points for discussion (from Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary)

[Guest guest]

Hi everybody,

 

I am Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary, the author of the article Ruling

Planets in KP... quoted by tw853 here. I have reduced interacting on

discussion forums nowadays due to time constraints. Inspite of that I

joined this forum yesterday to be in touch with KP researchers (if

anything is being done at all). Though I can't contribute to the

discussions right now, I hope to after a few months.

 

Previously the article on Ruling Planets quoted here, was hosted by

Andrew on his website which seems to be non-functional now. Those who

want to access the article can visit the following link.

 

http://www.karmicrhythms.com/pe12.htm

 

I hope to participate in some discussions here after April, since I

have too much on my plate till then.

 

Regards,

Dr. Satya Prakash

 

 

 

 

 

, " tw853 " <tw853 wrote:

>

>

> 1. The RPs in Krishnamurti Padhadhati Vol 2, Sagar Publications,

1965,

> are:

>

> 1) Day lord,

>

> 2) Moon sign lord,

>

>

> 3) Moon star lord,

>

>

> 4) Ascendent lord.

>

>

>

>

> 2. The RPs in KP Reader VI (any edition) p 123 & RP & KP, edited

by

> K. Subramanium & K. Hariharan, 1985 are:

>

> 1) Day lord,

>

> 2) Moon sign lord,

>

>

> 3) Moon star lord,

>

>

> 4) Ascendent lord

>

> 5) Ascendent star lord

>

> 6) Nodes tenenting the signs of RPs.

>

>

>

>

> 3. In KP Ruling Planets, Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary says:

>

>

> Simply put ruling planets are the planets which rule over the

> particular moment of judgement (in the case of horary/Prasna),

birth

> (in the case of natal chart), or whatever the issue maybe. They are

the

> strongest determinants of the moment. According to Krishnamurti

they

> are:

>

> Lagna star lord

> Lagna lord

> Moon star lord

> Moon sign lord and

> Weekday lord

>

> Later his students also added the Lagna sublord and Moon sublord.

In

> practice the ascendant sublord works very well. I use the Moon

sublord

> as a contender only if it is already among the first six ruling

> planets, only to eliminate the weaker ones, if too many planets

appear

> in the list of ruling planets. If Rahu or Ketu occupy a sign whose

lord

> (ruler) owns another sign, and if that planet happens to be a

ruling

> planet, the node should also be taken as a ruling planet.

>

>

> , Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear members

> > The Ruling Planets were 4 in the 1965 edition, now increased to 5

> > 1. Sign Lord of ascendent (this can be only one).

> > 2. lord of star lord of ascendent

> > 3. Sign lord of Moon

> > 4. sign lord of Moon's Star Lord

> > 5. day lord

> > 6 rahu/ketu if in the houses as above

> > Â

> > Authority KP Reader 6 Page 123Â 9th edition sept 2002

> > Â

> > here we do not go onto the House in

> > which the planent reside, or houses owned by it

> > Where Rahu is seen, it shoud have priority.i

> > Â Â

> > THERE IS NO QUESTION OF GOING FURTHER AND GETTING CONFUSED

> >

> > raichur anant

> >

> > --- On Wed, 28/1/09, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> >

> > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@

> > Re: points for discussion

> >

> > Wednesday, 28 January, 2009, 5:40 PM

> >

> > Sir,

> >

> > I have read it the same way, as you mentioned it now.

> >

> > Suppose there are 2 Planets positioned in the Lagna, then the

count of

> > RP's goes too much nearly as many as the number of the planets.

> >

> > For example all the astrologers who had sat today early morning

for

> > doing some BTR, if had taken the planets positioned in the Lagna (

> > Capricorn ) ,then there were practically no planets left, which

would

> > not be added to the RP's. In such a case the theory of using the

> planets

> > positioned in the time chart, as RP's may not work.

> >

> > best wishes,

> >

> > Bhaskar.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Bhaskar

> > > Please read my point number one as below

> > > Some KP stalwarts have taken the planets posited in the lagna

of the

> > time chart also included in the Ruling Planets list for birth time

> > rectification.

> > > Dhanabalan

> > >

> > > --- On Mon, 1/26/09, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> > >

> > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@

> > > Re: points for discussion

> > >

> > > Monday, January 26, 2009, 5:57 PM

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Dhanabalanji,

> > > My observations in Blue.

> > > > Some KP stalwarts have taken the planets posited in the time

chart

> > also included in the Ruling Planets list for birth time

rectification.

> > > Already the Ruling Planets are 4 ( And some take 5, if the

> > Asc.StarLord is also taken ), and if the planets posited in the

time

> > chart are also taken for BTR, then what remains actually ?

> > > >

> > > > Badhaka sthana is rasi based and not bhava based. Even in KP,

the

> > bhathaka sthana has to be calculated only on the basis of rasi

and not

> > on bhava.

> > > This has been discussed some weeks back in the group. I had

> questioned

> > the seniors here about this. We look for the significations of

the 9th

> > Cusp or any other Cusp as per SubLord, but we keep the Badhak

Lord as

> > same for the 9th Lord in Fixed sign, or the other Lords as fixed

for

> > Earthy, Dual and watery signs.

> > > >

> > > > Day lord in RP: Day is calculated from sunrise to sunrise.

> > > This must be, but are all softwares who mention the RP's, are

based

> > as Sunrise to Sunrise when mentioning the Day Lord ?

> > > >

> > > > Marriage timing: Planets in the star or sub of 7th cuspal

starlord

> > and sublord.

> > > No comments.

> > > >

> > > > Birth time: Experiment shows that the Umblical card cutting

time

> > need not coincide with astrological birth time. Even for the exact

> card

> > cutting time, the birth time has to be rectified with ruling

planets.

> > >

> > > This also has been discussed about previously, and I suppose the

> > conclusion arrived at, was the first cry or inhalation of air in

the

> > baby must be considered as the correct Birth time.

> > > kind regards,

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ---

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Dear sir,it is our pleasure to have you in our forum. Your article on RP is quite informative and interesting.Your consistent participation in this form will be more useful to all.Expecting the same.

Kind Note:Sir, when I visited the site and happened to go through the example on Allan's call. In that I have found in the RP that Moon is in Cancer but the Moon sign lord is noted as Saturn. Also noted as Saturn is strong as it appears twice. I doubt if I am wrong somewhere or missed something. It might be a typo also.This I just thought and sent my findings. Pls forgive me if I am wrong.

Thanks and RegardsAdithI just reproduce the content here: The Lagna was 5 degrees 34 minutes Capricorn (I used

KP ayanamsa). Moon was in Cancer 15 degrees 1 minute and the weekday

Tuesday. So the Ruling planets are:

Saturn (lagna lord)

Sun (lagna nakshatra lord)

Mercury (Lagna sublord)

Saturn (Moon sign lord)

Jupiter (moon nakshatra lord)

Mars (Weekday lord)

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:01 AM, backtocosmicroots <backtocosmicroots wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hi everybody,

 

I am Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary, the author of the article Ruling

Planets in KP... quoted by tw853 here. I have reduced interacting on

discussion forums nowadays due to time constraints. Inspite of that I

joined this forum yesterday to be in touch with KP researchers (if

anything is being done at all). Though I can't contribute to the

discussions right now, I hope to after a few months.

 

Previously the article on Ruling Planets quoted here, was hosted by

Andrew on his website which seems to be non-functional now. Those who

want to access the article can visit the following link.

 

http://www.karmicrhythms.com/pe12.htm

 

I hope to participate in some discussions here after April, since I

have too much on my plate till then.

 

Regards,

Dr. Satya Prakash

 

, " tw853 " <tw853 wrote:

>

>

> 1. The RPs in Krishnamurti Padhadhati Vol 2, Sagar Publications,

1965,

> are:

>

> 1) Day lord,

>

> 2) Moon sign lord,

>

>

> 3) Moon star lord,

>

>

> 4) Ascendent lord.

>

>

>

>

> 2. The RPs in KP Reader VI (any edition) p 123 & RP & KP, edited

by

> K. Subramanium & K. Hariharan, 1985 are:

>

> 1) Day lord,

>

> 2) Moon sign lord,

>

>

> 3) Moon star lord,

>

>

> 4) Ascendent lord

>

> 5) Ascendent star lord

>

> 6) Nodes tenenting the signs of RPs.

>

>

>

>

> 3. In KP Ruling Planets, Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary says:

>

>

> Simply put ruling planets are the planets which rule over the

> particular moment of judgement (in the case of horary/Prasna),

birth

> (in the case of natal chart), or whatever the issue maybe. They are

the

> strongest determinants of the moment. According to Krishnamurti

they

> are:

>

> Lagna star lord

> Lagna lord

> Moon star lord

> Moon sign lord and

> Weekday lord

>

> Later his students also added the Lagna sublord and Moon sublord.

In

> practice the ascendant sublord works very well. I use the Moon

sublord

> as a contender only if it is already among the first six ruling

> planets, only to eliminate the weaker ones, if too many planets

appear

> in the list of ruling planets. If Rahu or Ketu occupy a sign whose

lord

> (ruler) owns another sign, and if that planet happens to be a

ruling

> planet, the node should also be taken as a ruling planet.

>

>

> , Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear members

> > The Ruling Planets were 4 in the 1965 edition, now increased to 5

> > 1. Sign Lord of ascendent (this can be only one).

> > 2. lord of star lord of ascendent

> > 3. Sign lord of Moon

> > 4. sign lord of Moon's Star Lord

> > 5. day lord

> > 6 rahu/ketu if in the houses as above

> > Â

> > Authority KP Reader 6 Page 123Â 9th edition sept 2002

> > Â

> > here we do not go onto the House in

> > which the planent reside, or houses owned by it

> > Where Rahu is seen, it shoud have priority.i

> > Â Â

> > THERE IS NO QUESTION OF GOING FURTHER AND GETTING CONFUSED

> >

> > raichur anant

> >

> > --- On Wed, 28/1/09, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> >

> > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@

> > Re: points for discussion

> >

> > Wednesday, 28 January, 2009, 5:40 PM

> >

> > Sir,

> >

> > I have read it the same way, as you mentioned it now.

> >

> > Suppose there are 2 Planets positioned in the Lagna, then the

count of

> > RP's goes too much nearly as many as the number of the planets.

> >

> > For example all the astrologers who had sat today early morning

for

> > doing some BTR, if had taken the planets positioned in the Lagna (

> > Capricorn ) ,then there were practically no planets left, which

would

> > not be added to the RP's. In such a case the theory of using the

> planets

> > positioned in the time chart, as RP's may not work.

> >

> > best wishes,

> >

> > Bhaskar.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Bhaskar

> > > Please read my point number one as below

> > > Some KP stalwarts have taken the planets posited in the lagna

of the

> > time chart also included in the Ruling Planets list for birth time

> > rectification.

> > > Dhanabalan

> > >

> > > --- On Mon, 1/26/09, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> > >

> > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@

> > > Re: points for discussion

> > >

> > > Monday, January 26, 2009, 5:57 PM

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Dhanabalanji,

> > > My observations in Blue.

> > > > Some KP stalwarts have taken the planets posited in the time

chart

> > also included in the Ruling Planets list for birth time

rectification.

> > > Already the Ruling Planets are 4 ( And some take 5, if the

> > Asc.StarLord is also taken ), and if the planets posited in the

time

> > chart are also taken for BTR, then what remains actually ?

> > > >

> > > > Badhaka sthana is rasi based and not bhava based. Even in KP,

the

> > bhathaka sthana has to be calculated only on the basis of rasi

and not

> > on bhava.

> > > This has been discussed some weeks back in the group. I had

> questioned

> > the seniors here about this. We look for the significations of

the 9th

> > Cusp or any other Cusp as per SubLord, but we keep the Badhak

Lord as

> > same for the 9th Lord in Fixed sign, or the other Lords as fixed

for

> > Earthy, Dual and watery signs.

> > > >

> > > > Day lord in RP: Day is calculated from sunrise to sunrise.

> > > This must be, but are all softwares who mention the RP's, are

based

> > as Sunrise to Sunrise when mentioning the Day Lord ?

> > > >

> > > > Marriage timing: Planets in the star or sub of 7th cuspal

starlord

> > and sublord.

> > > No comments.

> > > >

> > > > Birth time: Experiment shows that the Umblical card cutting

time

> > need not coincide with astrological birth time. Even for the exact

> card

> > cutting time, the birth time has to be rectified with ruling

planets.

> > >

> > > This also has been discussed about previously, and I suppose the

> > conclusion arrived at, was the first cry or inhalation of air in

the

> > baby must be considered as the correct Birth time.

> > > kind regards,

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ---

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Dear Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary,

 

Your nice article on KP RPs has been mentioned many times (Msg# 1552/

2380/ 4884/ 5054) in this Group. Your KP contribution will be helpful

for KP learners.

 

Even though namsas are not considered in KP, your Dasama article is

comprehensive and " Even malefics in Kendras are not bad for career. "

is worthy to note in Vedic study. A similar article with a lot of

examples had also been noticed a few years back.

 

http://members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags is no more active and so it

may be replaced with your given new link in Punit ji's KP Wiki.

 

Regards,

 

tw

 

 

 

, " backtocosmicroots "

<backtocosmicroots wrote:

>

>

> Hi everybody,

>

> I am Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary, the author of the article Ruling

> Planets in KP... quoted by tw853 here. I have reduced interacting on

> discussion forums nowadays due to time constraints. Inspite of that I

> joined this forum yesterday to be in touch with KP researchers (if

> anything is being done at all). Though I can't contribute to the

> discussions right now, I hope to after a few months.

>

> Previously the article on Ruling Planets quoted here, was hosted by

> Andrew on his website which seems to be non-functional now. Those who

> want to access the article can visit the following link.

>

> http://www.karmicrhythms.com/pe12.htm

>

> I hope to participate in some discussions here after April, since I

> have too much on my plate till then.

>

> Regards,

> Dr. Satya Prakash

>

>

>

>

>

> , " tw853 " <tw853@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > 1. The RPs in Krishnamurti Padhadhati Vol 2, Sagar Publications,

> 1965,

> > are:

> >

> > 1) Day lord,

> >

> > 2) Moon sign lord,

> >

> >

> > 3) Moon star lord,

> >

> >

> > 4) Ascendent lord.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > 2. The RPs in KP Reader VI (any edition) p 123 & RP & KP, edited

> by

> > K. Subramanium & K. Hariharan, 1985 are:

> >

> > 1) Day lord,

> >

> > 2) Moon sign lord,

> >

> >

> > 3) Moon star lord,

> >

> >

> > 4) Ascendent lord

> >

> > 5) Ascendent star lord

> >

> > 6) Nodes tenenting the signs of RPs.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > 3. In KP Ruling Planets, Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary says:

> >

> >

> > Simply put ruling planets are the planets which rule over the

> > particular moment of judgement (in the case of horary/Prasna),

> birth

> > (in the case of natal chart), or whatever the issue maybe. They are

> the

> > strongest determinants of the moment. According to Krishnamurti

> they

> > are:

> >

> > Lagna star lord

> > Lagna lord

> > Moon star lord

> > Moon sign lord and

> > Weekday lord

> >

> > Later his students also added the Lagna sublord and Moon sublord.

> In

> > practice the ascendant sublord works very well. I use the Moon

> sublord

> > as a contender only if it is already among the first six ruling

> > planets, only to eliminate the weaker ones, if too many planets

> appear

> > in the list of ruling planets. If Rahu or Ketu occupy a sign whose

> lord

> > (ruler) owns another sign, and if that planet happens to be a

> ruling

> > planet, the node should also be taken as a ruling planet.

> >

> >

> > , Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear members

> > > The Ruling Planets were 4 in the 1965 edition, now increased to 5

> > > 1. Sign Lord of ascendent (this can be only one).

> > > 2. lord of star lord of ascendent

> > > 3. Sign lord of Moon

> > > 4. sign lord of Moon's Star Lord

> > > 5. day lord

> > > 6 rahu/ketu if in the houses as above

> > > Â

> > > Authority KP Reader 6 Page 123Â 9th edition sept 2002

> > > Â

> > > here we do not go onto the House in

> > > which the planent reside, or houses owned by it

> > > Where Rahu is seen, it shoud have priority.i

> > > Â Â

> > > THERE IS NO QUESTION OF GOING FURTHER AND GETTING CONFUSED

> > >

> > > raichur anant

> > >

> > > --- On Wed, 28/1/09, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> > >

> > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@

> > > Re: points for discussion

> > >

> > > Wednesday, 28 January, 2009, 5:40 PM

> > >

> > > Sir,

> > >

> > > I have read it the same way, as you mentioned it now.

> > >

> > > Suppose there are 2 Planets positioned in the Lagna, then the

> count of

> > > RP's goes too much nearly as many as the number of the planets.

> > >

> > > For example all the astrologers who had sat today early morning

> for

> > > doing some BTR, if had taken the planets positioned in the Lagna (

> > > Capricorn ) ,then there were practically no planets left, which

> would

> > > not be added to the RP's. In such a case the theory of using the

> > planets

> > > positioned in the time chart, as RP's may not work.

> > >

> > > best wishes,

> > >

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > , Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Bhaskar

> > > > Please read my point number one as below

> > > > Some KP stalwarts have taken the planets posited in the lagna

> of the

> > > time chart also included in the Ruling Planets list for birth time

> > > rectification.

> > > > Dhanabalan

> > > >

> > > > --- On Mon, 1/26/09, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@

> > > > Re: points for discussion

> > > >

> > > > Monday, January 26, 2009, 5:57 PM

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Dhanabalanji,

> > > > My observations in Blue.

> > > > > Some KP stalwarts have taken the planets posited in the time

> chart

> > > also included in the Ruling Planets list for birth time

> rectification.

> > > > Already the Ruling Planets are 4 ( And some take 5, if the

> > > Asc.StarLord is also taken ), and if the planets posited in the

> time

> > > chart are also taken for BTR, then what remains actually ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Badhaka sthana is rasi based and not bhava based. Even in KP,

> the

> > > bhathaka sthana has to be calculated only on the basis of rasi

> and not

> > > on bhava.

> > > > This has been discussed some weeks back in the group. I had

> > questioned

> > > the seniors here about this. We look for the significations of

> the 9th

> > > Cusp or any other Cusp as per SubLord, but we keep the Badhak

> Lord as

> > > same for the 9th Lord in Fixed sign, or the other Lords as fixed

> for

> > > Earthy, Dual and watery signs.

> > > > >

> > > > > Day lord in RP: Day is calculated from sunrise to sunrise.

> > > > This must be, but are all softwares who mention the RP's, are

> based

> > > as Sunrise to Sunrise when mentioning the Day Lord ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Marriage timing: Planets in the star or sub of 7th cuspal

> starlord

> > > and sublord.

> > > > No comments.

> > > > >

> > > > > Birth time: Experiment shows that the Umblical card cutting

> time

> > > need not coincide with astrological birth time. Even for the exact

> > card

> > > cutting time, the birth time has to be rectified with ruling

> planets.

> > > >

> > > > This also has been discussed about previously, and I suppose the

> > > conclusion arrived at, was the first cry or inhalation of air in

> the

> > > baby must be considered as the correct Birth time.

> > > > kind regards,

> > > > Bhaskar.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ---

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

Dear Tw ji, replaced old URL with the new one on the resource page - http://logy.astrosage.com/Home/resourcesDear Dr. Satya Praskash ji, welcome to the forum and appreciate your contribution. I hope we will have great learning together. Looking forward to your participation.

Thanks & Regards,Punit PandeyOn Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:00 AM, tw853 <tw853 wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary,

 

Your nice article on KP RPs has been mentioned many times (Msg# 1552/

2380/ 4884/ 5054) in this Group. Your KP contribution will be helpful

for KP learners.

 

Even though namsas are not considered in KP, your Dasama article is

comprehensive and " Even malefics in Kendras are not bad for career. "

is worthy to note in Vedic study. A similar article with a lot of

examples had also been noticed a few years back.

 

http://members.optusnet.com.au/skinbags is no more active and so it

may be replaced with your given new link in Punit ji's KP Wiki.

 

Regards,

 

tw

 

, " backtocosmicroots "

<backtocosmicroots wrote:

>

>

> Hi everybody,

>

> I am Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary, the author of the article Ruling

> Planets in KP... quoted by tw853 here. I have reduced interacting on

> discussion forums nowadays due to time constraints. Inspite of that I

> joined this forum yesterday to be in touch with KP researchers (if

> anything is being done at all). Though I can't contribute to the

> discussions right now, I hope to after a few months.

>

> Previously the article on Ruling Planets quoted here, was hosted by

> Andrew on his website which seems to be non-functional now. Those who

> want to access the article can visit the following link.

>

> http://www.karmicrhythms.com/pe12.htm

>

> I hope to participate in some discussions here after April, since I

> have too much on my plate till then.

>

> Regards,

> Dr. Satya Prakash

>

>

>

>

>

> , " tw853 " <tw853@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > 1. The RPs in Krishnamurti Padhadhati Vol 2, Sagar Publications,

> 1965,

> > are:

> >

> > 1) Day lord,

> >

> > 2) Moon sign lord,

> >

> >

> > 3) Moon star lord,

> >

> >

> > 4) Ascendent lord.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > 2. The RPs in KP Reader VI (any edition) p 123 & RP & KP, edited

> by

> > K. Subramanium & K. Hariharan, 1985 are:

> >

> > 1) Day lord,

> >

> > 2) Moon sign lord,

> >

> >

> > 3) Moon star lord,

> >

> >

> > 4) Ascendent lord

> >

> > 5) Ascendent star lord

> >

> > 6) Nodes tenenting the signs of RPs.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > 3. In KP Ruling Planets, Dr. Satya Prakash Choudhary says:

> >

> >

> > Simply put ruling planets are the planets which rule over the

> > particular moment of judgement (in the case of horary/Prasna),

> birth

> > (in the case of natal chart), or whatever the issue maybe. They are

> the

> > strongest determinants of the moment. According to Krishnamurti

> they

> > are:

> >

> > Lagna star lord

> > Lagna lord

> > Moon star lord

> > Moon sign lord and

> > Weekday lord

> >

> > Later his students also added the Lagna sublord and Moon sublord.

> In

> > practice the ascendant sublord works very well. I use the Moon

> sublord

> > as a contender only if it is already among the first six ruling

> > planets, only to eliminate the weaker ones, if too many planets

> appear

> > in the list of ruling planets. If Rahu or Ketu occupy a sign whose

> lord

> > (ruler) owns another sign, and if that planet happens to be a

> ruling

> > planet, the node should also be taken as a ruling planet.

> >

> >

> > , Raichur-a-r <raichurar@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear members

> > > The Ruling Planets were 4 in the 1965 edition, now increased to 5

> > > 1. Sign Lord of ascendent (this can be only one).

> > > 2. lord of star lord of ascendent

> > > 3. Sign lord of Moon

> > > 4. sign lord of Moon's Star Lord

> > > 5. day lord

> > > 6 rahu/ketu if in the houses as above

> > > Â

> > > Authority KP Reader 6 Page 123Â 9th edition sept 2002

> > > Â

> > > here we do not go onto the House in

> > > which the planent reside, or houses owned by it

> > > Where Rahu is seen, it shoud have priority.i

> > > Â Â

> > > THERE IS NO QUESTION OF GOING FURTHER AND GETTING CONFUSED

> > >

> > > raichur anant

> > >

> > > --- On Wed, 28/1/09, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> > >

> > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@

> > > Re: points for discussion

> > >

> > > Wednesday, 28 January, 2009, 5:40 PM

> > >

> > > Sir,

> > >

> > > I have read it the same way, as you mentioned it now.

> > >

> > > Suppose there are 2 Planets positioned in the Lagna, then the

> count of

> > > RP's goes too much nearly as many as the number of the planets.

> > >

> > > For example all the astrologers who had sat today early morning

> for

> > > doing some BTR, if had taken the planets positioned in the Lagna (

> > > Capricorn ) ,then there were practically no planets left, which

> would

> > > not be added to the RP's. In such a case the theory of using the

> > planets

> > > positioned in the time chart, as RP's may not work.

> > >

> > > best wishes,

> > >

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > , Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Bhaskar

> > > > Please read my point number one as below

> > > > Some KP stalwarts have taken the planets posited in the lagna

> of the

> > > time chart also included in the Ruling Planets list for birth time

> > > rectification.

> > > > Dhanabalan

> > > >

> > > > --- On Mon, 1/26/09, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@

> > > > Re: points for discussion

> > > >

> > > > Monday, January 26, 2009, 5:57 PM

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Dhanabalanji,

> > > > My observations in Blue.

> > > > > Some KP stalwarts have taken the planets posited in the time

> chart

> > > also included in the Ruling Planets list for birth time

> rectification.

> > > > Already the Ruling Planets are 4 ( And some take 5, if the

> > > Asc.StarLord is also taken ), and if the planets posited in the

> time

> > > chart are also taken for BTR, then what remains actually ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Badhaka sthana is rasi based and not bhava based. Even in KP,

> the

> > > bhathaka sthana has to be calculated only on the basis of rasi

> and not

> > > on bhava.

> > > > This has been discussed some weeks back in the group. I had

> > questioned

> > > the seniors here about this. We look for the significations of

> the 9th

> > > Cusp or any other Cusp as per SubLord, but we keep the Badhak

> Lord as

> > > same for the 9th Lord in Fixed sign, or the other Lords as fixed

> for

> > > Earthy, Dual and watery signs.

> > > > >

> > > > > Day lord in RP: Day is calculated from sunrise to sunrise.

> > > > This must be, but are all softwares who mention the RP's, are

> based

> > > as Sunrise to Sunrise when mentioning the Day Lord ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Marriage timing: Planets in the star or sub of 7th cuspal

> starlord

> > > and sublord.

> > > > No comments.

> > > > >

> > > > > Birth time: Experiment shows that the Umblical card cutting

> time

> > > need not coincide with astrological birth time. Even for the exact

> > card

> > > cutting time, the birth time has to be rectified with ruling

> planets.

> > > >

> > > > This also has been discussed about previously, and I suppose the

> > > conclusion arrived at, was the first cry or inhalation of air in

> the

> > > baby must be considered as the correct Birth time.

> > > > kind regards,

> > > > Bhaskar.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ---

> > >

> > >