Guest guest Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 Dear Gurujis, I am seeking a clarification. I have read that Guru and Shani destroy the effects of the house they occupy but benefit the houses they aspect. I have my doubts. How can a out and out benefic like Guru destroy the house he occupies? In case of Shani, being an out and out natural malefic, why is it said that he benefits BY ASPECTING? An astrologer told me a story yesterday. I believe, Ravana had captured and imprisioned all planets and kept them under his steps - threshold- down on their stomachs and arranged them in such a way that his son indrajit would be invincible when he was born. Narad muni arrives on the scene at the point of Indrajit's birth and tells Ravan " Why do you keep the planets down on their stomachs? You should put them on their backs and step on their chests " . Ravan does the same, and Shani's drashti falls on him. At the same time, now that he is on his back, Shani lifts his foot and places it in the next house , there by disrupting the carefully planned arrangement made by Ravan regarding the placement of planets at the time of Indrajit's birth. RAvan who notices this , is supposed to have hit Shani's leg for doing that and that is why Shani is lame. This is what caused Indrajit's downfall later on. Please clarify. Is Shani's aspect more malefic that his occupation of a house? Regards, Anita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.