > > > > > > Dasa lord (Prime Minister) coming earlier than the other > > > > > > evil dasas of Mars, Saturn, Mercury etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanking you for your sharing your obstacle with me. > > > > > > > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani . > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 2:06 PM > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ramani > > > > > > I have tried this quiz3 according to KP but got struck. I > request > > > > > somebody to guide me and correct me to proceed. > > > > > > > > > > > > For accident: For DBA, houses to be considered 8,12,(6), > (4) as > > > per > > > > > TinWinJi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the sub of planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the star of planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets occupied > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the sub of house lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Planets in the star of house lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mar,Sat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup, > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun, Ketu, Moon, > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun, Mer, Ven, Ketu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > > > > > > > Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (6) > > > > > > > > > > > > Ven > > > > > > > > > > > > Jup, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rahu > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (4) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Venus > > > > > > > > > > > > Strong significators for > > > > > > House 8: Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu > > > > > > House 12: Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup, > > > > > > House 6: Venus > > > > > > House 4: Venus > > > > > > Planets close to the Cusp 6 within 3 degrees: Rahu > > > > > > Planets close to the Cusp 12 within 3 degrees: Ketu, Sun > > > > > > Saturn aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees > > > > > > Sun is aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees > > > > > > Sun and Ketu are in rapt conjunction > > > > > > Badhaka lord:Mars. Saturn is in Mars star. Sun and Ketu are > in > > > Mars sub > > > > > > Maraka lord: Saturn/Jupiter, Moon. Mars and Mercury are in > Moon > > > star. > > > > > Mercury and Saturn are in Saturn sub. Rahu is in Jupiter star > > > > > > > > > > > > Mer,Sat,Sun, Ketu,Rahu, Moon,Mar, Jup,Ven(All the nine > planets > > > have come > > > > > as significators) > > > > > > In the normal practice, > > > > > > Rahu represents mercury. So I eliminated Mercury > > > > > > Ketu represents Jupiter. So I eliminated Jupiter > > > > > > Rahu represents Saturn. So I eliminated Saturn > > > > > > Ketu represents Sun. So I should have eliminated Sun also. > But it > > > is > > > > > told that the accident happened in Sun dasa. Here I got > struck. > > > > > > > > > > > > Significators are: Ketu,Rahu,Moon, Mars,Venus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ruling planets on 9-2-2009 at 17.47.35 PM in Vennandur, > near Salem > > > > > > Day lord :Moon > > > > > > Rasi lord :Moon > > > > > > Rasi star :Mercury > > > > > > Lagna lord :Moon > > > > > > Lagna star :Mercury > > > > > > > > > > > > Moon aspects sun(opposition) > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun,Moon,Mercury are in RP. But Mercury and Sun are not in > > > significator > > > > > list. So I eliminated Mercury and Sun. Remaining common > planet is > > > Moon only. > > > > > > > > > > > To pinpoint the event, I need 3 significators. So I have > included > > > lagna > > > > > sublord and moon sublord in the RP list. > > > > > > Lagna sublord :Venus > > > > > > Moon Sublord :Rahu > > > > > > Common planets are :Moon,Venus and Rahu > > > > > > Dasa period is combination of Moon,Venus and Rahu. > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 7:07 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalanji, > > > > > > > > > > > > My desie is also same as yours. Most seniors, who are > considered > > > as > > > > > authentic and authoritative in the field may feel the quiz > programme > > > as > > > > > childish and it is below their > > > > > > dignity to partake.. Professional astrologers may feel that > their > > > > > reputation will affect, if the answer given by them.goes > wrong. > > > Majority > > > > > of beginners may feel shy to participate due to their > ignorance or > > > for study > > > > > and understanding of astrology. In the absence of such > majority > > > members, > > > > > only few members who have fair > > > > > > knowledge and study and who are really interested to > > > > > > improve their ability to gain practical experience will come > > > > > > forward to answer the quiz. Such numbers may be a dozen are > > > slightly > > > > > more. My suggestion is the quiz master should put about 6 > simple > > > questions > > > > > daily and gradually increasing the standard. He may give the > > > answers to > > > > > the quiz next day.. This w ill help a lot for beginners and > > > interested > > > > > persons to gain experience. In the mean time > > > > > > the quiz like 1 to 3 so far conducted may be continued > > > > > > giving 1 week time for solution. By this way, the debate > will > > > > > > be lively and at the same time acquire more knowlege by > > > > > > way of discussion with members. I wish that you should > > > > > > initiate this with your abundant knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > With best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > goes wrong. - > > > > > > Dhanabalan R > > > > > > @gro ups..com > > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 7:44 AM > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji > > > > > > If experienced astrologers are participating and sharing in > the > > > quiz, it > > > > > would be more lively and useful to other members. Because I > read so > > > many > > > > > books, books confused me. I hope this quiz program will guide > me. > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> > > > > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from > Naadi > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 5:12 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji, > > > > > > Such responses to those who have not participated in the > Quiz, > > > would > > > > > prove to be a deterrant and aversion to further members from > > > participating > > > > > in the quiz. > > > > > > Participation in the quiz is unot a measure or scale of > > > measurement or > > > > > yardstick to judge whether one knows KP or not. > > > > > > There could be many reasons for one not participating, > including > > > lack of > > > > > time, other pre-occupations, some bad memories associated > with cases > > > such as > > > > > accidents, a feeling of imcompetency, suspicions of the quiz > being > > > > > fabricated to downsize certain astrologers , not wishing > failures, > > > > > embarassment at the prospects of not arriving at the clear > answer, > > > and so > > > > > many other such reasons looming , from individual to > individual. > > > Which > > > > > reason is linked to which astrologer, we are not anyone to > judge. > > > > > > You seem to be a knowledgable person. Shri Raoji is a > elderly > > > person and > > > > > they must be allowed their eccentricities if any , dont you > think ? > > > After > > > > > all he has proved himself over and over again on innumerable > > > occasions that > > > > > he is knowledgable in KP. He does not require certificates > from > > > passing in > > > > > Quizzes. Or does he ? > > > > > > Indian culture teaches us to respect Gnana(Knowledge) and > Umra > > > (Age) both > > > > > which Shri Rao Sahab possesses. > > > > > > Please take this positively. > > > > > > best wishes, > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > <r.dhanabalan@ > > > ...> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear L.Y.Rao > > > > > > > If you understand the KP correctly, why cant you > participate in > > > the > > > > > quiz? > > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ . wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ . > > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from > > > Naadi > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, "Tin Win" tw853@ > > > > > > > Cc: "Punit Pandey" punitp@ > > > > > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 8:11 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dears TW & Punit, > > > > > > > I just cannot comprehend as to just > > > what > > > > > people like Dhanabalan et al,are trying to prove... > > > > > > > Krishnamurthi Padhdhati clearly > > > says that > > > > > KSK derived inspiration from Nadi Astrology... the name of > the Nadi > > > is also > > > > > given by him.... > > > > > > > But what is the hullabuloo about ? > > > Does > > > > > it matter as to from which Nadi KSK derived his Padhdhati... > > > > > > > Unless of course, the objective > > > seems to > > > > > be, to prove how knowledgeable one is...about the history of > the > > > development > > > > > of K.P.(FULL STOP)... > > > > > > > What is more important,to my mind, > > > is the > > > > > useful application of K.P., to practical prognosis... and not > > > wasting the > > > > > groups' time over fruitless discussuions and semantics about > who > > > discovered > > > > > what,when,how, borrowed this knowledge from where and > whom ?...and > > > for > > > > > example,raising Newton's theory even ater the Quantum theory > has now > > > taken > > > > > over...and in time to come many more theories are bound to be > be > > > > > discovered.. . > > > > > > > Improvements in the existing > > > Padhdhati in > > > > > order to enable it to deliver more accurate results should be > the > > > objective > > > > > of all inquiring students of astrology. > > > > > > > I hope more and more students of > > > astrology > > > > > curb their desire for instant fame... or even notoriety just > to draw > > > > > attention towards themselves.. . . > > > > > > > I am sure that you both and Kanak > > > Bosmia > > > > > certainly believe likewise... > > > > > > > With kind regards, > > > > > > > L.Y..Rao. > > > > > > > GOOD > > > LUCK ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tw853 tw853 > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > > Tuesday, 10 February, 2009 10:38:16 AM > > > > > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from > Naadi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Punit ji, Dhanabalan ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. It seems Dhanabalan ji has switched from Brihat Jatak > to > > > Satya Jatak > > > > > and Punit ji prefers Brihat Jatak.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary has given two > posibilities. First > > > one is > > > > > similarity to Satya Jatak and second one is as follows: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Krishnamurthi himself doesn't tell where he got the idea > of > > > Ruling > > > > > planets from. But other astrologers who interacted with him, > suggest > > > that he > > > > > got the idea from his researches on prenatal epoch, that > certain > > > ruling > > > > > planets of the prenatal epoch, become ruling planets at the > birth > > > time, and > > > > > also dominate the individual's life. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. This second one seems getting the idea of connection > between > > > the > > > > > planets ruling at birth and at the moment of major life > events from > > > Brihat > > > > > Jatak.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Such kind of connection idea is not found in Satya > Jatak as > > > > > mentioned by Punit ji, but some similar RPs are mentioned in > sloka > > > 6: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6. The fortunes of a native are to be studied with > reference to: > > > > > > > (1) the ascendant lord; (2) the lord of the ascendant in > the > > > navamsa > > > > > diagram (3)The lord of the birth star; and (4) the lords of > the > > > rasis > > > > > occupied by the above three. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5. In sloka 7, it is said to choose the birth star, Moon > or > > > Lagna, > > > > > whichever is stronger. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7. Birth-star : Consider the strengths of the Moon and the > > > ascendant. > > > > > If the ascendant is Stronger than the Moon, the lord of the > star in > > > which > > > > > the ascendant falls, is to be taken as the birth star.. If, on > the > > > other > > > > > hand, the Moon is stronger than the ascendant, the lord of > the star > > > in which > > > > > it is posited is to be taken as the birth star...... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6. The birth time to take is mentioned in sloka 5: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5. There are three different moments which can be taken > as the > > > tune of > > > > > birth and for which the horoscope can be cast. These are(1) > Adhana > > > lagna > > > > > i.e. the moment of conception. (2) Siro-darshma lagna i.e., > the > > > moment at > > > > > which the head of the child is first sighted. (3) Bhupatana > 1agnathe > > > moment > > > > > at which the child leaves the body of the mother and touches > the > > > earth.. As > > > > > it is difficult to determine the first two moments > accurately, the > > > third one > > > > > should be taken for preparing the horoscope > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7. In Satya Jatak there are similar RPs and the idea of > taking > > > Moon or > > > > > Lagna, whichever is stronger (which Guru ji KSK had used at > early > > > stage) and > > > > > in Brihat Jatak, idea of connection between but similar RPs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8. Therefore in my opinion, it is possible that the RPs > are the > > > > > combined idea of both Brihat Jatak and Satya Jatak, whatever > > > Dhanabalan ji > > > > > may call. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tw > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, "Punit Pandey" punitp@ > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The quoted text seems a little misleading to me. What > > > Satyacharya > > > > > said > > > > > > > > in "Satya Jatak" that these planets should be used for > > > determining > > > > > the > > > > > > > > destiny (or may be general nativity by common > interpretation) > > > . In > > > > > > > > "Satya Jatak", I don't find "determination of any > moment" > > > using these > > > > > > > > planets. "Satya Jatak" deesn't talk about rectification > or > > > horary > > > > > > > > astrology, as far as I know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The application of ruling planets came, I believe, from > > > "Brihat > > > > > Jatak" > > > > > > > > of Varahmihira where Varahamihira told that there is > > > connection > > > > > > > > between the planets ruling the moment of question and > planets > > > ruling > > > > > > > > the moment of birth. It seems that Shri KSK improvised > upon > > > the ideas > > > > > > > > taken from these two texts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, from the Hindi edition of "Jatak Satyacharya" , > > > following are > > > > > the > > > > > > > > planets for judging destiny of a native - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Lord of Ascendant Sign > > > > > > > > 2. Lord of Ascendant Navamsa > > > > > > > > 3. Lord of Ascendant or Moon Nakshatra (whichever is > powerful) > > > > > > > > 4. Lord of the signs where are all above planets are > located > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > > > r.dhanabalan@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Punitji > > > > > > > > > Please go through the article "Ruling planets" by > Dr.Satya > > > Prakash > > > > > > > > Choudry. He stated that the RP concept is Naadi > concept. I am > > > > > > > > reproducing the sentences, "The determinants of any > moment > > > according > > > > > > > > to the sage are: > > > > > > > > > * Birth lagna (ascendant lord) lord > > > > > > > > > * Moon or lagna star lord (whichever is stronger) > > > > > > > > > * Moon signlord > > > > > > > > > * Navamsa lagna lord > > > > > > > > > * Lord of rasi (in the rasi chart) occupied by the > Navamsa > > > lagna > > > > > lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr.KSK has taken both starlord of moon and lagna. He > has > > > taken > > > > > > > > daylord instead of Navamsa lagna lord. It is what I > told you > > > already > > > > > > > > as japanese style. > > > > > > > > > Dhanabalan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get perfect Email ID for your Resume. Get before others > grab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them > now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 The 6th one and the latest is, Nadi Astrology and ProfessionHasmukhrai J Mehta --- On Tue, 17/2/09, tw853 <tw853 wrote: tw853 <tw853 Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi - - - - KP House Grouping Date: Tuesday, 17 February, 2009, 11:49 PM Not 4, I've 5 books, namely 1) Accurate Predictive Astrology (1999,4th Edition 2002); 2) Dictionary of Significators in Astrology (2000);3) The Text Book of Astrology (2001); 4)Marriage and Relationships(2006) and 5) Prashna (2007). Some ideas are interesting, forinstance,The strength of the house is drawn from the strength of theCuspal Sub Lord. If the Cuspal Sub Lord signifies the combinationsconnected with the house, the house is strong; For countries wheredivorce is considered as sacrosanct, the involvement of 8,12 houses,in addition to 1,6,10 houses, is essential for divorce, and incosmopolitan cities in India divorce is possible without the presenceof 8 and 12 with 1,6,10, which amounts to divorce with mutualconsent.What Punit ji is referring may be "Dictionary of Significatorsin Astrology",which is the same of Rex E Bill's Rulership Book, butnot KP House Grouping.@gro ups.com, kumar gautam <swami_gautam@ ...> wrote:>> Hi,> > Umang Taneja has written four books so far, i have all of them and ihave attended around 4 workshops so far conducted by him delhi. hiswebsite is nadi-astrology. com. > > You will find all the contact details there, the system taught byhim is very simple and easy to learn.> > Gautam> > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> tw853 <tw853> @gro ups.com> Saturday, 14 February, 2009 6:30:45 PM> Re: KP Ruling planets concept from Naadi - - -- KP House Grouping> > > Dear Pundit ji,> > 1. I'm sorry for typo for Pundit Nehru.> > 2. It may be Dictionary of Significators in Astrology by Umang Taneja > & P K Sarna, 2000 and there are pictures of Rasi signs on the yellow-> pink color. But it is the same of Rex E Bill's Rulership Book.> > 3. I would be grateful, if you could mention the name of his book to > order it. > > Thanks and regards,> > tw> > @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> >> > Dear Tw ji,> > > > 1. I am not referring "Nadi Astrology, Accurate Predictive > Methodology by> > Umang Taneja." There is another book by him and the whole book is > dedicated> > to house grouping only, as far as I remember. I'll find out the > name and> > post in the forum.> > > > 2. Is Punit Nehru a typo?> > > > 3. Wish you all the best for your study on prisoners. Wish to see > the> > results soon.> > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:53 AM, tw853 <tw853@> wrote:> > > > > Dear Punit ji and Friends,> > >> > > 1. That is the book "Nadi Astrology, Accurate Predictive > Methodology by> > > Umang Taneja, First Published in 1999, Fourth Edition 2004".> > >> > > 2. In fact it is a good KP book where the significations at 3 > levels of> > > Planet, Star Lord and Sub Lord are SIMULTANEOUSLY considered like > C.K.> > > Bahatt and Kanak Bosmia.> > >> > > 3. The House Grouping from that book are incorporated in my KP > House> > > Grouping. There are the House Grouping for DBA only, not > mentioning the> > > cusps concerned.> > >> > > 4. More detailed house grouping for marriage can be found > in "Astrology,> > > Marriage and Relationship, by the same author, 2006".> > >> > > 5. For examples, when the combination of 5 (love) ,8 (sexual > organ) or> > > 5,12 (bed comfort) is signified in the DBA, the love affairmay > invole> > > the physical relations and bed pleasure. It is consistent with a > finding> > > in "Progeny and Romance, 2007" that the signification of 5,8 > without> > > 7,11 may indicate thinking of enjoying sex without marriage. In > Umang> > > Taneja's book, like in KP Readers and C.R. Bhatt's books, it is > found> > > that 8, 12 (ego, hurdles, quarrel, disappointment, loss of all > kinds> > > etc) are signified with 1,6,10, it will increase the probability > of> > > divorce. In K.M. Subramaniam' s books also, 8 is in UNFAVOR of > marriage.> > >> > > 6. It is interseting how and when 5,8 can replace 2,7,11?> > >> > > 7. Is there any KP astrologer considering 8 in FAVOR of marriage > in the> > > KP latrature like Astrosecrets & KP, K.P. & Astrlogy Year Books > etc?> > >> > > 8. My house grouping is not taking word by word from the KP > Readers or> > > other KP latrature. For examples, the foreign settlement rule > from KP> > > Reader VI is not mentioned because it doesn't work as per my > study of> > > 100 charts. For imprisonment, it is not strict for 12 CSL to be > Rahu as> > > C.R. Bhatt has done because it is found many welknown prisioners > like> > > Mahatma Gandhi, Punit Nehru, Mrs. Gandhi (even as per TOB > rectified by> > > Guruji KSK), Nelson Mandela etc.> > >> > > 9. Another very important point is that in KP which based on the> > > signignification of house lordship and occupation of a planet, the> > > Karaka planet can play a supporting role only not a major role > like in> > > Verdic. What I mean is that without 12CSL being Rahu one may be> > > imprisoned, if the required house grouping is signified; Venus > alone> > > without 2,7,11 can't give marrige; Jupiter alone without 2,5,11 > can give> > > child.> > >> > > 10. I need to take a break from the Group to prove that many > prisoners> > > are not with 12 CSL Rahu on the basis of birth data of over 90 > executed> > > prisoners and over 500 prisoners from AstroDatabank.> > >> > > Thanks and regards,> > >> > > tw> > >> > > @gro ups.com <% 40>, > Punit> > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Last time when I was at the place of my favorite astrology > bookseller> > > KK> > > > Goyal in Delhi, I also remember seeing a book by Umang Taneja in> > > English.> > > > The whole book was dedicated to house grouping in KP.> > > >> > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > >> > > > Punit Pandey> > > >> > > >> > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:11 AM, tw853 tw853@ wrote:> > > >> > > > > KPEzine Oct 2007 to February 2008> > > > > KP House Grouping Part 1 to 5> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > @gro ups.com <%> 40. com>,> > > Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@ wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > KPEzine January 2008> > > > > >> > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, sujata das sujatadash1@ wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > sujata das sujatadash1@> > > > >> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi> > > > > > @gro ups.com <%> 40. com>> > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 2:46 PM> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Mr Dhanbalan and TWji,> > > > > > Where are the house groupings by TWji available. Putting > them in> > > File> > > > > section of KP groups will be appreciated> > > > > > Regards> > > > > > Sujata> > > > > >> > > > > > --- On Thu, 12/2/09, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ > > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ >> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi> > > > > > @gro ups.com> > > > > > Thursday, 12 February, 2009, 3:10 PM> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Adith> > > > > > My another doubt in the quiz3 is, the house 8 is also for > chronic> > > > > diseases. 6th house is disease. If the first cuspal sublord> > > signifies> > > > > 1,6,8,12 then the native may be admitted in the hospital due > to> > > chronic> > > > > disease and need not be due to accident.> > > > > > Another doubt is for occuring accident, the houses 4,8,12 > have to> > > be> > > > > considered. Mr.TinWin has given a table "House grouping -part > 4". In> > > that> > > > > table, whether he will met accident or not, he asked to look > into> > > the houses> > > > > 8,12 mainly with 6 as supporting house. What way 6th house is> > > related to> > > > > accident? Why not he taken 4th house as supporting house for> > > accident?> > > > > > In the same table, he asked to consider houses 8,12 mainly > and> > > houses 4,6> > > > > as supporting houses to arrive Dasa Bukthi Antharam for > accident.> > > Why he> > > > > included the houses 4, 6 here?> > > > > > Dhanabalan> > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@> > > gmail.com>> > > > > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com>> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi> > > > > > @gro ups.com> > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 9:14 AM> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan,> > > > > >> > > > > > We dont have such answers also for Sun is weaker than nodes > in> > > this case.> > > > > Here we have the example with the result. Also the strength > does not> > > depend> > > > > just as Nodes or the Planets. As you know many points to be> > > considered.> > > > > >> > > > > > Also in this case , as first cum first. Sun has come first > as dasa> > > Lord> > > > > prior to Nodes .> > > > > >> > > > > > For instance , if I have not given the Sub as Dasa lord and > asked> > > the> > > > > question "when he will meet with accidents in his life > time?", then> > > the> > > > > answer will be quite different.. Many answers would have come. > But> > > may be> > > > > some would have not chosen Sun dasa also.> > > > > > So how to do the correct predictions? Here we have the > answer,from> > > which> > > > > why cant we try to find some points which we might have > missed also.> > > Thats> > > > > my opinion only to my my little knowledge.> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji, I do respect your expertise. Also you> > > consistent> > > > > questions on the results is always good to make the > importance of> > > such> > > > > points embedded in the minds. Definitely your queries are > valuable.> > > > > >> > > > > > I duly appreciate your thoughts!> > > > > >> > > > > > Regards> > > > > > Adith> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@> > > >> > > > > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Adith> > > > > > I want supporting evidence in KP Readers that Sun is > stronger than> > > > > Rahu/Ketu.> > > > > > Dhanabalan> > > > > >> > > > > > --- On Thu, 2/12/09, adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@> > > gmail.com>> > > > > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com>> > > > > >> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi> > > > > > @gro ups.com> > > > > > Thursday, February 12, 2009, 6:57 AM> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Ramani ji> > > > > >> > > > > > I do agree with your statement of Nodes replacing the > signlord> > > they> > > > > occupy.And they are capable of giving the qualities of the > planets> > > which> > > > > aspect them. Also as I have said why dont we think of the any> > > importance of> > > > > the Sun being star lord of 4 and 8 th cusps??.Though Ketu is > in Sun> > > star.> > > > > Ketu is with close conjucntion with Sun itself. Having all > these> > > qualities> > > > > would have caused Sun to give the result??> > > > > >> > > > > > Also both Mercury and Sat are in Sat sub. Hence Sat is not > dropped> > > ??> > > > > >> > > > > > Regards> > > > > > Adith> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Ramani <kadavasalramani@> > > gmail.com>> > > > > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan,> > > > > >> > > > > > As I have said in my previous mail, it is Dr.Kar's theory of> > > > > > substitution of nodes for planets. I am not aware whether > this is> > > the> > > > > finding of KSK. Planets aspecting node will give the aspected> > > planet's> > > > > qualities to the nodes and not vice versa. As Saturn is quite > strong> > > here> > > > > being placed in 8th sign, place of accident along with its > star lord> > > Mars,> > > > > karaka for accident is very strong with additional portfolio > of> > > Lagna> > > > > signification, which is essential for accidents, I am not for> > > dropping> > > > > Saturn for Rahu. As regards to Mercury, sign lord in which > the node> > > is> > > > > placed is Agent of Mercury and Mercury can be replaced for > Rahu.> > > This has> > > > > been emphasised by late Dri K.S.K. strongly to include nodes > in> > > place of> > > > > planets while selecting Ruling Planets and also while > scrutinizing> > > the> > > > > Planets. As such inclusion of Rahu for Mercury and dropping > the> > > later is in> > > > > accordance with> > > > > > Guruji's advice.> > > > > > While discussing about the main Dasa lord Sun, Kethu is in > close> > > > > conjunction with Sun. Kethu is burnt with the rays of Sun, it> > > loosss> > > > > whatever strength he has and the Sun emerges as strong. Hence > Sun> > > as prime> > > > > Dasa lord is> > > > > > quite in order.> > > > > >> > > > > > ..With best wishes,> > > > > >> > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani. .> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > -> > > > > > Dhanabalan R> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > @gro ups.com> > > > > >> > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:05 PM> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Ramani> > > > > > Mercury has no planet in its star. So Mercury is stronger. > Why the> > > > > Mercury was dropped?> > > > > > Saturn has no planet in its star. Why Saturn was not > dropped?> > > > > > Dhanabalan> > > > > >> > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com>> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > @gro ups.com> > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 3:53 PM> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan,> > > > > >> > > > > > Among the two nodes Rahu and Kethu (Head & Tail of snake > demonin> > > Purana),> > > > > Kethu is weaker than Rahu in strength according to traditional> > > astrology. I> > > > > am unable to> > > > > > quote the reference. Similarly, the aspects of node are not> > > considered in> > > > > K..P, though some use the aspects of 5th, 9th and 12th > attributed to> > > them.> > > > > But other planets' aspecton them qill be there. It is only in> > > Dr.K.R.Kar's> > > > > sub sub theory, the theory of substitution for nodes have been> > > > > > introduced replacing the planet aspecting by the node.> > > > > > In the quiz 3, Rahu;s aspect on Sun need not be considered. > Sun> > > though in> > > > > conjunction with Kethu is strong> > > > > > by its own constellation and he is in the sub of Mars in> > > > > > whoose steps Kethu is supposed to follow (Kujawat Kethu)> > > > > > In view of this Sun can be considered as prime Dasa lord,> > > > > > as it is the earliest Dasa concerning with all the relevant> > > > > > houses of accident and hospitalisation etc.> > > > > >> > > > > > With best wishes,> > > > > >> > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > > > >> > > > > > I a> > > > > >> > > > > > -> > > > > > Dhanabalan R> > > > > > @gro ups.com> > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:41 PM> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Ramani> > > > > > Sun may be in its own star but rapt conjunction with Ketu. > So Ketu> > > > > represents Sun. Ketu will give the result of Sun. The Sun has > to be> > > dropped> > > > > from the sugnificator list. Is there any exemption?> > > > > > Saturn aspects Rahu. Rahu represents Saturn. The Saturn has > to be> > > > > dropped from the significator list. Is there any exemption?> > > > > > Dhanabalan> > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail..com> > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com>> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi> > > > > > @gro ups.com> > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 11:34 AM> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalan,> > > > > >> > > > > > My observation is that the native was born in Kethu Dasa> > > > > > balance left was only few days. When we look tor lagna> > > > > > cusp for longevity, it is Rahu in the star of Jupiter at 9, > lord> > > of 11th> > > > > and 12th Bhavam. Rahu is aspected strongly by the Karaka for > Ayul> > > Saturn and> > > > > Rahu is not involved either with> > > > > > Bhadhaka or Maraka. Hence longevity is fairly good.> > > > > > Next Venus Dasa too has no strong connection with Maraka or> > > Bhadhaka,> > > > > though he is in the star of Moon, 7th lord, but feeble in > strength,> > > as Moon> > > > > is not strong for 7th. So Venus is also ruled out as she is > not> > > significator> > > > > of 8th> > > > > > too as 2 malefic planets are placed in 8th. Venus is S/L of > 4th & > > > 11th> > > > > (not an evil house). Next to Venus Dasa, Sun comes in the > picture.> > > Sun is> > > > > in his own star fairly strong.> > > > > > Sun with his own star (equivalent to self strength) is Star > lord> > > of 4th,> > > > > 8th and 12th all the houses for accident.> > > > > > Sun is in the sub of Mars in 8tth (accident house) > associatd with> > > another> > > > > natural malefic Saturrn lord of> > > > > > Lagna having connection to both 1 and 8th, being in his own > sub.> > > Thus S/L> > > > > of Sun, Mars is strongly connected to> > > > > > 1 and 8th houses required for causing severe accident.> > > > > > Hence Sun Dasa is justified. Moreover, it is the earliest> > > > > > Dasa lord (Prime Minister) coming earlier than the other> > > > > > evil dasas of Mars, Saturn, Mercury etc.> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanking you for your sharing your obstacle with me.> > > > > >> > > > > > With best wishes,> > > > > >> > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani .> > > > > >> > > > > > -> > > > > > Dhanabalan R> > > > > > @gro ups.com> > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 2:06 PM> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Ramani> > > > > > I have tried this quiz3 according to KP but got struck. I > request> > > > > somebody to guide me and correct me to proceed.> > > > > >> > > > > > For accident: For DBA, houses to be considered 8,12,(6), > (4) as> > > per> > > > > TinWinJi> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > House> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Planets in the sub of planets occupied> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Planets in the star of planets occupied> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Planets occupied> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Planets in the sub of house lord> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Planets in the star of house lord> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > House lord> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > 8> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Sat> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Mar,Sat> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Mer> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > 12> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup,> > > > > >> > > > > > Sun, Ketu, Moon,> > > > > >> > > > > > Sun, Mer, Ven, Ketu> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Rahu> > > > > >> > > > > > Jup> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > (6)> > > > > >> > > > > > Ven> > > > > >> > > > > > Jup,> > > > > >> > > > > > Rahu> > > > > >> > > > > > Moon, Mars, Jup> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Mer> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > (4)> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Venus> > > > > >> > > > > > Strong significators for> > > > > > House 8: Mer, Sat, Sun, Ketu> > > > > > House 12: Rahu, Moon, Mars, Jup,> > > > > > House 6: Venus> > > > > > House 4: Venus> > > > > > Planets close to the Cusp 6 within 3 degrees: Rahu> > > > > > Planets close to the Cusp 12 within 3 degrees: Ketu, Sun> > > > > > Saturn aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees> > > > > > Sun is aspecting Rahu within 3 degrees> > > > > > Sun and Ketu are in rapt conjunction> > > > > > Badhaka lord:Mars. Saturn is in Mars star. Sun and Ketu are > in> > > Mars sub> > > > > > Maraka lord: Saturn/Jupiter, Moon. Mars and Mercury are in > Moon> > > star.> > > > > Mercury and Saturn are in Saturn sub. Rahu is in Jupiter star> > > > > >> > > > > > Mer,Sat,Sun, Ketu,Rahu, Moon,Mar, Jup,Ven(All the nine > planets> > > have come> > > > > as significators)> > > > > > In the normal practice,> > > > > > Rahu represents mercury. So I eliminated Mercury> > > > > > Ketu represents Jupiter. So I eliminated Jupiter> > > > > > Rahu represents Saturn. So I eliminated Saturn> > > > > > Ketu represents Sun. So I should have eliminated Sun also. > But it> > > is> > > > > told that the accident happened in Sun dasa. Here I got > struck.> > > > > >> > > > > > Significators are: Ketu,Rahu,Moon, Mars,Venus> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Ruling planets on 9-2-2009 at 17.47.35 PM in Vennandur, > near Salem> > > > > > Day lord :Moon> > > > > > Rasi lord :Moon> > > > > > Rasi star :Mercury> > > > > > Lagna lord :Moon> > > > > > Lagna star :Mercury> > > > > >> > > > > > Moon aspects sun(opposition)> > > > > >> > > > > > Sun,Moon,Mercury are in RP. But Mercury and Sun are not in> > > significator> > > > > list. So I eliminated Mercury and Sun. Remaining common > planet is> > > Moon only.> > > > >> > > > > > To pinpoint the event, I need 3 significators. So I have > included> > > lagna> > > > > sublord and moon sublord in the RP list.> > > > > > Lagna sublord :Venus> > > > > > Moon Sublord :Rahu> > > > > > Common planets are :Moon,Venus and Rahu> > > > > > Dasa period is combination of Moon,Venus and Rahu.> > > > > > Dhanabalan> > > > > >> > > > > > --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com>> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi> > > > > > @gro ups.com> > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 7:07 AM> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Sri Dhanabalanji,> > > > > >> > > > > > My desie is also same as yours. Most seniors, who are > considered> > > as> > > > > authentic and authoritative in the field may feel the quiz > programme> > > as> > > > > childish and it is below their> > > > > > dignity to partake.. Professional astrologers may feel that > their> > > > > reputation will affect, if the answer given by them.goes > wrong.> > > Majority> > > > > of beginners may feel shy to participate due to their > ignorance or> > > for study> > > > > and understanding of astrology. In the absence of such > majority> > > members,> > > > > only few members who have fair> > > > > > knowledge and study and who are really interested to> > > > > > improve their ability to gain practical experience will come> > > > > > forward to answer the quiz. Such numbers may be a dozen are> > > slightly> > > > > more. My suggestion is the quiz master should put about 6 > simple> > > questions> > > > > daily and gradually increasing the standard. He may give the> > > answers to> > > > > the quiz next day.. This w ill help a lot for beginners and> > > interested> > > > > persons to gain experience. In the mean time> > > > > > the quiz like 1 to 3 so far conducted may be continued> > > > > > giving 1 week time for solution. By this way, the debate > will> > > > > > be lively and at the same time acquire more knowlege by> > > > > > way of discussion with members. I wish that you should> > > > > > initiate this with your abundant knowledge.> > > > > >> > > > > > With best wishes,> > > > > >> > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > goes wrong. -> > > > > > Dhanabalan R> > > > > > @gro ups.com> > > > > > Wednesday, February 11, 2009 7:44 AM> > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from Naadi> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Bhaskarji> > > > > > If experienced astrologers are participating and sharing in > the> > > quiz, it> > > > > would be more lively and useful to other members. Because I > read so> > > many> > > > > books, books confused me. I hope this quiz program will guide > me.> > > > > > Dhanabalan> > > > > >> > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in>> > > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in>> > > > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from > Naadi> > > > > > @gro ups.com> > > > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 5:12 PM> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Dhanabalanji,> > > > > > Such responses to those who have not participated in the > Quiz,> > > would> > > > > prove to be a deterrant and aversion to further members from> > > participating> > > > > in the quiz.> > > > > > Participation in the quiz is unot a measure or scale of> > > measurement or> > > > > yardstick to judge whether one knows KP or not.> > > > > > There could be many reasons for one not participating, > including> > > lack of> > > > > time, other pre-occupations, some bad memories associated > with cases> > > such as> > > > > accidents, a feeling of imcompetency, suspicions of the quiz > being> > > > > fabricated to downsize certain astrologers , not wishing > failures,> > > > > embarassment at the prospects of not arriving at the clear > answer,> > > and so> > > > > many other such reasons looming , from individual to > individual.> > > Which> > > > > reason is linked to which astrologer, we are not anyone to > judge.> > > > > > You seem to be a knowledgable person. Shri Raoji is a > elderly> > > person and> > > > > they must be allowed their eccentricities if any , dont you > think ?> > > After> > > > > all he has proved himself over and over again on innumerable> > > occasions that> > > > > he is knowledgable in KP. He does not require certificates > from> > > passing in> > > > > Quizzes. Or does he ?> > > > > > Indian culture teaches us to respect Gnana(Knowledge) and > Umra> > > (Age) both> > > > > which Shri Rao Sahab possesses.> > > > > > Please take this positively.> > > > > > best wishes,> > > > > > Bhaskar.> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > <r.dhanabalan@> > > ...>> > > > > wrote:> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Dear L.Y.Rao> > > > > > > If you understand the KP correctly, why cant you > participate in> > > the> > > > > quiz?> > > > > > > Dhanabalan> > > > > > >> > > > > > > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ . wrote:> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Yogesh Rao Lajmi lyrastro1@ .> > > > > > > Re: Re: KP Ruling planets concept > from> > > Naadi> > > > > > > @gro ups.com, "Tin Win" tw853@> > > > > > > Cc: "Punit Pandey" punitp@> > > > > > > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 8:11 AM> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Dears TW & Punit,> > > > > > > I just cannot comprehend as to just> > > what> > > > > people like Dhanabalan et al,are trying to prove...> > > > > > > Krishnamurthi Padhdhati clearly> > > says that> > > > > KSK derived inspiration from Nadi Astrology... the name of > the Nadi> > > is also> > > > > given by him....> > > > > > > But what is the hullabuloo about ?> > > Does> > > > > it matter as to from which Nadi KSK derived his Padhdhati...> > > > > > > Unless of course, the objective> > > seems to> > > > > be, to prove how knowledgeable one is...about the history of > the> > > development> > > > > of K.P.(FULL STOP)...> > > > > > > What is more important,to my mind,> > > is the> > > > > useful application of K.P., to practical prognosis... and not> > > wasting the> > > > > groups' time over fruitless discussuions and semantics about > who> > > discovered> > > > > what,when,how, borrowed this knowledge from where and > whom ?...and> > > for> > > > > example,raising Newton's theory even ater the Quantum theory > has now> > > taken> > > > > over...and in time to come many more theories are bound to be > be> > > > > discovered.. .> > > > > > > Improvements in the existing> > > Padhdhati in> > > > > order to enable it to deliver more accurate results should be > the> > > objective> > > > > of all inquiring students of astrology.> > > > > > > I hope more and more students of> > > astrology> > > > > curb their desire for instant fame... or even notoriety just > to draw> > > > > attention towards themselves.. . .> > > > > > > I am sure that you both and Kanak> > > Bosmia> > > > > certainly believe likewise...> > > > > > > With kind regards,> > > > > > > L.Y..Rao.> > > > > > > GOOD> > > LUCK !> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > tw853 tw853 >> > > > > > > @gro ups.com> > > > > > > Tuesday, 10 February, 2009 10:38:16 AM> > > > > > > Re: KP Ruling planets concept from > Naadi> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Dear Punit ji, Dhanabalan ji,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 1. It seems Dhanabalan ji has switched from Brihat Jatak > to> > > Satya Jatak> > > > > and Punit ji prefers Brihat Jatak..> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 2. Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary has given two > posibilities. First> > > one is> > > > > similarity to Satya Jatak and second one is as follows:> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Krishnamurthi himself doesn't tell where he got the idea > of> > > Ruling> > > > > planets from. But other astrologers who interacted with him, > suggest> > > that he> > > > > got the idea from his researches on prenatal epoch, that > certain> > > ruling> > > > > planets of the prenatal epoch, become ruling planets at the > birth> > > time, and> > > > > also dominate the individual's life.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 3. This second one seems getting the idea of connection > between> > > the> > > > > planets ruling at birth and at the moment of major life > events from> > > Brihat> > > > > Jatak..> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 4. Such kind of connection idea is not found in Satya > Jatak as> > > > > mentioned by Punit ji, but some similar RPs are mentioned in > sloka> > > 6:> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 6. The fortunes of a native are to be studied with > reference to:> > > > > > > (1) the ascendant lord; (2) the lord of the ascendant in > the> > > navamsa> > > > > diagram (3)The lord of the birth star; and (4) the lords of > the> > > rasis> > > > > occupied by the above three.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 5. In sloka 7, it is said to choose the birth star, Moon > or> > > Lagna,> > > > > whichever is stronger.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 7. Birth-star : Consider the strengths of the Moon and the> > > ascendant.> > > > > If the ascendant is Stronger than the Moon, the lord of the > star in> > > which> > > > > the ascendant falls, is to be taken as the birth star. If, on > the> > > other> > > > > hand, the Moon is stronger than the ascendant, the lord of > the star> > > in which> > > > > it is posited is to be taken as the birth star......> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 6. The birth time to take is mentioned in sloka 5:> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 5. There are three different moments which can be taken > as the> > > tune of> > > > > birth and for which the horoscope can be cast. These are(1) > Adhana> > > lagna> > > > > i.e. the moment of conception. (2) Siro-darshma lagna i.e., > the> > > moment at> > > > > which the head of the child is first sighted. (3) Bhupatana > 1agnathe> > > moment> > > > > at which the child leaves the body of the mother and touches > the> > > earth.. As> > > > > it is difficult to determine the first two moments > accurately, the> > > third one> > > > > should be taken for preparing the horoscope> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 7. In Satya Jatak there are similar RPs and the idea of > taking> > > Moon or> > > > > Lagna, whichever is stronger (which Guru ji KSK had used at > early> > > stage) and> > > > > in Brihat Jatak, idea of connection between but similar RPs.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 8. Therefore in my opinion, it is possible that the RPs > are the> > > > > combined idea of both Brihat Jatak and Satya Jatak, whatever> > > Dhanabalan ji> > > > > may call.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks and regards,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > tw> > > > > > > @gro ups.com, "Punit Pandey" punitp@> > > wrote:> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Dear Dhanabalan ji,> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > The quoted text seems a little misleading to me. What> > > Satyacharya> > > > > said> > > > > > > > in "Satya Jatak" that these planets should be used for> > > determining> > > > > the> > > > > > > > destiny (or may be general nativity by common > interpretation)> > > . In> > > > > > > > "Satya Jatak", I don't find "determination of any > moment"> > > using these> > > > > > > > planets. "Satya Jatak" deesn't talk about rectification > or> > > horary> > > > > > > > astrology, as far as I know.> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > The application of ruling planets came, I believe, from> > > "Brihat> > > > > Jatak"> > > > > > > > of Varahmihira where Varahamihira told that there is> > > connection> > > > > > > > between the planets ruling the moment of question and > planets> > > ruling> > > > > > > > the moment of birth. It seems that Shri KSK improvised > upon> > > the ideas> > > > > > > > taken from these two texts.> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Also, from the Hindi edition of "Jatak Satyacharya" ,> > > following are> > > > > the> > > > > > > > planets for judging destiny of a native -> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 1. Lord of Ascendant Sign> > > > > > > > 2. Lord of Ascendant Navamsa> > > > > > > > 3. Lord of Ascendant or Moon Nakshatra (whichever is > powerful)> > > > > > > > 4. Lord of the signs where are all above planets are > located> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R> > > r.dhanabalan@ wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Dear Punitji> > > > > > > > > Please go through the article "Ruling planets" by > Dr.Satya> > > Prakash> > > > > > > > Choudry. He stated that the RP concept is Naadi > concept. I am> > > > > > > > reproducing the sentences, "The determinants of any > moment> > > according> > > > > > > > to the sage are:> > > > > > > > > * Birth lagna (ascendant lord) lord> > > > > > > > > * Moon or lagna star lord (whichever is stronger)> > > > > > > > > * Moon signlord> > > > > > > > > * Navamsa lagna lord> > > > > > > > > * Lord of rasi (in the rasi chart) occupied by the > Navamsa> > > lagna> > > > > lord> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Mr.KSK has taken both starlord of moon and lagna. He > has> > > taken> > > > > > > > daylord instead of Navamsa lagna lord. It is what I > told you> > > already> > > > > > > > as japanese style.> > > > > > > > > Dhanabalan> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Get perfect Email ID for your Resume. Get before others > grab.> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them > now.> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> >> Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.