Guest guest Posted January 29, 2000 Report Share Posted January 29, 2000 Aum Namah Sivaya Dear Gurudev, Narayana, Gauranga and Narasimha, Thanks to Gaurnga, Narayana and Narasimha for responding on the query on Arudhas, I will get back to you all after contemplation. Now I have some queries on Kakshya Hrasa and Rasi Hrasa as given in UPSJ. According to sloka 2.1.25 Lagna lord (Jupiter also) in a malefic sign (other than its exaltation sign), debilitated, having malefic association should cause Kakshya hrasa by implication, i.e., if it follows from the earlier sloka. But Gurudev in his interpretation in a page after some pages (sorry for not giving the page no.) says it causes Rasi hrasa. Similarly according to the sloke 2.1.27, which says Jupiter's position in a good/benefic place and benefic association would cause Kakshya Vriddhi. But Gurudev interpreted it as Rasi Vriddhi. In another subsequent sloka, Saturn in associating with or aspecting the Paka lagna/ Jupiter would cause Rasi Hrasa. If earlier two sklokas had meant the same i.e., Rasi Hrasa then this sloka is unnecessary or Redundant. But if the earlier sloka meant Kakshya Hrasa then it would be a exceptional condition and hence its presence is justified. In earlier sloka it is mentioned that malefic is the 1st/7th from lagna/ atmakaraka also cause Kakshya hrasa which has not been mentioned in subsequent summery on Kakshya hrasa or Rasi Hrasa. I have also found another condition for Kakshya Vriddhi in BPSH which says that Jupiter in the Lagna or 7th aspected by benefics also cause Kakshya Vriddhi. This is a special case of sloka 2.1.27 meaning Kakshya Vriddhi. Please Clarify Sarajit __________________ Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.