Guest guest Posted October 18, 2008 Report Share Posted October 18, 2008 Msg#19547 may be helpful. , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > > Dear all, > > No planet is good or bad. They behave benefic or malefic only as per > what they are supposed to give us , as per our purva karmas. > > Giving justice to Mars, I would say that without a averagely strong > Mars, one will have difficulty in creation or procreation. The > agression of Mars, is certainly necessary in the right levels , for one > to copulate. > > Karma ( Action ) is denoted by Mangala. Remember where does the Mars > get exalted in the natural Kundli ? In the 10th house of Saturn, > Capricorn. Saturn certainly loves to reward those who do their Karmas > properly through its ownership pf the 11th, Aquarius. Karma brings > welfare. karma is kartavya. Without fulfilling ones Kartavya ( Duties ) > one cannot be happy in life. > > Wherever one finds dispute in land, property, loss of affinity with > brother or wife, the result is due to amangala. > > A shubh Mangal is " Rinantaka " or tne ender of rins ( Debts ). Shubh > mangala is related to earthly possessions and stands for everything > produced from the earth ( Bhoomi). > > Karma connotes to the idea of 'sangram'. For instance challenge of > Life. Karma arises from " Kama " . Under tamoguna ( Tamo nakshatras ) > it will lead to blind impulsive actions, bloodsheds, might to win, > actions to yield power etc. > > An ashubha mangal represents obstructions to fulfillment of Kama. It > denotes loss or seperation from wife or husband, imcompatibilities in > relations, partner, and not in good relations with brothers. > > Remember that the 8th house is denoted by the Sign Scorpio owned by > Mars, a highly mystical and sexual sign , denoting secrecy . Therefore > Mars, is certainly related to Sex, but pure or clandestine, open or > secret, with wife or with paramour, powerful or powerless, will all > depend on the strength or affliction of Mars. > > Therefore as such Mars cannot be ruled out for happiness in a married > couples Life, and the knowledge which comes from the traditional Rishi > Munis , is without doubt, a great treasure for us. > > best wishes, > > Bhaskar. > > > > , " sujatkaram " <sujatkaram@> wrote: > > > > Respected members, > > Sir, > > As a student of astrology I would like to offer my comments on > > this topic.Let all of us clearly understand that these are thoughts > > of a student and so might be immature. > > Mars is considered a symbol of physical voilence, aggression -both > > physical as well as psycological- and to a great degree represents > > lack of tender emotions. In married life these characteristics are > > undesirable as those are likely to ruin the marriage. > > 12th house stands for shaiyya-sukha, 1st house for one,s > > nature/character,4th house for happiness at home and homely affairs, > > 7th and 8th houses for sex-related matters.All these houses can be > > spoiled by Mars, its characteristics are not conducive to these > > houses. This, I believe, must be the reason why we call it Mars, > > Dosha. > > In traditional astrology it is considered that a planet > > strongly gives " Phalams " of the house it occupies, and so Mars is not > > desired in these houses. > > I have not read the " Readers. " Has our revered Guruji anywhere > > said that MarsDosha does not exist? > > In my opinion, in KP, only the method of judging the Mars, > > Dosha may differ.We consider that a planet strongly gives results of > > its Starlord. So the positions in which mars happens to be a strong > > significator of the above houses should be considered similar to mars > > dosha. > > Comments and corrections from veterans and students alike are > > welcome. > > regards, > > sujat. , " Bhaskar " > > bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri Ramanaji, > > > > > > You are right partly. But in traditional astrology too, there are > > many > > > rules for Dosha bhanga, but in this busy world most of the > > astrologers > > > do not have time to see the " Dosha Bhanga " areas. Earning Quick > > money, > > > 2 minute noodles, 5 Minutes stirrable Chicken Soup from packets, is > > the > > > order of the day. The times are changing. KP astrologers are still a > > > better lot. Otherwise normally people pick up just the Mars house > > > placement in the chart without looking at the other factors and Lo > > and > > > behold the smart and intelligent astrologer is quick to exclaim and > > > announce " Sir this kundli has a Mars dosha " . After some money > > changing > > > hands, the Mars dosha goes to " Babaji ke ghar " , and the sanction > > is > > > given to the couple to " go ahead and marry " . > > > > > > We acnnot blame the astrologers wholely. Not many enquirists have > > the > > > time, capacity to sit for few hours, or the inclinations to pay a > > > comfortable sum of fees as remunerations, so what will the > > astrologer do > > > ? He has to finish as fast as he can, to serve the next customer. > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Ramani " <kadavasalramani@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sri Bhaskar, > > > > > > > > I quite appreciate your analysis of Mars in 7th. In traditional > > > astrology, there is unnecessary threatening about Mars in > > > > 7th. In KP system only, we are able to analyse threadbare > > > > with the help of Star, Sub, Planetary positions of malelefic > > > > planets in desired houses. Thanks, > > > > > > > > Astrologically yours, > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > - > > > > Bhaskar > > > > > > > > Thursday, October 16, 2008 7:40 PM > > > > Re: Badhaka - What is the best position ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri Ramanaji, > > > > > > > > > > > > // What would be the result if in a chart, Mars is not CSL of > > 7th, but > > > posited in 7th in the star of 7th Lord. Would it harm marriage any > > way? > > > // > > > > > > > > ( I am not an authority to reply any such queries in the presence > > of > > > great Masters like Tinwinji, Shri Yogesh ji, Shri Raichurji, Shri > > > Swamiji, Shri Gondhlekarji , Shri Kanakji, Shri Rajeevji, and many > > other > > > such great people of their cadres whose names I may have missed and > > who > > > adorn this great Forum . My humble attempt though with pranams to > > these > > > Masters ) - > > > > > > > > The answer would depend on many factors. > > > > > > > > 1) If Mars is positioned in a badhaksthan which may be the 7th, > > or as > > > the badhakLord for any ascendant placed in the 7th, then it would > > > produce badhas with regards to marriage, whenever it gets power as a > > > dasha lord or antar lord. > > > > > > > > 2) Now there is another factor which has to be taken in > > consideration > > > - Mars is owner of which houses in the birth chart ? > > > > > > > > 3) The third factor is, the 7th Lord represents which other house > > in > > > the chart , as the owner ? > > > > > > > > 4) The fourth factor is, where is the 7th Lord placed ? > > > > > > > > Thus we will have to check what Mars represents, and what does > > the 7th > > > Lord represents in order to gauge the actual results of whether Mars > > > would be harmful, harmless or positive . > > > > > > > > Especially results may differ, when the 7th Lord has ownership of > > evil > > > houses in the chart, or benefic houses in the chart. The same > > stands for > > > Mars. > > > > > > > > Thus there can be no hard and fast rule for anyone to judge what > > Mars > > > can effect, being placed in the 7th in the star of the 7th Lord. > > > > > > > > best wishes, > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Ramani " kadavasalramani@ > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr.Bhaskar, > > > > > > > > > > What would be the result if in a chart, Mars is not CSL of 7th, > > but > > > posited in 7th in the star of 7th Lord. Would it harm marriage any > > way? > > > > > > > > > > Astrologically yors, > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani > > > > > - > > > > > Bhaskar > > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:48 AM > > > > > Re: Badhaka - What is the best position ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sujata, > > > > > > > > > > // If mars is cuspal sublord of 7th or 10th house, then its > > neither > > > good for marriage nor profession....Death cannot be avoided. // > > > > > > > > > > One cannot jump to conclusions, and blurt out any negatives in > > this > > > manner, without using some discretions. One cannot say the above > > without > > > checking the star of the Cusp Sub Lord. - > > > > > > > > > > We do not use such words with definiteness in astrology in > > front of > > > any client or native. > > > > > > > > > > When you talk of the Sub Lord of any cusp being good or bad for > > any > > > native, just on the basis of where the Cuspal Sub Lord is placed in > > > house, you are talking only half truth or half lies, because you > > must > > > always check in which star this sublord is placed, before you pass > > > judgements about any issue related to the cusp. > > > > > > > > > > In this case, suppose the Mars would have been in star of > > Mercury, > > > then the results would have been quite contrary to what you > > mentioned. > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , sujata das sujatadash1@ > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bhasker > > > > > > If mars is cuspal sublord of 7th or 10th house, then its > > neither > > > good for marriage nor profession. One cannot consider anything > > without > > > the full chart.. > > > > > > Basically badhaka is to give obstructions and death and bad > > > health.For the 1st and 3rd problem 11th house is the best. Death > > cannot > > > be avoided. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > sujata > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 12/10/08, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ > > > > > > Re: Badhaka - What is the best > > position ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Sunday, 12 October, 2008, 4:00 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri Lutherji, > > > > > > > > > > > > I thank you for this beautiful, pain staking and a very > > educative > > > post. > > > > > > I can understand that some time has been given to this. I also > > > take > > > > > > opposrtuity to thank all those who have contributed to his > > thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > This is what we need in the forum, discussions on topics, > > rather > > > than > > > > > > wanton predictions given to non-issues. > > > > > > > > > > > > I also would like to take this thread further ahead - > > > > > > > > > > > > Suppose Mars is placed in the Lagna in sign Leo, but in Cuspal > > > position > > > > > > ( KP Chart ), it moves to the 12th Cusp, then is this Mars > > less > > > harmful > > > > > > ? > > > > > > > > > > > > regards/Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Luther Rath > > <rathluther@ ...> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskar, > > > > > > > My opinion in regards to your queries is as follows. I > > request > > > feed > > > > > > back. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Badhakasthanaadhipa ti is Mars. > > > > > > > a) Which is the best position - house placement wise, for > > any > > > > > > > badhaksthanadhipati , to be, in a chart? To be harmless? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * .Mars should not occupy II, VII and IX. (Virgo, Aquarius > > and > > > Aries). > > > > > > > * .Mars could occupy to be harmless by negating badhaka > > sthana > > > by > > > > > > occupying II (6th house to IX), IV (8th house to IX) or VIII > > (12th > > > house > > > > > > to IX). But II is maraka sthana so not harmless, VIII is > > house for > > > > > > accidents and other troubles, so this too is not safe. IV > > appears > > > to be > > > > > > safe till now. Thus Mars should not occupy Pisces as well. > > > > > > > * Mars should occupy IV (Scorpio) since it is 8th to IX and > > > negates > > > > > > badhaka effect. As it occupies its own sign it becomes strong > > to > > > negate > > > > > > the result of its other house. But it cannot be final as long > > as > > > the > > > > > > constellations are considered. > > > > > > > * IX cusp in Aries can be in the constellation of Kethu or > > Venus > > > or > > > > > > Sun. Scorpio does not contain these constellations. This is > > > definitely > > > > > > an advantage. Scorpio contains the constellations of Jupiter, > > > Saturn and > > > > > > Mercury. > > > > > > > * Jupiter owns house VIII. Though VIII negates IX, it is > > not an > > > > > > auspicious house. So Mars is this constellation may not be > > > considered as > > > > > > safe. > > > > > > > * Mercury owns II the maraca sthana, occupation of Mars is > > this > > > > > > constellation is not safe as well. > > > > > > > * Saturn owns houses VI and VII. So Saturn is also not > > > auspicious. > > > > > > > * So Mars in Scorpio is not very safe as considered. > > > > > > > * The planets that have not come to fore front are Moon and > > > Venus. So > > > > > > they are definitely safe as long as maraca and badhaka > > effects are > > > > > > considered. The conjoined zone of Moon and Venus is the > > > constellation of > > > > > > Rohini in Taurus. This should be the safest sign for Mars to > > > tenant to > > > > > > be harmless. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > b) What is the best planet to be as Nakshatra owner, of > > which > > > house, > > > > > > for this Badhaksthanadhipati ? To be harmless? > > > > > > > * As per the last clause, Rohini appears to be the safest > > > Nakshatra > > > > > > for Mars. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > c) Is it good for a badhaksthanadhipati to be placed in its > > own > > > house? > > > > > > Will it be less harmful then? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * In this particular instance we may note that if Mars > > occupies > > > it own > > > > > > house Aries its strength as a badhaka is supplemented. On the > > > other hand > > > > > > if it occupies the other house Scorpio it appears to be > > relatively > > > safe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps not much can be assessed until and unless one > > studies > > > the > > > > > > sub-lord of Mars and sub-lords of other cusps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With regards. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dr. Luther Rath. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ ... > > > > > > > @gro ups.com > > > > > > > Thursday, October 9, 2008 3:23:35 PM > > > > > > > Badhaka - What is the best position ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With reference to the Badhaka, I have 2 queries. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a) Which is the best position - house placement wise, for > > any > > > > > > > badhaksthanadhipati , to be, in a chart ?To be harmless ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > b) What is the best Planet to be as Nakshatra owner, of > > which > > > houses, > > > > > > > for this Badhaksthanadhipati ? To be harmless ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > c) Is it good for a badhaksthanadhipati to be placed in its > > own > > > house > > > > > > ? > > > > > > > Will it be less harmful then ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For instance, For Fixed signs, suppose Leo ascendant, then > > for > > > Mars, > > > > > > > what must be the best house for it to be placed in ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nakshatra owner must be this Mars, in, to be harmless ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be the first one to try the new Messenger 9 Beta! Go to > > > http://in.messenger./win/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.