Guest guest Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 KP Reader III, Old Edition part 2, page 9-10 (New Edition page 161-2) Bhadhaka Sthana According to Hindus, Bhadhaka Sthana Adhipathis are the worst malefics who will never hesitate to put an end to one's life. Of the twelve signs, Aries, Cancer, Libra and Capricorn are the movble-chara-signs, and the 11th house counted therefrom are Bhadhaka Sthanas i.e., to Aries born, Aquarius is the Bhadhakasthana and the lord of Aquarius is the Bhadhakasthana Adhipathi . To Cancer-born, Taurus is the Bhadhakasthana and the lord of Tarus, Venus is the Bhadhakasthana Adhipathi to Cancer borns. Similarly to Libra, the sign Leo and the Luminary Sun and to Capricorn, the sign Scorpio and its lord, Mars are the Bhadhakasthana and Bhadhakasthana Adhipathis. For people born in fixed signs Taurus, Leo,Scorpio and Aquarirus, the 9th sign from those houses are the Bhadhakasthanas and their lords are Bhadhakasthana Adhipathis. For people born in common signs Gemini, Virgo, Sagittarius and Pisces, the 7th sign therefrom and the lords of those houses are the Bhadhakasthanas and Bhadhakasthana Adhipathis. How to Judge Of all the planets, those which occupy the constellation of the occupants of Bhadhaka Sthana are the most evil. Next, the occupants of Bhadhaka sthana; of the planets occupying the constellation of the lord of the Bhadhakasthana, and the lord of that evil sign, those in the constellation are stronger. Also, the planets conjoined with them or being aspected by them acquire unfavorable effects. Mr. Sanjay Rath Räsi Bädhaka (Obstruction by Sign) Every sign has a sign of obstruction called Bädhaka Räsi and its lord is called Bädhakesa. This is given in the following Table. For example, if the Lagna is Gemini, then the Bädhaka sign is Sagittarius and its Lord Jupiter becomes the Bädhakesa. Table 1: Bädhaka Sign Räsi Bädhaka Räsi Bädhakesa Aries Aquarius Rahu & Saturn Taurus Capricorn Saturn Gemini Sagittarius Jupiter Cancer Taurus Venus Leo Aries Mars Virgo Pisces Jupiter Libra Leo Sun Scorpio Cancer Moon Sagittarius Gemini Mercury Capricorn Scorpio Ketu & Mars Aquarius Libra Venus Pisces Virgo Mercury Mr. Sarajit In Prasna Marga, Harihara has given the analysis of an horoscope based on Badhaka point of view. He says that for all movable signs, the 11th house therefrom is the badhaka sthana, for all fixed signs, the 9th therefrom are their badhakasthana and for all the dual signs, the 7th therefrom are their badkasthanas. Thus for the 12 signs of the zodiac, the badhakasthanas are as shown in the columns 1 & 2 of the above Table.Dr. Adhwal The Badhaka lord creates obstacles. It cannot deny an event on its own but will certainly create difficulties and obstacles. Badhaka should be determined as follows :- (a) For moveable sign as ascendant the 11th house in Badhak house and 11th lord adhakapati or Badhaka lord. For fixed signs as ascendant the 9th house is Badhaka house and its lord the Badhaka lord. For dual signs as ascendant the 7th house is the Badhaka and the 7th lord the Badhaka lord. From this information we derive the Badhaka planets for different ascendants as follows : Ascendant Badhaka Planet Aries 11th lord Saturn Taurus 9th lord Saturn Gemini 7th lord Jupiter Cancer 11th lord Venus Leo 9th lord Mars Virgo 7th lord Jupiter Libra 11th lord Sun Scorpio 9th lord Moon Sagittarius 7th lord Mercury Capricorn 11th lord Mars Aquarius 9th lord Venus Pisces 7th lord Mercury Jataka Parijata An additional condition: the badhaka lord for a particular lagana should be treated as an actual badhaka, if it simultaneously be the lord of the house tenanted by Mandi (Gulika) or Kharesha (Lord of 22 nd drekkana from the lagna). , "Prem Chopra" <pramchopra1964 wrote:>> ~~~ Om Shree Ganeshaaye Namaha ~~~> > Dear tw> > You are right as per Reader VI on Page 154 Query: How long will One Live ?> Para 2: If the Asc is in a movable sign, the 11th house is the Badhaksthana,> if the Asc Falls in a Fixed sign, 9th house is the badhakasthana, if the Asc> falls in a common sign, the 7th house is the Badhakasthana. Page 155 Para 2> Krishnamurti Padhadhati: Note the Sub-Lord of the Asc. If he is depositated> in the Star of the significators of Badhakasthana and Marakasthana the life> will be short after the time of judgement. So that means there is still more> conditions to be observed frist before one can reach to decision making and> that is most important.> According to the strength of the lord of star in which the Sub Lord of the> Asc (OR related House) is deposited, one is to fix the dasha and the sub> periods. Here it is clearly given that StarLord of Sub will decide that what> the native will have in its destiny. The properties of that Sign will give> the clue in which the starlord is placed in Today's horary chart. Hope this> will clear more of the consequence.> > Thanks> > Tem Pram Chopra> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:30 AM, tw853 tw853 wrote:> > >> > Dear Friend,> >> > It seems that you're saying "The KP rules are not yet complete." without> > thoroughly and fully studying the KP Readers, for instance about> > Bhdhaka in KP Reader III, to take transit at the place where the native> > is currently located in KP Reader V, 5th house for materialisation of> > love affair, not marriage in KP Reader VI.> >> > Regards,> >> > tw> >> > <%40>, Luther> > Rath rathluther@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Bhaskarji,> > > Namaskar.> > > I do agree to what you have expressed in your message. Prof. KSK was> > also a traditional astrologer. The padhati propounded by him heils from> > traditional only. So traditional system cannot be winded up. The KP> > rules are not yet complete. We are unable to reach to conclusion in all> > cases. So I do not think it unholy if we take help of Vadic of> > Traditional till that time when KP rules can give out all or at least 90> > %. Since this is a KP group every one of us wishes that every thing be> > done following KP. We have to remember while doing so we are not lost> > some where. Substanciation or fortification of KP by taking help of> > other syatem should not be condemned but welcomed if it is valuable.> > > With regards.> > > Dr. Luther Rath> > >> > > --- On Mon, 12/15/08, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:> > >> > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@> > > Re: Badhak for Leo ? Mars - Or the 9th Sub Lord> > ???> > > <%40>> > > Monday, December 15, 2008, 5:55 PM> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Satish ji,> > > You may find this funny -> > > I have been mixing KP, as well as Traditional, as well as Lal Kitab> > since few months , and now learning Western Progressions, which also I> > will mix in future. I will also mix Fixed stars in future. Now does all> > this sound impossible sacrilgeous and unholy ?> > > Learning many systems does not matter, as long as one knows what to> > mix and how much to mix and where to mix and uptil what stage to mix.> > > When you find the 2nd Cusp afflicted. The Planet in the 2nd Cusp> > afflicted and also the Planet owning the 2nd Cusp afflicted, you come to> > a important decesion about the 2nd Cusp, to tell the native.> > > In same way when I find the same result using a number of approaches> > for what subject matter I am looking for, it makes my job easier and> > more accurate.> > > I have done Traditional astrology for many years, and Kp for few> > years, so I believe I have the capacity to make a good mix. And of> > course we will always remain a eternal student because to become a> > Master of one single approach , there is no scale of measure to define> > the same.> > > I still learn from veterans like Shri Lajmiji and Sunilji and> > Raichurji and Lutherji and so many others. So this learning process is a> > ongoing and continous one. But I agree that for new students, a mix of 2> > systems is not healthy , but only confusing.> > > best wishes,> > > Bhaskar.> > >> > >> > > @gro ups.com, R Satish <rsatish1942@ ...> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Punitji,> > > >> > > > My reasoning is simple. We are in the process of> > learning abranch of astrology different from traditional .As students,> > half knowledge can confuse. Veterans like you and other Seniors, perhaps> > do tackle any astrological puzzle on more than 2 levels.> > > >> > > > Regards,> > > >> > > > Satish> > > >> > > > --- On Mon, 12/15/08, Punit Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > > >> > > > Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > Re: Badhak for Leo ? Mars - Or the 9th Sub> > Lord ???> > > > @gro ups.com> > > > Monday, December 15, 2008, 12:56 PM> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Satish ji,> > > >> > > > I disagree with your last statement that usage of KP with> > traditional is not 'desireable. ' I personally have got good results> > combining both the branches. Though I am sure that combining both the> > systems is confusing and we have to experiment a lot to understand what> > all features of both the systems can work together and what all cannot.> > > >> > > > Badhakas, though used only for judging longevity by Shri KSK, is> > being used by KP astrologers for all purposes now a days. Especially, I> > see many references to Badhakas in "AstroSecrets and Krishanmurti> > Paddhati" by Shari Shanmugam and KMS.> > > >> > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > >> > > > Punit Pandey> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 8:20 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ >> > wrote:> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Bhaskara Jyotish garu,> > > >> > > > In KP system the terms, Karakas and badhakas are not used,these> > coming under the domain of Vedic astrology. Not withstanding this many> > astrologers combine these two systems. No planet is totally good or bad> > in KP, but is subject to its starlord/sublord significations.> > > >> > > > Joining these two syatems,KP/Vedic is interesting but not> > desirable.> > > >> > > > Regards,> > > >> > > > Satish> > > >> > > > --- On Sun, 12/14/08, sampa mitra <sampa_mitra2000@ .co. in>> > wrote:> > > >> > > > sampa mitra <sampa_mitra2000@ .co. in>> > > > Re: Badhak for Leo ? Mars - Or the 9th Sub> > Lord ???> > > >> > > > @gro ups.com> > > > Sunday, December 14, 2008, 5:39 PM> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > dear bhaskar,> > > > u should judge for father 9th and sun also(both)> > > > for mother moon and 4th house both> > > > ur 2nd question is for leo asc, mars is badhakaor not?> > > > answer is mars is not badhaka, aries is badhaka sthana, if any> > planet posited in 9th bhaba, in aries, they will give the result for> > badhaka if the question arise for longivity otherwise not,> > > > thanx> > > > sampa> > > >> > > > --- On Sun, 14/12/08, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> wrote:> > > >> > > >> > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in>> > > > Badhak for Leo ? Mars - Or the 9th Sub Lord> > ???> > > > @gro ups.com> > > >> > > > Sunday, 14 December, 2008, 12:20 PM> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Masters of KP> > > >> > > > I have a few doubts as under, which please be kind enought to clear.> > > >> > > > 1) Which planet represents Mother and Father for a Leo Ascendant ?> > > > Is it Mars who represents both 4th and 9th house ? In that case how> > > > to differentiate the results ? Or should we add the karaka Sun and> > Moon to confirm the results ? Or should we see the 4th SL for Mother to> > represent Mother and the 9th SL to represent Father ?> > > >> > > > 2) In case you advise to check the Sub Lords of the 4th and 9th> > Cusp-> > > > If we have to check the Sub Lords of the 4th and 9th cusp to> > represent Mother and Father repsectively, then why must we keep Mars> > fixed, as the Badhak Lord in our studies for a Fixed ascendant Like Leo> > ??? Why should we not see the 9th Sub Lord to represent the badhak Lord> > , just asI would be advised to check the 9th Sublord to go for> > significations of father or 4th Sub Lord for mother, or 3rd for younger> > brother ?> > > >> > > > 3) When the other significating planets become variable as per the> > > > Sub Lords of the Cusps, then why must we hold the 9th Raashi Lord> > Mars, always as fixed , to be the badhak Lord ?> > > >> > > > 4) In case the 9th Lord Mars is badhak, and the 4th and 9th Lord> > also being Mars for Leo ascendant, does it imply that for a Leo> > ascendant Mother and Father -areas would always be full of badhas, and> > so will be the education or domestic bliss or the significations of the> > 9th House ?> > > >> > > > 5) Actually what will Mars represent for a Leo Ascendant ?> > > > Mother ?> > > > Father ?> > > > Brother ?> > > > Badhak Lord ?> > > > Yogkaraka ?> > > >> > > > 6) Since the 5th Lord of Leo ascendant or the Lord of Love is always> > going to be Jupiter whgo is always going to be also the Lord of the 8th> > House, then should we presume that the Leo nativity is never going to be> > successfull in his Love affairs ? Or shall we forget Jupiter all this> > and just concentrate on the 5th Cusp SubLord which ever planet it may> > be, to judge the promise of Love in the natives Life ?> > > >> > > > regards,> > > > Bhaskar.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.> > > >> > >> >> > > >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.