Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

#2 Palana Devata:Freedom-ji

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Freedom-Ji

 

Thank you for clarifying this issue in further detail.

 

On a fundamental level I guess these things dont matter.

 

I am enjoying your mp3 classes and look forward to hearing

more.

 

One further thing I wanted to ask based on your following response is

that if some native requests for deities that he should worship

(without a specific purpose), how does one go about recommending a

form which will be helpful ?

 

Thanks and Pranaams.

 

Adhyaayin

 

Om Sri Gurubhyo Namah

 

 

sohamsa , " freedom " <freedom@s...> wrote:

>

> Hare Rama Krsna

>

>

>

> When I personally chose a devatta for my own or someone else's

worship, the

> first thing I take into account is [1] the relation of the gunas of

the

> purpose of the worship relative to [2] the gunas of the devatta.

One must

> also take into account the person's spiritual background, we would

not ask a

> devout Christian or Muslim to worship Kurma Avatar if their Palana

devatta

> (Saturn) was afflicted. We would have to understand the fundamental

> principles, and find a solution according to the individual's

background,

> yet based about gunas and grahas. In this way Vedic science is

universal.

>

> Namah Sivaya

>

>

>

>

>

> adhyaayin [adhyaayin]

> Wednesday, December 21, 2005 8:47 PM

> sohamsa

> Re: #2 Palana Devata: Form of Sri Shakti or Sri

Vishnu ?

> FOR PVR-ji

>

>

> Dear PVR-ji

>

> Thank you for clarifying my doubts and elavating me from the level

> of " adhyaayin " to " Sri Dakshinamurthy " :-)

>

> Annway, I am just a student.

>

> I totally agree with you and Nitin-ji on the sensibilities of

> choosing the palana deity.

>

> I just wanted to find out if there is an official parampara line on

> this matter. This is the link to Freedom-ji specific mp3 file

> (http://shrifreedom.com/VyasaSJC/lecture/01/2005-9-25%2006%

> 20Ishta.mp3). The last 30 seconds of the file have the statements.

>

> Sincere thanks to all SJC gurus for providing the mp3 lessons and

> other resources.

>

> Kind regards.

>

> Adhyaayin

>

>

>

>

>

> sohamsa , " pvr108 " <pvr@c...> wrote:

> >

> > Namaste Sri Dakshinamoorthi,

> >

> > One should realize that there are no perfect objective answers to

> > questions in astrology that relate to religion, spirituality and

> > philosophy.

> >

> > What I said in my class was based on the same thinking that was

> > outlined by Nitin below. Sanjay ji once taught me that it is

> > advisable to take a form of Vishnu as ishta devata and a form of

> > Devi as palana devata.

> >

> > The above is, however, not strictly following Pararsara. Parasara

> > outlines all gods when describing ishta and palana devatas. Thus,

> it

> > makes sense to accept any devata. At the same time, Sanjay ji's

> > specific guidance on using the forms of Vishnu and Devi is

logical

> > too.

> >

> > Are you sure you are not mistaking what Freedom said regarding

> ishta

> > devata for palana devata? That is possible.

> >

> > In any case, in my humble view, you can worship any form of god

as

> > ishta devata or palana devata. If Mars is in the 12th from AK in

> > navamsa and one worships Kartikeya or Bagalamukhi for moksha

> > (instead of Narasimha), I don't believe that that worship goes

> > wasted. Those gods may still take one closer to moksha.

Similarly,

> > if Saturn is in 6th from AmK in navamsa and one worships Koorma

> Deva

> > or Vishnu Himself instead of Mother Kaali and asks for

livelihood,

> > one's livelihood may still be taken care of.

> >

> > It is good to follow the advice of maharshis, tradition and gurus

> > whenever possible, but one should be flexible and focus on the

> > essence and spirit of the teachings. Sometimes, we can get stuck

in

> > some details and miss the essence. Thumbrules are just that -

> > thumbrules.

> >

> > Understanding the TRUE nature of either Vishnu or Shiva or

Shakti -

> > even one of them - is not easy. If someone feels close to one of

> the

> > three, I wouldn't mind recommending the forms of the same for all

> > purposes.

> >

> > May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> > Narasimha

> > -------------------------------

> > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net

> > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org

> > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org

> > -------------------------------

> >

> > > Dear Nitin-ji

> > >

> > > I had sent a reply to your response but for some reason it

> > > never got posted on the vedic astrology group.

> > >

> > > Thanks for the reference to the article. I have a copy.

> > >

> > > However even in that article under the " Palana devata " section

> > there

> > > is no reference to palana devata as a form of the mother. Many

> > > deities are listed.

> > >

> > > Personally i rightly agree with you and also belive in the

> > mother's

> > > form for palana devata.

> > >

> > > But in Sri Freedom-ji's mp3 (sjc vyasa) class

> > > http://shrifreedom.com/VyasaSJC/lecture/01/2005-9-25%2006%

> > 20Ishta.mp3

> > > he mentions palana devata as a sri vishnu swarupa.

> > >

> > > In PVR-ji's mp3 classes (lesson no 20) he mentions palana

devata

> > as a

> > > form of the mother.

> > >

> > >

> > > Please clarify this.

> > >

> > > Adhyaayin

> > >

> > > Om Sri Gurubhyo Namah

> > >

> > >

> > > sohamsa , " Nitin K " <sjc@j...> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > ||| Aum Krishna Guru |||

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology/message/68220

> > > >

> > > > || Namah Shivaaya ||

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > --

> > > > " adhyaayin " <adhyaayin>

> > > > sohamsa

> > > > Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:05:40 -0000

> > > >

> > > > >Dear Gurus

> > > > >

> > > > >Pranaams

> > > > >

> > > > >Please clear my confusion about the Palana Devata (6th from

> > AmK).

> > > > >

> > > > >On hearing the audio classes of PVR-ji my understanding was

> > that it

> > > > >should be a form of the mother corresponding to the planet.

But

> > > > >recently I heard Freedom-ji's class mp3 (Vyasa SJC) that it

> > should

> > > be a

> > > > >form of Sri Vishnu.

> > > > >

> > > > >So I hope somebody could clarify this.

> > > > >

> > > > >Thanks and kind regards.

> > > > >

> > > > >Adhyaayin

> > > > >

> > > > >Om Sri Gurubhyo namah

> >

>

*tat savitur varenyam*

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...